More

Gaddafi Vows To Fight To The Death

Muammar Gaddafi

DIAA HADID   06/ 7/11 08:14 PM ET   AP

TRIPOLI, Libya — Moammar Gadhafi stood defiant Tuesday in the face of the heaviest and most punishing NATO airstrikes yet – at least 40 thunderous daylight attacks that sent plumes of smoke billowing above the Libyan leader's central Tripoli compound.

The strikes continued overnight. Early Wednesday, some 10 explosions shook the Libyan capital. It was not immediately clear what was hit.

Late Tuesday afternoon, Libyan state television broadcast an audio address from Gadhafi, who denounced NATO and the rebels challenging his rule. He vowed never to surrender.

"We will not kneel!" he shouted.

Alliance officials warned for days that they were increasing the scope and intensity of their air campaign to oust Gadhafi after more than 40 years in power. NATO is backing the rebel insurgency, which has seized swaths of eastern Libya and pockets in the regime's stronghold in the west since it began in February, inspired by uprisings elsewhere in the Arab world.

Some 6,850 people, nearly all of them Libyans, have streamed across the border from Libya to Tunisia since Monday to flee the NATO raids as well as fighting between the rebels and government forces, according to the Tunisian Defense Ministry.

It couldn't be confirmed whether Gadhafi's some 10-minute speech was a live phone call or an audio recording, but it appeared to take state television by surprise. The sound was hastily adjusted to make it louder

"We will not surrender: we only have one choice – to the end! Death, victory, it does not matter, we are not surrendering!" Gadhafi said. Highlighting his anger, he called the rebels "bastards."

As he spoke, reporters in Tripoli heard the whooshing sound of low-flying military craft again, followed by several explosions. Pro-Gadhafi loyalists also fired celebratory gunfire in the air.

The Libyan leader also later appeared on state television sitting with tribal elders, said government spokesman Moussa Ibrahim. "He is still resilient," Ibrahim said, adding that Gadhafi believes NATO strikes are "not about civilians, democracy or peace in Libya. The attacks are about domination, revenge and wealth."

Gadhafi was last seen in a brief appearance on state television in late May. He has mostly been in hiding since NATO strikes in April targeted one of his homes. Libyan officials said one of his sons, Saif al-Arab, and three of his grandchildren were killed in that strike.

Another of his sons, Al-Saadi Gadhafi – a one-time football player and leader of an army unit – also called into a late night state television show early Wednesday, denouncing the regime's opponents.

The sharp escalation in NATO strikes comes as the U.S. and its allies step up efforts to break the virtual stalemate that has prevented both sides from achieving an outright victory.

On Tuesday, U.S. President Barack Obama once again called on Gadhafi to step aside.

"Gadhafi must step down and hand power to the Libyan people, and the pressure will only continue to increase until he does," Obama said during a joint news conference in Washington with visiting German Chancellor Angela Merkel.

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton is heading to the United Arab Emirates to confer with NATO nations and others prosecuting an air campaign in Libya to assess the effort to get Gadhafi to leave and increase support for the country's opposition.

Western reporters and a senior Libyan government official said the pounding airstrikes Tuesday easily outstripped the number of bombing runs on any day since the international air campaign began in mid-March.

Ibrahim claimed some 31 people were killed in 60 NATO strikes on Tripoli. Previous government tolls have proven to be exaggerated.

Reporters, who face tight restrictions in the Libyan capital, saw only one dead man during a visit to Gadhafi's Bab al-Aziziya compound.

The dust-covered bloodied man was draped around a cement column at one of the crushed compound buildings. He was seen on a government-escorted tour of bombed sites.

The boot and legs of the man, identified as Misbah Hussein, in his forties, stuck out from beneath a pile of twisted metal close to the remains of a building just inside the eastern entrance of the Gadhafi compound.

As his comrades realized what they were staring at, they rushed toward him, their arms raised.

"Bring a blanket!" one shouted.

They wrapped him in the closest thing they could find – a large green flag – green being the iconic color of the Gadhafi regime.

A soldier said eight strikes targeted the building, which he said was a guest house for visiting dignitaries.

Around him, one building was smashed into three hulking cement parts and the floor was strewn with small chunks of metal, foam and cement.

He said some two dozen soldiers and civilians were sitting near the building when it was hit. He would not be named, citing military regulations.

A strike smashed another nearby building that officials identified as a guest house. The ground was littered with small gray shards.

That was not far from a zone where pro-Gadhafi supporters have camped in tents for the past few weeks to act as human shields against NATO strikes. Ibrahim, the regime spokesman, said the attacks would spawn "generations of revenge."

NATO issued no immediate comment on battering it delivered over Tripoli.

Gadhafi's inner circle has been shaken by a wave of defections. A Libyan rebel diplomat in Geneva said Tuesday that the country's labor minister Al-Amin Manfour – who had been representing Libya at the International Labor Organization's annual meeting – has defected and joined the rebels.

Adel Shaltut said Tuesday that Manfour was on his way to the rebel stronghold of Benghazi, in eastern Libya. Shaltut and other diplomats at Libya's mission to the United Nations in Geneva defected to the rebels in February.

Russia, meanwhile was renewing diplomatic efforts to end the civil war.

Mikhail Margelov, the Kremlin's special representative for Africa, said Gadhafi had lost his legitimacy but that NATO airstrikes were not a solution to the stalemate in Libya.

"As long as bloodshed continues the more difficult it will be to build a national reconciliation process after the civil war," Margelov told reporters Tuesday during a visit to the eastern rebel stronghold of Benghazi.

Russia, along with China, abstained in the U.N. Security Council vote authorizing the use of force against Libyan government loyalists and has repeatedly criticized the NATO bombing campaign in support of the rebels.

U.N. envoy Abdelilah Al-Khatib also arrived in Tripoli, Ibrahim said, without providing details. And Libya dispatched Foreign Minister Abdul-Ati al-Obeidi to Beijing for a three days of talks, an apparent effort to restore some of Libyan government influence and defuse a setback delivered by China last week. Chinese officials announced on Friday that they had reached out to the rebel forces challenging Gadhafi, a significant effort to boost Chinese engagement in the Libya conflict and possibly jostle for a mediator role.

Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Hong Lei told reporters at a regular briefing Tuesday that talks with al-Obeidi would focus on the need for a political solution to the Libyan crisis.

The revolt against Gadhafi followed popular uprisings that overturned the longtime rulers of Tunisia and Egypt. As the conflict escalated, it grew beyond an insurrection by a small group and has now evolved into a civil war.

___

Associated Press Writer Hadeel Al-Shalchi in Benghazi, Gillian Wong in Beijing, Frank Jordans in Geneva and Matthew Lee in Washington D.C. contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

TRIPOLI, Libya — Moammar Gadhafi stood defiant Tuesday in the face of the heaviest and most punishing NATO airstrikes yet – at least 40 thunderous daylight attacks that sent plumes of smok...
TRIPOLI, Libya — Moammar Gadhafi stood defiant Tuesday in the face of the heaviest and most punishing NATO airstrikes yet – at least 40 thunderous daylight attacks that sent plumes of smok...
Filed by Curtis M. Wong  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,168
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (49 total)
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
rf dude
Just an average Man of Bronze
05:12 AM on 06/09/2011
Wasn't he the bad guy in Iron Man 2?

http://snarkerati.com/movie-news/files/2008/10/mickey-rourke.jpg
09:41 PM on 06/08/2011
yep. he is going down in a blaze of glory. and taking people with him.
Sevilleaba
There is a sufficiency in the world for man's need
12:31 PM on 06/08/2011
Gaddafi reminds me of the opening battle scene from the movie Gladiator:

QUINTUS: PEOPLE SHOULD KNOW WHEN THEY'RE CONQUERED.
photo
rbenjamin
Rule 5 rules
11:58 AM on 06/08/2011
The BBC reports ground action around Misrata as rebels attempt a break-out.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-13700908
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:49 PM on 06/08/2011
Hmmm.

Why don't the rebels get NATO to move them out of Bengazi to a point west of Tripoli and make an attack from there?

Sort of like Anzio?

Not terribly practical, I suppose.
photo
rbenjamin
Rule 5 rules
04:36 PM on 06/08/2011
It would probably turn out to be a bigger snafu than the original Anzio. Toyota pickups don't float, at least not for very long.
photo
rbenjamin
Rule 5 rules
09:20 AM on 06/09/2011
For "the record," I think NATO is happiest when the insurgents stay more or less in their own neighborhoods. They are poorly trained light infantry and fight most effectively in defensive posture. I'm convinced Nato's air strategy is to enable and encourage more and more neighborhoods to "light up" in opposition to the Kadhafi government, rather than to move the front by actually moving soldiers about.

At some point in the plan, Kadhafi leaves or is deposed by immediate subordinates. When (and if) this happens, NATO would like to see a peace conference leading to a transitional government and elections. This is a lot more likely if NATO encourages the rebels to stay hunkered down. A low casualty count is very helpful - fewer people with scores to settle.

NATO's nightmare endgame is for the Kadhafi government to fall and for rival militias to fight it out among themselves.
photo
stape45
Spin this!
11:04 AM on 06/08/2011
He won't have to surrender. We have ourselves a go-getter in the Oval Office now.
photo
songoftherushes
I can think, I can wait, and I can fast
11:40 AM on 06/08/2011
Are you saying Obama IS responsible for all this, not England and France? Is this Obama's war?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:51 PM on 06/08/2011
I think the point is that Obama has proven himself capable of taking difficult and politically hazardous decisions.

Remembering that the assault on bin Laden's house was politically the MOST dangerous alternative available to Obama. It would have been easy to just drop a few bo mbs on it and call it a day. But so much that was gained would not have been.
10:49 AM on 06/08/2011
I hope he does not surrender.

I also hope that the NATO forces complete their mission.

Gaddafi and his sons are responsible for murdering thousands of their own people just so that they could steal Libya's wealth. They should end up just like Saddam. Either hanged or bombed.

No one should be allowed to live out their life in luxury after committing crimes against humanity such as the likes of Idi Amin, Ex-President of Tunisia and Yemeni President Salah, everyone of these mass murderes have been given a safe haven in Saudi Arabia.

Saudis are harboring all these mass murderers and yet no one is raising an eyebrow at the UN, United Kingdom, France, Germany, Spain, Italy, Australia or the United States. We in the west are in this respect no different than the tyrants we so love demonize.
photo
songoftherushes
I can think, I can wait, and I can fast
11:52 AM on 06/08/2011
Amen, I can't wait to see Cheney, Bush, and Obama facing charges.
10:45 AM on 06/08/2011
I wondered what happened to Keith Richards.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Proud Progressive
Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness
10:31 AM on 06/08/2011
I wonder what this fool sees as a possible, positive result of the civil war (that he instigated) that Libya is now embroiled in? There are few countries that would shelter him now, after he hired mercenaries to kill his people. I wonder why he and his family did not take a pile of money and get the heck out of town when he had the chance??? There are still places where his money would be welcome, after all OBL was able to hide undetected for 10 years, so why did he not cut his losses and run, it just seems nonsensical to me.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
MJinCanada
Safe from zombies until my 2nd cup of coffee
11:11 AM on 06/08/2011
I don't think he's been playing with a full deck for years now. Dictators reach a point where they think they're practically immortal, ruling by divine right, always right and cannot be defied, and at the same time are utterly paranoid. And he's apparently raised his kids to be arrogant, spoiled sociopaths who won't be able to back down either.
photo
songoftherushes
I can think, I can wait, and I can fast
12:00 PM on 06/08/2011
Q's two most prominent children were hardly monsters.
Aisha al-Gaddafi was the Goodwill Ambassador for the UN.
Saif was long held to be a reforming influence.
photo
songoftherushes
I can think, I can wait, and I can fast
11:48 AM on 06/08/2011
It seems nonsensical to you because you have bought into a narrative that is simply untrue.

A He didn't start it. On Feb. 16, violent demonstrations (including attacks on police, property etc) were put down. THEN the demos (also violent) in Benghazi began which were anti-Q.
B The 'mercenary' claims were debunked ages ago by Human Rights Watch.

He made that country into one of the riches in the region, having built up a system which includes free education (to third level), greater women's rights, free medical etc.
Many people support Q, so he even if he wanted to, to desert them to the rebels would be horrendous.

Finally, because the ICC are now gunning for him, there are few places he can go. Besides, since you mention it, now that Obama has decided it is ok to use SEALS to perform extrajudicial 'killings', where would Q be safe?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Proud Progressive
Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness
12:52 PM on 06/08/2011
I remember listening to Al Jazheera as this started. Yes, peaceful protests were met by sniping, as the interveiwee described it they were mostly head shots, kind of demoralising when the person you are talking to or standing next to suddenly developes a hole in their head. Libyan pilots flew their jets to Italy to avoid having to turn their guns on the civilian 'rebels'. I also heard from the other side, the apologists, and backers of the regime (also on Al Jazheera) about how it was the land of milk and honey. Mayhaps there is more than one narrative going on here, I haven't heard anything from Quaddaffi or his sons that sounds like moderation. I have heard from the other side, before they were armed, and they wanted what we want, peace and justice.
I guess we will have to believe the narrative that we have heard or have formed in our minds.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
12:59 PM on 06/08/2011
Oh, now you are crying a river for bin Laden?

To quote the president, you need your head examined.

Only a raging dolt would argue that we should have taken bin Laden alive and tried him publicly.

Al Qaeda would have been conducting terrist outrages all across the globe.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TeaLady005
10:19 AM on 06/08/2011
March 18th Obama said we will be in Libya "days, not weeks". ---March 18th Obama said we were in Libya to enforce a "humanitarian no fly zone" and then fired hundreds of Tomahawk Cruise Missiles in Libyan cities. Today Obama is using bomber aircraft and Apache Attack helicopters in his attempt to KILL the leader of a sovereign nation. ---Are libs in favor of an illegal war only when a Democrat is president?
firehorse1200
Saving the world one thick skull at a time
10:41 AM on 06/08/2011
If "an illegal war" is the only way to end 40 years of murder, terror, and despotic rule, then is the war or the regime more illegal? At least there is the framework of an international UN mandate for the war, which the world at large does not consider to be illegal. Only teabaggers and tyrants do. Perhaps you should write an Amicus Brief in support of the lawsuit brought by Gadaffi's daughter.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
MJinCanada
Safe from zombies until my 2nd cup of coffee
11:14 AM on 06/08/2011
Thank you. There seem to be an awful lot of people who have no idea that numerous UN nations are involved in this. It's like the action in Bosnia, and what should have been done in places like Rwanda. The UN has learned that you can't send in UN forces to protect civilians and then stand by and let them be slaughtered.
photo
songoftherushes
I can think, I can wait, and I can fast
11:51 AM on 06/08/2011
There was UN order for a no-fly zone...not regime change.
photo
Kevin Theis
Yellow dog Democrat from Chicago
10:09 AM on 06/08/2011
Why is it that in every recent picture taken of him, Gadhafi looks like the guy I used to see sleeping under the train tracks by the City dump? Disheveled hair, greasy beard, bloodshot eyes. Add a little pee stain on his uniform and he's Leo the Drunken Bum.
photo
songoftherushes
I can think, I can wait, and I can fast
10:13 AM on 06/08/2011
Those are the pictures certain people want you to see.
photo
Kevin Theis
Yellow dog Democrat from Chicago
10:23 AM on 06/08/2011
"Certain people"? You mean to say that they're holding back the really sexy Gadhafi pictures so that he'll look like a drug-addled clown while we're bombing him? Who are these mysterious photo-hogging people? Is it Doc Brown looking for revenge?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
MJinCanada
Safe from zombies until my 2nd cup of coffee
11:24 AM on 06/08/2011
Twenty, thirty years ago he looked alert and on the ball -- even brutally handsome if you go for that sort of thing.

However, for the past several years he's looked like he's either doing a lot of drugs and/or not sleeping. There's a tightness in his face that says that he's closed his mind against any sort of disagreement. He just doesn't take a good photo anymore.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
eden4barack08
Watch out! He carries a big stick!
10:07 AM on 06/08/2011
Lol...He hung up the phone on the Libyan people mid conversation? How rude!

Come' on Tripoli folks, rise up, you can do this!
There's no freedom without sacrifice, no victory without suffering, no dawn without night, no rainbow without rain...
10:06 AM on 06/08/2011
Why Libya?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
eden4barack08
Watch out! He carries a big stick!
12:49 PM on 06/08/2011
Because Ben Ali and Mubarak stepped down, rather than wage all out war on their citizens.
01:14 PM on 06/08/2011
Yeah--their citizens are in really good shape now (or haven't you bothered to look)?
And why not Syria? Why not Yemen? Why not Ivory Coast? They really are waging all out war on their citizens. Qaddaffi was only threatening to.
10:04 AM on 06/08/2011
Let's see. The president told us this wasn't about regime change.
Then he botched up and tried to kill qaddaffi, but only managed to kill his grandbabies. That didn't make the news much because voila: bin laden got offed.

He said it was humanitarian and only to establish a no fly zone. But we are bombing the daylights out of Tripoli.

Meanwhile, the rebels we're supporting are torturing their captives.

Oh yes, this is a real fine not-war.

Strangely, no one questions the president about these things.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CaptMike65
09:50 AM on 06/08/2011
Who cares. We don't want him alive.
photo
songoftherushes
I can think, I can wait, and I can fast
10:14 AM on 06/08/2011
"We?"
photo
FoxIslander
Fox Island...no relation to Fox News
09:47 AM on 06/08/2011
"WE" will not surrender? must have a mouse in his pocket.