More

FDA: Some Prostate Drugs Actually Raise Cancer Risk

06/ 9/11 02:44 PM ET   AP

Prostate Drugs Cancer Risk

NEW YORK — The Food and Drug Administration expanded the warning label on a group of prostate drugs Thursday, saying they may increase the risk of a more serious form of prostate cancer.

The FDA is updating the warning information on a group of drugs including GlaxoSmithKline PLC's Avodart and Merck & Co.'s Proscar, which are used to shrink the prostate. The warning indicates the drugs are linked to a greater risk of high-grade prostate cancers. While the drugs have been shown to reduce the risk of prostate cancer overall, the FDA said the drugs were linked to an increased risk of more serious cancers.

Earlier this year, Merck, based in Whitehouse Station, N.J., and British drugmaker GlaxoSmithKline asked the FDA to approve the drugs as preventive treatments for prostate cancer, but the agency refused, citing the risk of high-grade cancer. In March, GlaxoSmithKline said it was abandoning global efforts to get Avodart approved as a preventive cancer drug.

The agency is basing its conclusions on a review of two studies in which about 27,000 men 50 and older used the drugs for several years. The FDA said the risk of high-grade prostate cancers is small, but doctors should be aware of it.

The drugs are also known as dutasteride and finasteride, respectively. Finasteride is also available as a low-cost generic.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST HEALTHY LIVING

NEW YORK — The Food and Drug Administration expanded the warning label on a group of prostate drugs Thursday, saying they may increase the risk of a more serious form of prostate cancer. The FD...
NEW YORK — The Food and Drug Administration expanded the warning label on a group of prostate drugs Thursday, saying they may increase the risk of a more serious form of prostate cancer. The FD...
Filed by Amanda L. Chan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 9
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:54 AM on 06/13/2011
So while they have been prescribing "treatments" of this "caliber" the FDA, NCI, etc. have been suppressing therapies such as shown here?

http://vimeo.com/24821365

I'm impressed by Dr. Burzynski's fortitude and principles.
03:54 AM on 06/12/2011
You can go crazy with all these conflicting studies and opinions.
http://www.lifestyle-after50.com/andropause.html
04:39 PM on 06/10/2011
Profits win over ethics every day....
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MrCool
06:54 PM on 06/10/2011
The FDA is at it again. They approve it and then disapprove it. Are they on the take like some in the EPA were when BP exploded?
04:21 PM on 06/10/2011
I had cancer in 1999 I'm pretty sure it was due to 14 hour days and stress.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wakeuprightnow
04:07 PM on 06/10/2011
Gee you really think the drug companys care? All they care about is how much can we make off of each pill. Their own research is always hush, hush. I'm the CEO and need to pack as many golden parachutes as I can.
nancynancy
Atheist.
07:54 PM on 06/11/2011
Agreed. Today, many drug research studies are conducted in third world countries where costs are low and oversight is lax. My hunch is that a significant number of studies are faked. Medicine and profits are a toxic mix.
photo
jf12
Occupying myself
09:32 AM on 06/10/2011
Novel idea - spend your billions on actual research instead of churning and advertisement.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ex-eye-in-the-sky
South Jersey Progressive Piney
06:58 PM on 06/09/2011
What's next?