iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Fabrice Tourre, The Fabulous Fab, Offers Cautionary Tale: Data Never Dies

Fabulous Fab Fabrice Tourre Data

First Posted: 06/01/11 07:12 PM ET Updated: 08/01/11 06:12 AM ET

Fabrice Tourre (a.k.a. the "Fabulous Fab"), the Goldman Sachs mortgage trader who has become synonymous with Wall Street shenanigans, has now become synonymous with something else: the worst possible way to dispose of an old computer.

Among the more titillating passages in a front-page New York Times expose about Tourre's private correspondence with his lawyers is a disclaimer that the newspaper obtained his e-mails via a computer someone found "discarded in a garbage area in a downtown apartment building."

The computer was then passed on to someone else, who noticed that it continued to pull down fresh e-mails -- messages sent to someone with Tourre's name, a name suddenly in the news. The e-mails, correspondence between the trader and his lawyers, discussed how to handle accusations that he and his employer, Goldman Sachs, had played a key role in engineering a near-financial apocalypse.

Most of us have more mundane matters taking up space on our computer hard drives, yet we would still rather avoid giving the world easy access to our private messages, be they fragments of past romantic associations, candid assessments of coworkers or mere reviews of the food at our friends' dinner parties. We would surely prefer to keep our personal finances and legal correspondence clear of the public eye and away from scam artists.

The Fabulous Fab was reckless, it seems, leaving his e-mail client program intact and not password protected, making it vulnerable to people with designs on finding a way in. Yet that recklessness provokes a question that resonates far from Wall Street and into every home office: How do you keep computer data truly private? And how do you put files in the trash, beyond prying eyes, in the digital age?

The Tourre case serves as a warning that without careful digital document shredding, data -- even on devices discarded in the trash and forgotten -- never really dies. The banker's casual approach to managing files on his computer underscores the need for greater vigilance among all owners of electronics, and in particular, the imperative to fully destroy documents on abandoned devices.

As Tourre would no doubt agree, the cost of losing the data on a cellphone or laptop can be far greater than the price of the hardware itself. Security experts warn that information stored on a computer can put someone at risk for identity theft and fraud, or even turn colleagues, cousins and colleges friend into targets for nefarious scammers and hackers.

With the information on your computer, someone "can almost take over your life," said Chet Wisniewski, a security expert with Naked Security, a blog run by anti-virus software company Sophos. "They can basically communicate to your friends, log into your accounts, and impersonate you because so many of us use the Internet as a primary communication mechanism for relationships, whether it's with the power company or with a person."

One of the greatest dangers is that on a computer or cellphone, "delete" doesn't necessarily do what it says. Erasing a file on a laptop essentially removes the arrow pointing to the data, but not the data itself. Wisniewski likened file deletion to erasing an entry in a book's table of contents; it removes a note telling readers that a piece of information is on page 200 of the book, while leaving page 200, and the information on it, intact.

Safely discarding a device essentially requires rewiring its brain, the hard drive, to induce amnesia.

To ensure photos, bank statements and love letters on a laptop, tablet or phone have been properly gutted, users must wipe the hard drive using the machine's Secure Erase tool, which offers the equivalent of "a loaded gun aimed right at your data." The feature acts as an e-shredder that overwrites all the tracks on a hard drive to destroy every last byte and bit of information that's ever been stored.

Using a blunt object also works. The most surefire way to discard of data is to physically destroy the hard drive itself, experts say.

Before his wife threw away her old hard drive, Phil Blank, an analyst with Javelin Strategy & Research, said that he "took a hammer to it, gave it a good whack" and "that was the end of that."

But users can't always plan for their devices' departure. The glitzy, pricy gadgets from the likes of Apple, Google, Sony and Samsung are vulnerable to theft, and experts say it's all but inevitable that these stores of personal and professional information will be lost or stolen at some point.

The growing memory of our gadgets and their portability has made it easier than ever to put data on these devices and then lose them, often without recourse.

"Now thousands of file cabinets worth of company data can be put on something that slips into your pocket," said Wisniewski. "The risk of data loss is much larger, whether it's intentional or accidental, because employees, for convenience, are able to carry around large quantities of data on something the size of my fingernail."

Experts suggest that users, at the very least, put passwords on their devices to prevent a thief from easily logging in. They also recommend encrypting the data, a process that turns the information on the gadget into gibberish to anyone that doesn't have the proper passcode required to unlock it. Encryption software can be purchased from companies like Norton, downloaded for free from open-source providers like TrueCrypt, or found as an optional setting on some gadgets, such as Apple's iPhone, that users can set up at their convenience.

Yet even the best data defenses can potentially fall to determined attackers.

"Fraud often trumps security," said Blank. "Security guys think in square boxes, and fraudsters think outside the box."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

Fabrice Tourre (a.k.a. the "Fabulous Fab"), the Goldman Sachs mortgage trader who has become synonymous with Wall Street shenanigans, has now become synonymous with something else: the worst possible ...
Fabrice Tourre (a.k.a. the "Fabulous Fab"), the Goldman Sachs mortgage trader who has become synonymous with Wall Street shenanigans, has now become synonymous with something else: the worst possible ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 125
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
03:57 PM on 06/26/2011
Bernanke completely misses the worst financial crisis in the nation's history yet not only does he keep his position but is widely praised as some creative genius for concocting the Fed's emergency bailout facilities. Then again, it is like a trillion-to-one chance that the foremost expert on the Great Depression would be selected as Chairman of the Federal Reserve a year or so before the massive financial crisis and economic fallout. Pick one: amazing fortuitousness or one of the greatest scams ever conceived and pulled off.
10:09 AM on 06/03/2011
I thought the James Bond picture was sufficient enough to seen the pun of the title?

Mark at http://www.idgconnect.com/blog
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:15 AM on 06/03/2011
jeez forget about better ways of discarding a computer, what was in the emails????!!!!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
loki
cheap politicians for sale
02:06 AM on 06/03/2011
I was at the gas station the other day and a lady with a nice Lexus walked into the store, leaving her very expensive looking laptop on the passenger seat, and smart phone on the center console. Windows were all down too. I thought what an idiot. People just get to complacent , and think it will never happen to them. When it does, they are shocked and blame everyone else usually. A thief is like trusting a ivy greed corporation. You know they will rob you blind, they are just waiting for the chance. So dont give it to them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Adam Reid
Living a modest life in Canton, OH
10:13 PM on 06/02/2011
Oops.
photo
BryantG
Vicariously Apathetic
09:23 PM on 06/02/2011
Data never dies, huh? Just try finding a drive to read that circa 1984 8-inch floppy disk.
photo
Rational Thought Plz
Is the Micro Bio Half
05:22 PM on 06/02/2011
Admittedly I am very mechanically inclined but it still baffles me that people can't or simply don't remove 4 screws from their case and 2 connectors and grab their old hard drive.
05:15 PM on 06/02/2011
Fabrice, is a "peon" (perhaps highly-paid) that's now the FALL-GUY. Probably, being "foreigner" could add to his being a good candidate as the fall guy.

AS USUAL, the "well politically-connected" senior managers of GS (just like many of the other wall-street-financiers involved in our financial mess), will be spared.
03:35 PM on 06/02/2011
Data Never Dies. Sounds like the title of a bad Movie. “In a world of Uncertainty! One thing is certain, Data Never Dies!”
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
loki
cheap politicians for sale
02:08 AM on 06/03/2011
same goes for eveything you post on the web. Its there, somewhere, for ever. Facebook, HP post, etc... and it might come back to haunt you at the worst time.
02:43 PM on 06/02/2011
He should have formatted the hard drive first. He was as careful with his personal data as he was with mortgage and finance laws.
photo
DRaymond
Network administrator, voiceovers
05:17 PM on 06/02/2011
Formatting would have stopped a complete amateur. However burn this into your memory: FORMATTING A HARD DISK DESTROYS ABSOLUTELY NO DATA. That goes for both regular and quick formats and in most cases even for 'hard format utilities'. You need to do a wipe. The easiest way to do a wipe is with a 'boot and nuke' disk. This article includes the details. http://betweenthenumbers.net/2011/03/how-to-properly-prepare-a-computer-for-sale-or-donation/
RTIII
Poster of over 0.0135% of all HufPost comments
08:52 PM on 06/02/2011
You are somewhat mistaken here (and elsewhere where you make this same claim).

Formatting _does_ "destroy" the file system. That has some advantages, as I outlined in an earlier post you responded to. The advantage is, specifically, that you know that there aren't any blocks trapped in a file and that the file system will make all blocks accessible, should you then try and allocate all of them. It also destroys the logical order of the data and, depending on the type of data, that may be sufficient to render the data useless. Imagine, for example, a file whose contents represent a bitmap; if you lose the correct order, you lose the semantic meaning of the data and, if it's literally a bitmap, there is likely no way to recover it.

Other than these two points, you are correct.
02:15 PM on 06/02/2011
Great article, remember simply putting a file in the trash does not destroy the data, it's easy to recover if it has not been overwritten. If you completely overwrite your drive, it's impossible to recover the data. So you don't have to smash your hard drive to be safe, you can sell it make a little money and you don't have to worry about theft. I'm posting a link to the "great zero challenge" if you all want to read more about this. http://hostjury.com/blog/view/195/the-great-zero-challenge-remains-unaccepted
photo
DRaymond
Network administrator, voiceovers
05:54 PM on 06/02/2011
Actually a single zero pass has another advantage. To a typical investigator the drive will look just like a never-used drive.
RTIII
Poster of over 0.0135% of all HufPost comments
08:54 PM on 06/02/2011
For laypeople, you are correct, however, you are technically incorrect here. Please see my top-level post elsewhere in these comments (a little older than yours); agencies like the NSA can recover previous bit values on magnetic disks.
01:00 AM on 06/03/2011
I don't work for the NSA so I cannot comment on what they have or don't have, but the point of the "great zero challenge" is that no one has claimed the prize and bragging rights. If you overwrite the disk one time with zeros no data recovery company can recover it. If you can post a peer reviewed article that is accepted by most if not all computer scientists, that describes a method where overwritten data can be recovered, then I will concede that you are correct. On the other hand if you cannot, then you must concede that there is no evidence to back up your claim.

I'll grant you that the NSA may be more advanced in some ways and may not want to publish their methods for obvious reasons. On the other hand, they cannot do the impossible. For example the Nixon tapes are of great interest to historians and as you know the overwritten portions have not been recovered either. Furthermore the data density is much lower, meaning that more material stores less information. Therefore is there was any residual information, it could be recovered more easily than a computer hard drive. The fact that it has not happened suggests that it's impossible on a hard drive as well.
01:38 PM on 06/02/2011
Ask yourself why so many vegans in Silicon Valley own barbeques.
Getting warm?
photo
DRaymond
Network administrator, voiceovers
05:18 PM on 06/02/2011
No, because real techies know how to do it simple and right.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
goodgravy
01:05 PM on 06/02/2011
when i dispose of an old computer i fill the tub with water. dump in a box of salt and let it disolve. i set the computer in the salt water overnight. then i toss it as it is completely dead.
photo
DRaymond
Network administrator, voiceovers
05:19 PM on 06/02/2011
What a waste of a perfectly good computer and a box of salt.
RTIII
Poster of over 0.0135% of all HufPost comments
08:55 PM on 06/02/2011
Yes, not to mention the harm the salt does to the environment and the costs at the sewage treatment plant to prevent such effects from this thoughtless act.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
loki
cheap politicians for sale
02:13 AM on 06/03/2011
couldnt someone just soak it in clean water for days, let it dry for a month or so, and recover the HD? What will the salt do ? If it was in the ocean for a year, maybe, but a salt bath ? I just dont see it doing much but wasting time.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
JakeAZ
You can see my MACRO-bio for a small fee.
12:50 PM on 06/02/2011
That would be "Data never DIE".

Otherwise we are talking about the immortality of an old Star Trek Next Generation character.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
paganmist
Girl gamer geek armchair activist
02:07 PM on 06/02/2011
Fanned for sounding like my boyfriend. Are you an INTJ by any chance?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wonmean
University of Michigan Class of 2010
02:45 PM on 06/02/2011
"Girl gamer geek armchair activist"

I like that combo. :P
RTIII
Poster of over 0.0135% of all HufPost comments
12:47 PM on 06/02/2011
Unless special provisions / measures are taken beforehand, on nearly all modern computers when a new file is created or an existing one extended, and before it is populated with user data, it will still contain the data values from whatever was on the disk previously. To read this data, one may need a specially written program, but it's not that hard to write!

For this reason, you cannot reliably remove all data from a drive just by deleting a file and then filling the disk with garbage - it will not over-write the data allocated but as yet unused in other files on the disk. For that, you'd need a special program... I am not aware of any commercially available programs of this type.
photo
DRaymond
Network administrator, voiceovers
05:24 PM on 06/02/2011
Incorrect, there are several disk wipe programs, including ones that will fill in the sector slack. The biggest problem though is wiping the system drive, since you can't wipe the open operating system files! That is why the easiest solution is a boot-and-nuke disk (a bootable CD or USB drive that boots to a disk only Linux and then allows you to wipe all the drives) A typical one is called DBAN, and it is described here. http://betweenthenumbers.net/2011/03/how-to-properly-prepare-a-computer-for-sale-or-donation/
RTIII
Poster of over 0.0135% of all HufPost comments
08:33 PM on 06/02/2011
What, specifically, about my post was incorrect?