iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Obama's Middle East Speech: Religious Leaders Respond

Mohamed Magid Isna

First Posted: 05/19/11 05:03 PM ET Updated: 07/19/11 06:12 AM ET

Religious leaders are responding to President Barack Obama's ‬much-anticipated speech on the Middle East, in which the president said that "all faiths must be respected" and suggested "bridges be built among them.‬"

Much of the sweeping speech addressed political and economic issues in light of recent democratic movements in the majority-Muslim region. Obama promised U.S. support for democracy, human rights and a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.

But Obama, who famously addressed the Muslim world from Cairo University in two years ago in a speech focused on Islam, also discussed religion several times in Thursday's comments.

"We support a set of universal rights. Those rights include free speech; the freedom of peaceful assembly; freedom of religion; equality for men and women under the rule of law; and the right to choose your own leaders -- whether you live in Baghdad or Damascus; Sanaa or Tehran," Obama said in the hour-long speech.

"It was very important for the president to call for the respect of religious minorities who are not Muslim. For me, as an imam, I'd like to see the [Muslim] community respond and take action to that," said Imam Mohamed Magid, president of the Islamic Society of North America, who attended the speech in Washington, D.C.

In recent months, the plight of religious minorities in majority Muslim countries has made international headlines.

"I think his message was to the American Muslim Community, too. Religious tolerance and respect of women has to be the top priority of any democracy," said Magid.

"Coptic Christians must have the right to worship freely in Cairo, just as Shia must never have their mosques destroyed in Bahrain," Obama said.

The Rev. Timotheus Soliman, a Coptic Christian priest in Miramar, Fl., said Obama made similar statements about religious tolerance in his Cairo speech that "went unnoticed."

"Didn't he talk about the Copts last time? There is a lot to pray for and things haven't gotten better back home," he said.

Obama's remarks on religion were significantly less pointed than those in his 2009 speech, when he said wanted to "seek a new beginning between the United States and Muslims around the world."

Eboo Patel, president of Chicago-based nonprofit Interfaith Youth Core, said he was "struck by Obama's comments on the tremendous resource represented by young people in the region, and how what we are witnessing over there traces the arc of American history, from revolution to sectarian conflict to the spreading of freedom and equality."

"Just as young people pushed for universal values here and built bridges of cooperation between different communities, so are they doing that there. That presents great opportunities for partnership," said Patel.

What will likely be the most controversial part of Obama's speech was his call for a restoration of pre-1967 borders between Israel and the Palestinian Territories, a significant shift in U.S. policy.

‪Reaction to the speech from Jewish leaders varied.

"I was most struck by the President's assertion that we don't need to accept how things are, but can work toward how they could be - with humility," said Rabbi Brad Hirschfield, president of The National Jewish Center for Learning and Leadership. "While I am not sure that such humility about the role of history and indigenous culture was a part of all that he suggested we could achieve or help others to achieve, I appreciate the President's commitment to what I would call hopeful realism."

Abraham H. Foxman, Anti-Defamation League national director, released a statement applauding Obama's support for "universal rights" and opposition to " the use of force and political repression."

Foxman also directly addressed Obama's comments on Israel and Palestine, saying, "The Palestinians must heed the President's warnings about imprudent and self-defeating actions."

"The economic reforms and economic modernization as proposed by President Obama cannot succeed without religious and cultural reforms in the Arab World," said Rabbi Marc Schneier, president of The Foundation for Ethnic Understanding. "Muslims must choose between moderation and militancy, tolerance and terrorism."

Obama's speech comes after a poll released this week by the Pew Research Center that foud the United States' popularity has declined within the last year in many Muslim majority nations.

The poll was conducted in March and April, before U.S. forces killed Osama bin Laden on May 2 in northern Pakistan. It surveyed about 1,000 people each in Egypt, Indonesia, Israel, Jordan, Lebanon, the Palestinian Territories and Turkey. Another 2,000 were polled in Pakistan.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST RELIGION

Religious leaders are responding to President Barack Obama's ‬much-anticipated speech on the Middle East, in which the president said that "all faiths must be respected" and suggested "bridges be bu...
Religious leaders are responding to President Barack Obama's ‬much-anticipated speech on the Middle East, in which the president said that "all faiths must be respected" and suggested "bridges be bu...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 998
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (11 total)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
jugglefire
Your ad here!
04:34 PM on 06/08/2011
Jaweed Kaleem writes,"What will likely be the most controversial part of Obama's speech was his call for a restoration of pre-1967 borders between Israel and the Palestinian Territories, a significant shift in U.S. policy".

This is inaccurate in that President Obama hasn't called for a restoration of the pre-1967 borders, he has stated numerous times that those borders should be considered as a starting point when it comes to negotiating a peaceful two state solution to the Israel / Palestine conflict. In addition this is not a significant shift in U.S. policy.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:42 AM on 05/23/2011
Seems like every man and his dog is advising the president on middle east peace (says he after doing exactly the same thing)
06:56 PM on 05/22/2011
I'd say quickest road to peace in the middle east is to hang the theocratic leaders in Persia. The Arabs would relax the money for terrorism would be cut in half everyone wins
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Sallie Fajardo
Blessed is the man that trusts in the Lord.
02:34 PM on 05/22/2011
There's is no peace because people like atheists and muslims want to get rid of any believe they don't agree with.Atheists and Muslims you have the right to continue believing a lie and Christians have the right to continue believing the truth.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MikeWebster
Always happy.
10:31 PM on 05/22/2011
Or vice versa.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:44 AM on 05/23/2011
What about the people of Jewish faith (the majority in Israel), are they believing a lie as well, and what if there is no god at all.
celticfireusa
I Am A Limousine Liberal
12:24 PM on 05/22/2011
There will be peace on earth,when there is peace among the world's reglions.......
06:39 AM on 05/21/2011
I suppose I'm just a dreamer but it seems to me to be redundant that the path to peace is through war and killing. Attempting to force a way of life on peoples of the world who do not want 'our' way of life isn't working and won't work, unless they want the change. Democracy is only democracy if other people of the world embrace the idea.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bellmotor
stand for your rights and justice!
11:11 PM on 05/20/2011
it's time to say YES to peace in middle east and to the change if you believe in and voted for and put this middle east misery behind us for the sake of GOD Blessed USA and the sake of the man kind who was created by GOD to live on the face of earthly planet and for the sake of furture generation to teach and learn how to live peacfully without resorting to the killings of each other regardless of race and to live with dignity and mutual respects towards each other beliefs and rights and a free society in which we live in.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WarriorLemming
An avalanche On Republican's B*llsh*t Mountain
04:54 AM on 05/21/2011
Peace would be great but not if we don't have honest brokers:

Netanyahu boasting about Manipulating America (when he thought the cameras were off)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6TG0vdzrmt4
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:45 AM on 05/23/2011
That's what all religions say but few practice.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:44 PM on 05/20/2011
When a person goes to the emergency room, a nurse triages their needs to determine their priority level to see the doctor. Life threatening injuries are triaged to the top of the priority list for the doctor to see first. Despite the emergency room full of people who have been waiting all day while dealing with people who come after them but see the doctor ahead of them, they understand the process. Some even avoid this process by going to an urgent care office or their primary care doctor. Hence, using an alternative means rather then relying solely on the emergency room doctor. With that being said, President Obama has been in office 2 1/2 years. He must triage by addressing issues that are life and death, such as domestic threats, middle east conflicts which lead to domestic threats and yes healthcare. Everyone wants to know... why hasn't he done something for me, my race, my group, my interest? JFK said it best. "Ask not what your country can do for you, but what can you do for your country." But, that would require actually getting off the computer complaining about what he hasn't done, instead of volunteering with a nonprofit that supports your issues. Oh yea.... then collaborate with others to bring about change. Is this radical social engineering? No...just an idealist.
08:15 PM on 05/20/2011
I already volunteer.
08:17 PM on 05/20/2011
But, yes, I agree that people should do something apart from complaining on internet sites, that's why I do it! :-)
01:43 PM on 05/20/2011
Texas was a republic for 9 years before it voted for annexation to the US. They fought for their independence from Mexico. "Remember the Alamo!" Therefore, the only country we can "give it back" to is the Republic of Texas. Since that country no longer exists it would give the lawyers something to do. He could give back the Southwest states I guess.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Pastori Balele
Graduate degree
01:24 PM on 05/20/2011
I have told you President Obama speaks to both your brains and spirit. His speeches come from his inner spirit. He has this gift to connect his inner spirit with his brains. We have another Kennedy in the White House. Let's prepare for his re-election so that we can enjoy another 4 years of his presidency.
photo
hard2swallovv8
Slow n steady.
06:16 PM on 05/20/2011
He has great speech writers and spin doctors... Nothing more. This man is nothing like JFK in any way, shape, or form. Comparing Obama to Kennedy is an insult to our former President.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Pastori Balele
Graduate degree
04:41 AM on 05/21/2011
President Obama writes his own speeches and knows exactly what he wants to convey to us. I do not believe he depends upon speech writers. I have followed his speeches since he launched his presidential bid in 2008. In fact I heard about Obama well late 1990's. A friend of mine told me about Obama. He said, there was a young African-American man in Chicago who speaks to your heart and soul. I ignored this guy. But when I heard his speech when he was launching his presidential bid in 2008 the words he used were different from other people. You may remember during her campaign what Hillary Clinton characterized Obama's speeches. Clinton said at one time: " How can you compete with this guy (Obama) who starts his speeches in poems and ends in prose." I believe his wife-First Lady Michelle Obama, a lawyer, could be helping edit her husband's speeches. They are great couple.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WarriorLemming
An avalanche On Republican's B*llsh*t Mountain
04:56 AM on 05/21/2011
I agree with you, Pastori Balele, f&f ;)
12:59 PM on 05/20/2011
No doubt the peace loving muslons will fall into lock step with their new spokes person BO. When does Obama anticipate giving Texas back to Mexico,? It was .annexed from mexico as a part of a war. Same difference, to the winner goes the spoils and the opportunity to write history. Perhaps his plan for the Southwest is to just give it back one illegal at a time.
photo
Publicola
Reality has a scientific bias
02:34 PM on 05/20/2011
Your comparison between Texas and West Bank is facile.

Unlike in the West Bank, all native residents of Texas are citizens and can vote.
03:00 PM on 05/20/2011
So true, but being able to vote has not done us much good regarding immigration especially since the Federal government had decided to ignore its own laws. while punishing those who attempt to enforce. The Feds then reward sanctuary cities who are violating Federal law. A bit upside down isn't it?.
photo
Publicola
Reality has a scientific bias
03:40 PM on 05/20/2011
Me: "Your comparison between Texas and West Bank is facile. Unlike in the West Bank, all native residents of Texas are citizens and can vote."

evanrogers: "So true"

So why did you make that facile - and patently misleading - comparison?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TAIsabel
Suffer no fools.
05:37 PM on 05/20/2011
Palestine was invaded and usurped by Eastern European Jews and Zionists. It was not a"spoil of war".
07:14 PM on 05/20/2011
Opinions are divided on whether Israel's attack was an act of aggression or a preemptive strike of a defensive nature.
08:14 AM on 05/21/2011
Right or wrong, War is war, it does not matter who starts it. /this particular story will always have two diistinct stories each side justfying it's actions.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
zwyziec
We've Peaked!
11:57 AM on 05/20/2011
The Zionists, during the first world war, were pressuring the British for a homeland in Palestine. The British wanted to settle them in Uganda. Chaim Weizman, a chemist working in England, invented a high volume production process to produce Acetone. Acetone was used in the manufactur¬e of cordite explosive propellant¬s critical to the Allied war effort. He granted England the rights to the patent in return for England's public support of the Zionist movement for a homeland in Palestine.

The British supported the Zionist movement for a homeland in Palestine in return for the production rights of Acetone and because christian politician¬s like Lloyd George supported the Zionist's claim.

So Israel's homeland in Palestine was the result of a patent rights swap between Weizmann, who later became Israel's first president, and England for the Acetone rights.
01:01 PM on 05/20/2011
Interesting bit of history. Thanks for sharing
01:31 PM on 05/20/2011
Thanks and true.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
starchildjg24
Balance, Logic and Humor Rule
10:18 AM on 05/20/2011
What an awesome speech! Powerful, and so very right. Our religious leaders need to listen. I know, many Muslim leaders don't seem to be very open to tolerance and moderation, nor freedom and respect for other religions. However, the same holds true of some of our fundamentalist Christians. Nonetheless, it is clear in this speech what the US stands for, what the majority of us stand for, and it made an excellent impression on religious leaders in foreign lands. At least we have a clear goal to try to achieve.
photo
dave0mary
Give liberals facts - they hate it!
11:49 AM on 05/20/2011
Love it that you put the tolerance of Christians and Muslims in the same paragraph. Do you really understand how ridiculous you sound? Answer me this: if a bomb goes off today killing innocent people, what religion will be behind it? Thought so.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mamasilverhair
Fact, truth,belief. Know the difference.
12:24 PM on 05/20/2011
My experience either or. violent people exist. We must accept that. It isn't a religion, skin, nation, thing, it is a people thing. violence I mean.
12:42 PM on 05/20/2011
One religion harms innocent people through explosions and the other harms innocents through psychological manipulation, causing them to become irrational and spiteful and judgmental. They both are harmful and the world would be a better place without them.
09:31 AM on 05/20/2011
The real policy shift happened when the USA moved away from requiring a return to the pre-1967 borders. The USA supported UN Security Council Resolution 242 in 1967 that called for a return to those borders. President Obama is just returning to that original state policy. The USA has used trade boycotts and even force, such as invading Iraq twice, to force compliance with UN Resolutions. Israel's non-compliance with SC Resolution 242 has instead been supported by billions of dollars in USA assistance. That hypocrisy has not brought peace yet.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
pkafin
01:45 PM on 05/20/2011
That requirement, as stated in UN Security Council Resolution 242 was dependent upon peaceful relations and core acceptance of Israel's existence by Israel's neighbors and by the Palestinians themselves. At this point, that is perhaps possible. But, at the time that the US stopped insisting upon that, no Arab nation was willing to even acknowledge Israel's existence. Review the Arab League meeting of 1967 in Khartoum if you don't know what I'm talking about.
03:09 PM on 05/20/2011
Very true, but we have taken along time to turn back to that Resolution and use it for leverage. Even when progress was being made in more recent we failed to follow through. Supporting Israeli settlements, even if only by lack of opposition to them, has only added to the difficult issues to resolve today.
02:49 PM on 05/21/2011
THEY HAVE ATOMIC BOMBS THEN.
03:26 PM on 05/21/2011
The Israeli's? Yes, accidentaly confirmed by the Israeli's some years ago, then denied.