iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

USDA Lowers Pork's Minimum Cooking Temperature To 145 °F

By MICHAEL J. CRUMB   05/24/11 05:25 AM ET   AP

DES MOINES, Iowa -- A bit of pink in pork appears to be OK after all.

The U.S. Department of Agriculture's Food Safety and Inspection Service will announce Tuesday that it has lowered its temperature recommendation for cooking pork to 145 degrees. That's a change from the agency's longstanding guideline and means pork will be held to the same standard as beef, veal and lamb.

For chefs, it means the USDA has sanctioned what already was common practice.

"I'm glad they have the sense to make that change," said Rob Weland, a chef at Poste Moderne Brasserie, an upscale restaurant in Washington.

Weland said he has always cooked pork to the lower temperature because chefs knew it was safe and the meat clearly tastes better. But he said it could take years for backyard grillers to adjust to the change.

"People have been taught this for generations and it's going to take a long time to get this removed," he said. "It will be good for the next generation not to be so fearful so they can enjoy pork in a way they may not have been able to in the past."

With its lower temperature recommendation, the USDA also called for letting the pork rest for 3 minutes after removing it from the grill or oven. The meat's temperature will remain constant or rise during that period, killing any pathogens.

"With a single temperature for all whole cuts of meat and uniform 3-minute stand time, we feel it will be much easier for consumers to remember and result in safer food preparation," USDA Under Secretary Elisabeth Hagen said in a statement.

Ceci Snyder, vice president of marking for the Des Moines, Iowa-based National Pork Board, said restaurants are regulated by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, which has allowed the lower cooking temperature for a decade.

The USDA made the change after several years of research and talks with producers and food safety experts. Producers proposed the change in 2008, based in part on new production methods that reduced the risk of pathogens, Snyder said, citing improved feed and housing methods.

Dr. James McKean, associate director of the Swine Industry Center at Iowa State University, said 145 degrees is higher than the kill temperature for bacteria and parasites that could make people sick.

He said one important change has been to move hogs inside, reducing their exposure to wildlife, including birds and rodents that could carry disease.

"As we've moved pigs inside, put them in bird proof buildings and applied rodent control, the incidence of (diseases) have dramatically reduced over the past 40 years," McKean said.

"I believe, based on research, 145 degrees is a safe temperature," he said.

Like Weland, the Washington chef, Snyder said it would take time before people feel comfortable eating pork with a touch of pink.

"Those myths die hard," she said.

Despite the new recommendation, ground meats must still be cooked to 160 degrees and all poultry products must be cooked to 165 degrees.

Snyder also said it's important to use a digital thermometer, placed in the thickest part of the meat, to ensure it's properly cooked.

Noah Rose, a chef at the Blue Water Grill in Grand Rapids, Mich., said he welcomed the change from a practice he thought led to ruining the meat's flavor.

"This is a step in the right direction," Rose said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST FOOD

DES MOINES, Iowa -- A bit of pink in pork appears to be OK after all. The U.S. Department of Agriculture's Food Safety and Inspection Service will announce Tuesday that it has lowered its temperature...
DES MOINES, Iowa -- A bit of pink in pork appears to be OK after all. The U.S. Department of Agriculture's Food Safety and Inspection Service will announce Tuesday that it has lowered its temperature...
DES MOINES, Iowa -- A bit of pink in pork appears to be OK after all. The U.S. Department of Agriculture's Food Safety and Inspection Service will announce Tuesday that it has lowered its temperature...
DES MOINES, Iowa -- A bit of pink in pork appears to be OK after all. The U.S. Department of Agriculture's Food Safety and Inspection Service will announce Tuesday that it has lowered its temperature...
Filed by Colin Sterling  |  Report Corrections
 
 
  • Comments
  • 311
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
photo
butchcliff
The future is unwritten
08:06 PM on 05/28/2011
Doing this for years..145...doesn't dry out
09:11 PM on 05/26/2011
Trichinosis dies at 138 degrees.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chiara0
The sleep of reason produces monsters.
07:19 AM on 05/26/2011
I never thought making the meat into shoe leather was necessary.
11:47 PM on 05/25/2011
Funny, I cooked a pork tenderloin on the grill the other night and temp'd it at 145 after about 20 minutes. I let it go another few minutes to bring it up to 165 and it came out a little dry.
09:12 PM on 05/26/2011
Because it was overcooked.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Anti-Panoptic
Conscious Grad Student
12:38 PM on 05/25/2011
Um...ew.
08:26 AM on 05/25/2011
More tender!
Ayla McIntosh
photo
ShakeYourComplacency
Commonsense Progressive
06:01 AM on 05/25/2011
Ever since I saw a show about a woman who got worms in her brain from eating undercooked pork, I've never eaten pink pork again. In fact, I really stopped buying pork because of that. I'm sorry, but anything the USDA says is just to promote products, it's not about food safety. They have to protect the growers/raisers. The industry is not going to make money if people aren't buying pork because they don't want to bother with figuring out if it's done or not. Therefore, they lower the temp point.
07:26 AM on 05/25/2011
There hasn't been a single case of trichinosis from commercial pork in the U.S. for decades. The only cases have involved wild boar meat and other non-commercial pork.

In the "good-old days", pigs were basically employed as garbage disposal units on family farms. That's why they were so vulnerable to parasites. Today, pork is far, far safer than chicken or beef by any objective measure of public health. Just look at the alarming list of major foodborne illness outbreaks in the U.S. over the past several decades. Pork is nowhere to be found.
07:53 PM on 05/25/2011
I was wondering, though, if they offer a caveat for pastured pork?
photo
ShakeYourComplacency
Commonsense Progressive
06:12 AM on 05/26/2011
I knew I saw the story only a couple years ago so I had to google for it. It's this woman:

http://abcnews.go.com/Health/PainManagement/story?id=6309464
03:03 AM on 05/25/2011
Couldn't care less. Beef or veal were always my choice.
http://www.lifestyle-after50.com
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
goatboyslim
It's a good day to die,but I prefer to wait
01:22 AM on 05/25/2011
I always brined my pork with salt, sugar, and apple juice, and 160 was never an issue-it all tasted great.
07:35 AM on 05/25/2011
It depends on the cut. The shoulder, ribs, and belly don't get tender until they hit 180-190F. The loin and ham get tough at 155-160. If you brine, they will remain moist at 160, but they'll still become tough. To my taste, 145 is about right for loin and ham (brined of course).
10:44 PM on 05/24/2011
Take the left over pork and drop on Libyas leader compound.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cclawnj
10:34 PM on 05/24/2011
So if it's now safe to cook pork at the same temperatur­es as beef, how come fast food restaurant­s are still cooking hamburgers to death in the name of food safety?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
goatboyslim
It's a good day to die,but I prefer to wait
01:18 AM on 05/25/2011
There's a big difference between ground meat, which is exposed tp the open air throughout, and an integral piece of meat, such as a steak or a roast, the interior of which is shielded from the environment.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cclawnj
10:27 PM on 05/25/2011
Thanks. That makes sense.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Scooterish
Please pass the meat!
07:04 PM on 05/25/2011
E.coli lives on the outside of meat. When ground up, it get's all mixed up and that's why any ground meat should ALWAYS be cooked well.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cclawnj
10:26 PM on 05/25/2011
Thank you.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Arno Schuechen
10:28 PM on 05/24/2011
In Germany we eat raw pork. Ground up, with raw egg and salt and pepper on a fresh crunchy bread roll. Because in Germany all those chemicals and hormones and antibiotics are not allowed. Its delicious.
07:59 PM on 05/25/2011
The concern has been for trichinosis, which is naturally occurring and found pretty much everywhere, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trichinosis. Anyone eating raw or undercooked pork or wild game is likely going to be exposed at some point.
11:50 PM on 05/25/2011
Really? I love raw beef and fish, I bet I'd like that.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Still kickin
life should be Little House meets the Jetsons :)
10:23 PM on 05/24/2011
It's considered safe now 'cause they drug them so much.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
media4me2
06:22 PM on 05/24/2011
Will that make Allah happy?
photo
Obamalicious
Obama's Kool-Aid is mm, mm, good.
06:09 PM on 05/24/2011
I have been eating red/pink pork for years and I am still here. It's all about the freshness of the raw meat.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cclawnj
10:39 PM on 05/24/2011
Some years ago it came as a revelation to me that pork chops did not have to be overcooked and dried out the way my mom (who was otherwise a great cook) did it. The meat tasted so much better when it was white rather than dark gray. On the other hand, even the thought of eating pink pork makes me feel ill. And I'm a guy who likes his beef practically mooing.