iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reaching Record Highs

Greenhouse Gas Emissions Rise

By ARTHUR MAX   06/ 5/11 06:59 AM ET   AP

AMSTERDAM -- Despite 20 years of effort, greenhouse gas emissions are going up instead of down, hitting record highs as climate negotiators gather to debate a new global warming accord.

The new report by the International Energy Agency showing high emissions from fossil fuels is one of several pieces of bad news facing delegates from about 180 countries heading to Bonn, Germany, for two weeks of talks beginning Monday.

Another: The tsunami-triggered nuclear disaster in March apparently has sidelined Japan's aggressive policies to combat climate change and prompted countries like Germany to hasten the decommissioning of nuclear power stations which, regardless of other drawbacks, have nearly zero carbon emissions.

"Japan's energy future is in limbo," says analyst Endre Tvinnereim of the consultancy firm Point Carbon. The fallout from the catastrophe has "put climate policy further down the priority list," and the short-term effect in Japan – one of the world's most carbon-efficient countries – will be more burning of fossil fuels, he said.

And despite the expansion of renewable energy around the world, the Paris-based IEA's report said energy-related carbon emissions last year topped 30 gigatons, 5 percent more than the previous record in 2008. With energy investments locked into coal- and oil-fueled infrastructure, that situation will change little over the next decade, it said.

Fatih Birol, the IEA's chief economist, says the energy trend should be "a wake-up call." The figures are "a serious setback" to hopes of limiting the rise in the Earth's average temperature to 2 degrees Celsius (3.8 F) above preindustrial levels, he said.

Any rise beyond that, scientists believe, could lead to catastrophic climate shifts affecting water supplies and global agriculture, setting off more frequent and fierce storms and causing a rise in sea levels that would endanger coastlines.

The June 6-17 discussions in Bonn are to prepare for the annual year-end decision-making U.N. conference, which this year is in Durban, South Africa. Even more than previous conferences, Durban could be the forum for a major showdown between wealthy countries and the developing world.

Poor countries say the wealthy West, whose industries overloaded the atmosphere with carbon dioxide and other climate-changing gases over the last 200 years, is not doing enough to cut future pollution.

A study released Sunday supports that view.

The report, based on an analysis by the Stockholm Environment Institute commissioned and released by Oxfam, evaluated national pledges to cut carbon emissions submitted after the 2009 Copenhagen climate summit. It found that developing countries account for 60 percent of the promised reductions.

The analysis is complicated because countries use different yardsticks and baseline years for measuring reductions.

But the study calculated that China, which has pledged to reduce emissions in relation to economic output by 40-45 percent, will cut its carbon output twice as much as the United States by 2020.

"It's time for governments from Europe and the U.S. to stand up to the fossil fuel lobbyists," said Tim Gore, a climate analyst for Oxfam, the international aid agency.

Another keynote battle in Bonn will be the fate of the Kyoto Protocol, the 1997 accord whose provisions capping emissions by industrial countries expire in 2012.

Wealthy countries falling under the protocol's mandate are resisting demands to extend their commitments beyond 2012 and set new legally binding emissions targets unless powerful emerging economies like China, India and Brazil accept similar mandatory caps.

"The Kyoto Protocol uncertainty is casting even a bigger shadow over the negotiations than in years past, and is going to come to a head," said Jake Schmidt of the New York-based Natural Resources Defense Council.

Negotiators also must prepare options for the Durban conference on how to raise $100 billion a year for the Green Climate Fund created last December to help countries cope with global warming. One source under discussion is a levy on international aviation and shipping, said Oxfam's Gore.

"South African negotiators are hoping a deal on sources for long-term finance will be Durban's legacy issue," he said.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

AMSTERDAM -- Despite 20 years of effort, greenhouse gas emissions are going up instead of down, hitting record highs as climate negotiators gather to debate a new global warming accord. The new repor...
AMSTERDAM -- Despite 20 years of effort, greenhouse gas emissions are going up instead of down, hitting record highs as climate negotiators gather to debate a new global warming accord. The new repor...
Filed by Steven Hoffer  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 3,599
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (48 total)
05:26 AM on 06/10/2011
"Poor countries say the wealthy West, whose industries overloaded the atmosphere with carbon dioxide and other climate-changing gases over the last 200 years, is not doing enough to cut future pollution."

It's sad that even poor countries don't have the stomach to point to the main consumer of oil, which is not "industries", whose piece of the "oil pie" is slim compared to the average driver of the average automobile in the United States. Perhaps as we transition to hybrids, this will change, but no matter how hard we squint, we can't change the fractions on the oil pie chart, no matter how sympathetic we are to the struggling middle class.

Fuzzy math and class warfare won't solve the carbon emissions problem.
06:09 PM on 06/08/2011
Unsure if man made global warming is happening or if it's a natural event but regardless, we must reduce greenhouse gas emissions. This means expanding nuclear/atomic energy (nuclear isn't going away though it's gotten hostility), building more hydroelectric dams & reducing fossil fuel usage. The Germans will be using more coal & natural gas from Russia if they phaseout nuclear as they voted. Global warming has become a religion for some environmentalists where they say that there should be no further discussion though the scientists don't know if it's manmade or the sun. Let's just concentrate on reducing pollution & getting rid of greenhouse gases. It just seems that 2 topics among groups like Sierra Club & Greenpeac which are so dominated by religion are their irrational anti-nuclear view & the global warming topic where they say it's closed for discussion.
03:00 PM on 06/07/2011
I have a suggestion to reduce emissions.
Bring back the paper boy/girl and pay your neighbors kids to do yard work - with rakes & shovels. These are pre to early teen jobs that have gone to adults who use cars and power tools. Might even help the obesity problem and increase self esteem.
photo
cambo
On the grand MN's side.
11:33 AM on 06/07/2011
I`m so sick of these clowns (decision makers- laugh) getting together every once in a while to do absolutely nothing besides make a few false pledges. Or maybe there are 2 countries actually doing something.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Roadrun
In Financial Theocracy we Trust
08:35 AM on 06/07/2011
All weather has become extreme. There just isn't any such thing as a normal year anymore, anywhere.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:13 PM on 06/07/2011
There never was a normal year in weather my friend.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Roadrun
In Financial Theocracy we Trust
07:33 AM on 06/08/2011
I'd sure have to disagree with that as I have experienced many of them. Maybe it's the "normal" here. I mean it as average, low standard deviation, mean, typical.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ClimateHawk
Think before posting.
03:28 AM on 06/07/2011
Note to people who appreciate life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

We are pushing on the climate harder than the last great extinction:

http://live.psu.edu/story/53683

We need to switch over to clean energy.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
fumes
Midnight Toker
07:14 PM on 06/06/2011
algore..

is my role model!

my private jet should be here tomorrow fingers crossed..

i got free shipping (over $25 amazon.com).

http://uppitywoman08.files.wordpress.com/2010/06/759-al-gore-fire.jpg?w=400&h=296http://uppitywoman08.files.wordpress.com/2010/06/759-al-gore-fire.jpg?w=400&h=296
photo
GimmeShelter69
Carlos Reutemann's sexy 1974 Brabham F1 car
04:00 PM on 06/06/2011
Gotta start seriously looking at 4th-generation nuclear power (uses the current "spent" radioactive waste as it's own fuel!) and zero CO2 emissions to boot. Talk about killing two birds with one stone.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:25 PM on 06/06/2011
Have you read about the mini or micro nukes? Kind of like fuel cells but different. Google it, it's pretty interesting.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
fumes
Midnight Toker
06:51 PM on 06/06/2011
we're trying to avoid..

any more bird deaths!

sheesh..
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:21 PM on 06/06/2011
Then stop with the huge a** wind turbines! Talk about bird choppers!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ander35
02:38 PM on 06/06/2011
http://www.worldclimatereport.com/index.php/2010/02/01/what%u2019s-happened-to-global-warming/

Temps have not risen in the past decade.
photo
ie
ugh.
02:49 PM on 06/06/2011
Yeah, that blog is the ultimate resource for correct science, eh?
03:18 PM on 06/06/2011
All you have to do is look at the temperature record to see the ongoing warming trend:

http://tinyurl.com/6bzz8vz

If you can read a graph, you can see that temperatures are warming.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:33 PM on 06/06/2011
Since the hockey stick chart that Gore used and later was proved to be totally wrong if not a total fraud I am suspect of a lot of these so called temperature charts. I'll look but with a grain of salt. Have you ever seen some of the places (WX/Temp-stations) these temperatures are taken from? Some are placed in huge heat sink areas & some Russia stations were proved to giving twice daily temperature reading for station that no longer even existed. I know it is NASA and they are impeccable, like I said grain of salt.
photo
rodjard
I Update my brain frequently
11:53 AM on 06/06/2011
Talk and talk and talk. Old men sitting on the porch talking
about how they did it 20 years ago or how dad did it 50 years ago.

Who gives a damn? We have serious thing to do now.
Plenty of time to talk and talk about it later.

Get off your asses and get to work fixing the problems.

Well now that would be Liberal, Well noe that would
be conservative.

How about Well now that either fixes the problem or it don't.
A little common sense goes a long way.

The rest of the world is laughing at the ignorant Republicans
for what they are doing to us and at the ignorand democrats
for letting them do it, while they go right ahead fixing the problems.
We do not lead the world in doing anything anymore.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
06:36 PM on 06/06/2011
You are assuming that humans did it or can do much to stop it.
You know what they say about "assume" ?
photo
rodjard
I Update my brain frequently
10:50 PM on 06/06/2011
Forget all about the fact that our climate and weather paterns are all
screwed up. Pretend that the poles are not all of a sudden melting.

Coal miners lungs are full of black dirt. The Gulf is full of oil, The
oil companies, Walstreet and the Mideast have a stranglehold on
us at the gas pump. Japan just anounced that radiation is twice as
bad there than first reported. Don't pretend that the emissions from your
tailpipe and coal burning power plants is really good stuff to breath.

How about we become the rugged individualists that you want to pretend
that we are and become self sufficient on wind, water and solar energy
that is made right here in the U. S. A.
I forgot to mention gas in the water from fraking and earthquakes just
coinciding with fraking. What if we discover a much better application for
our oil reserves in another generation.
Who cares who did what. We need to follow the lead of Germany, The U.K.,
France, Italy, and China, put our people to work fixing this mess and stop
this stupid talk, talk, talk. like I said in the above post.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Roadrun
In Financial Theocracy we Trust
08:27 AM on 06/07/2011
I know what they say about thought but I know sharing it would be wasted on you.
11:07 AM on 06/06/2011
We know from laboratory experiment­s that CO2 is a greenhouse gas.

I've never heard a global warming denier give any explanation why adding 32 billion tons of CO2 to the air _wouldn't_ cause the mean global temperatur­e to rise.

They seem to believe that CO2 is only a greenhouse gas when you measure it in the laboratory­, but not when it's going into the atmosphere at a rate of 32 billion metric tons per year.”
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wsmith3023
Dems and Reps are two sides of the same coin
11:32 AM on 06/06/2011
Some AGW believers only think that CO2 added to the atmosphere by industry is affecting climate change. I have also been told that destroying 100s of acres of CO2-absorbing trees a minute has no affect on the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere nor is it affecting global warming.
I accept the science of global warming. It is the reason we can exist on this planet.
I accept the science of climate change. I accept the concensus of climate scientists that manmade GHGs may be contributing to the rise in temperature noted of late. I don't accept that politicians or a political party will do anything beneficial for the ecology or environment of this planet. I believe their only interest in this subject is the number of voters they can add.
11:48 AM on 06/06/2011
I do a lot to personally reduce my emissions. I weatherize my domicile, I purchase 100% wind energy for the home, and I drive an efficient car.

But we also need government to do it's part. We need to stop subsidizing fossil fuels and start subsidizing green energy. In other countries they have made small changes in their policy and have gotten huge rewards. In Spain they get more than 20% of their energy from renewable sources, with some regions get as much as 70%. We can do that here. We just need to be smarter, and we need to force fossil fuel companies to compete.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:23 PM on 06/06/2011
I thought global warming phrase was replaced with "human made climate change" ?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wsmith3023
Dems and Reps are two sides of the same coin
11:35 AM on 06/06/2011
Read the norkas comment below
11:06 AM on 06/06/2011
If you want real change then many of us have to make it ourselves and we can.

You cannot depend on politicians because it is proven not to work but what happens when you have people that are the movement and decides how they will live and purchase?

The answer is change or go broke and is that simple.

NO exclusive movements with political labels but a movement that makes you the boss and control of you own destiny.

How to make real change soon to come but for now please understand you and everyone who cares about the the planet can and will make the change that will force business to change or to be out of business.

Yes it is that simple.

Packaging the message and a how to effect yours and everyones life is the key to make massive changes.

EMPOWERMENT!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:01 PM on 06/06/2011
You change all you want but is that going to change China, India and others?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lw1
Jobs! Jobs! Jobs!
11:04 AM on 06/06/2011
As long as Contributions to Republican Climate deniers are at an all time high, the emissions and the climate change will also rise accordingly unless a large majority of people start objecting very loudly.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wsmith3023
Dems and Reps are two sides of the same coin
11:42 AM on 06/06/2011
A large majority of people objecting very loudly will only produce more heat to be added to an already climate change problem. Be proactive. Just slow down in your car and polute less and put more money into your own pocket instead of government and oil companies.
Car pool with one other person and almost double your fuel mileage without buying a new car for $30,000. Buy LED lights. They may be more expensive, but they produce less heat, use less energy and will eventually save you money. Use you imagination. Don't mindlessly follow some political party that only cares if you vote for them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lw1
Jobs! Jobs! Jobs!
12:03 PM on 06/06/2011
Any evidence that Republicans are more environmentally conscious than Democrats?

There are about 29 Billion metric tons of evidence that most Republicans are not at all concerned about environmental problems and LED lights, while a good suggestion, are not enough to counter pollution, mountaintop destruction, the population explosion etc.
10:59 AM on 06/06/2011
There are so many easy things people can do. If people would just weatherize their houses and switch to energy efficient vehicles, they could live the exact same lifestyle they are living now and actually _save_ lots of money. If you are willing to pay a small increase in your bill, you can get 100% green energy for the home:

http://app­­s3.eere.e­n­ergy.gov­/g­reenpow­er/­buying­/buy­ing_p­ower.­shtm­l

It doesn't take much to radically reduce your footprint. For most people, all it involves is simple investment­­s in the home and shifting to one of many transporta­­tion alternativ­­es. There are so many transporta­­tion choices out there from car pooling to biking to mass transit, but check out Yamaha's hybrid motorcycle­­:

http://gas­­2.org/200­9­/10/26/y­am­aha-hv-­x-h­ybrid-­moto­rcycl­e-deb­uts-­in-tok­yo/

That thing rules!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:37 PM on 06/06/2011
maybe try using tiny urls these links get messed up when you try to cut & paste a link
05:57 AM on 06/10/2011
I try to ride my bicycle by day, but since it's dark when I commute home from work, that isn't going to work out. I also work on Sundays when the public transportation system isn't open. I tried the carpool connection at work and have yet to get a response from anyone.

I'm not bashing on any of these things, and I think it's the practicing environmentalists who are keeping things from getting worse.

Perhaps the answer will be in changes in the workplace. A four day (10 hour day) workweek and telecommuting could put a dent in gasses, but people will take advantage of telecommuting and goof off during work. Employers will also take advantage of telecommuting to ship more jobs overseas. It will take another generation of employers and employees to mainstream this trend, and those people will have to have "Star-Trek" like intrinsic motivation to work without supervision. Maybe it will work at Google, though.

In short, we're in trouble.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
blood1
10:29 AM on 06/06/2011
A Catch-22 here in US. Suppose the US finally steps up, what do manufacturing corporations do? They move their industry to a country that doesn't have any restrictions. And then their follower's will say that the US pollution isn't the problem, it is the foreign country and hopes we don't notice it is the American Corporation doing the polluting elsewhere. The Corporation wins: profits increase and it simultaneously ignores all the problems in the country of origin. And what about the TAX Code, these same "American" companies are "rewarded" by delaying (or not paying) taxes in the US.

It is a complex problem and until the risk / reward is globally leveraged to reduce pollution, then nothing will change. That should include both individuals and corporations. Much easier said than done, especially here in the US.