iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Democratic Leadership Requests Investigation Into Gas Price Fixing (UPDATED)

Schumermc

First Posted: 05/17/2011 8:54 am Updated: 07/17/2011 5:12 am

WASHINGTON -- Keeping the spotlight on the high prices at the pump, Senate Democratic leadership has sent a letter to the Federal Trade Commission requesting an investigation into whether oil companies have been deliberately holding down the supply of refined gasoline.

The letter, spearheaded by Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-MO), is the latest in a line of politically sharp attempts to turn the screws on Big Oil. Last week, the CEOs of the five biggest oil companies came to the Hill to testify before Sen. Max Baucus' (D-Mont.) Finance Committee. The topics discussed varied, but focused primarily on why or whether oil companies needed generous tax breaks when oil was selling so high.

"Don't punish our industry for doing its job well," was the reply from John Watson, CEO of Chevron.

A Senate vote on eliminating those tax subsidies is expected shortly, perhaps even as soon as Tuesday. The votes will likely fall short of the 60 needed to reach cloture, with several oil-friendly Democrats raising opposition.

In the meantime, the Department of Justice is looking into the possibility of fraud and manipulation in the oil market. Now, the Senate is pressing the FTC to investigate the possibility that U.S. inventories were being kept artificially low in order to maintain high gas prices.

"At a time when major refiners and oil companies are making record profits and American families continue to struggle with gasoline at record prices the idea that refiners may be manipulating the market to keep prices artificially high goes beyond reproach," the Democratic leadership writes. "It is incumbent upon the Commission to ensure that the American people are protected from this type of manipulation. Accordingly, we request that the Commission open a full investigation into these allegations of wrongdoing and to determine the impact this behavior, if confirmed, has on regional and national gasoline prices."

In the letter, McCaskill cites Energy Information Administration data showing that "refineries are using only 81.7 percent of their capacity, a decline of 7 percent from the same time last year."

The petroleum industry has contended that the disparity between the two years is simply a result of changing supply, with refineries struggling last year. Recent flooding from the Mississippi River has caused additional concerns about refinery disruptions. But those eased on Monday with gasoline futures going below $3 a gallon and oil prices subsequently falling.

UPDATE: 12:05 PM

McCaskill, who is up for reelection this year, and Sen. Charles Schumer (D-NY) held a Tuesday briefing on Capitol Hill to discuss the letter to the FTC.

When it was noted that a bill eliminating tax subsidies for oil companies is unlikely to advance in the Senate, Schumer said any proposal for deficit reduction put forward by Democratic leadership would "certainly" call for the elimination of oil subsidies.

"I believe that all of us in the leadership -- and I think there's pretty broad consensus in our caucus -- believe that this is the place to start," Schumer told reporters at the briefing. "We do have to reduce our dependence on foreign oil, and that is a longer process and we'll be doing things on that down the road. But immediately ... we have to cut spending, and you have so many things that are being proposed being cut. Some propose cutting cancer research. Some propose cutting help that middle class families get to go to college," Shumer said. "Our question is simple: Are these subsidies a better place to cut than those and shouldn't we start with these?"

The full letter from Democratic leadership is below.

May 17, 2011

Jon Leibowitz, Chairman
Federal Trade Commission
600 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20580

Dear Chairman Leibowitz:

We write today to request the Commission begin an investigation into potential price fixing of gasoline by U.S. refiners. Recent reports have indicated that U.S. refiners are cutting back on U.S. gasoline stockpiles in order to artificially keep prices high and inflate their bottom line. If true, this behavior is a direct affront to the American people who are still struggling with the economic downturn. It is currently within the Federal Trade Commission's (Commission) authority to review these allegations for any potential wrongdoing and to determine the impact these actions may have on gasoline prices both regionally and throughout the country.

The rise in the price of oil is certainly a driving factor behind the recent rise in gasoline prices, but concerns have been raised that while gasoline use is declining, U.S. gasoline inventories remain below average and refining margins continue to rise. According to information posted by the Energy Information Administration U.S. refiners are using only 81.7 percent of their capacity, a decline of 7 percent from the same time last year. Moreover, since the beginning of 2011 U.S. refiners have seen over a ninety percent increase in their refining margins. While some have argued that this increase is due to potential impacts from recent flooding along the Mississippi River, this cannot justify the steady increases in their margins since January of this year.

At a time when major refiners and oil companies are making record profits and American families continue to struggle with gasoline at record prices the idea that refiners may be manipulating the market to keep prices artificially high goes beyond reproach. It is incumbent upon the Commission to ensure that the American people are protected from this type of manipulation. Accordingly, we request that the Commission open a full investigation into these allegations of wrongdoing and to determine the impact this behavior, if confirmed, has on regional and national gasoline prices.

Thank you for your consideration of our request. Should you have any questions about please feel free to contact Senator McCaskill's office at 202-224-6154. We look forward to hearing from you.

Sincerely,

Senator Claire McCaskill
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid
Senator Charles E. Schumer
Senator Patty Murray

UPDATE: Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) has signed on to the letter as well, according to a leadership aide.

Lucia Graves contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- Keeping the spotlight on the high prices at the pump, Senate Democratic leadership has sent a letter to the Federal Trade Commission requesting an investigation into whether oil companie...
WASHINGTON -- Keeping the spotlight on the high prices at the pump, Senate Democratic leadership has sent a letter to the Federal Trade Commission requesting an investigation into whether oil companie...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,407
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (34 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Alicia Westberry
college student & Wordpress blog/ website owner
09:59 AM on 05/21/2011
I wouldn't be surprised if price fixing was happening. I just hope that it can be resolved. I'm not holding out much hope for that; though.
03:56 PM on 05/20/2011
A number of pundits have argued for higher gasoline for decades as a way to encourage people to move into smaller more efficient cars and reduce driving....now that we have higher gas prices they want lower ones. If prices stay up, the government will be able to cut back on the $7500 credits for electric cars and ethanol subsidies. It may be a blessing in disguise.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ken Tabor
05:30 PM on 05/19/2011
Don't hold you're breath,while you wait for anyone on the hill to accomplish anything that will really reduce the price at the pump.All these politco's (congress ,senate,representatives,) are all bedfellows with the "oil" groups.We know it they, know it, the whole world know's it.This is just another feigned attempt at trying to "pretend" to do something while the lot of them "backdoor " us.I for one am sick to death of hearing all this hocus-pocus, mumbo-jumbo that the powers that be put on display. The taxes on a gallon of gas is some 30-40 cents. If they were really serious about cutting the cost's for the consumers they would drop that tax immediatly. You sure don't hear them doing that ,now do you?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
conchop
logic ethics quality
02:55 PM on 05/19/2011
I am in the "sustainability" business and I study a lot of these things. We are now past peak oil and peak coal production. Lots of fossil fuel money is being spent on the possible winners of any election - DEM or GOP. They want to get all the possible profit from their investment, which is normal business. Nobody wants to leave money "on the table". Therefore, they buy any politician they can, anywhere they can. Every dollar they can make due to speculating against instability in the middle east or the Appalachian coal field will be made. Its a science.

There is very little that the average person can do when they are committed to an "unsustainable lifestyle". Everyone in the USA uses and average of 21 pounds of coal per day. The fossil fuel industry is going to be around for some time to come and they will do everything they can to avoid the yoke of regulation. They will do everything they can to maximize their profits. They will allow a certain amount of alternative energy in until they figure out a way to dominate in that "new fangled" alternative energy.

Your individual, household, or governmental suffering means nothing to the fossil fuel industry. They're selling every bit of it that they can get to the surface. They're making money, which to the eye on the dollar bill means they're doing it right!

If you don't like their product or business practices, go buy your energy elsewhere.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sean777
08:20 PM on 05/18/2011
For the 2012 elections just remember that most petroleum businesses are owned by Republicans (e.g., Bush and Cheney)
08:59 AM on 05/19/2011
For the 2012 elections just remember that Jeff Imelt and GE are "ALL IN" on Obama's Green Energy initiative. NO DOUBT GE has received many "subsidies" for Green Energy development. GE has paid ZERO..........ZERO.......... in income TAXES!!!

In 2008 the oil industry paid 92 BILLION in income, excise and other levies........92 BILLION.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sean777
10:04 AM on 05/19/2011
But GE products and services are not speculated as gas prices are by the Republican run oil companies.
01:48 PM on 05/18/2011
In response to out of control oil prices in 2008 Bush announced he would open up off shore areas and ANWAR to drilling. The world believed Bush would move forward with these drilling policies and oil prices dropped from $147 to $30.

Obama walked into the WHite House and quickly pandered to his environmental left wing base and REVERSED these policies making oil more expensive. Oil has DOUBLED in price since Obama took office, with NO END IN SIGHT.

For Obama high oil prices worked hand in hand with his push for green energy.

The liberal left once touted Spain's green energy initiative as a model for the world. Spain has figured out green jobs COST the economy 2.5 jobs for every green job created and have abandoned their green energy initiative, once the toast of the liberal left.

With $4.00 gas poised to stall what meager "recovery" there is Obama's energy polices are COMING HOME TO ROOST and hurting his chances of re-election.
Obama has just announced....very QUIETLY.......a very timid DRILL MAYBE DRILL policy to open up increased drilling. Oil prices have dropped $20 in just one week. IMAGINE what woud happen if the WORLD BELIEVED Obama was serious about drilling and not just BLUFFING to lower gas prices in time for his re-election campaign!!!
photo
mpilkanis
Attitude Adjustments Done Here
08:19 PM on 05/18/2011
Wall St. speculation is the primary factor driving oil prices now. Furthermore, this rampant speculation is having a major impact on other prices domestically and will contribute to further contraction of the economy. The price swing you mention has nothing to do with Bush's symbolic lifting of the ban in question because Congress already had a moratorium in place. The price change then was due to far less demand because of high gas prices and deteriorating global economic conditions. What is far more significant is the fact that the price per barrell rose as high as it did SOLELY during the Bush administration. During Clinton's two terms oil was never as high as it was during your misbegotten Cheney/Bush regime. The same cycle will repeat.

Your simplistic post outs you as a Faux News viewer.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
treadway123
treadway123
12:05 AM on 05/19/2011
Thats why you only have 26 fans, you try to do a Fox spin! Exon admitted that it probally cost $30. a Barrel Right now to produce/cost etc. This is done by speculations/Republicans who want to keep the Gas price's soaring for the 2012 Elections. Other wise they would have already investigated/brought aligation charges against them! NO Demacrate will get past the GOP line of Fire they put up to control this!
09:05 AM on 05/19/2011
mp.............. Economic numbers LAG by as much as THREE MONTHS. Oil prices FELL OFF A CLIFF from $147 to $30.

I do not deny a slowing economy impacted oil prices but Bush's announcement he was opening drilling had an IMMEDIATE IMPACT on oil prices steep drop.

The economy dragged oil prices down.......Bush's announcement pushed oil prices down....................as Obama's RECENT DRILL MAYBE DRILL call has so amply demonstrated................$20 in one week. .........and most of the world does not take his calls for increased drilling seriously.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ejfreeman
10:38 AM on 05/18/2011
Theater Theater Theater BS BS BS
07:47 AM on 05/18/2011
BREAKING NEWS

The Senate has just concluded the 75th annual hearing on price gouging by Big Bad Oil.

They forgot the results of the last 74. Sheeeeesh!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
treadway123
treadway123
12:07 AM on 05/19/2011
You mean the Republican Controled Congress has done 74 hearing on this, an won't let NO gouging alligations go through them, don't ya?
06:23 AM on 05/19/2011
I think you will find out that it is a bipartisan committee of self-seeking politicians. You might remember, if you have any memory at all, that our esteemed Democratic President called for the 74th.
05:46 AM on 05/18/2011
T. Boone Pickens plan is the answer.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nick Lyons
ENDTHEFED
03:07 AM on 05/18/2011
I think Rand Paul as the right idea

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xCzhjbzrTpA
photo
hewhowaits
If ignorance is bliss, you must be very happy.
03:06 AM on 05/18/2011
Investigate,and then do nothing.."We found no evidence of wrongdoing". Same old BS.
04:38 PM on 05/18/2011
I remember the mom and pop gas stations when I was a kid. There was a lot of competetion between gas stations (it was during the embargo) and if somebody put the price 2 cents lower their livelyhood was in danger! The larger companies certainly had the upper hand and dealt the blow that kept the mom and pop places going out of business. Price fixing went on then and still does on a much larger scale.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jahsmah
Freelance writer, MAT student, mom, and wife
02:57 AM on 05/18/2011
I have nothing relevant to say on this story, but that picture reminds me of my parents fussing me out for something...my mom would do all the talking and my dad would just stand there seething because he had to listen to her fuss at me, so I got in trouble twice! lol
07:48 AM on 05/18/2011
You noticed. But really, would you want that couple as Mom and Dad?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jahsmah
Freelance writer, MAT student, mom, and wife
03:01 PM on 05/18/2011
lol nope!
photo
irochfpst
no right turn
12:57 AM on 05/18/2011
yes, let's go after the refineries because that is where the real problem lies. they seem to be intentionally controlling the supply and hiding behind the claim they can't keep up with demand.
07:49 AM on 05/18/2011
Or the last several Administrations that have denied permits to build new ones?
RTIII
Poster of over 0.0135% of all HufPost comments
09:40 AM on 05/18/2011
I don't believe that - links?
04:41 PM on 05/18/2011
I drove across this great nation of ours last year and from the Pacific to the Atlantic I saw at least 500+ oil pumpers and wells. (my kids counted them). Not sure what to think but are we keeping a supply handy for the day when we say bye bye to the Arab oil?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gaspar Ramsey
Licensed Curmudgeon, Hammer of Reason
12:49 AM on 05/18/2011
Exxon Mobil (the Mobil is silent) is so top-heavy with management, each layer more lavishly rewarded, that it is impossible for the Company, as we called it, to develop any new business that does not produce a profit of at least $100 million in its first year. The development money that Exxon (Mobil) gets from gov.com covers little mini-projects run by Post-Docs, and every once in a while produces something worth having. If we taxed Exxon (Mbbl) more judiciously, we could fund an equal amount in Academia. Maybe somebody could get us out of this mess the short-sighted have got us into.
07:50 AM on 05/18/2011
We tried that with Chu and you are pleased with the results? I think not!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dave Harpe
Was young, now old.
12:13 AM on 05/18/2011
The answer in this "free market" world is that, by now there should have been a lot of cars that run on something other than the products of these greedy oil companies, and there should have been a lot more high quality public transportation, like they have in Europe. There was an attempt to make this happen in the 70s, but it was killed by guess who. They can't stand competition, but that would be a big part of the answer to this problem.