More

After Protest-Related Charges Dropped, More Confrontation Likely, Climate Activists Say

Blair Mountain

First Posted: 05/13/11 03:21 PM ET Updated: 07/13/11 06:12 AM ET

WASHINGTON -- Charges against 21 activists who staged a sit-in at Department of the Interior headquarters last month were dropped by the U.S. Attorney's office earlier this week, a move that will embolden more confrontational protests in the future, proponents of climate protection say.

The DOI protesters received notice at the Tuesday hearing that the U.S. Attorney's office for the District had "declined to proceed with prosecution against you for the the incident that led to your arrest for the offense of unlawful entry."

Ann Wilcox, an attorney with the progressive National Lawyers Guild and one of two attorneys who had agreed to represent the defendants, said the government could have dropped the charges for a variety of reasons: administrative hurdles, a wariness about pulling cops off their beats to testify, the nonviolent nature of their crimes or the diversity of the activists, among others. But ultimately, she said, "we don't know for sure why some cases are dropped and some are processed."

The U.S. Attorney's office in D.C. declined to comment on the specifics of the case.

The group of protesters was arrested at the close of Power Shift, a biennial gathering of climate activists in the nation's capital. On April 18, conference organizers led a demonstration of some 3,000 protesters to the Chamber of Commerce building and the lobby shop of BP. After that rally concluded, hundreds of the marchers joined an impromptu march on the DOI headquarters led by confrontational climate activist organizations Peaceful Uprising and Rising Tide. At the Interior building, some 300 protesters -- including a brass band -- stormed inside the main foyer of the headquarters and staged a raucous protest that went on until the last hold-outs in the entryway were finally arrested some two hours later.

The protest was intended to highlight the role two Interior agencies play in setting the rules for mining and oil companies, Rising Tide spokeswoman Henia Belalia told The Huffington Post at the time. Lax regulation at the corrupt Minerals Management Service -- renamed the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement in the wake of the Deepwater Horizon explosion -- helped set the stage for last year’s BP oil spill. The other agency, the Office of Surface Mining, angered activists shortly before the Power Shift conference by opening up over 7,000 acres of federal land in Wyoming’s Powder River Basin to coal extraction.

Climate activists are largely relieved by the local prosecutor's decision to drop the cases against the DOI protesters. A smaller group, however, views the move as an invitation for further confrontational protests.

"Essentially, the United State government told the activists who risked their freedom on April 18th that they’re not willing to argue with the necessity of their actions," Peaceful Uprising member Deb Henry wrote on her blog Tuesday. "The government gave in. They do not want to spend time or money taking activists to court to dissuade other activists from taking action."

But it's not quite as simple as that, as Henry later explained to The Huffington Post: She is still facing charges for a similar protest staged in the House gallery.

Henry and eight other protesters were arrested on April 15, the day before Power Shift began, for singing a modified version of "The Star Spangled Banner" during a series of contentious budget votes in the House.

During a status hearing scheduled for May 31, the plaintiffs will likely have to decide whether to accept the government's diversion offer -- 40 hours or so of community service and six months arrest free to make the charges disappear, Wilcox speculated -- or proceed to a jury trial. If convicted in court, the activists could face up to six months in jail, Wilcox said.

"What they're trying to do is deter these very young people who have no criminal record whatsoever from taking that action in the future," Peaceful Uprising Director Flora Bernard said, referring to the different approaches the government has taken with the two groups of protester arrested during Power Shift. "I really doubt that that's going to work out," she added.

Henry is one of a handful of activists arrested during Power Shift who are not letting their brushes with the law stop them from attending what many in the climate movement view as the next big battle: the march on Blair Mountain this coming June.

Brandon Nida, one of the march's organizers and native West Virginian, said he expected thousands of people will converge on the tiny town of Blair, W.Va., for the protest, which plans to highlight the destruction caused by of mountaintop removal, an environmentally destructive surface mining practice where vegetation and earth are blasted away to expose the coal underneath. Since 1991, six mountaintop removal mining permits have been issued around Blair, Nida said, although no mining has yet occurred.

But Blair Mountain's significance to the protest extends past the recent attempts to mine the mountain. Ninety years ago, Blair Mountain was the site of the Battle of Blair Mountain, one of the largest labor uprising in American history. Although the over 10,000 coal miners seeking unionization lost in a violent battle against coal mine operators -- which were even supported by federal air power -- many consider the battle an important catalyst for the early 20th century labor movement.

Nida and other's hope their June protest will prove a similar catalyst for the current American labor and climate movements.

"With the Wisconsin thing and the Ohio union-busting," Nida said, "people are more receptive when you talk about this huge battle between labor and coal operators or corporations. … What happened at Blair Mountain and central Appalachia was integral to the American labor movement."

"As far as in the environmental movement, mountaintop removal has been really shaking things up," Nida added. "A lot of people are concentrated on what is one of the most most visceral and visible environment devastating practices."

Confrontational protests may play a role in culmination of the five-day demonstration. After the DOI protesters charges were dropped, Henry wrote that there is a "window of opportunity for our movement to engage in more acts of nonviolent civil disobedience." The March on Blair mountain is the next opening, activists say.

"I'm not sure how much organization is going for arrestable actions" at Blair Mountain, said Bernard, who is planning to attend the march. But she predicted that the combined actions of the thirty protesters arrested at Power Shift "are probably going to invigorate and inspire a lot of potential activists to be willing to take risks at Blair Mountain. … I like to think that people are feeling like they're in a comfortable place to risk arrest."

Wilcox agreed that some activists might try to get arrested at Blair Mountain. But the lawyer noted, "they do have the right to do that."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

WASHINGTON -- Charges against 21 activists who staged a sit-in at Department of the Interior headquarters last month were dropped by the U.S. Attorney's office earlier this week, a move that will embo...
WASHINGTON -- Charges against 21 activists who staged a sit-in at Department of the Interior headquarters last month were dropped by the U.S. Attorney's office earlier this week, a move that will embo...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 608
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
03:05 PM on 05/29/2011
Someone should try to unseal the records in the USA v. Brenda Stewart D of Colorado 1:10-cr-00580. She was the madame for the Denver Players brothel and is being prosecuted for income tax evasion. It is well known that government officials were customers at the Denver Players brothel, that third party credit cards were charged for prostitutes provided to other people, and that prostitutes were part of the corruption in Denver at the Minerals Management Service. There wasn't even a motion to seal the documents. The taxpayer is paying for an expensive lawyer for Brenda Stewart not a public defender. Former judge Nottingham was identified as a Denver Players customer. I was imprisoned on Nottingham's order with no criminal charge, no related criminal case, no government prosecutor, no arraignment and no bail hearing. I wrote to Senator Salazar and complained about that and he responded that that was fine with him. Why would he do that unless there was something to cover up?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
givemtheirwish
Science is the belief in ignorance of "experts"
11:02 AM on 05/18/2011
http://www.dontpaniconline.com/DPTV/undercover-with-conservation-international

A must see - Don't Panic do a Breitbart & punk Conservation International (you know the "conservancy" group which is supported by many of the "luvies"from Hollywood). It's hilarious. Q. Why are these groups so easy to punk?????

LOL
03:05 AM on 05/18/2011
The headline proclaims victory, but I see no such thing here.
photo
CivilDebate10
Practical Independent Libertarian
10:28 PM on 05/16/2011
Yet another example of the Obama administration's disregard for the rule of law.
photo
DocSkull
My questions aren't rhetorical.
07:01 PM on 05/17/2011
"Yet another example of the Obama administra­tion's disregard for the rule of law."

You invoke the "rule of law" but there has been no ruling. Your outrage is based on your own judgment that the protesters are criminals rather than citizens exercising constitutional rights.
photo
HUFFPOST BLOGGER
Shan Wells
Sciencey sun venerator + political cartoonist
01:48 AM on 05/27/2011
Yes. Like the Bush administrations illegal war. That showed such respect for the rule of law.
06:55 PM on 05/16/2011
You may be interested in our article "Global Climate Change and Non-Violent Civil Disobedience" recently published in the peer-reviewed journal "Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics" (Vol.11, pgs. 3-12, 2011). The open access pdf version of the article, including an editorial by the journal's editor and commentary responses to the article by A.S. Bosworth, J Rosales, K. Ott and A. Gupta can be found at: http://www.int-res.com/abstracts/esep/v11/n1/

Additional responses to our article will be published shortly.

We recognize that the topic of our article is controversial. Despite knowledge of the risks of global climate change during the past 30 years, the United States, among other nations, has failed to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions to reduce the risks to present and future generations. This is despite the fact that scientific and ethical literature makes the case that meaningful action is urgent. Consequently, we suggest that climate and environmental scientists, among others, consider whether non-violent civil disobedience (NVCD) should be used as a means to promote action on global climate change.

Dr. John Lemons
Professor Emeritus of Biology and Environmental Science
Department of Environmental Studies
University of New England
Biddeford, ME 04005
USA
jlemons@une.edu

Dr. Donald A. Brown
Associate Professor Rock Ethics Institute
Penn State University
College Station, PA 16802
USA
dabrown57@gmail.com
RTIII
Poster of over 0.0135% of all HufPost comments
10:07 AM on 05/18/2011
A 30 year claim is disingenuous; the science has only been unequivocal for perhaps 15 years, tops. However, the need to stop what's presently happening is perhaps much more urgent than even many scientists realize. Because of the delay in emissions to maximal effect of greenhouse gasses is quite long (and imprecisely known - 20 years is a good estimate), we have probably already passed the point where significant change can be avoided. Now we are fighting to prevent catestrophic change. My not so wild guess is that we have less than or about 10 years to _completely_stop_adding_carbon_ to the atmosphere and reverse the trend if we can.

I don't see how we are going to make it, NVCD or not. But, more power to you!

I wish you - and all of us - the best of luck on this endeavour; we sure need it!
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
08:00 PM on 05/15/2011
Humans can't possibly be causing global climate change, can they? I mean, the fact that humans emit 100-300 times as much CO2 and other junk into the air, as all of the worlds volcanoes, can';t possibly have an effect, can it? Wake up folks. Rooftop Solar, offshore wind and waste bio char bio fuels are the way to go.
photo
AGooglyMinotaur
Ahh, Theseus. It appears you are out of thread.
12:00 PM on 05/16/2011
I never understand people who think adding 30,000,000,000 tons of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere every year (about 1,000 tons every second) isn't going to have any effect on its chemistry. John Tyndall proved the different heat retention characteristics and quantified absorption/emissions spectra for atmospheric gases in the 1850s. Arrhenius was lecturing on anthropogenic global warming before the turn of the 20th century. It is a sad testament to this country's disgraceful school system that anyone can be so ignorant of science.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:48 PM on 05/15/2011
Blasting the moutain tops off? How disgusting. Our bearuiful earth is being ruined. Trees vegetation and wildlife blasted.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
polidoc
here for a peaceful revolution
12:54 PM on 05/15/2011
Blithely, these activists are labelled "eco-terrorists' by the likes of Massey's former CEO Don Blakenship, but if anyone is an eco-terrorist, it is the pocketful of industrialists who do not demand to hold themselves to a high safety standard and fully mitigate the serious environmental and social damage they create in the wake of their practices. Former Gov. Joe Manchin likes to say that West Virginia is doing her part for the nation to make us energy independent. It's great to pull a patriotic message out of the rubble of what's left when instead, WV could make a long-term strategy for the sale of her metallurgical coal that would allow the steel industry to return to the U.S.

Whether or not you believe in "climate change" or whether or not humans are at all responsible for it, pollution is pollution. The use of potable water for extractive industries is heedlessly destructive and financially unsound for the long run. The leaders of extractive industries, under the shield of corporate personhood have been permitted to behave in our own country as they do in third world countries where no protections are set in place.

We should not let ourselves be intimidated from standing up for the benefit of our land, our children and our futures. The takers will always take and it is we who must defend. While merely a diversion for the Dept. of Int. folks, the demonstration was an empowering infusion for the right of citizens to petition
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KarlaElisa
The atmosphere is Toxic
02:42 PM on 05/16/2011
well said and fanned
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
realpolitic
GOP is full of sound and fury, signifying nothing!
12:23 AM on 05/17/2011
Great post, but climate change is not something to believe in or not.  It is what scientists know to be true based on the physics of greenhouse gases and how they operate in the atmosphere. Not believing in it is like a disbelief in gravity, which is fine until one jumps from a high place.
photo
AGooglyMinotaur
Ahh, Theseus. It appears you are out of thread.
08:16 AM on 05/18/2011
Faved (already a fan)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Trickish Knave
Both sides suck, but neither will admit it.
10:19 AM on 05/15/2011
The government felt sorry for them and dropped the charges. No use adding insult to injury.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Malik Skyy
09:27 AM on 05/15/2011
Power tends to pollute, and absolute power pollutes absolutely.
01:50 PM on 05/16/2011
Well Malik Sky if you believe that only get an 1800 watt solar electric system.
Meanwhile I will get a 3600 watt solar electric system and i will be on TWICE THE POWER TRIP ;)

Evergreen Solar Panels Prices - Massive Sale On Now
Brand New Evergreen 205w 12 volt Only$399.

Made in Massachusetts Greenest string solar panels uses least silicon.
http://evergreensolar.com/en/
The highest output panels period!
Our NEW ES-E panels feature more power and higher voltage for broader inverter compatibility - all combined with our industry leading positive power tolerance.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
givemtheirwish
Science is the belief in ignorance of "experts"
11:38 PM on 05/14/2011
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NUutE-82vtc&feature=mfu_in_order&list=UL

Nothing like watching "Flat Earthers" squirming trying to substantiate AGW & their alarmist cr@p..........
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
realpolitic
GOP is full of sound and fury, signifying nothing!
04:11 AM on 05/15/2011
Nothing like watching deniers who get an understanding of science from youtube.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
givemtheirwish
Science is the belief in ignorance of "experts"
09:41 AM on 05/15/2011
What's the difference between "denier" & "skeptic"?

Maybe the difference between "Intergovernmental Panel on Chicanery & Corruption (IPCC)" & "Bernie Madoff"

Who said -
"based on the weak argument that the current models used by the IPCC couldn't reproduce the warming from about 1978 to 1998 without some forcing, and that the only forcing that they could think of was man. Even this argument assumes that these models adequately deal with natural internal variability—that is, such naturally occurring cycles as El Nino, the Pacific Decadal Oscillation, the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation, etc.
Yet articles from major modeling centers acknowledged that the failure of these models to anticipate the absence of warming for the past dozen years was due to the failure of these models to account for this natural internal variability. Thus even the basis for the weak IPCC argument for anthropogenic climate change was shown to be false."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
givemtheirwish
Science is the belief in ignorance of "experts"
09:50 AM on 05/15/2011
“Perhaps we should stop accepting the term, ‘skeptic.’ Skepticism implies doubts about a plausible proposition. Current global warming alarm hardly represents a plausible proposition.â€
Remind me, who said that??????
08:29 AM on 05/15/2011
Got science?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
givemtheirwish
Science is the belief in ignorance of "experts"
09:41 AM on 05/15/2011
Got science?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Trickish Knave
Both sides suck, but neither will admit it.
10:23 AM on 05/15/2011
Activism does not equal science.
07:59 PM on 05/14/2011
There has been a race into the arctic to claim new fossil fuel deposits uncovered by warming if you can believe that. This is a small victory and emissions need to be cut as the situation is growing more dire as time goes on.

Wikileaks cables show race to carve up Arctic

Since the 1970s, Professor Peter Wadhams of Cambridge University has made repeated trips under the North Pole in Royal Navy nuclear submarines to measure the thickness of the ice.

He told Newsnight the graph "has gone off a cliff" because the ice sheet has thinned as well as shrunk. ( http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/newsnight/9483790.stm )
08:09 PM on 05/14/2011
I also fear the potential that for the good these movements accomplish they detract form serious scientific environmental concerns. Case in point the no nuke ideological movement is facilitating more fossil fuel consumption and in some cases destructive environmental solutions in lieu of a reasoned and cautious approach to energy policy.
03:56 PM on 05/15/2011
If there really are new ff deposits in the arctic then you can rest assured this administration will not allow the U.S. to be among the countries going ofter them. But China, South America, et. al will be there.
photo
blackwind
Relax, nothing is under control
04:54 PM on 05/15/2011
China and South America won't be going there because it isn't in their territory. Despite conservative propaganda, it isn't a free for all when it comes to drilling. No drilling will occur without the permission of the country that controls the area.
04:09 PM on 05/14/2011
Whether or not man has an affect on climate is not as important as how fast it is changing. Now the question is not how do we slow down or stop global climate change, but how do we mitigate the destruction rising seas will cause. Beware waterfront property.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
02:40 PM on 05/14/2011
Dear person I was walking around in circles because I was bored and I decided to sneak into your house and write a letter I don't no why but do dumb things all the time like once I was in the woods and I was wondering if I could climb to the very top of a tree a 50 year old oak tree but I didn't know how to tell a 50 year old oak tree so a cut some down and counted the rings after 23 trees I found one and I was about to climb it when I realized I had cut it down I was very disappointed of nature so I started a fire and left- sincerely bob