iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Dossier's Andrej Pejic Cover Censored By Barnes & Noble, Borders (PHOTO, POLL)

The Huffington Post   First Posted: 05/16/2011 11:00 am Updated: 07/16/2011 5:12 am

Update: A spokeswoman for Barnes & Noble contacted us to say the chain never asked for the issues to be poly-bagged, writing, "We have no plans to poly bag the magazine nor did we ever have plans to do so." We again contacted the folks at Dossier who forwarded us the emailed request from their distributor, reading, in part, "We have a problem with the new issue in the US chain stores. The chains require that this issue be in an opaque poly bag," however, the names of the chains aren't specified.

Previously: Barnes & Noble and Borders have censored the latest cover of Dossier Journal featuring androgynous model Andrej Pejic taking off his button-down while his long blond locks are rolled in curlers, Elle.com reports.

We spoke with Dossier Co-Founder and Creative Director Skye Parrott who explained that the bookstores asked for all copies of the magazine to be placed in "opaque poly bags because even though they knew Andrej was a man, he looked too much like a woman, basically," a move that she suspects will limit sales, but that's not really the issue here.

"It's a naked man on the cover of a magazine, which is done all of the time without being covered up, so I definitely don't think it merits this, but I understand what it is," Parrott told HuffPost Style. "It's not a coincidence that it's only the giant U.S. chain stores that are asking us to do this....It's only the American copies that are being censored. It seems that it probably made people uncomfortable. But that's part of what's interesting about the cover, I think, is that it's playing with those ideas of gender roles. He's topless, you can see that he's a man, but if you look at his face, he looks like a woman and he's so beautiful, he's both in that picture, in a way. I think that's what's interesting about it."

Take a look at the cover and tell us what you think. And for more, head over to DossierJournal.com.

Quick Poll

Should this cover be censored?

YES! Too racy for the magazine rack.

NO! It's a shirtless guy. Big deal.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST STYLE

 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,816
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (54 total)
06:43 PM on 06/01/2011
"His" body is not that great. He looks kind of flabby, soft and not healthy. sorry.
06:02 PM on 06/01/2011
so wonderful to see trans individuals get attention with no government involvement. im proud of who i am
11:22 PM on 05/31/2011
that photo is fantastic....so challenging to one's sensibilities and conditioned expectations. great art is not (usually, sorry matisse) about being comfortable.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:13 AM on 05/28/2011
androgyny upsets the puritan homophobes.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Papa Swamp
Apex predator, ocean freak.
05:16 PM on 05/20/2011
Used to be the hair fashion a few hundred years ago....now it's a nono? Heck guys used to wear make-up and lace.
10:50 AM on 05/20/2011
...and kardashian milk factory walks around uncensored. i don't understand. oh, i get it - it's the nipple factor
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Theophrastus
OK, ok... so maybe I'm not "human" per se...
07:22 AM on 05/19/2011
George Washington in his modeling years.
10:16 PM on 05/18/2011
I Don't get it.
Isn't that a man?
I'm so confused.
01:00 AM on 05/21/2011
Yeah which is why it's confusing why they'd censor it.
08:33 PM on 05/18/2011
Why not? It's part of the real world.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sentimentiques
independent and ornery but purrfectly lovable
05:08 PM on 05/18/2011
There's gotta be some way to blame the Republicans for this!
05:25 PM on 05/18/2011
WHY ?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sentimentiques
independent and ornery but purrfectly lovable
05:58 PM on 05/18/2011
Why not!? Every comment I've seen on many other topics manages to get in a snarky gibe or two at Republicans~~just kind of surprised to see that no one posted one here.
04:50 PM on 05/18/2011
Skye Parrot?????????????
04:14 PM on 05/18/2011
So, what if it was a female model? When is this culture going to mature and accept the human form? Strange that art work and statuary on public display in parks and museums is acceptable; but, not on a magazine cover. Heaven forbid that people are exposed to a part of the body that infants are introduced to on day one of their lives. OMG, it's a boob!
FaceReality2
Democracy in the U.S. is an illusion
11:01 PM on 05/18/2011
"When is this culture going to mature and accept the human form?"

When all the religious nutjobs are dead.
01:02 AM on 05/21/2011
You don't have to be religious in order to have modesty. I think artistic nudity is fine. When it becomes sexualized is when it should become an issue. This particular picture is artistic nudity in my opinion.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
theelfhimself
04:10 PM on 05/18/2011
It's an ugly picture, male or female notwithstanding.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Reddog21
03:44 PM on 05/18/2011
Only because she's flatter than a board.
05:36 PM on 05/18/2011
That's a guy.
01:58 PM on 05/26/2011
So you are in favor of objectifying a woman if she is well endowed but not if she doesn't live up to the Barbie Doll myth of what women are supposed to look like?