iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

The Cost Of Defunding Indiana Planned Parenthood

Planned Parenthood

First Posted: 06/08/11 01:14 PM ET Updated: 08/08/11 06:12 AM ET

As a federal judge considers whether to block the implementation of a recently-passed law that defunds Planned Parenthood of Indiana, more than 20,000 low-income patients are on the verge of losing their primary health care provider.

Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels (R) signed a bill in early May that, among other things, blocks Medicaid patients from being reimbursed for health services at Planned Parenthood clinics and requires doctors to tell a pregnant woman seeking abortion that the fetus might feel pain during the procedure. Republican lawmakers have said the bill is intended to prevent taxpayer-funded abortions, although the Hyde Amendment has prevented government money from being used for abortions for the past 30 years.

Since the bill took effect, Planned Parenthood of Indiana has received an unprecedented amount of donations from nearly 1200 donors across three continents. The donations totaled $116,000, and PPIN estimates that the money will allow it to continue providing medical services to its current Medicaid patients through June 20.

“We are delighted that this astounding outpouring of donations from around the world continues," said PPIN President and CEO Betty Cockrum. "Using those generous gifts to provide Pap tests, birth control and STD testing and treatment to our Medicaid patients is absolutely the right thing to do."

But unless Judge Tanya Walton Pratt strikes down the defunding law, when the money runs out, PPIN says it will be forced to close at least seven of its clinics in poor, rural or medically-underserved areas, lay off up to 30 health center staff and displace an estimated 20,858 Medicaid patients from their primary health provider. None of the clinics that would be shut down provide abortions.

At a hearing on Monday, attorneys for the American Civil Liberties Union and Planned Parenthood Federation of America asked the judge to stop the law from being implemented, because it is designed to penalize health providers that perform legal, privately-funded abortions. Moreover, the attorneys argued, the law endangers patients by requiring providers to give patients misleading information about abortion.

The federal Health and Human Services Department recently rejected Indiana's request to defund Planned Parenthood, since Medicaid rules state that patients should have the freedom to choose any qualified health provider, but the state has not said whether it intends to comply with the rule. If Indiana proceeds with the defunding, it could lose all of the family planning money it currently receives from the federal government.

"CMS has informed Indiana that their proposed Amendment is not in compliance with federal law," a Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services official said in a statement. "We are working with Indiana and fully expect that the State will follow the federal law that sets the conditions for its receipt of over $4 billion in Federal Medicaid funds."

Judge Pratt said she would deliver a final decision on the law by July 1, but Cockrum pleaded for an earlier decision on behalf of the thousands of Medicaid patients that will be displaced when donor money runs out.

“Fortunately, thanks to the generosity of hundreds of first-time donors, we’ve been able to keep our doors open to most Medicaid patients across the state,” she said. “However, this kind of financial support is already waning and cannot be sustained. Every day that we are not a Medicaid provider, women are put at risk of unintended pregnancy."

A recent study by the Guttmacher Institute, a leading reproductive health research and advocacy group, estimates that unintended pregnancies cost U.S. taxpayers an estimated $11.1 billion a year. The Indiana Family and Social Services Administration reported in 2008 that over half of all Indiana births were financed by Medicaid, averaging a cost of $11,250 per birth.

"Restricting access to preventative health and family planning services for thousands of low-income men and women is a very cavalier and irresponsible approach to public health policy," Cockrum said.

Related:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
As a federal judge considers whether to block the implementation of a recently-passed law that defunds Planned Parenthood of Indiana, more than 20,000 low-income patients are on the verge of losing th...
As a federal judge considers whether to block the implementation of a recently-passed law that defunds Planned Parenthood of Indiana, more than 20,000 low-income patients are on the verge of losing th...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 6,105
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (71 total)
01:32 PM on 07/01/2011
It's not surprising to see right-wing Indiana trying to stop Planned Parenthood. They get access to all sorts of federal powers through child support laws.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gregory Hinton
pursuit of happiness
09:37 AM on 06/22/2011
i hope i live long enough to see these repubtparty animals hanging from tree limbs.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rda1911a1
God Bless John Browning
02:15 PM on 06/15/2011
Why can't planned parenthood give up it's child murder industry ? If it's such a small part of it's overall services cut the baby killing off as a seperate entity. Those needing an unborn child killed can go there and those needing the vast amount of planned parenthood services can still be fully funded.
09:17 PM on 06/24/2011
They cut funding from all Planned Parenthoods--Including the MANY that don't even perform abortions. You think that they'd attempt to provide an incentive for PP to stop providing abortions by simply cutting funding to the ones that perform abortions. As stated before, many don't, and they cut funding to ALL PP places in Indiana, regardless of whether or not they performed abortions.

This wasn't an action against abortion, per se. It was, however, an action against family planning and against reproductive health services.

Why just Planned Parenthood? Why not ALL abortion clinics? As stated, they're not fighting "abortion" here, but rather, health care.

I wonder how long it will take for the courts to rule that this violates federal law and the Constitution (14th Amendment)? OH WAIT. A district court did. I don't know about the Constitution part, but they did realize that it violates federal law. :)

And if people really wanted abortion numbers to go down, they'd realize that making it illegal upfront right now is NOT the way to go. It will just end up hurting women, children, and families. But let's not think of consequences, right? You only want the women that have sex to think of consequences--right? Correct me if I'm wrong.
photo
mcostello
It's just math
02:18 PM on 06/11/2011
Let it lapse and the rest of the country will see what short-sighted mor ons the right are. (at the expense of the health of the women of Indiana)
photo
splashy
Really?!?!!!
12:10 PM on 06/10/2011
Another part of the war on women, where those that don't have money are expected to have children and live in poverty, starving and homeless, so the wealthy right wing men can pick and choose which ones to exploit for money, leaving the others that aren't so pretty to suffer and die.

These men, mostly white, are really hateful toward women. I'm astonished there are any women that would have anything to do with them. Maybe that's why they want to be able to exploit the poor women, because women in their status ignore them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WillistonElkoAlum2002
Strongly favor abortion rights & less government.
06:24 AM on 06/10/2011
The Obama Admin should stop dawdling around and cut off ALL of Indiana's federal funding. And not just for healthcare -- they should also cease ALL other forms of federal aid to the state.

Indiana should be punished for violating federal law. This is about following the letter of the federal law, not about those who need help.
photo
mcostello
It's just math
02:17 PM on 06/11/2011
I have said repeatedly that Obama should have a list of Federal money projects in every state and when one of the Jack-__s starts on about the deficit, he should look up that state and start in defunding those projects. Everyone wants to balance the budget, but not on their dime.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Veganie
Live food, live bodies
01:41 PM on 06/09/2011
A fetus is not a child, those men might never have to face that reality and should not dictate to women about abortion, it will only demonstrate how immoral they have become.
photo
Lenape105
Austerity is fiscal terrorism
01:07 PM on 06/09/2011
Right-wingers want a fetus to survive long enough to join the military, go to foreign countries, then kill other surviving fetuses, or be killed by them.
photo
splashy
Really?!?!!!
12:12 PM on 06/10/2011
Actually, not really, since they refuse to fund health care, food, shelter, or anything else for the poor. I think it's about forcing poor women to service the wealthy men in many ways, including their perversions, to survive.
12:17 PM on 06/09/2011
California Managed Care Department-Kaiser Permanente Gag Patient Speech

I was a federal fraud investigator, when Roe v. Wade was decided. I worked with the principals in pro-choice and pro-life to attempt to INSURE THAT NEITHER PATIENTS NOR DOCTORS WERE GAGGED by the government and special interests. Patients have a right to know all unbiased facts pertaining to medical decision-making to insure informed consent.

GAGGING (prior restraint of speech) is an abhorrent practice that government, health plans, and special interests depend upon to ration health care to the taxpayers who fund it.

Twenty-first century patient gagging by the California Department of Managed Health Care and Kaiser Permanente has destroyed the doctor-patient relationship.

Original investigations are posted on http://www.hmohardball.com/Writ-GIN024734_2b001.pdf
http://healthfraudanalytics.com/1st%20Thumbnail%20%20%20-%20Judges%20Death%20Panel.pdf
www.hmohardball.com

Jacquelyn Finney MPA
11:51 AM on 06/09/2011
Look, I went to a CATHOLIC schools for 12 years and when we turned 14 years old, the school sent a note home asking parents if they would allow their children to attend a sex education class! This was in the 70s and out of a class of 33 children only 2 kids DID NOT take the class. The teacher was a 23 year old nun who had spent a some time in African and Asia, where the population explosion was (and is) off the charts. I remember her talking to the girls in the class about Planned Parenthood. For most of the girls in the class, this was our first introduction to obtaining birth control, having regular pap smears, learning about STDs, etc. We just did NOT associate Planned Parenthood with abortion. We knew it was provided, but this was not our reason for going there. It was more like a place for young girls to go and get birth control, have an exam or just plain talk about our growing bodies and sexually without being judged (it was the 70s after all). Again, Planned Parenthood is NOT JUST about abortion. I don't know what I or some of my friends would have done without Planned Parenthood and the great people who work there. This biIl and others like it are a direct assault against women, men, children and the poor. We have so little real freedoms left. Can we AT LEAST have control over our bodies?!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nate35
08:24 PM on 06/09/2011
I should be surprised that celibate nuns are more informed and realistic about issues surrounding human sexuality than our right-wing politicians (who by all accounts seem to have sex as often as and with whom they want), but I'm not.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kittyburger
Schrodinger's micro-bio may or may not be empty.
12:03 AM on 06/11/2011
Catholic nuns tend toward the awesome.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
El Saltine
11:09 AM on 06/09/2011
But look at all the jobs this wil create.
10:09 AM on 06/09/2011
I may be a republican in terms of fiscal policy and upholding the constitution. However, defunding planned parenthood is a disaster waiting to happen. Planned parenthood performs so many duties for women of all walks of life, not just low income. Performs a variety of services not just abortion. For some women, that’s the only doctor they've ever seen!

I may never get an abortion myself (unless something horrible happened) nor am I for using it as a method of birth control (it's happened), but I would never take away that choice from another woman. As a woman it is your right to make that decision for yourself. Nor should politicians deny women access to an abortion in the case of rape or incest. That is forcing a woman to relive the worst day of her life from that day forward.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
OneLiberalLady
Liberals rock!
10:51 AM on 06/09/2011
Regarding your first sentence: the implication that Democrats do not "uphold the constitution" is sad. What we disagree with is - at times - matters of specific policy.
Such as the very one you are complaining about: the outrageous de-funding of Planned Parenthood, which causes thousands of women in Indiana to loose their healthcare .
photo
splashy
Really?!?!!!
12:16 PM on 06/10/2011
Not only the part about Democrats not "upholding the constitution" is sad, but the part about fiscal policy, considering that the Republicans are the ones that ran up the debt. They are anything but conservative in that area. The Republicans borrow and spend, as opposed to the conservative policies of the Dems, tax and spend. At least the Dems like to pay as they go.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jkooba
myliberalbias_blogspot
09:41 AM on 06/09/2011
Google the Personhood Ammendment - people are trying to make birth control pills illegal. They are calling them murder!
photo
The Right is Wrong
Pissing off CONS for more than 56 years!
09:56 AM on 06/09/2011
We have defeated such proposed Amendments here in Colorado in both 2008 and 2010 by a wide margin, I might add.

How do they keep getting the same stuff up for a vote every election?

It's crazy.
10:26 AM on 06/09/2011
I'm republican (not FAR RIGHT THOUGH), but thats effing crazy.. My pill keeps me "regular" once a month for a couple days instead of every 10th Thursday lasting two weeks, where I would miss work and school and become anemic each time. TMI I know, but I'm proof that women use it for reasons outside of preventing pregnancy.

Though I am not for the big pharmaceutical companies sticking their nose in politics, i hope to they do it in this instance!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jkooba
myliberalbias_blogspot
09:37 AM on 06/09/2011
Last night Rachel Maddow did a segment on the "Personhood Ammendments" and one of their slogans was the "Conceived by Rape Tour". Radical Right Wingers get crazier by the day. Their goal is not only to make abortion illegal, but make birth control illegal too. Well what about women who take birth control for other medical reasons? What are they supposed to do?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
logic63
Secular humanist liberal
10:05 AM on 06/09/2011
I watched that also and I wonder about a couple of things. Where is the opposing voice on the left? I don't hear anything or read about anything to counter this nonsense. Secondly, when there is no birth control other than condoms will those be outlawed as well and how will this play out in the population explosion that will follow with more people and the right wanting to eliminate healthcare for women and WIC and other social programs? I see bigger problems than these people are thinking about.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ocrmom59
10:33 AM on 06/09/2011
The problem is that the right always act without thinking and what is going to happen is that there will be more births, more stds, more cancers in women because they won't seek help.

When the births rates start rising and other things that PP can do, then they will want to reverse everything they do. The only thing that is going to stop these people is for the president to step in a put a stop to it, because judges will not do anything at all. The sad thing is that a lot of innocent people have to suffer under the wings of the republicans and teaparties people until people with common sense get elected.

This goes to show that people should not vote in angry or hatred, but vote for the right person regardless of skin color. The innocents are the one who are paying for others mistakes.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ninthraphael
i have my god! He/she doesn't look like yours!
09:33 AM on 06/09/2011
if fertilized egg is a legal person:
- what will happen to the ova fertilized in a petri dish? what wil be the legal and moral consequences for the fertility lab who produced this "person"? will they be considered the parents? what will the christians do? would the pro-life people do anythng about this poor "baby"?
-since a glob of cellular being is considered human would it fair that a sperm cell should be declared the same? is it fair to say that masturbation should also be prohibited since sperm is considered a living being too? imagine killing millions of healthy sperm by flushing it down the toilet or let dry out on a piece of tissue paper!
-how far would the religious fundies stretch the definition of life!
photo
The Right is Wrong
Pissing off CONS for more than 56 years!
09:57 AM on 06/09/2011
But then once out of the womb, no help at all.

It is BS!