More

With Melanoma On The Rise, New Drugs Boost Survival

By MARILYNN MARCHIONE   06/ 5/11 04:21 PM ET   AP

Melanoma Drugs

CHICAGO -- They're not cures, but two novel drugs produced unprecedented gains in survival in separate studies of people with melanoma, the deadliest form of skin cancer, doctors reported Sunday.

In one study, an experimental drug showed so much benefit so quickly in people with advanced disease that those getting a comparison drug were allowed to switch after just a few months.

The drug, vemurafenib, targets a gene mutation found in about half of all melanomas. The drug is being developed by Genentech, part of Swiss-based Roche, and Plexxikon Inc., part of the Daiichi Sankyo Group of Japan.

The second study tested Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.'s Yervoy, a just-approved medicine for newly diagnosed melanoma patients, and found it nearly doubled the number who survived at least three years.

"Melanoma has just seen a renaissance of new agents," and more are being tested, said Dr. Allen Lichter, chief executive of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

The new studies were presented Sunday at the oncology group's annual meeting in Chicago and published online by the New England Journal of Medicine.

"This is really an unprecedented time of celebration for our patients," said Dr. Lynn Schuchter, of the University of Pennsylvania's Abramson Cancer Center. The new drugs are not by themselves cures, but "the future is going to be to build upon the success" by testing combinations of these newer drugs, she said.

Melanoma is on the rise. There were 68,000 new cases and 8,700 deaths from it in the United States last year, the American Cancer Society estimates. Only two drugs had been approved to treat it, with limited effectiveness, until Yervoy, an immune-system therapy, won approval in March.

The experimental drug, vemurafenib, (vem-yoo-RAF-eh-nib), is aimed at a specific gene mutation, making it the first so-called targeted therapy for the disease. The drug got attention when a whopping 70 percent of those with the mutation responded to it in early safety testing.

The new study, led by Dr. Paul Chapman of Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center in New York, was the key test of its safety and effectiveness. It involved 675 patients around the world with inoperable, advanced melanoma and the gene mutation. They received vemurafenib pills twice a day or infusions every three weeks of the chemotherapy drug dacarbazine.

After six months, 84 percent of people on vemurafenib were alive versus 64 percent of the others.

Less than 10 percent on the drug suffered serious side effects – mostly skin rashes, joint pain, fatigue, diarrhea and hair loss. About 18 percent of patients developed a less serious form of skin cancer. More than a third needed their dose adjusted because of side effects.

The study is continuing, and many remain on the drug, including one of Schuchter's patients: Brian Frantz, a 50-year-old former firefighter from Springfield, Va.

Within a week or two of starting on the drug in September, "we noticed an improvement" and shrinkage in his many tumors, he said. "It was just a miracle."

Schuchter said that's typical of how patients have responded to the drug.

"Within 72 hours, their symptoms improve, pain medicines can be reduced," she said.

The study is a landmark and the results are "very impressive" in people who historically have not fared very well, said Dr. April Salama, a Duke University melanoma specialist.

The study was sponsored by the drug's makers, and many of the researchers consult or work for them. The companies are seeking approval to sell the drug and a companion test for the gene mutation in the U.S. and Europe. A Genentech spokeswoman said the price has not yet been determined.

The other new drug, Yervoy, is not a chemotherapy but a treatment to stimulate the immune system to fight cancer. Dr. Jedd Wolchok of Memorial Sloan-Kettering led the first test of it in newly diagnosed melanoma patients.

About 502 of them received dacarbazine and half also got Yervoy. After one year, 47 percent of those on Yervoy were alive versus 36 percent of the others. At three years, survival was 21 percent with Yervoy versus 12 percent for chemotherapy alone.

Side effects included diarrhea, rash and fatigue. More than half on the new drug had major side effects versus one quarter of those on chemotherapy alone.

Bristol-Myers Squibb paid for the study and many researchers consult or work for the company. Treatment with Yervoy includes four infusions over three months and costs $30,000 per infusion.

___

Online:

Array

Array

FOLLOW HUFFPOST HEALTHY LIVING

CHICAGO -- They're not cures, but two novel drugs produced unprecedented gains in survival in separate studies of people with melanoma, the deadliest form of skin cancer, doctors reported Sunday. In ...
CHICAGO -- They're not cures, but two novel drugs produced unprecedented gains in survival in separate studies of people with melanoma, the deadliest form of skin cancer, doctors reported Sunday. In ...
Filed by Meghan Neal  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 61
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
01:28 PM on 06/13/2011
No comment about the raise in melanoma that occurs as more sunscreen use occurs. Is there a relationship? "Yes! A dose of sun CAN protect you against skin cancer"

By Professor Angus Dalgleish

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-1390243/Sun-CAN-protect-skin-cancer.html#ixzz1PB678Bo5
02:46 AM on 06/07/2011
Time will tell how effective the drugs are but at least there is a hope for this incurable disease.
http://www.lifestyle-after50.com
photo
PenguinLinux
got root ?
02:47 PM on 06/06/2011
In 2001, I had Nodular Melanoma (Stage 2 B - with a Clark's Level 5 and a Breslow Level 4) and a tumor 9mm deep on the left-lateral side of my scalp. 10 years clean now, I was VERY luck it did not metastasize, as when it does, it's almost impossible to beat as chemo and radiation do not work on it. (by US federal law, chemo, radiation and surgery are the only approved and allowed therapies). I'm glad to see these new treatments happen, but if I ever get cancer again, I'm going to Tijuana, Mexico to the Gerson Clinic. They have had the cure for Cancer since 1928. If you have NetFlix, watch "The Gerson Therapy" and "The Beautiful Truth".
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
chickenNgravy
03:05 PM on 06/06/2011
Unbelievable!
People on Huffpost that suggest such obviously fraudulent recommendations should be BANNED!
Their is NO data from the Gerson clinic demonstrating the cure of any cancer.
Anyone can make a video or commercial (propaganda).
You statments suggest physicians in the US (Oncologists) have no real interest in curing their patients of cancer.
They will take your money, give you coffee enemas and vitamin infusions and send you home.

I wish you could go back in time at let the FP at the Gerson clinic cut off your melanoma. But, why cut it off, they could magically make it disappear.
photo
PenguinLinux
got root ?
03:49 PM on 06/06/2011
I should be banned for my opinion?

Ja Vohl Herr Kommendant.

Maybe ya need to move to China or North Korea.

Yes, you are right of course, the US pharmacuetal companies and the AMA have ONLY your BEST interest at heart. They are nOT about the bottom line at all.

These are not the droids you are looking for. Move along now.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
No death panels
There's no man with a trumpet. Only me.
11:57 AM on 06/07/2011
You're lucky you chose conventional therapy rather than the Gerson clinic. You'd probably not be here to post otherwise.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Vajara
vajara
02:01 PM on 06/06/2011
Perhaps I missed the citation, but who did the research and how are they related to the BigPharmas? I wonder why we are so skeptical about these legal drug cartels?
02:52 PM on 06/06/2011
The drug companies make the drugs, and allow particular groups of physicians to sign up their patients to be included in the study, as long as they fit particular requirements (BRAF V600E or alternate mutation positive, reasonable activity level, particular disease state, no concurrent chemotherapy, etc.). Here at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania we had many patients enrolled. Patients are randomized to get either the new drug or in this case dacarbazine (an approved therapy). And then the patients are watched to see how they do. This particular drug can do amazing things in the short term. People near death frequently get a new lease on life and as much as an extra good year. However, most eventually have breakthrough resistant disease and die.

You can argue the cost/benefit profile of paying so much for that amount of increased lifespan (although the prices won't be that high forever), but you can't argue against the vision. We are at the very beginning of the age of personalized cancer therapy, where tumors are treated based on the particular individual genetic mutations that caused them using protein- or pathway-targeted therapeutics. Isn't the idea of a cure for cancer still attractive for this backwards-moving nation? Yes, it's expensive, but we are learning and improving, and the knowledge gained from this process spills over into so many different areas of study.

ps - all of you worried about this benefitting only the rich should support a nationalized healthcare system.
photo
THE GREAT PURIFIER
If you are going through hell, keep going.
12:56 PM on 06/06/2011
Is that photo what I think it is, or is it just my dirty mind at work?
02:42 AM on 06/07/2011
seems like we can share our thoughts :-)
12:54 PM on 06/06/2011
OMG!
Do the math!

68,000 new cases of skin cancer per year in the United States alone! Four treatments in three months at 30,000 per injection!

4 x 30,00 = 120,000.
120,000 x 68,000 = 8,160,000,000.

This does not include the cost of chemo treatment that is used in conjunction per patient nor the anti nausea and pain medicines that are almost always a given! These are the numbers just from skin cancer! What about the profits from 200,000 new diagnosis of breast cancer each year? What about prostate, colon, brain, bone, blood, liver, cervical, ovarian, lymphatic along with the myriad of other cancers diagnosed per year in the United States? Add all the other continents numbers too, plus the fact that only a small handful of pharmaceutical companies run the whole show and reap 90% of the benefits.

This is insane!!!! At this point in the game they don't care if we know it is all about the money or not because they have it and we don't !! Fortunately (unfortunately?), we all know the real bottom line......He who has the most money wins!!!!!

How are we (the people) going to fix this?????
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:05 PM on 06/06/2011
You can't rationally extrapolate the costs of an experimental treatment to apply to universal coverage of the general population.
photo
VeryGrood
only class worse than micro-bio was molecular-bio
01:10 PM on 06/06/2011
OMG! This drug is only approved for LATE STAGE METASTATIC MELANOMA.

Your 'math' is like saying- 'Every year, there are over 1 billion headaches in the US. Migraine medication costs $100 per month. That's $1,200 per year. That's $1.2 TRILLION DOLLARS?!??!?!!'

Doctor's salaries and hospital bills account for ~52% of the total expenditure in healthcare in the US. Pharmaceuticals account for ~10% of the total healthcare expenditure. If you want to fix healthcare.... you're barking up the wrong tree.
11:00 PM on 06/06/2011
That's 62%. Where is the other 38%? That's a large percentage to be unaccounted for. Your math is like saying Yea we made $1.2 trillion dollars selling Migraine medication, but were only to claim 62% of it. No one will ever notice.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
electricladyland
Don't censor me bro.
12:49 PM on 06/06/2011
Increase melanoma survival? Don't we want to kill melanoma?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
omobob
left coast, usa
12:43 PM on 06/06/2011
My father had stage three melanoma when they injected his growths with a new drug. It rendered the swollen red sore back to a healthy pink color. Unfortunately the drug was so expensive my father had to purchase it and then sell it back to the hospital. No mark ups allowed. Sadly he was too far gone and died. There are drugs that can wipe out melanomas. There is no guarantee they will not resurface. Nor any guarantee that the price will be affordable.
12:23 PM on 06/06/2011
Just like AIDS, the REAL cure can only be afforded by the super-wealthy...pathetic!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MikeyJaii
Socialism.
12:04 PM on 06/06/2011
Getting close to a cure.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:01 PM on 06/06/2011
Easy cure. Give the natives back their land, This includes, Canada. Australia. Israel,United States. New Zealand. and wherever Europeans are not originally from.

Rising UV Radiation levels are on the rise world wide so unless you have dark skin your days are numbered.
11:46 AM on 06/06/2011
All the talk about chemicals and drugs, preventing skin cancer, why not tell the public how to avoid cancer in the first place. Avoid the chemicals avobenzone, octycrylene, and more that are in the very products we put on our skin to prevent cancer. Most sunscreens on the market contain these very chemical that help increase cancer. Use Neways Sombrero suncream for maximum protection without the questionable and controversial ingredients. positivehealthyliving.ineways.com
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MikeyJaii
Socialism.
12:04 PM on 06/06/2011
The Gov't do give warnings. But it's the media that portray "tan" is beautiful.
photo
VeryGrood
only class worse than micro-bio was molecular-bio
02:55 PM on 06/06/2011
The idea that many of these chemicals may cause cancer hasn't been proven and studies are inconclusive... but if they can be avoided... I would avoid them.

The BEST way to prevent skin cancer is to avoid overexposure to the sun and sunburns.
10:22 PM on 06/06/2011
They haven't been disproven either! Precautionary Principle requires one to error on the side of caution for the purpose of doing no harm to any living thing. Better safe than sorry is good common sense and a sound foundation from which to conduct one's business ( no I am not against science nor technology) !

Inconclusive is no better than pleading the fifth. Admitting nothing when substantiated evidence raises concern or saying it's safe because not enough people have died from it yet is not good science.

Avoid them? It's hard to avoid something you don't know is there! This goes for possible causes of all cancers. Current labeling laws don't require ALL ingredients to be listed on All products. This obstructs our right to choose. Why are they fighting public demand to provide full and accurate information? What do they have to hide? If they were behaving honorably and with integrity it would be seen as a simple request and not some public conspiracy to take them down! That attitude can go both ways you know.

Avoiding radiation in all forms is a good idea, but that's getting harder as well. Between early detection (radiation), treatment of (radiation), nuclear disaster (duh), and flying the friendly skies (wouldn't want to be a flight attendant right now), we'd all have to opt out of modern civilization!

The point is: Let's AVOID disease by ELIMINATING some of the carcinogens and not ADD more of them to the mess we are already in.
11:46 AM on 06/06/2011
$30,000 for one infusion? Who on earth can afford that unless you are a multi-millionaire! Shame, shame, shame on drug companies who charge that much money!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:59 AM on 06/06/2011
It costs a lot of money to develop these new treatments. The high initial cost is part of the process of technological development, and there is nothing shameful about it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lakabux
Imagine...
02:25 PM on 06/06/2011
Bull. Drug companies typically spend twice as much on advertising than on research.

The shameful part is that if you have melanoma, there are now two outcomes: If you are wealthy, you might be cured, if not, sayonara!

Equal rights under the law. Hah!
photo
VeryGrood
only class worse than micro-bio was molecular-bio
01:19 PM on 06/06/2011
If I had to guess... I'd say the total tab for research by this company is somewhere north of $4,000,000,000 per year (that is just a guess though). Not to mention that Yervoy is a biologic... a protein and not a small molecule... so it is much more expensive to create, purify, and package.

If the drug company couldn't generate a profit somehow (and many of them are just barely hanging on right now)... they would never be able to create these new, life saving medicines.

And you don't have to be a millionaire to afford it... you just have to have good healthcare. Obama is trying his hardest to get everyone covered and the republicans are fighting it with everything they have....
11:41 AM on 06/06/2011
This is great news but I'm sure you will need to sell a KIDNEY to afford it!

Kenny Nash

youtube "BROKE IN BEVERLY HILLS"
11:41 AM on 06/06/2011
is that a picture of testicles up there?