More

Kansas Abortion Bill Poised To Become Law

Kansas Abortion Law

JOHN HANNA   05/13/11 08:48 PM ET   AP

TOPEKA, Kan. — Kansas legislators approved restrictions on private insurance coverage for abortions and adopted a state budget stripping funds from a Planned Parenthood affiliate, capping a string of victories Friday for abortion opponents only four months after sympathetic Gov. Sam Brownback took office.

This year, five major proposals favored by abortion opponents cleared the GOP-dominated Legislature as members heeded a call from Brownback to create "a culture of life." But Planned Parenthood of Kansas and Mid-Missouri, the target of much of lawmakers' efforts, confirmed that it is consulting with attorneys over possible legal challenges

"Four or five anti-choice bills, as we would characterize them, is pretty significant," said Tait Sye, a spokesman for the Planned Parenthood Federation of America. "It would be in the top tier of anti-choice legislatures, which is probably what Brownback wants."

Brownback, a Republican, is expected to sign the bill sent to him by the state House a mere 15 minutes before lawmakers adjourned their annual session. The House's early-morning vote was 86-30 in support of a larger bill that included the abortion coverage restrictions. The state Senate had approved it Thursday night, 28-10.

The measure prohibits insurance companies from offering coverage of abortions as part of their general health plans, except when a woman's life is at risk. If the bill becomes law as expected, starting in July, individuals and employers who want abortion coverage would have to buy supplemental policies that cover only abortion.

Supporters of the bill argue that it will protect employers who oppose abortion rights from having to pay for policies that cover the procedures. The legislation also says that no state or federally administered health-insurance exchange in Kansas established under last year's federal health care overhaul law can offer coverage for abortions, other than to save a woman's life.

The $13.8 billion budget approved by legislators, also early Friday, includes a provision diverting about $330,000 in federal family planning funds away from Planned Parenthood of Kansas and Mid-Missouri to public hospitals and health departments. The group's top executive warned that it will be forced to reduce services dramatically at clinics in Hays and Wichita that don't perform abortions without affecting one in the Kansas City suburbs that terminates pregnancies.

Brownback already has signed legislation to tighten restrictions on late-term abortions and require doctors to obtain written permission from parents before terminating minors' pregnancies. Legislators also have sent him a bill to impose new health and safety standards specifically for abortion clinics, which the governor plans to sign Monday.

"Governor Brownback has never been shy about the fact that he's pro-life," spokeswoman Sherriene Jones-Sontag said.

Kathy Ostrowski, legislative director for the anti-abortion group Kansans for Life, said the state's new laws will protect women who seek abortions from dangerous clinics and provide more accurate reporting by doctors about their activities.

"It has obviously been a good session," Ostrowski said after lawmakers adjourned.

Democratic Govs. Kathleen Sebelius and Mark Parkinson, who held the office before Brownback, blocked most major changes in Kansas abortion laws, vetoing legislation that is becoming law this year.

"There's clearly a message here that women are dispensable," said state Rep. Annie Kuether, a Topeka Democrat and one of the Legislature's shrinking number of abortion rights supporters. "I'm sick and tired of being treated like a second-class citizen."

The measures in Kansas are part of a wave of anti-abortion legislation across the nation, as abortion opponents have been encouraged by the election of new Republican governors last year and conservative legislators.

The Guttmacher Institute, a research organization supporting abortion rights, says Kansas and Missouri are among seven states now with restrictions on private health insurance coverage of abortion. Also, a dozen states, including Kansas, restrict coverage in health exchanges.

Planned Parenthood officials say moves to strip funds from affiliates are afoot in at least five other states; one in Indiana has filed a lawsuit there.

"Why would we want to continue to give Planned Parenthood tax dollars to ostensibly prevent pregnancy, when they make even more money performing abortions when that 'prevention' fails?" said Mary Kay Culp, Kansans for Life's executive director.

But Brownlie said the Planned Parenthood clinics offer a wide range of services, including thousands of breast exams and tests for sexually transmitted diseases each year. The federal dollars account for about 10 percent of the budget for its Kansas operations, he said.

___

Associated Press Writer Roxana Hegeman contributed to this report from Wichita, Kan.

___

Online:

Kansas Legislature: http://www.kslegislature.org

Kansans for Life: http://www.kfl.org

Planned Parenthood: http://www.plannedparenthood.org/kansas-mid-missouri/

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
TOPEKA, Kan. — Kansas legislators approved restrictions on private insurance coverage for abortions and adopted a state budget stripping funds from a Planned Parenthood affiliate, capping a stri...
TOPEKA, Kan. — Kansas legislators approved restrictions on private insurance coverage for abortions and adopted a state budget stripping funds from a Planned Parenthood affiliate, capping a stri...
Filed by Elyse Siegel  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 396
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (7 total)
photo
DonJM
The narrower the mind, the broader the statement.
11:02 PM on 07/01/2011
A lot of taxpayer money in Kansas is going to be used in trying to defend these unconstitutional laws. I don't think they can tell insurance companies that they can't offer insurance for abortions as part of policies. Neither can they require all of these extra requirements for abortion clinics which are nothing more than an "undue burden." A judge will put a screech and halt to this.
12:34 AM on 07/01/2011
This really good news! I hope it succeeds and will start a domino affect to all the states!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:56 PM on 05/25/2011
If you bare the body, bear the child.
06:16 PM on 05/15/2011
Republicans putting the interests of businesses and corporations above individual citizens, AGAIN. Why do we put up with this?
01:19 AM on 05/15/2011
Can anyone give me information on how to fight these anti women extremists
07:50 PM on 05/14/2011
But is Abortion MORALLY Right---? If so why?
photo
DTOM1776
Veritas Liberabit Vos
12:01 AM on 05/15/2011
Greetings OneWordAmerican

The answer to that question is an unequivocal NO.

Abortion is the most important and pressing human rights issue ever to face us. The powerful are given power over the defenseless, innocent, and voiceless. Power to destroy and kill. Every aspect of the killing of innocent human life simply because it is in the way is humanly and morally repugnant and without any defense.
06:58 PM on 05/15/2011
In your worldview, is all life valuable, or just human life?
apiazza
There is no such thing as a fiscal conservative.
10:44 PM on 06/24/2011
A woman bears a child and continues a pregnancy based on her own benevolence. To bear a child because it's mandated by the state is equivalent to slavery. Your simpleton moral explanation ignores the complex issues surrounding this topic. A woman can have an abortion and no law can stop her.
06:07 PM on 05/15/2011
Morality is subjective and it should not be the business of the government to legislate morality.
07:27 PM on 05/15/2011
If that the case ---them isnt the government making a moral decision to take a portion of my paycheck and feed people who say....food stamps---? Seems like a moral decision on the part of the government
04:01 PM on 05/14/2011
Roe v. Wade isn't exclusivel­­y about abortion. It's about personal privacy and legal establishm­­ent of the fact that the government doesn't own our bodies. It's the ULTIMATE ruling regarding privacy, personal freedom, physical autonomy and liberty from tyranny of the government­­. It ruled that YOU own your body, not the government (or corporatio­­ns or individual­­s). THAT is where the legal basis for abortion comes from. It's amazing to me how many people don't understand this.
photo
DTOM1776
Veritas Liberabit Vos
11:58 PM on 05/14/2011
Greetings MarsAmbassador

To the contrary. Roe v. Wade and the companion ruling, Doe vs. Bolton, are specifically and exclusively petitions for unrestricted abortions. Absolutely nothing in any of the testimony or rulings is about anything other than abortion. The so-called legal basis for abortion is nothing more than unhinged judicial activism. Read the ruling. It is legally hilarious. The majority ruling justices couldn't find any mention of abortion literally or figuratively in the Constitution. They could find no writings or philosophical support for unrestricted abortion in any supporting contemporary documents to the Constitution. They had to look at the "vapors" of the bill of rights to construct a 'right to privacy' that has no Constitutional foundation. The happenstance that certain consequent results flow, or emanate, from the two decisions is not factual support for any type of broadness.
06:55 PM on 05/17/2011
Nor could they find a prohibition. Consistent with the founding principles of this country, privacy and freedom of choice had to trump religious ideology.
07:59 PM on 05/13/2011
Whatever happened to "smaller, less intrusive" government?
06:38 PM on 05/13/2011
I agree 100% with paying for an abortion in the case of incest, rape or health of the mother. This makes up a tiny percentage of abortions. I believe women have the right to choose when it comes to their body. Just don't ask ME to pay for YOUR abortion. If you think this is a worthy cause start an abortion charity. Then you can give and give and give. Your OWN money !!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KaAp
06:49 PM on 05/13/2011
You are not paying for someone's abortion. It is being paid for via their private health insurance policy.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:56 PM on 05/13/2011
Then you will pay for additional pregnancies in your insurance pool, and you will pay for unwanted children in your community. Be honest, this has nothing to do with cost—the alternative is always more expensive. It has to do with your personal religious beliefs and your refusal to MYOFB.
06:22 PM on 05/13/2011
In other news, the sky is blue.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dustyoh
06:19 PM on 05/13/2011
All this is going to do is push abortions back into the alleys.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KaAp
06:49 PM on 05/13/2011
We should start passing out coat hangers at the Kansas border.
photo
rocketdog56
Don't want to be an American Idiot
07:07 PM on 05/13/2011
Sterilize your coat hangers ladies, welcome to the dark ages.
06:16 PM on 05/13/2011
What in the name of sweet Jesus is wrong with these Republicans?! I am sick and tired of reading about legislators regulating what a person does or does not do to their personal bodies. What happened to small government? What happened to personal responsibility? How is this promoting any of those things? If an insurance company wants to offer abortion coverage as part of their plan, what in the world is Kansas doing saying they cannot? What about the free market and capitalism the Republicans love to throw out there?

The hypocrisy that flows so deep within the conservative party lines is so blatant I am surprised anyone takes anything they say seriously. How is it possible for them to sleep at night?
05:58 PM on 05/13/2011
As if ANYONE needs another reason to never step foot in Kansas.
photo
dfranz
With Liberty and Justice for all
05:52 PM on 05/13/2011
Women's Choice groups are afraid to bring this before the Supreme Court because it is stocked with Bush plants and based on their other activist decisions would likely find this as reason enough to mess with Roe V Wade.
05:30 PM on 05/13/2011
Oh, don't forget the Kansas legislator that came up with his solution for Illegal aliens, and announced it in session...shoot them from helicopters. Seriously.
06:22 PM on 05/13/2011
Not that I don't believe that, but I'd love a link.
photo
rocketdog56
Don't want to be an American Idiot