iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Teachers Union, NAACP Sue New York City Education Officials Over School Closures

Michael Mulgrew

First Posted: 05/18/11 07:52 PM ET Updated: 07/18/11 06:12 AM ET

NEW YORK -- The battle between New York City's teachers union and its school officials reached its latest crescendo in the form of a lawsuit Wednesday.

The United Federation of Teachers, joined by the NAACP and several public officials, filed suit against the New York City Department of Education on Wednesday in attempt to halt the city's closure of 22 schools and to prevent charter schools from using space in buildings that house public schools.

Newly-installed New York City Schools Chancellor Dennis Walcott had fighting words for his plan's assailants. "Right now the UFT and the NAACP are denying our students quality options," he said at a press conference Wednesday.

Walcott added the suit "outraged" him, because as he sees it, the UFT and the NAACP are using it to keep failing schools open. He promised to fight "tooth and nail" in court.

New York City schools comprise the country's largest school district. Wednesday's suit targets efforts to close low-performing schools and share spaces of public schools with charter schools, two of the city's marquee reform initiatives that echo components of broader education policy issues on a national level. The U.S. Department of Education, under Education Secretary Arne Duncan and the Obama administration, emphasizes a choice between public and charter schools and an increased focus on low-performing schools.

Last year, the UFT filed a similar suit that successfully kept 19 New York City schools open. The union won that case on the basis of the DOE's failure to satisfy regulations agreed upon in 2009 as a modifier to legislation that gave Mayor Michael Bloomberg continued control of the city's schools.

A settlement required the DOE to support the schools the UFT saved, committing the city to working on improving their performance instead of closing them. This year's suit alleges that the DOE did not provide those resources, instead deciding to move forward with more closures.

"Clearly the Department of Education has not learned its lesson," UFT President Michael Mulgrew said at a press conference Wednesday.

Since the city's loss in court last year, Walcott said New York has worked "in full compliance" with the law. "What they're trying to do is protect adults with disregard to our students," he said of the new suit.

Though Walcott says he and Mulgrew have a good working relationship, the lawsuit drives yet another wedge between the union and school leaders.

In light of looming teacher layoffs, Bloomberg has been lobbying to end the practice of firing the most recently-hired teachers first, a tightly held union right. Disagreements also recently plagued the negotiation of the details of agreements the UFT and city reached to help secure federal Race to the Top funds.

And earlier this week, the umbrella organization that encompasses New York State's teachers unions said it would consider suing the state after the Board of Regents voted to enact teacher evaluations that tie student performance on state tests to performance reviews.

Last year, State Senator Bill Perkins (D-Harlem) signed on to the union's suit. He did the same this year because "it's a question of educational justice," he said. "The city seems to be closing schools with an agenda to replace them, in some cases, with charter schools and not providing schools with the opportunity to improve," he told The Huffington Post.

This time around, UFT and NAACP allege that the DOE did not fulfill its promise to support those schools before closing them and did not abide by a law that required them to specify the logistics of all space-sharing arrangements and seek the state education commissioner's approval before deciding to close several schools.

The UFT and NAACP, according to the suit, condemn what they call the DOE's:

dogmatic effort to ... short-circuit community participation in school governance, (ii) evade its responsibility to assist struggling schools before summarily seeking their closure often to improperly make way for charter schools, and (iii) co-locate other favored programs without regard to squeezing out the students in "traditional" public schools from any fair allocation of school resources.

Walcott responded first with a harshly-worded statement and then by appearing at a press conference with parents and principals of the charter schools whose space assignments the lawsuit seeks to block.

"We totally disagree with the union," he said. He declined to address specific complaints, saying that he was cautious because the suit named him as a defendant. "We'll be filing our papers once we see their exact papers. ... We have definitely lived up to our agreement as far as supporting these schools."

Walcott condemned the timing of the suit, saying that it throws the students already registered to attend the targeted charter schools into confusion. "It is something that boggles my mind," he said. "It is outrageous for them ... to hold hostage 70,000 students."

Eric Nadelstern, a former deputy chancellor in the New York City Department of Education, said it's just politics.

"From the UFT's perspective, they're engaged in a war," he said. "When the other side fires on you, you fire back. This is their effort to do that."

But to Ken Cohen, regional director of New York State Conference of the NAACP, it's a matter of equity. "The NAACP has worked feverishly to serve the children of New York City," he said in a statement. "With the focus on education reform we find there has been a rush to judge and condemn schools and not enough effort to provide the quality education that the original case sought."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST EDUCATION

NEW YORK -- The battle between New York City's teachers union and its school officials reached its latest crescendo in the form of a lawsuit Wednesday. The United Federation of Teachers, joined by ...
NEW YORK -- The battle between New York City's teachers union and its school officials reached its latest crescendo in the form of a lawsuit Wednesday. The United Federation of Teachers, joined by ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 297
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (5 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:19 PM on 06/18/2011
Time to stop complaining and start contributing more to your own enhanced benefits.
09:48 AM on 05/20/2011
Just how much more money are we (taxpayers) supposed to shell out to a failing education system. Teacher's shouldn't even be in a union. Where does all the money go anyway?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DanInLA
10:58 AM on 05/20/2011
It's all public record. You should do your homework instead of asking someone else to do it for you.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:36 PM on 05/20/2011
From http://www.counterpunch.org/macaray03202009.html:

"In Georgia, where 92.5% of the teachers are non-union, only 0.5% of tenured/post-probationary teachers get fired. In South Carolina, where 100% of the teachers are non-union, it’s 0.32%. And in North Carolina, where 97.7% are non-union, a miniscule .03% of tenured/post-probationary teachers get fired—the exact same percentage as California.

An even more startling comparison: In California, with its “powerful” teachers’ union, school administrators fire, on average, 6.91% of its probationary teachers. In non-union North Carolina, that figure is only 1.38%. California is actually tougher on prospective candidates."
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Youcantstandthetruth
03:07 PM on 05/20/2011
NC is currently 46th is student expenditure and getting ready to go up to 50th.

I know of teachers who were told they would be fired if they made the public aware of the the mold in their school. They have no recourse.
12:22 AM on 05/20/2011
Their are solutions. But of course the unions won't accept pay cuts so they just watch the schools close and then cry foul. But the union bosses keep getting paid. Supposedly these union teachers are educated. How long will it take before they figure out they're just being used like a cheap date? Probably as long as it's taking the minorities to figure out that the dems are their real problem not the GOP. So Sad!!!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DanInLA
10:57 AM on 05/20/2011
The proposed solutions have no record of being any better than what is already in place.
01:54 PM on 05/20/2011
So with the price of food, gas, healthcare payments, taxes going up and up, union members should take a pay cut. Love the logic keep on reading the post!
11:03 PM on 05/19/2011
Evidently they would rather keep the status quo.. but is that a suprise
10:33 PM on 05/19/2011
The union's have lost most of their control in the past 15 years in NYC, with Giuliani and then Bloomberg dictating the educational rules and curriculum. are there some bad or burnt out teachers? Yes as in any workforce of 70,000. But in the unions defense, they have made it easier to get rid of them (3 years of "u's" with a cost). I will agree that for far too many years tenure was given out for a teachers attendance record. But don't lay the blame only on the union for that as the CSA and city judges or arbitrators have an equal role there. But that seems to be a thing of the past which I think is is a promising beginning (but the City had a history of abusing this).

Now back to the original topic. As a teacher, everything is about accountability (I suspect with all the no-bid contracts given out it is more economic). Teachers are restricted in so many ways as to methodology, lessons are scripted with little wiggle room to develop a creative lesson (especially in ELA and math). The books that are read are forced down teachers throats, and they often have NO REAL meaning to who a inner city poverty student is experiencing.

Add to the mix the disciplinary state of the schools. Children that disrupt classes (maybe they are bored, but still have no right to stop others) come to school completely unready and ready to push their limits or power
09:14 PM on 05/19/2011
How have the NY schools planning with the students and families in mind. They weren;t not given any real options (transfer to a higher performing school etc) prior to the school being close.

Nope its just time for the lackluster untested anybody's charter (Translation--- cheaper to run school for brown and black kids) to take root. Its he New York School leadership that sucks, remember Cathy Black. Rise up people like we did in DC and fire their mayor and school chief. Vote the bums out for good.
10:38 PM on 05/19/2011
Why,oh why, can't these parents be satisfied with their kids' failure ? It's almost as if-despite ample coaching to the contrary-they feel the public school teachers are doing well for themselves,but poorly for their students.
been2there
Facts have a liberal bias.
10:01 PM on 05/20/2011
Teachers teach; students learn. Show me a student who is listening in class and doing his/her best on the work, and I will show you a student who is learning.
How many parents enforce the student part of the equation? My children had a rough time in school, especially my autistic daughter. I sat beside her on more than one occasion and ended up home schooling. I never saw another parent work as hard with a child as I did, and I saw my daughter's education FUBARed by other students' misbehavior. It takes all of us.
08:57 PM on 05/19/2011
I agree. Unions SUCK!
photo
libobstruction
Am I my brothers keeper...NO, I am not
07:04 PM on 05/19/2011
Unions suck.
09:24 PM on 05/19/2011
I meant to say that it is the NY School leadership that sucks. Parents represented by the NAACP want quality education for their children not the constant churn of supposed education reform. This BS doesn't go down in schools that are educating majority group children... So be honest and fair...if you can.
photo
hypnotoad72
Real democracy = living wages.
05:25 PM on 05/21/2011
Then give up your middle class status.  Unions fought and died to brings it to people.

I'm sure a 40¢/hr job, with no benefits, is something you really want - after all, that will help your company's owner ensure an even higher profit margin, salary, and bonus.  Thanks to you sacrificing your livelihood and dignity just for him.
06:46 PM on 05/19/2011
This has nothing to do with educating children. It has everything to do with preserving the "UNION WAY". The unions do not care about the students, they only care about themselves. This is not just in NY but across the country. We have allowed these people to control education & then we have to listen to them complain about lack of funding. Once again you can credit our incompetent politicians for spending our money & getting an inferior return on our investment. The really bad part of this is it hurts our children & the great majority of teachers who try to do a good job.
06:02 PM on 05/19/2011
In general, ive noticed that the reason families pursue charters- to get away from the more problematic and poorly behaved kids who stop the others from learning.Charters wont keep or admit such kids . Teachers in public schools in new york tend to be very good.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:28 PM on 05/19/2011
The statistics on NY teachers do little to back your statement of them being good.
07:18 AM on 05/20/2011
the statistics show many kids with low reading and math scores,and this is correlated to income in nyc. and its not because the better teachers are in the more well off neighborhoods. Poorer kids, esl kids come to school with so much less, and they need more support. The constant testing only makes it worse for them, because the teachers feel they cannot go back to a lower curriculum even if thats where the children are it. Heterogenous grouping is another failure for same reason.
09:42 PM on 05/23/2011
I teach at a charter school and I am constantly faced with this misconception from friends and family. The kids are not pre-screened, it is a blind lottery generated from a computer. Everyone stays, unless they are withdrawn by their families, which does happen. You may not expel a child, at least at the elementary level. Believe me, it has come up. My children are no angels. They started the year as new students, far below level in most cases, and many with extreme behavioral issues, and we watched them crawl up one, two, even three grade levels. The behavior has not developed as rapidly, however.
Most of my kindergartners are writing full paragraphs and reading at a second grade level. Still throwing violent tantrums and cursing, however.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:33 PM on 05/19/2011
It should be pointed out time and again that Wolcott is not qualified to be in the position that he holds.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Max Shaw
My micro-bio is no longer empty.
02:47 PM on 05/19/2011
Maybe if Bloomentard re-routed some money from pointless aims such as the 75 million spent on marijuana posession arrests and prosecution, then not so many--if any--schools would need to be closed or overcrowded. Not to mention a large portion of that money can be spent on hiring well-qualified teachers, offering incentives to ones with proven track records to stay onboard and for overall better resources for our children.

We can also lose the six-figure income for certain adminstrative positions in so many school districts which are complete unecessary..

Its disgusting how much money is wasted on pointless projects and thrown away on nothing important..

Does anyone care about our kids? Or are we hoping they will all grow up to be completely illiterate with no hope of a brighter future??

Getting rid of Cathy Black was a great first step..but now we need to concentrate a lot of our energy on figuring out ways to not lay off so many teachers (nearly 3000) and closing so many schools (dozens)...Its a shame that our mayor thinks this is an area of our government that can slashed and burned..sickens me.
03:15 PM on 05/19/2011
The second step is to get ride of mayoral control of schools. No matter who is chancellor, he makes the decisions.
01:30 PM on 05/19/2011
This lawsuit is typical Union tactics - it is our way or the highway. Why else would the teachers union fight the installaion of a Charter School? Does the union feel threatened that people will actually have something else to compare to their low standards of educating our kids. Having competition strikes at the core of any union...they lack control of everything by people having a choice. Our education system is flawed and some of the blame has to be put squarely on the union, as they are demonstrating now. Charter schools may not be the best answer, but competition is and quality is...why are we forced to educate as dictated by union implemented standards....our quality is down based on union membership.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kamster
I'll be nicer when you're smarter.
02:29 PM on 05/19/2011
What about the children that the schools were servicing? Realize that charter schools pick and keep students at their discretion, something a public school may not do. With every public school closing and charter school opening, the number of seats lost is not being restored and the children ultimately pay the price.
09:20 PM on 05/19/2011
What about the children who want to learn but are unable to because of other students? Where do they go? They are the ones paying the price in inferior learning environments.I was relieved my son's zoned school, Franklin K. Lane, was closed. I wasted 4 years of my life there.
08:59 AM on 05/20/2011
Charter schools do not pick students at their discretion, they do keep students at their discretion. It may seem minor but it is an important fact, bolster your arguments by using facts not FUD.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kamster
I'll be nicer when you're smarter.
02:44 PM on 05/19/2011
Yes exactly! And all the parents who came to protest the closures were also only for the unions. They did not come out to protest and voice anger over their kids losing schools, no not at all, they came out to keep the corrupted union, which bankrupted this country, in power...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DanInLA
11:00 AM on 05/20/2011
Are you being sarcastic?
12:42 PM on 05/19/2011
It's just crazy how much they get paid and they want more.
photo
maninal2
Without knowledge action is useless
03:06 PM on 05/19/2011
I agree. Bloomberg makes way too much.
photo
hypnotoad72
Real democracy = living wages.
05:26 PM on 05/21/2011
F&F
photo
peterhenry
We have met the enemy and he is us --- Pogo
09:14 PM on 05/19/2011
Well, the article doesn't discuss salary. And teachers must really be overpaid since over half of starting teachers leave within the first 5 years.
08:14 AM on 05/20/2011
haha good retorts- i guess there is such jealousy that people go nuts. After all, they have jobs in which they are indiscriminately fired, have poor pension plans, etc Yet, they are angry at the people in the unions, instead of their own employers.Also, Its funny how years ago,there was a real support for raising the minimum wage- we see that no more.Our middle class is becoming less 'middle class', while the rich get ridiculously richer, and it anint trickling down! thats a fallacy- it wont happen)
been2there
Facts have a liberal bias.
11:00 AM on 05/19/2011
It is about time that people began fighting the trend of making teaching progessively more impossible, and then using the results to justify killing education.