More

Michel Barnier: Obama Administration, Regulators Not Doing Enough To Curb Banker Bonuses

First Posted: 06/01/11 06:13 PM ET Updated: 08/01/11 06:12 AM ET

Bonuses
Obama Administration, Regulators Not Doing Enough To Curb Excessive Banker Bonuses, Says Europe's Top Financial Cop

WASHINGTON -- The U.S. isn't doing enough to curtail excessive banker bonuses, Europe's top financial regulator told the Obama administration in a recently-disclosed letter.

"I think you agree with me that 'bankers' bonuses' is a matter that continues to cause public outrage," Michel Barnier, the European commissioner overseeing finance, wrote to Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner. "Getting this matter right is key to restoring our citizens' confidence in the financial system -- and ultimately -- their confidence in the public authorities regulating the financial institutions."

Lavish compensation paid to traders and bankers during the housing-driven bubble fueled risk-taking at the nation's largest financial firms, experts have said. Those risks eventually led to the collapse of storied firms, the near-collapse of the financial system and the most punishing economic downturn since the Great Depression.

Yet bonuses were never recouped. Individual traders made off with tens of millions of dollars, and chief executives of failed firms and those rescued by taxpayers left with hundreds of millions.

To prevent further occurrences, the European Union moved to restrict cash bonuses for executives and risk-takers at banks and other financial institutions.

The U.S., however, has been loathe to do so, and is moving slowly in implementing the resulting rules enacted into law last year, charged Barnier, as the Financial Times first reported. U.S. regulators are leaving "too much latitude" to financial firms, which allows them to potentially "circumvent globally-agreed principles," Barnier wrote to Geithner.

Two years ago, leaders of the 20 leading industrialized nations agreed to curb bonus-fueled risk-taking during a summit in Pittsburgh.

But while Europe charged ahead with creating hard rules restricting specific pay packages, the U.S. approach gives bank regulators great latitude in determining what's appropriate -- a power such organizations have held since 1995.

Regulators have also lumbered along in creating rules designed to rein in risk-taking, having yet to formally implement pay rules lawmakers called for in passing the financial reform bill known as Dodd-Frank.

U.S. bank and securities regulators proposed a rule earlier this year that calls for firms to defer at least 50 percent of executive officers' annual incentive-based pay (commonly known as bonuses) for at least three years. It also seeks to prohibit pay schemes that lead to "excessive" compensation and packages that "could lead to material financial loss."

Regulators will scrutinize the overall design of those packages, rather than individual packages themselves.

But since 1995, bank regulators have had the ability to prohibit risky compensation schemes based on the premise that such packages could be an "unsafe and unsound" practice.

It's unclear whether bank overseers at the Federal Reserve, which oversaw institutions like Countrywide; the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, which regulated banks like Citibank; and the Office of Thrift Supervision, which was responsible for AIG and Washington Mutual, ever used that authority to rein in excessive bonuses geared towards short-term profit at the expense of long-term risks.

In the new proposed rules, excessive pay won't necessarily be determined by the dollar amount.

Dodd-Frank doesn't require firms to report "the actual compensation of particular individuals as part of this requirement," regulators wrote in their proposed rule.

However, cash bonuses on Wall Street are down 39 percent since their peak in 2006, according to data compiled by New York's Office of the State Comptroller.

In Europe, banks are restricted by law when doling out cash bonuses, and as much as 60 percent of bonus payouts for "risk takers" and other senior employees must be deferred for at least three years. About half of the pay must be in the form of shares.

No such requirement exists in the U.S.

"Up front cash bonuses that are based on expected rather than actual performance are a key driver of excessive risk taking," the European Parliament argues on a page of its website devoted to explaining the new rules. "Staggering payments over time and linking them to the bank's health and actual performance should ensure that these risks are tackled."

Spokeswomen for Barnier didn't respond to emailed requests for comment. A Treasury spokeswoman declined to comment.

*************************

Shahien Nasiripour is a senior business reporter for The Huffington Post. You can send him an e-mail; bookmark his page; subscribe to his RSS feed; follow him on Twitter; friend him on Facebook; become a fan; and/or get e-mail alerts when he reports the latest news. He can be reached at 917-267-2335.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- The U.S. isn't doing enough to curtail excessive banker bonuses, Europe's top financial regulator told the Obama administration in a recently-disclosed letter. "I think you agree with...
WASHINGTON -- The U.S. isn't doing enough to curtail excessive banker bonuses, Europe's top financial regulator told the Obama administration in a recently-disclosed letter. "I think you agree with...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,882
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (34 total)
  1 of 2  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
photo
tony wise 01:34 AM on 06/02/2011
healthcare reform that makes healthcare no more affordable. financial reform that allows the banks to keep ripping us off. a preventable devastating spill on his watch. permitted to occur by his own lax secretary of the interior. an economy that is consistently worse then the mess he was supposed to fix. unemployment chronically above 9%, again worse then the mess he was supposed to fix. not only failing to  Read More...
Osusuki
KO fan
08:14 AM on 06/04/2011
I bet it just frosts the GOP's cookies that it took a Frenchman to point out the obvious about their policies vis a vis bank regulation. I wonder if the House cafeteria is going to go back to serving "Freedom Fries" now.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:53 PM on 06/03/2011
So a foreign bank regulator is tougher on americas bankers corruption than our own president is, wow, even foreigners are defending americans better than obama is against corporate corruption and cronyism. Sad and sick state of affairs we live in america.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
anonymous67
02:48 PM on 06/03/2011
America, you are not being well-served by your government. It is time to investigate of the Department of Treasury for PUBLIC CORRUPTION and OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE.

1. WHY has the CFTC STILL not implemented position limits on OIL and FOOD? Instead there are delays, delays, and more delays while Wall Street milks millions from the struggling American economy and forces tens of thousands into hunger.
2. WHY is Secretary Geithner pushing to exempt Forex derivative trades from Dodd-Frank oversight? This will allow Wall Street to gamble with the economies of other nations -- while the US taxpayers and economy assume the risks.
3. WHY did OCC's John Walsh rush a voluntary, toothless, non-punitive settlement on the massive perjury of Wall Street banks when faced with a SERIOUS criminal investigations by the the states?
4. And WHY, three years after some of the largest financial crimes in the history, has Treasury still not provided criminal evidence to the Department of Justice -- when it is their job?

America, we no longer has a financial system that serves the country -- instead we have been ENSLAVED by it.
Osusuki
KO fan
08:16 AM on 06/04/2011
Absolute agreement. F
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
vobox3343
Each day is a new day - make the most of it
11:24 AM on 06/03/2011
Gosh, every one is picking up on how greedy Republican initiatives continue to affect our economy. What's it gonna take, Conservatives?
photo
humanbeing-rick
Born in the USA 1947
11:19 AM on 06/03/2011
Sometimes it takes a fresh view from an outside observer to get the full picture, and this may be the case here for Mr. Geithner. I admire this European for speaking up and telling it like it is: "I think you agree with me that 'bankers' bonuses' is a matter that continues to cause public outrage,"
Something must be done about the banksters!
11:11 AM on 06/03/2011
Barnier’s warning can be read not simply as a warning that wealth has too much power over government in the American republics and federal government, but also that, given such value on wealth, it is foolhardy to let it have its way. As good parents know, being run by one’s kids is not in the kids’ interest (or that of the parents and society). For more, please see http://thewordenreport.blogspot.com/2011/06/eu-and-us-on-executive-compensation.html
photo
KobraKai7474
He Ain't Heavy, He's My Governor
09:52 PM on 06/02/2011
This is just another example of how plutocracies work. The obscenely rich control the government and, thus, make rules that ensure they can continue to get richer. The rest of us... well, the rest of us get to sit and watch and every few years we get to elect legislators and presidents who, in spite of talking a good game, are completely beholden to the same obscenely rich plutocrats.
photo
StevieRae
2012 Choice-Oligarchy or a Republic
09:38 PM on 06/02/2011
The sting of being a multi-national enterprise. What you get away with here in the US doesn't mean you'll get a free ticket elsewhere. Show us, Europe, what is meant to seek justice, here it's only an ideal.
04:25 PM on 06/02/2011
How to Trade Penny Stocks:http://www.tekbuz.com/how-to-trade-penny-stocks/88652
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:51 PM on 06/02/2011
He's right. I'm not entirely sure by what effective authority - if any - Barnier is offering this judgment, but of course he's right.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
deltalady
02:02 PM on 06/02/2011
Our country has become so corrupt and hated on the world stage that other countries have to scold us.....what a disgrace. I'm praying Dubya will be flying over a country that REALLY despises him, has plane trouble, and the next picture we see will be of him in chains. Fantasy, though, not reality.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ColoradoCool
Relentless...
03:07 PM on 06/02/2011
I like the way your mind works DeltaLady! Fanned!
01:26 PM on 06/02/2011
Like Gadhafi, these guys won't stop scamming until they are stopped by public outrage -- the abusive similarities that have oppressed the general population are uncanny and dripping with greed. Unless, there is change now, it may be a bit too late later to fix their reputation in America.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
equilange
you tell me
12:46 PM on 06/02/2011
I find it fascinating that the word "capitalism" will not flag a post, but the word "fascism" will. In my books, they are equally offensive terms.
photo
flossophy
Liberalism is not liberal.
01:19 PM on 06/02/2011
You misunderstand those terms then.... Capitalism is just the exchange of goods and services in the marketplace ... Fas_cism is when the State controls capitalism and private industries.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
equilange
you tell me
01:24 PM on 06/02/2011
Capitalism is characterized by private ownership and pursuit of profit. Government is supposed to be an institution imbued with the collective rights and responsibilities of individual citizens in a particular place. Fas - cism is when corporate power is merged with the state, whether or not there may be any general or specific benefits to the broader society they are supposed to represent/govern.
12:28 AM on 06/04/2011
What should we call our system now that corporations control the State?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
equilange
you tell me
12:45 PM on 06/02/2011
Experiment fascism
photo
flossophy
Liberalism is not liberal.
01:20 PM on 06/02/2011
for instance: State-run health care corporations, State-run education factories, State-run mortgage lending institutions, etc.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
equilange
you tell me
01:29 PM on 06/02/2011
I think fas - cism looks more like privatized health care administered by the state, hence the merger of corporate/private interests with the the state, in a manner that benefits corporate interests first, makes the interests of the state serving those private interests, and leaves the population more or less out of the equation (except to fulfill their role as client/consumers).
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
equilange
you tell me
12:45 PM on 06/02/2011
Experiment capitalism