More

Medicare, Social Security Finances Worsen In Bad Economy

Timothy Geithner

By STEPHEN OHLEMACHER and RICARDO ALONSO-ZALDIVAR   05/14/11 12:23 AM ET   AP

WASHINGTON -- The bad economy is worsening the already-shaky finances of Medicare and Social Security, draining the trust funds supporting them faster than expected and intensifying the need for Congress to shore up the massive benefit programs, the government said Friday.

Both Medicare and Social Security are being hit by a double whammy: the long-anticipated wave of retiring baby boomers and weaker-than-expected tax receipts, according to the annual report by the trustees who oversee the programs.

The Medicare hospital insurance fund for seniors is now projected to run out of money in 2024, five years earlier than last year's estimate. The Social Security trust funds are projected to be drained in 2036, one year earlier than the last estimate. Once the trust funds are exhausted, both programs can only collect enough money in payroll taxes to pay partial benefits, the report said.

More immediate bad news for seniors: After they've gone two years with no cost-of-living increase in Social Security payments, the trustees project a 0.7 percent increase for next year, a raise so small that it will probably be wiped out by higher Medicare Part B premiums for most beneficiaries.

"There can no longer be any doubt or denial: Our nation's Medicare and Social Security programs are unsustainable and will run out of money sooner than expected," said Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky.

Congress and the Obama administration are negotiating possible changes to Medicare and other benefit programs as part of a deal to increase the government's ability to borrow. The $14.3 trillion debt ceiling will be hit Monday, though Treasury officials are taking measures to put off an unprecedented default on government bonds until August, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner said.

Congress is putting off changes to Social Security, but Medicare, the government health insurance program for older Americans, is still on the table.

The longer Congress waits to fix the programs, the more likely it is that lawmakers will be forced to impose tax increases, deep benefit cuts, or both, to save them, the report said. By acting sooner, the trustees said Congress can impose gradual changes that reduce the impact on current beneficiaries and give future retirees time to prepare.

"The financial shortfalls confronting both Social Security and Medicare are substantial and – absent legislation to correct them – quite certain," wrote two of the trustees who oversee the programs, Charles P. Blahous III and Robert D. Reischauer. "Elected officials will best serve the interests of the public if financial corrections are enacted at the earliest practicable time."

The weak economy is hurting Medicare and Social Security because fewer people are working and paying payroll taxes that support the programs, the trustees said. Medicare is in worse shape than Social Security, in part because it is also being hit by rising health care costs.

To illustrate the challenges facing the programs, the trustees calculated the tax increases or benefit cuts that would be necessary to make both programs solvent for the next 75 years.

Fixing Social Security would require an increase in the payroll tax of 2.15 percentage points, or an immediate and permanent 14 percent cut in benefits, the report said. Fixing the Medicare hospital fund would require an increase in the payroll tax of nearly 1 percentage point, or a 17 percent cut in benefits.

If benefit cuts are designed to reduce the impact on current beneficiaries, future retirees will face even more significant changes, the report said.

On the other hand, if the Medicare trust fund is allowed to be drained, the program will collect only enough payroll taxes to pay about 90 percent of benefits. If the Social Security trust funds are drained, the program will collect only enough payroll taxes to pay about 77 percent of benefits, the report said.

Nearly 55 million retirees, disabled people and children who have lost parents receive Social Security benefits, which average $1,077 monthly. More than 46 million people are covered by Medicare.

Even after the economy comes back, Medicare will still be in trouble. Part of the reason is the cost of modern high-tech medicine. And people are living longer, and having complicated procedures such as bypass surgery and hip replacements later in life.

On top of that, financial projections for Medicare rely partly on assumptions that the trustees' report say are obviously unrealistic or questionable. Those include a 1990s law that would require a 30 percent cut in payments to doctors, and is routinely waived each year by Congress.

The report also raised questions about whether Medicare cuts under Obama's health care plan would be politically sustainable over the long haul.

"It is important to note that the actual future costs for Medicare are likely to exceed those shown by the current-law projections in this report," the trustees said.

Six trustees oversee Social Security and Medicare. Besides Geithner, Blahous and Reischauer, the others are Labor Secretary Hilda Solis, Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius and Social Security Commissioner Michael Astrue.

___

Associated Press Economics Writer Martin Crutsinger contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- The bad economy is worsening the already-shaky finances of Medicare and Social Security, draining the trust funds supporting them faster than expected and intensifying the need for Congr...
WASHINGTON -- The bad economy is worsening the already-shaky finances of Medicare and Social Security, draining the trust funds supporting them faster than expected and intensifying the need for Congr...
Filed by xxXTeri D'angeloXxx  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,785
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (32 total)
  1 of 5  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS

photo
Waltfl 08:21 PM on 05/14/2011
Social Security is supposed to be budget neutral. It is not an entitlement, because people need to pay in for a long time to get SS payments.  They employers pay in too. The program adjusted for the bay boomers in the 70-ies, so this is not a new problem, either. Yes, recession doesn't help, but every recession is offset by times of boom, where more SS revenues are  being  Read More...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Koeiseun
07:16 PM on 06/17/2011
Let's pretend that Medicare and SSI are a middle-eastern country with loads of oil that needs to be "saved" with democracy and pump billions of would be war dollars into them.....
02:26 PM on 05/19/2011
I guess we have to hurry and get the taxes that are fair from the oil companies and top 2%. then we wouldn't have to worry about it
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ttowse
08:15 AM on 05/19/2011
Please forward this article to the president. He is giving away billions to Egypt. Where is the money coming from?
photo
shothot
same, same, but different
01:25 AM on 07/07/2011
How about Israel and Turkey, and a group of smaller welfare recipients.
04:37 PM on 05/17/2011
I’ve retired and I think I’ve saved Social Security! Here’s the story. I reached retirement age this year and since April have received a monthly Social Security check. However, how I’ve saved Social Security is that I am also working full time and contributing to the system as I collect Social Security checks from the system. This year I will pay in about $12,000 to the Social Security program and will receive about $24,000 from Social Security. I am not unusual in working after arriving at the retirement age for Social Security; in fact, I am probably typical of the Baby Boomer Generation in having not enough in savings to fully retire nor having the inclination to stop working just because a threshold has been stepped over.

I know that the assumptions for Social Security include really good projections on the out-go from the system that will be necessary to meet the demands of the Baby Boomers but have they considered that the Baby Boomers will still be working well into retirement age and contributing to the system? All of the information that I have heard assumes that the Baby Boomer Generation when it reaches retirement age, will. I don’t think so and if they are continuing to work and contributing to the system then the net out-go predicted should be adjusted downwards significantly.

So, see, by retiring I have saved Social Security!
07:06 AM on 05/16/2011
This is a clear case of embezzlement and misappropriation of funds, OUR GOVERNMENT , is corrupt. Its not enought to kick them out, they need to accountable for thier actions. A 4 X 4 cell will do just fine. There is not one law on the books that supersedes our Constitution. Our Constitution is what protects our freedom and rights, not the ones who hold office. Its their job to uphold it. Thats where the failure is. Yes we voted them in but once they in its there job to do what right. The facts are that they can't comprehend this, which deems them unfit. For starters:The Constitution of the United States:Article II Section 4
The President, Vice President and ALL civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on impeachment for, and Conviction of Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.
Webster’s Dictionary:
bribe - To influence or induce by giving, illegally or immorally, a token or anything of value for service.
08:47 AM on 05/16/2011
YESSSS!!! The present administration ignores our Constitution. They appear to "make up their own rules" as they go along. IMPEACH!!!
10:16 AM on 05/16/2011
In your ignorance you fail to realize that also applies to congress who are just as guilty. I mean ALL
photo
shothot
same, same, but different
01:29 AM on 07/07/2011
Right or wrong , if you make strong accusations, it would be patritotic to share your information with those of us who don't have the info of which you speak. Impeachment of the president under what aspect of the constitution?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
keyman125
11:00 PM on 05/15/2011
"Even after the economy comes back......." Dream on...dream on.... dream on.....Aerosmith
photo
Grokenspiel
I grok, therefore I spiel
02:09 PM on 05/15/2011
It's getting more and more difficult for Republicans to justify the Social Security tax cap. Currently, even millionaires and billionaires are taxed only on the first $106,800 of income, and income beyond this amount is not taxed. Eliminating this giveaway to the rich would stabilize Social Security completely. There would be no shortfall.

Republicans are opposed to this fair and sensible notion, of course; they have a vested interest in maintaining this sweetheart deal for the wealthy. Their impassioned arguments for keeping the cap in place are specious and transparently self-serving. They cannot counter this simple fact: everyone should pay their fair share.

End the cap now.
02:16 PM on 05/15/2011
"It's getting more and more difficult for Republican­s to justify the Social Security tax cap. Currently, even millionair­es and billionair­es are taxed only on the first $106,800 of income"

I don't think it's that difficult at all, the reason for the cap on paying IN is because there is a cap on paying OUT.

In other words, a person making $100 million gets the same payout in SS as a person making $106,000.

Unless of course you believe SS should be a welfare program because that is what it would be if you eliminated the cap.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:47 PM on 05/15/2011
You are something else VQ - and it ain't something I can post.
photo
Grokenspiel
I grok, therefore I spiel
04:51 PM on 05/15/2011
Tying taxes paid to benefits received is one of those specious arguments I mentioned. Few tax-supported programs and services benefit all taxpayers equally. In fact, many federal programs, such as subsidies for the oil, coal, tobacco, pharmaceutical, insurance, and financial industries, are of no benefit to anyone except the wealthy. Nevertheless, we cannot pick and choose which taxes we pay based on the direct benefit we receive. It's the price of living in a land of freedom and opportunity. And I doubt we'll see any millionaires or billionaires in soup lines as a result of eliminating the Social Security cap and having them pay their fair share.
photo
don
We're going to need a bigger nutshell.
01:54 PM on 05/15/2011
Decreasing government spending does not increase economic activity. On the contrary, the opposite occurs. So the effort to reduce the deficit by reducing spending alone is counter productive. The cuts in spending will result in decreased economic activity, which will in turn result in decreased revenue necessitating a cut in spending to reduce the deficit. There is no bottom to that spiral.

I think that the beginning and end of our problem is our industrial Corporations' rush to develop China's economy at the expense of our own. We're not only exporting jobs, we're exporting our money through our purchases of imported goods to people that are beyond our taxing authority. Ordinarily, a worker in this country is taxed, takes his net income and spends it, giving it to someone else who pays tax on that income. The exportation of both our jobs and our purchases eliminates that stream of revenue for our governments, resulting in the need to borrow to maintain the social contract. Cheap goods from China are something we cannot afford in that the real cost is the very destruction of our society.
02:07 PM on 05/15/2011
"Decreasing government spending does not increase economic activity"

Conversely, spending more does not increase economic activity . . .

If it did, we would never have any economic downturns in the past decade when we DOUBLED THE AMOUNT OF SPENDING BY THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.
photo
don
We're going to need a bigger nutshell.
02:33 PM on 05/15/2011
GDP has increased over the last decade. True it has not doubled as government spending has. The increase of goverment spending has shorn upthe economy. It has increased to compensate for the exportation of our economy. Remove that shoring and it will collapse.
08:52 AM on 05/16/2011
Thank you!!! You have done your "homework." AMERICAN JOBS FOR AMERICANS!!!
photo
ihatepeople0 1
at caput asini ex tuo
01:16 PM on 05/15/2011
It'd be great to be able to shift away from a "debt-based" economy back to a nation that consumes what it manufactures - I'm not an economist, but it seems like that would help as a long term strategy...
02:17 PM on 05/15/2011
That would be ideal but let's be honest, the US isn't the best at everything and other countries can add vital resources as well. A push towards that is fine with me though.
01:12 PM on 05/15/2011
"After they've gone two years with no cost-of-living increase in Social Security payments,..." Funny how everything has imploded in the last two years. Golf anyone? For just in case. You support Obama and don't like my little joke? To bad. Won't respond to whatever nonsense you have to say. Support Obama means you have nothing of importance to say anyway.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Docdearth2
01:10 PM on 05/15/2011
First these pudits say that there IS enough funding and we shouldn't be worried. However, most, say these programs are indeed running out of money. Considering this country has been running up trillions of dollars in defecits and borrowing with no clear solutions in sight who should we believe? IF this country wants to save some real money it needs to stop being the police force of the world and reel in the enormous amount of military spending required to keep occupying forces in places like Iraq and Afghanistan. If the rest of the world won't help us out in this regard and apparently doesn't care, why are we constantly left holding the bag of taking on the defense of the planet? While unpopular, taxes most likely are going to have to be raised to pay for all of this.This means the middle class once again takes it on the chin. I say, simplify the tax law and make EVERYONE pay a reasonable fair share. No more loopholes for big corporations and the wealthy. Police medicare fraud and abuse in the country's social services systems. Go after those "wise guys" on Wall Street and get back the billions they ripped off and make them pay for the economic fiasco they caused. The costs of paying for illegal immigrants in our over stretched social service system has got to come to an end, too. Most importantly, common sense, NOT political correctness needs to be the order of the day.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Roy Heath
01:04 PM on 05/15/2011
A disguised way of saying that we're broke and we need to break into the savings account to pay for our debt account. I just wonder if there is any money there any way.
I am just happy to never have had any confidence in the accounting practices of people who never have any accountability for their actions. I will not be heart broken once the truth comes out that there is nothing there for me to retire. I never believed that money was there for me in the first place, even if I am wrong, it will never be enough to cover my golden years.
I just wish they would give me the option for me to have my money back before they finance another war.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:55 PM on 05/15/2011
You notice the wealth of the people that crashed our economy, WS and the bankers , are still intact. Why are they not inprisoned? Why is it expected for the people to pay for their crimes? Why is gw still running around scot free after bankrupting this nation with them? The people need to demand these bastids to pay - NOT us.
photo
ihatepeople0 1
at caput asini ex tuo
12:58 PM on 05/15/2011
The horrible thing is, that you're right, this has all been planned for a long time - years in the planning.....
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Beachchick
Dignity is not negotiable
01:01 PM on 05/15/2011
absolutely!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Beachchick
Dignity is not negotiable
01:00 PM on 05/15/2011
The rich refuse to pay for their crimes. We are being forced to pay.

It's sad.istic.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Beachchick
Dignity is not negotiable
12:52 PM on 05/15/2011
Americans have been told that social security is in trouble for over thirty years now.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:56 PM on 05/15/2011
Funny, just about raygun was elected.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Beachchick
Dignity is not negotiable
12:57 PM on 05/15/2011
I know...interesting coincidence... ahem

Hello, izza!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Peppers Dad
02:21 PM on 05/15/2011
Trickle-nosis.
02:10 PM on 05/15/2011
There is a reason Reagan doubled the SS tax . . . because it was in trouble.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:50 PM on 05/15/2011
Too have people pay into it more so they could raid more.
12:49 PM on 05/15/2011
Get rid of Geithner.