More

Password Sharing Crackdown: Web Entertainment Theft Bill Passes In Tennessee

Password Sharing

SHEILA BURKE and LUCAS L. JOHNSON II   06/ 1/11 03:59 PM ET   AP

NASHVILLE, Tenn. — State lawmakers in country music's capital have passed a groundbreaking measure that would make it a crime to use a friend's login – even with permission – to listen to songs or watch movies from services such as Netflix or Rhapsody.

The bill, now awaiting the governor's signature, was pushed by recording industry officials to try to stop the loss of billions of dollars to illegal music sharing. They hope other states will follow.

The legislation was aimed at hackers and thieves who sell passwords in bulk, but its sponsors acknowledge it could be employed against people who use a friend's or relative's subscription.

While those who share their subscriptions with a spouse or other family members under the same roof almost certainly have nothing to fear, blatant offenders – say, college students who give their logins to everyone on their dormitory floor – could get in trouble.

"What becomes not legal is if you send your user name and password to all your friends so they can get free subscriptions," said the bill's House sponsor, Rep. Gerald McCormick.

Under the measure, download services that believe they are getting ripped off can go to law enforcement authorities and press charges.

The bill expands an existing law used to prosecute people who steal cable television or leave restaurants without paying for their meals. It adds "entertainment subscription service" to the list of services protected by the law.

Tennessee would become the first state to update its theft-of-cable laws for the 21st century and address the new trend toward Internet delivery of entertainment, according to the Recording Industry Association of America.

"I think it's stupid," college student Josh Merbitz said of the law. The 20-year-old music education major at Middle Tennessee State University said he watches Netflix movies online using the password of his friend's father, with the father's permission.

Stealing $500 or less of entertainment would be a misdemeanor punishable by up to a year in jail and a fine of $2,500. Theft with a higher price tag would be a felony, with heavier penalties.

Gov. Bill Haslam said Tuesday that he hasn't yet reviewed the bill but expressed support for steps to reduce music piracy, citing the large record industry presence in Nashville.

"I don't know enough about that legislation, but if it's combating that issue, I would be in favor of it," Haslam said.

The recording industry, a major taxpayer in Tennessee, loses money when users share accounts for music services instead of paying separately.

Mitch Glazier, executive vice president of public policy for the RIAA, said the bill is a necessary protective measure as digital technology evolves. The music industry has seen its domestic revenue plunge by more than half in 10 years, from $15 billion to $7 billion, he said.

Bill Ramsey, a Nashville lawyer who practices both entertainment law and criminal defense, said that he doubts the law would be used to ban people in the same household from sharing subscriptions, and that small-scale violations involving a few people would, in any case, be difficult to detect. But "when you start going north of 10 people, a prosecutor might look and say, `Hey, you knew it was stealing,'" Ramsey said.

Music industry officials said they usually catch people who steal and resell logins in large quantities because they advertise.

Among the measure's critics is public defender David Doyle, who said the wording is too vague and overly broad. He said an "entertainment subscription" could be interpreted to mean a magazine subscription or a health club membership.

Kelly Kruger, an 18-year-old aerospace major at Middle Tennessee State University, said she likes to watch Netflix movies online in her dorm by logging in with her mother's account information. Kruger said she hands out the login information to friends who don't live with her.

Even with a law against it, "I think people will keep doing it, like illegal downloading," Kruger said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

Filed by Catharine Smith  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 75
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ElTommo
06:18 PM on 06/03/2011
Oh, so it's Big Government to expect businesses to deal with any sort of regulation requiring them to behave responsibly, but it's not Big Government to create a law to make sure you aren't sharing your Netflix account so said businesses can make greater profits? SMH.
03:50 AM on 06/03/2011
I also wonder if this isn't a violation of the first amendment.

"The legislation was aimed at hackers and thieves who sell passwords in bulk."

This seems to imply that the act of sharing the password information is itself illegal. Someone selling the account information wouldn't be using the account information themselves, or not necessarily. Obtaining the information may be illegal but how can publishing it be illegal?
03:21 AM on 06/03/2011
Bill Ramsey, a Nashville lawyer who practices both entertainment law and criminal defense, said that he doubts the law would be used to ban people in the same household from sharing subscriptions, and that small-scale violations involving a few people would, in any case, be difficult to detect. But "when you start going north of 10 people, a prosecutor might look and say, `Hey, you knew it was stealing,'" Ramsey said.

Or, the prosecutor or someone who has influence with the prosecutor has a reason not the like you so they take advantage of the fact that you are technically breaking the law. Making something illegal and then selectively enforcing the law is a recipe for abuse.

Perhaps it could be argued that this is a matter of interstate trade and thus not within a State's jurisdiction.
03:11 AM on 06/03/2011
Since when did using something someone else paid for with their permission theft? Hell, if they are going to make it a criminal charge why wouldn't I just torrent the files? That's just a civil offense.
photo
Parkite
Still haven't found what I'm looking for
03:28 PM on 06/19/2011
Ugh Oh, All those patients in the doctor's office reading the magazines are in trouble.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Adam Reid
Living a modest life in Canton, OH
10:26 PM on 06/02/2011
First of all, Boo-Hoo-Hoo, entertainment industry.
Second of all, Shame on you TN legislature for pandering.
And Third, How in the world are you gonna enforce this law? People log in to their services on multiple devices (computers, smartphones, AppleTv, Nintendo Wii !!!!) all the time?
casaroonc
Your micro-bio is empty
08:45 PM on 06/02/2011
The music Industry is always crying. I personal know a number of artist that have ripped off by the corporations, so I don't feel bad.

This is an Industry that charged $20 for a cd
photo
bryanzth
Honest to Goodness USA Patriot!
07:07 PM on 06/02/2011
The Netflix account, for example, is permission to view, not the media itself. So, technically, one could watch a movie through a Library computer, no? It's not tied to a particular computer. Then you come the next day, and you could watch a movie from another computer.

Thus, that permission to view probably could not be used simultaneously. So, you couldn't use two computers at the Library to view two movies at the same time.

To me, if someone watched a Netflix movie on my computer instead of me, that should not be a problem. Likewise, if I wanted someone to see a movie, and let them use the Netflix interface their computer, fine, too. But the difference is using two computers, or using two Netflix sessions simultaneously. And even if you could stretch it to letting someone watch next to you on their computer while you watch another on yours is still simultaneous usage. Not kosher.

Could a person buy a Netflix package that allows 1-3 simultaneous users? Yes. Do they sell that? I dunno. I mean, the NYT stops you from viewing more than 10 articles per month (that Bookmark is long gone), so why can't Netflix sense simultaneous or multiple sessions? Duh.

BZ.
06:31 PM on 06/02/2011
What a waste of time and money. The subscription services already have technology to limit and track logins.
04:25 PM on 06/02/2011
Why do they need a law? Can't these companies just change their software so you can't be logged-in in more than one location at the same time?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:45 PM on 06/02/2011
Sure, but you don't have to use it at the same time.
My uncle in Israel and I shared a WoW account because he was asleep when I was playing and vice versa.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Max Shaw
My micro-bio is no longer empty.
03:33 PM on 06/02/2011
Let me know when it hits NY. Until then, I aint paying.
02:39 PM on 06/02/2011
I wonder if sharing social networking passwords with other social networking services will be considered illegal under the new law. For example, this website asks its users to log in using Facebook accounts. Google also asks its users to share their social networking accounts.

This gives multiple social networks access to the combined social graph, in a similar way as people might share their Netflix accounts with each other to get access to the combined media library. So are these social networks breaking the law in Tennessee?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
William David Smith
wordsmithjr
02:38 PM on 06/02/2011
The issues in the internet age are many times more important than protecting large companies with access to great resources to track this type of activity. They can do that themselves.
Layman23
Do we want to live in the past?
01:40 PM on 06/02/2011
Big government. Where are the conservatives?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Claw2122
not everyone can be me
06:39 PM on 06/02/2011
it's encroaching on their "free enterprise" and "hurting profits" talking points so they have to stop scratching their heads first before they can speak.
01:04 PM on 06/02/2011
it's each companies' responsibility to monitor account usage and decide on policy. if that company is losing money or otherwise straining then they can limit the number of logins at a given time or whatever, not cry to lawmakers for more laws.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Scott Stevenson
Shh, I'm talking now.
01:04 PM on 06/02/2011
How stupid is this. My partner got his mom a Netflix account because she doesn't have cable or a computer. He pays for the account, but it's in her name and he logs into it to add movies to the que for her. More GOP big government intruding on private lives.