More

Leon Panetta Aligns Himself With Robert Gates On Defense Issues

Panetta

First Posted: 06/09/11 04:01 PM ET Updated: 08/09/11 06:12 AM ET

Robert Gates is due to retire as defense secretary in three weeks, but his named successor, CIA Director Leon E. Panetta, said Thursday he plans to continue Gates' policies.

At his confirmation hearing before the Senate Armed Services Committee, he spoke of bolstering defense spending, staying the course in Afghanistan and Iraq, treating al Qaeda as a standing threat and maintaining the most powerful military in the world.

“Secretary Gates and I pretty much walk hand in hand on these issues," Panetta said at the hearing.

U.S. forces have made progress in Afghanistan, but these gains are "fragile and reversible," Panetta said, choosing a phrase often used by Gates. He also said that any withdrawal of American troops from Afghanistan "should be conditions-based," again echoing Gates' formula for determining the size of the troop reductions that President Barack Obama has promised to make next month.

When Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-Conn.) approvingly quoted Gates' answer to critics of the Afghan war's cost -- "the most costly thing of all would be for us to fail" -- Panetta dutifully replied: "I agree with you fully on that issue."

Just one minor complaint was raised about the United States' continued presence in Afghanistan. Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) observed that building and training Afghanistan's security forces will cost American taxpayers $12.8 billion this year -- almost half of the entire Afghan gross domestic product of about $30 billion, most of which comes from international donations. "And that says to me that we are going to have to continue to be a major contributor to paying for those security forces forever, virtually," she said.

"So tell me how this ends. I just don't see how it ends."

"I think if we stick with it," Panetta replied carefully, "if we continue to provide help and assistance to them that -- I think -- I think there is going to be a point where Afghanistan can control its own future."

After a pause, he added: "We have to operate on that hope."

Surprisingly, given the long list of scary threats and challenges that Panetta said lie ahead, three hours of questions and testimony produced barely a ripple of disagreement or challenge to his views, suggesting the Senate will quickly confirm him to guide the Pentagon during the final 18 months of President Obama's first term.

In a swirling reshuffle of his national security team last month, Obama named Panetta to the Pentagon and Gen. David Petraeus, currently the top commander in Afghanistan, to take his place as CIA director. The president also nominated Army Gen. Martin Dempsey to take over as chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff when Adm. Mike Mullen, the current chairman, retires in September.

Gates, a Republican and former CIA director who was named to the Pentagon by President George W. Bush in 2006 and kept on by Obama, was generally well-regarded on Capitol Hill, even though his views on the Afghan war and defense spending were often at odds with those of congressional Democrats.

Panetta, a California Democrat who served for 16 years in Congress before becoming President Clinton's budget director, sat impassively as Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), ranking Republican on the committee, savaged the Pentagon's dismal record of major cost overruns on costly weapons programs. "We have terrible, out-of-control costs with virtually every weapon system … it's simply not affordable for us to continue business as usual," McCain thundered. "We have got to get our arms around this."

"I agree with you fully on that issue," Panetta replied when McCain came to a stop.

In an abbreviated version of the annual threat briefing he gave as CIA director, Panetta reminded the Senate committee that the Cold War, with its comfortable one-adversary environment, is long over. "This is more like the blizzard war -- a blizzard of challenges that draws speed and intensity from terrorism, from rapidly developing technologies, and the rising number of powers on the world stage," he said.

Panetta weighed in on al Qaeda, saying that the group is in "disarray" and that the killing of Osama bin Laden was "a significant victory" against terrorism. "No question it impacted on their capability, on their command and control capabilities," he said.

Yet he cautioned that while the death of al Qaeda's founder and leader "has weakened them," they still remain dangerous. "We have got to keep the pressure up," he said, against al Qaeda in Afghanistan, against the one thousand al Qaeda fighters he said were still active in Iraq, and in Pakistan, where the CIA has been conducting drone attacks against al Qaeda leaders.

Like Gates, though, Panetta was unable to articulate a convincing strategy to end the safe havens that al Qaeda and Taliban fighters enjoy in Pakistan, and demurred on the issue of whether the United States ought to maintain military forces in Iraq after December, when under a U.S.-Iraqi agreement all American troops are to be withdrawn.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
Robert Gates is due to retire as defense secretary in three weeks, but his named successor, CIA Director Leon E. Panetta, said Thursday he plans to continue Gates' policies. At his confirmation he...
Robert Gates is due to retire as defense secretary in three weeks, but his named successor, CIA Director Leon E. Panetta, said Thursday he plans to continue Gates' policies. At his confirmation he...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 60
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
clearasmud
De Tocqueville and Marx were both right
04:52 PM on 06/10/2011
Can Afghanista­n ever take over on their own?

Panetta, "We have to operate on that hope." HOPE?

At the current cost of this war, with troops dying and being maimed everyday..­. This is the answer we get?

Even if we left now, Afghanista­n cannot afford to pay their police and military, so we will continue to virtually finance this country forever?

Afghanista­n has gdp of $30 billion... Kharzi steals more than that a year by himself.

If we left now, Afghanista­n would revert back to it's 200 AD time warp. If we leave in 10 years Afghanista­n will return to it's 200 AD time warp.

Is it that simple when considered in a global scheme of things? No!

Should we leave anyway and see which way the dice fall? Yes!

What awaits at the end of this tunnel is not worth the trip to get there.
09:38 AM on 06/10/2011
Just like in VietNam, the generals and brass keep talking about "progress being made" right up until the last helicopter left the roof of the US embassy. The reality for the troops in Afganistan is that it is unwinable and a waste of a lot of lives and treasure.

The military budget has doubled in the past 10 years, from about $300 billion to over $700, not including extra for the wars. And what do you get for your money, bogged down in two third world backward countries on a road to nowhere.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
AZreb
equal-opportunity Independent heathen
09:30 AM on 06/10/2011
Seems like a game of "musical chairs" in the federal government.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
padrushka
question authority
02:32 AM on 06/10/2011
blah- blah- blah,what is it they don't seem to understand? the world knows but dc can't figure it out.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
John Horner
02:27 AM on 06/10/2011
None of the establishment is willing to face the financial facts. The US accounts for less than 24% of the world's economic output, but over 50% of the world's military spending. That is a non-sustainable situation. The US risks a USSR like implosion if we don't start actually dealing with the big issues. So far, we haven't dealt with any of them in a meaningful way.
09:55 PM on 06/09/2011
As a Democrat, I was disappointed when the President left President Bush's Defense Secretary in place. But, he said it was only for a year of "transition," so I held my breath and waited. One year turned into two and a half yearws, but at least a change finally became possible. But, now, we have a new Defense Secretary-designate who is "aligning himself" with the policies of his predecessor -- the Defense Secretary in a failed Republican administration. Seems like things on the Defense Department (and foreign war) front have not "changed" much at all, and that continues to be an enormous disappointment.
photo
kocean1
When this party's over it will start again
08:24 PM on 06/09/2011
"We have to operate on that hope." Hope things improve over there. Fingers crossed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DevonTexas
Eternal Optimism
07:59 PM on 06/09/2011
What is it with this back and forth between the CIA and DOD!?! Smells very very fishy!
06:54 PM on 06/09/2011
"We've forgot what we're fighting for, lets row into shore".
U-B-L is dead. the bad guy has been gotten so now what? Invent a new boogey-man? Bring everyone home! Its time and lets think about OUR Economy for once.
06:42 PM on 06/09/2011
The industry runs the show, not individual D's or R's. They're just there to justify all these wars of choice.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WhatDaBleep
Left is Right and Right is Wrong
05:51 PM on 06/09/2011
And the goosestepping continues.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
robert horwitz
05:50 PM on 06/09/2011
Generally I really enjoy Senate and Congressional Hearings but sometimes I'm just not in the mood at the time that one particular subject matter or another is being discussed. This hearing today was one of those days and this was the subject matter. It's not just because I have been listening to exactly this same Hearing for the last decade or so but that's really a big part of it. Same faces, same questions, same answers. Enter stage left. Leon Panetta. I think of him as sort of a Universal Remote Control. When you can't find someone to be approved by the tiresomely no matter what it is your side likes our side doesn't like it Senate or Congress pick someone both sides can sort of agree on. Leon fits the bill. Anyway since I am interested in the scientific aspects of the Drones that we have been using on our I have lost track of how many battlefields I am glad that our Nations two biggest Drones were participating in this hearing. John McCain and Joe Lieberman.
05:44 PM on 06/09/2011
When will Obama find the courage to get out of Afganistan?
InYourWorld
Progressive, educated, redneck but fan of no party
06:20 PM on 06/09/2011
When is Military Industrial Complex lobbyists in the WH say it's okay to do so.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DevonTexas
Eternal Optimism
08:00 PM on 06/09/2011
exactly.
05:38 PM on 06/09/2011
At least he's from the democratic side of the plutocracy

Its hillarious to me that all the democrats let Obama get away with keeping Bush's defense secretary
photo
flaconoire
Anartist
05:26 PM on 06/09/2011
What a surprise!!!