iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

New Rule Pushing Big Down Payments Could Make Homeownership Unaffordable

Mortgage Down Payment

First Posted: 06/02/11 10:58 AM ET Updated: 08/02/11 06:12 AM ET

Among the most hotly contested ideas bank regulators have proposed to reduce the risk of another financial crisis is rule making a 20 percent down payment mandatory on some new home loans. Consumer advocates, civil rights groups and lending industry groups alike have said the proposed rule would deter many families from ever buying a home.

A new survey by the National Foundation for Credit Counseling could shed light on the actual effects of the proposal: The survey found that half of the 1,000 people contacted thought they would never be able to put together a 20 percent down payment to buy a home.

And the situation that would be created by the proposed rule, introduced by the the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation in March, might end up being even worse than the survey suggests.

"Since prices for homes are at historic lows, the necessary down payment represents a lower dollar amount than would typically be necessary," Gail Cunningham, a spokesperson for the NFCC, said in a statement. "Nonetheless, consumers still do not feel capable of meeting the requirements."

Almost 40 senators asked bank regulators to modify the proposed rule last week, Reuters then reported. The senators described the proposed rule as hazardous to homebuyers, families and the housing market all at the same time.

During the boom years leading up to the financial crisis, banks and other financial institutions that sold loans to individual homebuyers built hefty profits with fees they charged borrowers. Some also bundled and then resold the same mortgages to other investors. When banks sold these bundles they didn’t just sell the value of the underlying mortgages; they also offloaded all the risk of default onto investors. The mortgages became someone else's problem.

Some analysts have blamed the financial crisis on these practices in recent years. Others have blamed inflated appraisals and homebuyers who bought more house than they could afford.

To cut down on all three, the proposed regulations would require banks to hold on to 5 percent of the risk associated with bundled mortgagees, or mortgage-backed securities. Only loans made to borrowers who put 20 percent or more down would be exempt from the 5 percent holding rule. Opponents of the rule say the fix will just lead to lower interest mortgages for people with larger down payments and more expensive loans or none at all for those who don't have 20 percent to put down.

Enacting the proposed 20 percent down payment rule, sometimes referred to as the qualified mortgage exemption or QRM, could further complicate the depressed and double-dipping housing market. Sales prices around the country hit new lows in March since the real estate bubble burst in 2006. The nationwide home price index fell by 4.2 percent in the first quarter of 2011 and nearly 13 percent of the nation's housing stock is sitting vacant. The problem, analysts say, is the volume of homes on the market, the number of foreclosures that are pending and the number of Americans who can't find work.

In April, trade groups such as the National Association of Realtors, the National Association of Homebuyers and the Mortgage Bankers Association and consumer lobbying groups including the Center for Responsible Lending took the unusual step of issuing a joint report denouncing the proposed 20 percent down payment requirement. A jointly released report said:

“Based on 2009 income and home price data, it would take almost 9 years for the typical American family to save enough money for a 10 percent down payment, and fully 14 years to save for a 20 percent down payment. A 20 percent down payment requirement for the QRM means that even the most creditworthy and diligent first-time homebuyer cannot qualify for the lowest rates and safest products in the market.”

But not all economists think the rule is a bad idea.

All three lobbying groups have an incentive to oppose a rule that would keep families out of the housing market. Real estate agents and mortgage bankers want to sell more homes, said Dean Baker, co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research, and some consumer advocates want to advance the idea that homeownership is essential.

"There were a lot of groups, some of these same groups opposed to this rule, who spent a lot of time promoting this idea that homeownership is an excellent idea for everyone, the path to the American dream and middle class status," said Baker. "The results have been sad, if not tragic for a lot of families."

Shrinking the pool of people who attempt to purchase a home to those who are truly qualified will reduce the number of mortgage defaults, Baker said. And, because there are already so many homes on the market, housing prices would just keep falling to a more affordable and realistic zone, Baker said.

Last year, there were a number of homebuyers who did manage to buy and put 20 percent or more down. But nearly 40 percent did so with a lot less, according to Core Logic, a data analysis firm.

Bank regulators will continue accepting public comments on the proposed rule until June 10. They are also considering another rule that would require down payments lower than 20 percent.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
Among the most hotly contested ideas bank regulators have proposed to reduce the risk of another financial crisis is rule making a 20 percent down payment mandatory on some new home loans. Consumer ad...
Among the most hotly contested ideas bank regulators have proposed to reduce the risk of another financial crisis is rule making a 20 percent down payment mandatory on some new home loans. Consumer ad...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,107
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (21 total)
08:03 AM on 06/06/2011
Homeownership is NOT a civil right. Homeownership is NOT for everyone. Not only were we told we would not qualify based on salary we were also informed that we couldnt use my income since I was female. That part has changed, but adhering to the one third rule still makes economic sense. We found a better deal on a new home with another builder who offered us an FHA loan for which we would qualify. When we sold that house 8 years later it had doubled in value and we came out with a very nice equity. Dont buy something that eats up your entire monthly income, it cant and wont work.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
R2D2-51
Flower Power Forever
03:24 AM on 06/06/2011
Homeownership: a uniquely American phenomena.
01:41 AM on 06/06/2011
20% is not reasonable. This creates a class of renters who are called the working poor.
20% on a 100k house is 20K.
How many have 20K just laying around?
Many people are far removed from reality!
The people who were mostly responsible for this crisis is shifting the blame.

There were standard already in the housing market but people ignored IT! Tighten standard on wall street not main street! Scapegoating will not solve the problem.

I know the people who have benefited by buying undervalued assets are not lovin' this. I make someone say tenants and can charge whatever I want because they can't ever save enough to buy a home.

America the beautiful.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
R2D2-51
Flower Power Forever
03:28 AM on 06/06/2011
Unless we clean the slate with our fiat money system anyway your living in the end times of what Marx called the circular self-destruction of Neoliberal Capitalism. That's why defaulting the debt was a trail balloon for prevue of coming attractions.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Y3rMawm
veni, vidi, bibi.
07:06 PM on 06/05/2011
/sigh. supply and demand. If homes are "unaffordable" based on traditional lending standards, then people will not buy them. Prices will fall.

Excessive leverage is what got us into this mess in the first place.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Realtors Are Liars
NAR is CORRUPT
12:16 AM on 06/06/2011
That's right.

Prices are falling, falling, falling.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
h23154
05:16 PM on 06/05/2011
It is not a bad thing to require people to be able to pay for the houses they buy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mabinog
My micro-bio is a desolate wasteland
06:23 PM on 06/05/2011
of course it is, you got to have bad debt to make a killing on bad debt.
01:21 PM on 06/05/2011
In Europe it's almost impossible to get a loan if you don't put 20% down... and the result is no housing bubble, not predatory lending, prices somewhat stable (except in major metropolitan areas). If you can't save money to put money down on your first house, honestly what are the chances your'll be able to make mortgage payment on time or even feel accountable for making them?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
frank day
Obama cares about all of U.S.
01:31 PM on 06/05/2011
20% is very reasonable.

In much of Asia they put 40-100 % up front.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
krm1255
Facts are not negotiable
01:07 PM on 06/05/2011
Doesn't matter what the downpayments are if you are unemployed or wiped out by medical expenses. These articles often totally miss that point. People with no health insurance will inevitably have to stop owning houses.
12:43 PM on 06/05/2011
When we bought our first house, 25 years ago, we had to either have 20% down, or pay PMI (Private Mortgage Insurance), and the bank held our mortgage, and we made payments to them, and we knew our loan officer (we've known her for 25 years). That seemed to make complete sense to my wife and I. We paid down the mortgage until we were at the 20% threshold, and refinanced (withouth the PMI).

The whole problem started when banks were allowed to pass off their loans (and dump your mortgage onto another financial institution, rather than HOLDING the mortgage.) That gave banks the incentive to do all kinds of RISKY loans, like no money down or interest only mortgages. This created a situation where NO ONE had any skin in the game -- not the lender and not the homeowner (either could walk).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
frank day
Obama cares about all of U.S.
01:32 PM on 06/05/2011
bingo
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Mamma Roma
Contrarian and proud of it
07:19 PM on 06/05/2011
Weren't PMI's also just another way to add in a middleman? If they had stuck to the original format in the first place, many of those buyers would have been weeded out. F/F
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ABACADABRA RABBIT
05:12 AM on 06/05/2011
Housing prices have been going down 8-10 percent a year. This is awesome for those without homes.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Eileenla
Author, "Sacred Economics"
01:48 AM on 06/05/2011
The notion that people have to work forty years to scrape up a downpayment and then pay off a mortgage is relatively new. Up until the last 150 or so years, home ownership was a given. People built houses on the land where they lived, and lived in them until they died. It was the recent creation of the " housing market" that turned home ownership into a commodity, and a house - the basic right to space that belongs to every human being - into a material possession that needs to be earned. What we've actually done is turn the right to space into a long term rental program that requires the "homeowner" to pay taxes and buy insurance, while the likelihood the so-called "owner" will ever truly hold full title to his home is very small.
06:17 PM on 06/05/2011
I like your input and it is a true depiction how our homes have been used as a tool to keep us indebted. On top of this indebtedness, they have taxed our properties for revenues to pay for further buearacracy to govern us. The price of homes as in cars have been tied to a middle class income, not to the actual value. This commodity pricing has ruined this nation and intentionally put us in control by banks. It has made home ownership unrealistic for those that do not meet middle class income, again intentional so the lower class will pay the mortgages of the middle class investor and of course the top 10%. This is the crime of a nation that has gone unpunished.
01:48 AM on 06/06/2011
Huh? Interesting!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Mamma Roma
Contrarian and proud of it
07:25 PM on 06/05/2011
Not to mention "Climbing the Property Ladder" I see so many people on shows like House Hunters (and HH INTL) and the worst one is Property Virgins, where they are encouraged to use their down payments to BUY UP istead of getting a loan for less the down payment.

I agree with you about this notion of "ownership". You don't own ANYTHING until you have PAID IN FULL> F/F
photo
rbchilds
In times of deceit, the truth will set you free
10:12 PM on 06/04/2011
" Among the most hotly contested ideas bank regulators have proposed to reduce the risk of another financial crisis is rule making a 20 percent down payment mandatory on some new home loans. Consumer advocates, civil rights groups and lending industry groups alike have said the proposed rule would deter many families from ever buying a home. " Like lowering the down payment the last 15 years worked out so well!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Realtors Are Liars
NAR is CORRUPT
08:16 PM on 06/04/2011
This is good news folks.

Going back to traditional lending standards like 20% downpayments will drive prices down making housing more affordable.

There is another thing change coming that will make prices even more affordable, especially in California. What is it you ask?

FHA guarantees mortgage paper up to $729,000. This will be lowered to roughly $400,000 by the end of this year. Did you ever wonder why housing was so expensive on the coasts? This is the reason. When the loan limits get cut in half, watch housing prices fall dramatically, especially on the east and west coasts and in particular, California.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Mamma Roma
Contrarian and proud of it
09:02 PM on 06/04/2011
I love your moniker! Having spent the last 2 years trying to sell our house (can't pay an $1,800 house payment with an $1800 UI benefits) ,then ultimately surrendering it the lender, we went through 3 Realtors. The last one actually worked against us bringing in buyers who knew were going to lose it, and making low offers. No one would even pay a fair price, and the realtor kept saying "the lender should accept this offer", I said, "they want their money, we want our money, the only unfair thing is you telling every buyer what our financial situtation is and putting the kibosh on a decent price". But I geuss since she gets paid either way, she didn't give a damn about us.

In the end we surrendered. Our neighbor told us it ws a couple who has previously viewed the house and raved about it, but never made an offer. They paid $60,000 less than what we were asking.

The kicker was, they were a couple about 20 years older than us and retired, (we lived in a 55 community) they WAITED for us to crash an burn and stepped in a got the place for nothing. REALTORS ........ARE LIARS, but so are BUYERS.

F/F
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Realtors Are Liars
NAR is CORRUPT
10:00 PM on 06/04/2011
You paid too much. Far too much. Like millions of others who bought housing in the last 15 years.
photo
zelda777
transcend the B. S.
06:03 PM on 06/04/2011
Didn't a 20% down payment used to be the norm until a couple decades ago? People did use to save for their purchases, and things were just simpler. All the new homes built by developers in recent years have been becoming more and more upscale with closets as big as bedrooms, granite counters, etc. With EZ credit, it's very easy to simply spend too much. Hogs at the trough...

Without a credit bubble, yes, it will be harder to buy things. And people can get back to reality. Talk to your parents and grandparents about that.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Mamma Roma
Contrarian and proud of it
09:17 PM on 06/04/2011
Well, we're the parents. In 2007 we bought a fairly priced Mobile Home for $125K in a great city in a great 55 park, put our 20% down, spent $20K in renovations then 3 years later everything crashes and we lose our jobs. Most of our saving were gone and POOF, our lives have changed in an instant. Now, we are pariahs because we had the misfortune of still being alive and continuing to age ,and require food and housing and medical care.

I think lenders lumped people like us together with people who had no investment in their homes and when we appealed to them for forbearence, they treated us like we had nothing to lose, so they did nothing to help us buy some time and get back on our feet.

We lost about $80k all total. And for what?, they turned around and sold it for $70K. How did that even square? Read my above post. F/F
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Realtors Are Liars
NAR is CORRUPT
10:03 PM on 06/04/2011
Again... you paid far far too much like millions of others.
photo
DXM
An extreme moderate
03:22 PM on 06/04/2011
If I had to come up with a 20% down payment, I'd probably never be a home owner - the cost of housing in my area (north of Boston) is too high even now with a "depressed" housing market. I was lucky to be able to scrounge up 5% down when I bought my first home in 1990 (which I had to sell at a huge loss two years later after the last housing bubble burst after my divorce) and 10% down for my second home I bought in 1997. It was only because of the huge increase in value of my second home that I was able to pony up 20% in 2003 when I bought my current home. I was always against the no-down-payment mortgages - they were obvious scams that were bound to screw somebody (the naive mortgagee or the unsuspecting mortgage note holder). But 20% is almost unattainable in many areas of the country where the cost of housing will always be high. There's got to be a middle road.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Realtors Are Liars
NAR is CORRUPT
08:18 PM on 06/04/2011
As prices fall, 20% downpayments will be much more affordable.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Mamma Roma
Contrarian and proud of it
09:19 PM on 06/04/2011
Not without a job it won't. It took us years to save the money. We rented for like 20 years and worked and saved and POOF!
photo
DXM
An extreme moderate
12:26 PM on 06/05/2011
Assuming that wages don't fall faster than housing prices (a big unsupportable assumption at this point), what you say might be true in many areas of the country but not here in the northeast where the cost of real estate has been higher than average for decades because of the population density and the lack of land left to build anything on. In my little town north of Boston, the only way you can build a new house is by tearing down an old one... the supply can not keep up with demand and prices are therefore always going to be high.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mazzo
02:11 PM on 06/04/2011
Instead of requiring 20%, the focus should be on increasing the average wage and reducing the price of homes.

20% of a $100k is not impossible for the average American salary
20% of a $500k home is nearly impossible for most people

I live in Los Angeles, where $500k means you've just bought yourself a dump! Unless you have nearly a million to spend, you're priced out of home ownership outright. Unless you can save up between $100k to $200k, you're gonna be out of luck!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Realtors Are Liars
NAR is CORRUPT
08:20 PM on 06/04/2011
Give it time. Housing is about to get much more affordable as FHA reduces loan limits by 50% in California.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Y3rMawm
veni, vidi, bibi.
07:19 PM on 06/05/2011
From where will the money come to increase wages? What we are seeing in the price of houses is the result of too much easy money, and too much of the wrong type of government intervention (home buyer credits, cheap money, mortgage % deductions, and mark-to-unicorns-s#!tting skittles accounting rules for the banks).

Requiring 20% DP means fewer people will be able to buy, thus prices have more to tumble.