iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

New Jersey: An Unlikely Leader In U.S. Solar Energy

New Jersey Solar Energy

First Posted: 05/13/11 01:00 PM ET Updated: 07/13/11 06:12 AM ET

MONTCLAIR, New Jersey (By Ronda Kaysen) – New Jersey, home to more industrial waste clean-up sites than any other state, is poised to become an unlikely shining example to the nation on use of solar power, but not everyone is happy about it.

One of the nation's smallest and most populous states, New Jersey is not known for its sunshine -- it has five cloudy days for every three sunny days.

Yet the combination of a stringent legislative energy mandate by the state government and a generous carbon offset program has made New Jersey the nation's second largest producer of solar power, trailing only California, where more than half the days are typically sunny.

Legislation passed during former Governor Jon Corzine's administration in 2006 requires energy suppliers to get 20 percent of their power from renewable sources by 2020, including 2 percent from solar power.

Under its carbon offset program, New Jersey allows companies that emit greenhouse gases to buy certificates, or credits, from producers of renewable energy, giving them a source of revenue and an incentive to invest in solar power.

Photovoltaic panels, which collect the sun's energy, have sprung up on utility poles, atop parking lots and on rooftops across the state. Vacant lots, farmland and university campuses are all fair game for housing solar farms.

Recently approved legislation calls for opening access to old landfills -- 80 are located in the Pinelands National Reserve in the southern part of the state -- for renewable energy use such as solar farms.

"I used to say renewable energy is going to be the issue of the future, but I think it is the issue of now," said Democratic state Senator James Whelan, sponsor of the Pinelands legislation.

At Rutgers University, 60 percent of the Livingston campus is expected to be powered by its existing seven-acre solar farm and a new 32-acre solar canopy that will begin construction this summer and set to be completed next summer.

The new canopy system is designed to generate more than $1 million a year in electrical power, school officials say.

"That's money we would not have to pay to buy electricity," said E.J. Miranda, a university spokesperson. The Rutgers solar project has become something of an academic tourist attraction with students as far away as North Carolina paying the farm a visit.

But not everyone is warming to solar power's embrace. Critics say solar panels are ugly and that the high cost of investing in solar will simply be passed onto consumers.

Most controversial are 180,000 solar panels being attached to utility poles along quiet residential streets, part of a push by the state's largest utility company, the Public Service Electric and Gas Company, to produce enough solar power to supply 13,000 homes.

The utility's $518,000 million investment in solar energy will bump up consumer energy bills by 29 cents a month, the company said.

Just five panels, which measure 5 feet by 2.5 feet, had been installed on utility poles in the affluent community of Ridgewood before an outcry erupted. House-proud residents were so angry by the visual affront that the town forced the company to stop work, a halt repeated in three other nearby towns.

"Certainly the aesthetics are a No. 1 concern," said Thomas Riche, Ridgewood's deputy mayor.

Another concern was the possibility that the panels could interfere with fire pull boxes on the utility poles, he said.

Mayors of a handful of municipalities have sent letters protesting the panels to the state's Board of Public Utilities, which approved the program.

After a decade-long hot streak, solar energy is getting a cooler reception from Republican Governor Chris Christie. who has indicated that current renewable energy rules are too strict on businesses. He has called for the state's energy master plan to be reviewed in light of the economic downturn, a move renewable energy supporters fear could affect solar energy legislation.

(Editing by Barbara Goldberg and Greg McCune)

Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

MONTCLAIR, New Jersey (By Ronda Kaysen) – New Jersey, home to more industrial waste clean-up sites than any other state, is poised to become an unlikely shining example to the nation on use of solar...
MONTCLAIR, New Jersey (By Ronda Kaysen) – New Jersey, home to more industrial waste clean-up sites than any other state, is poised to become an unlikely shining example to the nation on use of solar...
Filed by Travis Donovan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 206
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
theepoxyman
Reaching point of diminishing returns in 3,2,1
09:18 PM on 05/17/2011
These people are complaining about solar panels being hung from utility poles are ugly.
Right, cause utility poles with 10 wires drooping from pole to pole and those lovely capacitors atop them are just so beautiful.
And then there is the horrible high price it will cost. $0.29 a month. The horror.
Some anti environment people will find just about anything to complain about.
03:59 PM on 05/17/2011
I can't believe that people are complaining that the solar panels are "ugly." I would love if they passed a bill like that in philadelphia. If you really want to see something ugly google pictures of the nuclear power plant in japan or of the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. Obviously the solar panels are not being put up for aesthetic purposes; they are being put up to provide people with clean, renewable energy.
photo
rodjard
I Update my brain frequently
07:26 AM on 05/17/2011
Beauty is in the eyes of the beholder.
That which provides warmth and security
becomes beautiful quickly.
photo
rodjard
I Update my brain frequently
07:21 AM on 05/17/2011
Aesthetics. What is that to people who can't buy gas
and need assistance paying rediculous heating bills?
Well, La-De FXXXXXX-Da.
photo
Star2000dancer
Pay it forward, the movie..
10:16 PM on 05/17/2011
Snap. Big great Lakes story today about transferring nucleur waste across the lakes.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:23 PM on 05/16/2011
As a NJ resident I am PROUD to see solar panels on telephone poles. And I am irritated by these short-sighted selfish fools who would prefer to see fossil fuel burnt rather than have clean solar cells around instead. Form follows function and I think solar cells are beautiful.

Here's hoping that Chris Christie is a one-term governor. He couldn't even get the streets cleared. He lost us a major education funding aid, then lied about it and fired a fall guy. He has done NOTHING for New Jersey but make us a laughing stock.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ScapeGoat
Facts are stubborn things. Science Rocks!
08:23 AM on 05/16/2011
I live in NJ and see the panels on the utility poles all the time. Frankly, I think the pole and the wires are uglier then the small solar panel that is attached to the pole. When you consider the benefit the solar panel brings, it is worth the "unsightly" view.

I also don't mind pay 30 cents extra a month if it means clean-green energy.
02:58 PM on 05/15/2011
It is time to transition to safe, clean alternative energy.

Nuclear power gave us Chernobyl and Fukishima.
Oil gave us the BP disaster in the Gulf
Coal gave us the Massey mine disaster

Wind, solar, wave energy, geothermal and second generation biofuels made from algae cellulose and waste are the future.
10:02 PM on 05/15/2011
Definitely time to make the transition to safe, clean, renewable energy sources. And it is possible. Renewable energy can be used to power up any kind of business, including -my field of interest- the music business. And as a consumer, one is more powerful than a lot of people might think. Time to make use of that power.

If interested, here's some solar power music on that topic: www.youtube.com/watch?v=8W_sR-fbKo0
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ReedYoung
global mean temperature, obviously INCREASING
01:41 PM on 05/15/2011
I question the veracity of this figure.

The utility's $518,000 million investment in solar energy will bump up consumer energy bills by 29 cents a month, the company said.

That would be a very awkward way to say $518 Billion, and if it was right, it would be global front page news, because that would equal more than half a Trillion dollars. More likely it's a typographical error. Reuters is getting to be as bad as AP these days. Okay, I exaggerate. Nothing's that bad except Fox, but still, pretty sloppy "journalism."
02:39 PM on 05/16/2011
Good catch. I missed that on the first time around.
07:55 AM on 05/15/2011
So utility poles are not an eyesore but solar panels are? That is a joke! The aesthetic argument holds no validity.....you think I like looking outside and seeing power lines, telephone poles, and satellite dishes? No, I would rather see the natural environment. If I can't see the natural environment, then I would rather see solar panels and other forms of alternative energy because at least I know they are helping preserve the natural environment.
07:25 AM on 05/15/2011
I have read that Arkansas was the best place for alternative energy.

It is tiresome to watch Cristy and his kind do their best to keep our country behind the times.

Energy companies could sabatoge Solar and Wind by putting it in places in a way that looks bad and put it next to water that will flood it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:11 AM on 05/15/2011
That was a surprise.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
p47nandmosquito
08:17 PM on 05/14/2011
Figures anything our state actually does well Christie will decide needs to be cut. Just like the libraries. Such a shame the other guy ran with that b-word who couldn't run her own agency so she decided homeschoolers should suffer for it, otherwise he probably would have won. Of course, the libraries got saved, so with luck these green energy programs will be too.
12:06 PM on 05/14/2011
Why would you be surprised if John "Goldman Sachs" Corzine mandated that 20% of the power in the state had to come from solar, they would be a leader. the power is very expensive, and there are a lot of other things to spend the money on. No other state has priorotized green energy above education, medical benefits and assistance for the needy like NJ has.

I See posters saying things like, "Go New Jersey" like solar is a free lunch. If you had to choose between some solar power and an extra teacher at your school so your children could get a better education which would you choose? If you had to choose between some solar power and helping a poor person who does not have enough to eat, which would you do.

These are real choices. New Jersey is broke and deep in debt. Something will be cut. This expensive, feel-good investment will crowd out other expenditures. Typical progressive politics - I like every program and refuse to conceed that I may have to choose some over others.
photo
wwilcox
Laws are made by people, not gods.
08:03 PM on 05/14/2011
Do you honestly believe that any money saved would be spent on extra teachers? And if the Public Service Electric and Gas Company says that the solar will add 29 cents to each persons utility bill, how exactly is that going to be collected and transferred to the schools? Maybe Christie will raise a tax?

Sounded to me that the complaints were all of the NIMBY variety if "Certainly the aesthetics are a No. 1 concern," said Thomas Riche, Ridgewood's deputy mayor.
photo
French Toast
MAPLE SYRUP
11:38 AM on 05/14/2011
"Critics say solar panels are ugly"

So are those critics, generally speaking.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Donna Davis
Enlightening the village idiots
11:29 AM on 05/14/2011
NJ is known as the ‘Garden State’ so it should also go green! Go NJ!
12:08 PM on 05/14/2011
So why only 20% solar? Why not 100% or 120% so you could send some to other states to make them greener?

This makes no sense at all and is run by beuracrats who have no responsibility when it comes to spending our money!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
p47nandmosquito
08:19 PM on 05/14/2011
I'd love to see the whole country go 100% renewable energy by 2020. But what do you think the chances are that will get through? 20% is a start, no more, but it is at least a definite start.