More

Greenpeace Activists Block Nuclear Waste Transport Heading To France

Greenpeace Activists Nuclear Waste Transport

06/ 7/11 04:40 AM ET   AP

THE HAGUE, Netherlands -- Greenpeace activists say they are blocking a train carrying nuclear waste from a Dutch power station to a reprocessing plant in France.

Activist Ike Teuling says the environmental group has driven a truck across rail lines being used by a train transporting the waste from the Borselle nuclear power station in the southern Dutch province of Zeeland through Belgium to La Hague in northern France.

Teuling said four Greenpeace activists chained themselves to the truck being used in Tuesday morning's blockade.

EPZ, the company that operates the Borselle nuclear power plant, did not immediately respond to an email seeking comment.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

THE HAGUE, Netherlands -- Greenpeace activists say they are blocking a train carrying nuclear waste from a Dutch power station to a reprocessing plant in France. Activist Ike Teuling says the environ...
THE HAGUE, Netherlands -- Greenpeace activists say they are blocking a train carrying nuclear waste from a Dutch power station to a reprocessing plant in France. Activist Ike Teuling says the environ...
Filed by Travis Donovan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 34
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael Mann
Nuclear Educator
05:21 AM on 06/08/2011
They should be prosecuted to the fullest extent and made to pay damages. Maybe they can use some of the profits from "Whale Wars" to pay, why would someone who professes to be an environmentalist protest recycling? Greenpeace international should pay huge fines for this.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rick Fallin
Splitting through the clutter
10:55 AM on 06/08/2011
maybe Greenpeace believes that the train company is not in compliance with the Transport of Dangerous Goods regulations. We don't have a complete picture.

As a nuclear educator.. you should not make a blanket judgment without having all the facts.. transport of all materials is highly regulated and we know companies break the rules.. enforcement should be transparent to both sides and be applied to both sides.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Michael Mann
Nuclear Educator
11:29 AM on 06/08/2011
So, what you're saying, if I believe a theatre is not meeting fire codes, I am justified in starting a fire in that crowded theatre to make the point? It doesn't make sense.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alvdh1
01:51 AM on 06/09/2011
Your company and its employees, Mr Mann, in the event of a major radiation release to the environment at your nuclear power plant should be prosecuted for premeditated murder.

Mr. Mann does not have the credentials to be a nuclear educator, but he is fully qualified to be a nuclear propagandist.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alvdh1
02:18 AM on 06/09/2011
"The train hauling the nuclear waste to the La Hague reprocessing facility on the Normandy coast was blocked by Greenpeace and they should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law". Yet, the La Hague facility discharges 110,000,000 gallon of radioactive waste into the English Channel every year and routinely vents radioactive Krypton 85 into the atmosphere. Beaches have been closed, fishing has been halted around the facility and the radiation has been tracked to the Arctic Ocean. It is unbelievable that you are not recommending punishment of AREVA and the French government for the contamination. You have the moral compass of the devil considering the fact that this is a violent act against the environment, marine life and humans who consume marine life in the area and wherever the currents take the crap. The right to protest and civil disobedience is the cornerstone of our democracy. There isn't a day that passes where your comments here do nothing short of stagger one's imagination on the shallowness of your world view.

http://www.alternet.org/world/132852/the_french_nuclear_industry_is_bad_enough_in_france%3B_let's_not_expand_it_to_the_u.s./
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
beckjr2000
been there done that & tired of it
03:00 PM on 06/07/2011
They are nothing more than low grade Terrorists!
photo
blackwind
Relax, nothing is under control
03:35 PM on 06/07/2011
Terrorism is defined as using terror to achieve political ends. Nobody is terrified of a protest, so this doesn't fit the definition.
photo
vmf211
Fighting against Liberalism everyday
09:23 PM on 06/07/2011
Have you ever seen a left wing protest ?
They are never peaceful and most time there is violence in some form.
photo
vmf211
Fighting against Liberalism everyday
09:23 PM on 06/07/2011
I'd go with terrorists without a clue.
photo
John Mainstream
I'm a Clinton Democrat that is now an independent.
01:30 PM on 06/07/2011
Imagine the security risks.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alvdh1
02:34 AM on 06/09/2011
Imagine the security, environmental and health risks of the operations at La Hague.

http://www.alternet.org/world/132852/the_french_nuclear_industry_is_bad_enough_in_france%3B_let's_not_expand_it_to_the_u.s./
01:10 PM on 06/07/2011
Greenpeace Hitler Youth

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wy-a0Axf0tI
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alvdh1
02:36 AM on 06/09/2011
And what would you call the people in the link below. AREVA/French Government Hitler Facist, planet poisoners. Your moral compass hat is pointing straight down.

http://www.alternet.org/world/132852/the_french_nuclear_industry_is_bad_enough_in_france%3B_let's_not_expand_it_to_the_u.s./
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
fireofenergy
Promote freedom AND science
11:44 AM on 06/07/2011
How utterly silly!
Chances are, the "wastes" came from a reactor that pressurizes water needed to keep the unnatural reaction safe and producing (some what) clean electricity.
Without reprocessing, they would be like the silly USA that contemplates burying it.
Reprocessing is like recycling! They can't get the left over 99% of the power out of the solid fuel because the heat, gamma's and and thus subsequent release on zenon gas (or is it kryton?) cause structural damage to the zirconium structure that holds it.
That is why conventional nuclear sucks!
Now, there is a whole DIFFERENT approach to the process of fission.
It is called the liquid fluoride THORium reactor, the molten salt reactor, and possibly others that "burn" ALL of the nuclear fuel and thus would be 100 times more efficient (and would not need off site reprocessing). In fact "take a little here, give a little there" is the continuous approach that PROVED this concept as a 6 month test (among others) at ORNL in the 60's!
Of course, there are material challenges to making thorium reactors last decades, but then again, we now live in a world 50 years more advanced!

Search LFTR

So, the next time somebody wants to block nuclear, please explain to them that they are only blocking the wrong kind!
05:59 PM on 06/07/2011
Im all for LFTRs

ORNLs Alvin Weinberg was right
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wsmith3023
Dems and Reps are two sides of the same coin
07:56 PM on 06/07/2011
The USA has been burying radioactive wastes for 30 years. I collected data for the EIS in the 70s when I was a new environmentalist. It wasn't exactly what I expected an environmentalist to do. We killed as many animals as we could each month, skinned them and put their organs in labeled vials and the rest in an old refrigerator where demestids ate all of the meat and left the skeleton. Needless to say I looked for other employment possibilities.
11:35 AM on 06/07/2011
Greenpeace activities such as this event in fact, increases risk and degrades both safety and security.
photo
maslin
At 6 bn km, it's mostly small stuff.
05:56 PM on 06/07/2011
Though in general I might agree with some of Greenpeace's goals, it's this kind of thing that precludes my supporting them.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alvdh1
02:35 AM on 06/09/2011
Yet you fully support the radioactive contamination of the English Channel from the La Hague reprocessing facility.

http://www.alternet.org/world/132852/the_french_nuclear_industry_is_bad_enough_in_france%3B_let's_not_expand_it_to_the_u.s./
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
alvdh1
02:34 AM on 06/09/2011
And what are your feelings about the link below. This ought to be good since you raised the safety and security issues.

http://www.alternet.org/world/132852/the_french_nuclear_industry_is_bad_enough_in_france%3B_let's_not_expand_it_to_the_u.s./