More

LinkedIn IPO Price Jump Ups Value To Over $4 Billion

MICHAEL LIEDTKE   05/17/11 05:55 PM ET   AP

Linkedin Ipo

SAN FRANCISCO — Investors are clamoring to connect with the online networking service LinkedIn Corp. in the latest sign of the fervor for Internet companies that specialize in bringing together people with common interests.

The demand to buy a piece of LinkedIn is so intense that the 8-year-old company is expected to make its stock market debut Thursday with a value of at least $4 billion. That would make LinkedIn's initial public offering of stock the biggest by a U.S. Internet company since Google Inc. went public in 2004, according to the research firm Renaissance Capital.

The appetite for LinkedIn's IPO encouraged the company's bankers to raise the asking price by about 30 percent Tuesday to $42 to $45 per share. It won't be surprising if the IPO is priced even higher Wednesday evening and then sells for more than that Thursday morning when they are expected to begin trading on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol "LNKD."

The IPO is expected to raise about $200 million for LinkedIn and produce $125 million to $135 million for existing stockholders, who plan to sell some of their shares. The biggest winner will be LinkedIn's co-founder and chairman, Reid Hoffman, whose 20 percent stake in the company will be worth more than $800 million.

The coming-out party on Wall Street for LinkedIn, which focuses on connecting professionals online, could be the prelude to even more excitement if several popular Internet companies decide to go public during the next year. The list of candidates includes the online messaging service Twitter, online game maker Zynga, online coupon service Groupon and the biggest social network of all, Facebook.

"LinkedIn will be used very heavily as a modeling tool for other companies in this space," predicted David Menlow, founder of research firm IPO Financial. "The pricing is going to have a dramatic effect. This is just the starting point for valuation adjustments."

Facebook is the most prized among the Internet companies still awaiting an IPO. It was valued at $50 billion as part of an investment organized in January by Goldman Sachs Group Inc., a major shareholder in LinkedIn. If Goldman Sachs follows through on its plan to sell its entire LinkedIn stake in the upcoming IPO, the bank would receive about $38 million at the mid-point of the targeted price range.

LinkedIn, based just down the street from Google's Mountain View, Calif. headquarters, has become profitable by building a website that acts both as a Rolodex and a hiring center.

People set up LinkedIn accounts to post the resume on a page and connect with current and past colleagues. LinkedIn members can then ask the people they know to introduce them to other connections that might help further their careers.

Although not nearly as popular as hanging out on Facebook, LinkedIn has emerged as a widely used directory. Through March, it had 102 million members and is adding another million each week.

The company gets about two-thirds of its revenue from fees that it charges for greater access to the website and more data about the expertise listed on each member's page. Businesses and job headhunters use LinkedIn to recruit people who might not even be looking for a job at the time. LinkedIn also has made money from business surveys of its members and a service that offer career advice to college graduates.

The rest of LinkedIn's revenue comes from Internet ads, which serve as the financial backbone for Google, Facebook and many other Internet companies.

The lofty appraisals being given LinkedIn and other online networking companies have raised worries of an investment meltdown if the businesses don't turn out to be as successful as enthusiastic investors anticipated.

That is what happened in the late 1990s when hundreds of unprofitable Internet companies attracted billions in venture capital and then went public to much fanfare. That led to a devastating collapse that still haunts Internet investors.

The big difference this time is that the current Internet darlings haven't rushed to the public markets. Instead, they are waiting until they have developed ways to make money while amassing massive audiences.

"These are serious businesses with huge global market opportunities ahead of them," said John O'Farrell, a partner with Andreessen Horowitz, a venture capital firm that owns stakes in Facebook, Twitter, Zynga and Groupon. "To an uninformed person, the valuations may look like a bubble, but we believe they will in fact prove to be very low valuations."

Last year, LinkedIn earned $3.4 million on revenue of $243 million. Its growth accelerated during the first three months of 2011, putting it on a pace to generate $500 million in revenue this year. Management, though, has warned that the company might lose money this year as it invests in more products and more computers to run its website as it tries to ward off competitive threats overseas.

If LinkedIn's IPO is priced at the mid-range target of $43.50 per share, the company would have a market value of $4.1 billion – about 17 times its 2010 revenue. By comparison, Google's current market value of $170 billion is less than six times its revenue last year. When Google went public, though, its market value of $24 billion was 16 times higher than its revenue from the previous year.

___

AP Business Writer Tali Arbel in New York contributed to this story.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

Filed by Catharine Smith  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 34
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
12:48 PM on 05/19/2011
.LinkedIn’s founder is now a billionaire. Will he be like Jim Cayne, who held his Bear Stearns stock and lost $1 billion, or like Alan Greenberg, who consistently diversified once his stock at Stearns could be sold? Moreover, the extent of expectations involved in LinkedIn’s stock trading at 540 times its 2010 profit is itself worthy of note to the wise and prudent investor. Whether the social media companies are in a bubble or not, the extent to which expectations are involved is itself a reason to invest lightly within a well-diversified portfolio. For more, please turn to my essay at … http://t.co/yhVOScw
.
photo
Peter Combs
Amused by the illogical..no, NOT a Republican
10:31 AM on 05/19/2011
Opened this morning at 8 Billion, double fomr the time this article was written this morning, despite announcing a lower revenue from the 243 Million published here...down to 163 Million and a loss against earnings...and they announced revenues could grow to 500 Million next year and will still be unprofitable.

8 Billion?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
blurredmolly
Was you ever bit by a dead bee?
09:17 AM on 05/19/2011
Another bubble.
05:49 AM on 05/19/2011
And oh yes, I forgot about the spammers on LinkedIn. First headhunters and employment agencies; then spammers.

Being accepted as a connection on LinkedIn does not give permission to spam -- email marketing without permission and cluttering group discussions with uninvited solicitations.
05:44 AM on 05/19/2011
LinkedIn is being ruined by headhunters and employment agencies: uninvited guests who look over your home and move in uninvited to stalk your guests.

First job boards, soon to hit the obsolescence heap because of their activities; next LinkedIn.
photo
stape45
Spin this!
03:01 AM on 05/19/2011
Yet another bubble?
photo
OutAtFirst
Believe it! You don't know how to text and drive
10:41 PM on 05/18/2011
Sucker bet. This one will fade in less than five years.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jwilson1
09:10 PM on 05/18/2011
This one will fall...no Jobs just panic
ThePeacemakers
Concerned Citizen
07:35 PM on 05/18/2011
Tech bubble?
Maybe it should be called an advertising bubble.
ThePeacemakers
Concerned Citizen
07:28 PM on 05/18/2011
"The rest of LinkedIn's revenue comes from Internet ads, which serve as the financial backbone for Google, Facebook and many other Internet companies."

This gets more and more interesting. These companies will need the companies that are advertising goods to continue to sell even more of their goods to continue all the advertising and/or these companies advertising goods could also become internet companies that depend on advertising for revenue.

Or it's internet advertising revenue companies advertising with other sites that depend on advertising...

hehehehehehehe
photo
Peter Combs
Amused by the illogical..no, NOT a Republican
07:01 PM on 05/18/2011
Does it make any money? Does it have a profit?

What is its anticipated Growth? How much did it grow in the last four quarters?
05:50 AM on 05/19/2011
Don't think you read the article.
photo
Peter Combs
Amused by the illogical..no, NOT a Republican
10:29 AM on 05/19/2011
I saw that it made 3.4 Million but had a loss according the the Chairman this morning.

They also lowered the revenues since this article to 160 million from 243 as was printed here.

The reality is , it has no net profit, peanuts for revenue and no potential for positive earnings for several years..... these numbers are terrible and in no way justify an IPO now at 8 Billion.

When I said does it have any earnings, i was talking about NET profits...not raw earnings.

I should have been more specific.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JackHoffman
Pundit
04:45 PM on 05/18/2011
Kudos to Linkedn founders and early investors for this beautiful stock play. Nice cash out. Wish I had been in on it. I'm jealous.
05:52 AM on 05/19/2011
You are right. Nice cash out. Probaly impossible to get one's hands on some IPO stock.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
abuckley23
Visit me at Planet Kibi!! Google it!
01:42 PM on 05/18/2011
It won't last. While there's definitely a hefty shelf life for social networking the individual components of social networking will come and go.
01:39 PM on 05/18/2011
The wall street pundits may be claiming that there is not a tech bubble inflating but from the street it sure seems that way. There is way too much money in too few hands that wants to get richer quicker to avoid another mess.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jsgaetano
Semper Fidelis Tyrannosaurus!
12:20 PM on 05/18/2011
As if we needed another reminder that the US stock market is still based on a foundation of crap.