iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Wide Disparities In Public Transit Access Keep Residents From Jobs, Brookings Study Says

Public Transit Access Limiting Jobs

First Posted: 05/12/11 07:52 PM ET Updated: 07/12/11 06:12 AM ET

WASHINGTON -- Seven in 10 working-age metropolitan residents live within three-quarters of a mile of a transit stop. But a new study from the Brookings Institution found that these commuters can reach only 30 percent of the jobs in their area in under 90 minutes.

The report, "Missed Opportunity: Transit and Jobs in Metropolitan America," revealed access to jobs varied widely across metro areas: from 60 percent in Honolulu to just 7 percent in Palm Bay, Fla. Such differences reflect variable rates of transit coverage, disparities in service frequencies as well as differing levels of employment and population decentralization, the authors of the report note. In large metropolitan areas, the percent of jobs accessible via public transit ranged from 37 percent in New York to just 16 percent in Miami.

The findings, which are based on data from 371 transit providers in the nation's 100 largest metropolitan areas, come as local governments struggle to pay for public transit. Many are being forced to increase fares or seek federal aid. With governments at all levels considering deep budget cuts, the report authors say it is increasingly important to understand how well public transit options align with where people work and live.

"It's not enough to create new and better jobs if workers can't get to them," said Bruce Katz, vice president of Brookings and director of its Metropolitan Policy Program. "Forty-five percent of jobs were 10 miles away from the central business district, so these location dynamics have completely upended the daily commute."

Katz said the country has regained about 20 percent of the jobs lost during the downturn. He noted that, while the U.S. jobs creation is picking up, it's not growing fast enough. If the rate of employment growth stays the same, it would take 29 months to regain all the jobs that were lost in the recession, Katz said.

"We need a new game plan," said Robert Puentes, a senior fellow in the Metropolitan Policy Program. That means "more jobs and better jobs," he added, "but we need to make sure those jobs are accessible."

Puentes pointed to a handful of Western and coastal communities where a dense urban population as well as geographic barriers such as the Rocky Mountains and Pacific Ocean have made it easier to implement comprehensive public transit systems. Indeed, of the 20 highest-ranked transit systems, the report found 15 in this group, with Honolulu; San Jose, Ca.; Tucson, Ariz;, Salt Lake City, Utah; and Fresno, Ca., topping the list.

"These are places that have invested heavily in their transit systems," said Puentes. "Jobs and housing are more compact, and that makes it easier to serve by transit. They are also more likely to have topographical barriers like mountains, oceans and deserts, which hem in growth."

But the report also found exceptions to the West Coast rule. New York's public transit system, ranked at 13th, beat out both San Francisco's (16th) and Seattle's (18th). Washington, D.C., came in 17th.

The weakest public transit systems, or 15 of the 20 lowest-ranking metro areas, were found in the South. A handful of older systems in cities that residents left decades ago for the suburbs -- Boston (34th), Philadelphia (49th) -- didn't fair well either.

Regardless of region, the authors of the report said these trends have broad implications for leaders at the local and national levels.

Transportation planners should make job access via public transit an explicit priority, report authors say, especially where spending decisions and allocating scarce resources are concerned.

The authors also emphasized the importance of coordinating planning strategies across areas of expertise, such as land use, housing and economic development. As if to underscore the point, Brookings invited Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood and Housing Secretary Sean Donovan to speak at a panel discussion on the report.

"There has to be connectivity," said LaHood, adding that Americans are going to rely increasingly on public transit as gas prices increase.

Puentes also underscored the importance of implementing new strategies in a changing urban landscape.

"If you always do what you always did," he said, quoting Yogi Berra, "you'll always get what you always got."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- Seven in 10 working-age metropolitan residents live within three-quarters of a mile of a transit stop. But a new study from the Brookings Institution found that these commuters can reach...
WASHINGTON -- Seven in 10 working-age metropolitan residents live within three-quarters of a mile of a transit stop. But a new study from the Brookings Institution found that these commuters can reach...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 187
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:10 PM on 05/15/2011
Twas ever thus.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_American_streetcar_scandal
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
maxfax
Taa - dah!
01:54 PM on 05/15/2011
As should all Governors.
 
Transportation planners should make job access via public transit an explicit priority, report authors say, especially where spending decisions and allocating scarce resources are concerned.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
gregcurts
Any belief worth having must survive doubt”
10:28 AM on 05/14/2011
This issue doesn't just affect smaller cities, I live in Chicago and just moved primarily to be closer to a train line. All Cities are cutting back on Mass Transit in order to save money, which is mind boggling to me seeing that we are more and more becoming a Service based economy. My Service industry job requires that I work late and at my prior address that meant getting out after the last bus had run. Like I said I live in Chicago a supposedly World Class City and Mass Transit has stopped running? People on the Southside and Westside of town have it even worse, wonder if thats why crime and poverty prevail in those areas?
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
AbeMartin
The best person fer a job is never a candidate
09:47 AM on 05/13/2011
A few years ago, I was carrying too much weight and my cholesterol and blood pressure were too high. Shortly after resolving to get these things under control without adding to my meds, I managed to blow the engine of the car.  MzAbeMartin and I were forced to begin to walk more often or, when the weather was not clement take public transportation.  We are fortunate that the town we live in is small and, for the most part, walkable, and both of us were gratified by my 10% weight loss and 30 point drop in my cholesterol count.

But, public transportation here is problematic.  The bus fares are affordable, routes make most of the town and the surrounding communities accessible with one transfer.  The Transit Authority also offers discounts to seniors, the handicapped, and also provide an unlimited day pass at a very reasonable cost.  But they do not run the buses often enough.  Sometimes they are on an half-hourly schedule; sometimes it is hourly, and they do not run in the evenings, which makes those who work in 24-hour businesses have to travel by car or motorcycle or bike.

More of our neighbors now dealing with layoffs, dismissals, lowered wages, and radically increased gasoline prices, follow our lead and leave their cars at home.  But I have no illusions that once gasoline costs are reduced to the low $3.00 that the big trucks and SUV's will be used again.  Gas and oil conservation needs to be encouraged with incentives and with viable alternatives to single occupant, short hop errand driving.  Either that, including many more bike lanes, and much more enforcement of "bike only" lanes, or the re-development of light rail and interurban rail service (which was effectively ended in the middle of the last century), or much higher gasoline prices will be the only strategy that works.

Gas in Europe is twice as expensive as it is here.  People drive much smaller cars, much less frequently.Some cities, such as Amsterdam, have so restricted automobile and truck traffic that the preferred, and fastest modes of travel are biking and taking the trains.  Obesity has largely disappeared there over the past twenty years and the air quality is excellent.  Perhaps our "elected leaders" should excuse themselves from their oil lobbyist paid lunches and dinners at Nobu or Michel Richard Citronelle and explore how other countries are handling this growing problem, successfully.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AndyWright68
Freedom is inevitable!
09:31 AM on 05/13/2011
Depend of the government instead of yourself and that is what you get.
photo
red wolfe
My micro-bio is only half empty
11:25 AM on 05/13/2011
So you're saying you build your own roads? Fix them? Plow them?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AndyWright68
Freedom is inevitable!
12:27 PM on 05/13/2011
Actually I do. I put in the roads to my business, about 2 miles, and I care for them. they look as new as they did 12 years ago when I put them in. Drive onto a county road and you would be better off with 4 wheel drive. Crumbling junk is what the government provides. No one takes care of things better than the owner.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ritamary
12:06 PM on 05/13/2011
In most industrialized countries people "depend of the government" to provide public transportation. It is only in the United States where using public transportation is somehow considered wrong. Why do you hate your fellow Americans so much?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AndyWright68
Freedom is inevitable!
12:24 PM on 05/13/2011
Depending on the government, or anyone else for that matter, is at the root of the problems we have. Dependent is not freedom. Public anything, especially provided through threats of violence and theft, is wrong. You apparently hate your fellow humans so much you are willing to chain them up, kidnap them and put them in cages like they were rabid animals for simply not wanting to fund the tyranny you support.
08:58 AM on 05/13/2011
thats it ride bikes, that will slim you fatass americans down
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ritamary
12:09 PM on 05/13/2011
Some people have health issues which make riding a bike not possible. Other industrialized countries provide public transportation without question. The race to Third World status continues here in the United States.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
maxfax
Taa - dah!
01:57 PM on 05/15/2011
The majority of roads in America are not safe for biking.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
MrBadExample
Friends call me ‘exampleicious’
08:51 AM on 05/13/2011
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DMDAY44
36 Fans
Become a fan
Unfan
16 minutes ago (8:26 AM)
Didn't read a word of what I said, huh? My point was that if we only had 27 billion barrels in 1986, and we pumped out 58 billion barrels since then - how is it that we still have 20 billion barrels of reserves? Because we keep finding more. There are some estimates that say we have as much as a 300 year supply of oil, if we would only access it. The EROEI on gulf oil might be less than with wind turbines, but try putting one of those wind turbines in your fuel tank. It won't fit.
===============================================================
Currently, the world is finding only one barrel of 'new' oil for every four it burns. I don't know where you're getting a 300 year figure, but the DoE's Hirsch report in 2005 predicted that oil supplies would probably peak by 2010 to 2025 (best case). After peak, we'd have declining oil returns and supply would undershoot demand.

And as I pointed out, the oil that's being found in the US is in places that are extremely expensive or difficult to drill in. Chevron's Jack II field might have 15 billion barrels in it, but it's under miles of rock that's under miles of ocean. Assuming Chevron can surmount a whole host of technical issues in drilling a well that deep (and assuming the oil is of decent quality, which has NOT been proven), it will be the most expensive oil we've ever used. There's a point of diminishing returns.

Running a car on a wind turbine? We'll be lucky to have cars in 30 years. And there's a plan B for cars with EVs. If we don't have cheap oil, we don't have an airline industry.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
MrBadExample
Friends call me ‘exampleicious’
08:30 AM on 05/13/2011
In 2009, the Obama administration decided to factor in commuting costs to the real cost of housing. Surprise! Even with the real estate crash, less than 40% of US housing is affordable once a long car commute is factored in.

http://dc.streetsblog.org/2010/03/24/feds-begin-redefining-affordable-housing-to-include-transport-costs/

This means that a whole lot of the housing that was built in the last decade in far-flung suburbs is unaffordable no matter what the price. As long as oil prices are high and such communities don't have mass transit or walkable shopping options, no one is going to buy houses in places with no plan B for getting to and from work.
08:54 AM on 05/13/2011
Even if mass transit is available it is still almost as expensive as driving. I pay 3.50 each way on the metro and 4.25 just to park. That 11.25 a day. On a good day my car can get 28 mpg. What is the incentive to take the metro? I don't have to wait in traffic? It just seems like a lot of BS. Not to mention the rate hikes (peak-of-the-peak), that happen all the time, for times when the metro is crowded. What pisses me off is that they do this but the majority of the people who commute during this time have their expenses subsidized by the governement anyhow (I live in D.C. by the way). It's like robbing Peter to pay Paul.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
MrBadExample
Friends call me ‘exampleicious’
09:09 AM on 05/13/2011
This is the LIRR conundrum--if you need a car to get to the station, you've wiped out most of the cost advantage for the mass transit. The DC metro (I'm assuming you're in DC) is about preventing the city from gridlock. OTOH, if large number of people said 'screw it' and got back in their cars, the commute hassles would be worse and downtown parking would get difficult.

The Congress for New Urbanism has written extensively about this and related issues, as has the Livable Streets Movement blog. Mass transit set down in suburban communities is horribly expensive because the population density isn't enough to support it.
brownfrown
Political Fundip
08:27 AM on 05/13/2011
Them buses is raciss
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
yodaveg
Ride si sapis
07:40 AM on 05/13/2011
Smart-growth principles call for transit-oriented development and reduced sprawl. We have to bring people closer to tansit, not just the other way around.
07:15 AM on 05/13/2011
I am on an ICE train from Cologne, Germany to Paris, France right now (such a model: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ANB-yZIJP6o ), using it's onboard highspeed Wifi.
Let me tell you: It's socialism, and communism, and socialism, and socialism.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
MrBadExample
Friends call me ‘exampleicious’
08:18 AM on 05/13/2011
As opposed to the socialism WE like. subsidies to auto manufacturers and subsidies to airlines and subsidies for building roads that we can't afford to maintain.

Not bitter.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ritamary
12:23 PM on 05/13/2011
Netzwerg, sounds like that socialism is just miserable. Too bad you aren't here in Encinitas CA. You are entitled to a 20-minute walk over the freeway, up and down hills, to an area devoid of sidewalks in order to get to the train station. The train comes every two hours or so except during rush hour. At night there are no trains. Think of all the great exercise you would get.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bynddrvn5
My Micro-bio is unwritten...
06:34 AM on 05/13/2011
America's infrastructure is crumbling and this adds up to billions in lost productivity for Americans. "Flight delays cost at least $15 billion each year in lost productivity." and "Congestion on roads costs $78 billion annually..." - The Economist

"The cracks are showing
America’s tradition of bold national projects has dwindled. With the country’s infrastructure crumbling, it is time to revive it"
http://www.economist.com/node/11636517?story_id=E1_TTGPGVTS
photo
meglon978
Beware of gifts bearing Greeks.
08:51 AM on 05/13/2011
That's what happens when you have 30 years of policy that is designed so leeches can fail to live up to the responsibility of reinvesting into the country for future generations.
photo
Bluedrgn
Truth has a liberal bias.
04:05 AM on 05/13/2011
From public transportation, to roads and bridges, to the energy grid, our infrastructure is in a sad state of neglect.

But rather then raising taxes a little to fund projects to improve our infrastructure and bring more jobs to our country our corporate controlled government is more likely defund Medicare so they can lower taxes and will most likely not do anything to address either jobs or the deficit.
03:40 AM on 05/13/2011
They left a huge question off the table. How many of the individuals who live in a part of the city not adequately serviced by public transportation, would use public transportation if it WAS available? The numbers are surprisingly low and many transportation authorities dirty secret, especially among business commuters. Because technology has all but done away with the necessity to have your business located in an urban center, the jobs/city connection doesn't exist to the same degree anymore. Also, commuters with jobs often times will have a car and chose that as a preferred mode of transportation vs. bus/rail. Only in cities where traffic and parking are problematic are residents compelled to make greater use of public transportation. Usage is a direct correlation between 'have to" not "want to." There are countless urban public transportation systems that go almost unused with incredibly low ridership regardless of accessibility, routes, modes or scheduling. Its simple human nature. Given the choice, would you rather drive your own vehicle to work, leave when you want, listen to your own radio station, control the climate, etc. OR wait at a bus/train stop for 20 min. sit next to a fat, smelly guy for your 45 min. commute and still and pay for the privilege?? In many cases, expansion of public transportation is one of those feel good, sounds good on paper, economically UN-viable and unrealistic solutions.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
itsnoteasybeingblue-n-tx
my micro-bio is none of your business
04:14 AM on 05/13/2011
when gas gets to 6 dollars a gallon that fat smelly guy will be looking pretty good!
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
satanlite
Liberal blogger
08:48 AM on 05/13/2011
Maybe fatties will discover bicycles at the point and put down the McMuffin.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
twelizabeth
if i believed in god, i'd be praying right now.
02:33 AM on 05/13/2011
to all the people who say this story is a joke, try living and working without a car and limited or no access to public transportation. it isn't really possible.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
heartsmindsvision
03:29 AM on 05/13/2011
But the repooplicans don't want to put any money into public transportation, in fact they want to cut funds for PT.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
itsnoteasybeingblue-n-tx
my micro-bio is none of your business
04:16 AM on 05/13/2011
if poor people get jobs..who will repooplicans scare people with? No more welfare queens and anchor babies..how will they get their people out to vote?
07:18 AM on 05/13/2011
In my town we have a bus service, but it doesn't run at certain times on Saturday, when people who use it during the week to get to work have to scramble for a ride. None of this makes sense to me.

I know of one person who could draw overtime every Saturday but with no bus service, she is not able to walk the 3+ miles to work and back.
03:42 PM on 05/13/2011
Same where I live also. It sucks because I work most weekends. The buses only run certain times. So I would have to show up an hr early for work or 15 minutes late.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
way2muchsense
A hobbit who lives in a hollow tree.
12:03 AM on 05/15/2011
In my town (Utica/Rome area of Upstate NY), we have buses, but they don't really go anywhere. Mainly from the nursing homes to the shopping centers and hospitals. And yes, I did check, which was quite an undertaking, since most of the actual information on bus routes was online, and nearly incomprehensible at that.

Most buses I see on the street are running empty, and it's little wonder why. To get anywhere from anywhere else, you have to go to a centralized location in downtown Utica, then transfer. A trip that would take fifteen minutes by car would take nearly two hours by bus. And people wonder why nobody rides them.

Actually, they don't. Most are completely unaware of the bus line's existence, so they drive whatever 15 year old beater Buick Skylark they can find that hasn't yet completely dissolved into a rusty pile of dust and road salt.