Natalia Vodianova, Kirsty Hume & More Go Unretouched For Viva Model Agency (PHOTOS)

A handful of famous fashion faces agreed to go unretouched to celebrate the launch of Viva Model agency in London, Vogue UK reports.

The likes of Natalia Vodianova, Raquel Zimmermann and '90s supermodel Kirsty Hume sat for photographer Scott Trindle over the last year. Viva's director Natalie Hand told the British glossy, "He shot them with no additional hair, make-up or styling. They were shot exactly as they were in person, exactly how they were when they walked through his door. And they looked really beautiful. The blemishes added to their charm."

Check out a few of the pics below. And to see the rest, head over to Vogue.co.uk.

Comments

[debbie214]

09:47 AM on 06/04/2011

looking at the picture you see the beauty of the women,come on girls stop spending all this money on prouducts that is not needed,we have all become so false.Great pictures well done.

[darkelflass]

09:08 PM on 05/31/2011

What is going on with board? It's eating my posts!

[darkelflass]

09:08 PM on 05/31/2011

But I like their B

[darkelflass]

09:07 PM on 05/31/2011

Actually, I don't think any of these women are particularly striking. But I like their B

[cameron d]

07:51 PM on 05/29/2011

Its funny because they're still more beautiful than 99% of people.

[DeniseDuffieldThomas]

06:48 AM on 05/29/2011

wow - just like regular people.... not

[patililac]

03:17 AM on 05/29/2011

They all look better than me--even with make up! But beauty is an asset, not a virtue...these ladies make the best of their assets. Some would say exploit...whatever I think, there is no reason to insult people I do not know.

[nokaoi]

12:42 AM on 05/29/2011

they looked better not made up.

[RosesForObama]

11:57 PM on 05/28/2011

Yeah uh huh. Show us the "unretouched" in color. They wont because they know in real life color they are plain ole ugly european women. The fashion Industry fools no one. We know your models are bone , pale marked up and ugly in real life.

[smp65]

08:20 AM on 06/01/2011

Wow, did you eat your wheaties today?

[Laylahnajwa]

04:43 AM on 06/07/2011

Was that racist? Is racist the new black?

[femmyror]

11:36 PM on 05/28/2011

This is kind of dumb – they're not 'retouched' on the runway either, just in makeup.

[blue moon]

11:02 PM on 05/28/2011

Un-retouched Raquel Zimmerman is quite ordinary--the makeup is clearly the star.

[McParadigm]

10:57 PM on 05/28/2011

They're all sort of cute in the raw, and laughably unappealing on the runway.

Don't ever offer me anything that skinny.

[Vivianite]

06:25 PM on 05/29/2011

Is anyone in the habit of offering you women?

[Tera Greene]

10:47 PM on 05/28/2011

Anyone else find it sad and ironic that this article is asking us to rate/vote on the women? I mean, if they're going to be unretouched photos, it's weird that we still feed into the notion of rating looks.

[HawkWings]

07:52 PM on 05/28/2011

Why are the unretouched photos in black and white? Isn't that also photohsopping -- Converting a picture to black and white.

[darkelflass]

09:10 PM on 05/31/2011

Not if it was taken with B

[Tammi Murphy]

04:52 PM on 05/28/2011

Yep, still gorgeous. There is good reason why they are super models.