iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Summers Are Going To Get Hotter, Stanford Scientists Say

Warmer Summers

The Huffington Post   First Posted: 06/09/11 12:26 PM ET Updated: 08/09/11 06:12 AM ET

The summer season has not even officially started yet in the U.S. and already people are cranking up the a/c, boxing away the sweaters, seeking out the best swimming hole, and plotting how to avoid sweat stains. It’s about to get a lot worse.

A recent study conducted by Stanford University scientists has concluded that if greenhouse gas concentrations continue to increase, many regions in the world will probably experience an irreversible rise in summer temperatures within the next 20 to 60 years.

LiveScience explains that a single heat wave or warm day is not a sign of global warming. But while an individual weather event cannot be attributed to a warming world, more long-term trends are accepted in the scientific community as evidence of man-made global warming.

The recent Stanford study, which will be published this month in the journal Climatic Change Letters, found that middle latitude regions of Europe, China and North America (including the U.S.) will likely see extreme shifts in summers temperatures within the next 60 years. In just the next two decades, tropical regions of Africa, Asia and South America could see permanent and “unprecedented” summer heat. The most immediate rise in extreme temperatures is expected to occur in the tropics.

Last year tied with 2005 as the hottest year on record, with the average worldwide temperature 1.12 degrees Fahrenheit above normal, according to the National Climatic Data Center. The Associated Press reports, “Most atmospheric scientists attribute the change to gases released into the air by industrial processes and gasoline-burning engines.” This is man-made global warming.

The Stanford study's lead author, Noah Diffenbaugh, sought to determine when the current hottest temperatures would become “the new normal.” He says, "According to our projections, large areas of the globe are likely to warm up so quickly that, by the middle of this century, even the coolest summers will be hotter than the hottest summers of the past 50 years."

Diffenbaugh and co-author Martin Scherer came to this conclusion after analyzing over 50 climate model experiments, including both computer simulations of 21st century predictions and 20th century simulations that accurately predicted the Earth’s climate over the past 50 years.

Beyond perhaps a need to stock up on sunglasses and deodorant, what is the significance of these findings? According to Diffenbaugh, this dramatic rise in seasonal temperatures could severely affect human health and agriculture.

Regarding health, heat waves can kill. As Diffenbaugh cites, heat waves in 2003 killed an estimated 35,000 people in Europe. Last year, a record heat wave in Russia killed 700 people per day. As for agriculture, new research reveals that global warming has hindered crop yields. Higher temperatures cause dehydration and prevent pollination, resulting in a rise in food prices. Other studies suggest that warmer winters keep pests alive longer, allowing them to carry plant diseases, and greenhouse gases affect a plant’s structure, reducing its protection abilities.

The Stanford report comes amid many other dire global warming predictions. One recent study found that rising sea levels could threaten 180 U.S. coastal cities by 2100. Reuters reports cities including Miami, New Orleans, Tampa, and Virginia Beach could lose over 10 percent of their land area by the end of this century.

U.N. predictions suggest that there may be 50 million environmental refugees by 2020. This past year alone, natural disasters displaced 42 million people, according to the Internal Displacement Monitoring Centre. According to the organization, over 90 percent of the disaster displacements were caused by weather incidents that were probably, to some extent, impacted by global warming.

Scientists and government planners announced in May that heavy rains, deep snowfalls, monster floods and deadly droughts signal a "new normal" of extreme U.S. weather events influenced by climate change.

How many looming threats and even visible evidence are needed before serious action is taken to fight global warming?

Instead of recognizing that another air conditioner is just a bandaid on our warming world, climate talks are expected to miss the Kyoto deadline, climate scientists are receiving death threats, and global emissions of energy-related carbon dioxide were the highest ever last year.

Will significant action against global warming have to wait until we can’t take the heat?

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

The summer season has not even officially started yet in the U.S. and already people are cranking up the a/c, boxing away the sweaters, seeking out the best swimming hole, and plotting how to avoid sw...
The summer season has not even officially started yet in the U.S. and already people are cranking up the a/c, boxing away the sweaters, seeking out the best swimming hole, and plotting how to avoid sw...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 5,790
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (59 total)
02:41 PM on 07/22/2011
Well this is their answer to substainable energy...

see if you get warmer summers, you also get warmer winters! So this means less oil you would need to heat your house
photo
SparkyGump
Obey the Beagle!
10:48 PM on 07/10/2011
We gotta get off that oil.
02:41 PM on 07/22/2011
We wont need heating oil
photo
StephenBP
What's he building in there?
09:09 PM on 06/18/2011
This past May was the seventh warmest on record for land temperatures.

The combined land and ocean temperature was 0.90°F above the 20th century average of 14.8°C (58.6°F).

Temperatures during May 2011 were warmer than average for much of the world's land surface, with the warmest temperature anomalies occurring over northwestern Africa, most of Europe and Russia, southwestern Asia, Alaska, and northwestern Canada.

But this is all BS, right? This is all just data collected by .......Ph.D. climatologists who can think of no better way to make a living than to make up big scary stories about how the earth is heating up.

And the liberal media like , such as HP supports this nonsense. What do THEY know anyway?

I suggest that we all get on the same page, listen only to THE news authority, FOX. That way we won't be wasting our time bickering about nonsense like climate change.

Climate change? The climate is ALWAYS changing. Blaming it on the combustion of fossil fuels is complete nonsense. Just because carbon dioxide absorbs infrared photons, and just because we are putting 30 billion tons of this waste into the atmospher each year..just because the ice caps and glaciers are melting... none of that is any reason to even begin to suspect that our primitive energy sources are wrecking our planet... [end sarcasm....]
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gottlieb
hated by left since 1973 and right since 1982
11:31 PM on 06/26/2011
It was a fine sarcastic comment. Than you. I need to remember to put [end sarcasm....] on some of my comments. Some people don't have a sense of humor. Of course, if you are really a following of the Fox Noise Party, you comment was right on the money and your [end sarcasm...] at the end of your comment is just an evil HP conspiracy to silence the righteous.
photo
SparkyGump
Obey the Beagle!
10:50 PM on 07/10/2011
You're wrong.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tj101
Hata ukinichukia la kweli nitakwambia
04:29 PM on 06/17/2011
Have teabaggers learned the difference between "weather" and "climate", yet?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimboy71
Hen Diapheron Heautoi
03:18 PM on 06/19/2011
No.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Exusian
Nature bats last
10:19 AM on 06/16/2011
...continued

Yet one must be somewhat awed by their persistence of blind belief in the face of all empirical evidence and hundreds of years of established scientific knowledge.

And one can understand the ever rising shrillness of the protestations and epithets as the evidence mounts and even the most stalwart champions of the cause admit that 1) it is in fact warming, 2) that CO2 is in fact a greenhouse gas, 3) that we humans are in fact responsible for the increasing level of CO2 in the atmosphere, 4) the grudging admission that rise is in fact causing at least part of the warming, and most recently, 5) the paper co-authored by none other than the Surface Stations Project's own Anthony Watts that found that there is no net urban heat island bias in the temperature record, it having already been accounted for in the analysis of the data, just as has been pointed out from the outset.

With that said, I bid all my friends here a temporary adieu. And I bid the individuals described above a long life so that they may enjoy the bitter fruits of their denial. As the curse goes: may you live in interesting times.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:45 PM on 06/16/2011
Well said! I hope you don't stay away for too long; your posts are always articulate and unselfish.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ClimateHawk
Think before posting.
06:39 PM on 06/16/2011
You deserve a break. Enjoy your time off.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Exusian
Nature bats last
10:19 AM on 06/16/2011
Sorry, I lost it the other day. There's only so much st up id a rational person can take in before one starts to feel like the proverbial Dutch boy with their finger in the dike holding back the flood of willful ignorance. That's why I have to take extended breaks from reading & posting here. (Well, that and the need to earn a living and live a life.)

The constant mantra that AGW is a hoax, a myth, a grand conspiracy are neon-coloured warning flags that those posts are not made by rational individuals cognizant of physical reality, but rather by unhinged alarmists.

The deluge of continually recycled long-debunked half-truths and misunderstood and mutually contradictory talking points, deliberately fabricated disinformation, and outright falsehoods leaves one speechless.

The legion charges of global professional misconduct, falsification of evidence, and outright fraud on the part of scientists leaves one flabbergasted at the sheer audacity of the organized campaign of st up id by a lunatic fringe.

continued...
photo
gallon
Those who fail to remember history are, um
02:31 PM on 07/05/2011
Hello Exusian. The Climate Science Defenders here on HP are wondering if we can get you to join us. Can't say a lot here. Send an email.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/social/gallon/hottest-year-on-record-20_n_808109_74484235.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Greatest Darthfruit
So, you the brains of this outfit, or is he?
06:10 AM on 06/16/2011
by the middle of this century??? who are you kidding? we will see those HOT winters by 2015
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ClimateHawk
Think before posting.
12:49 PM on 06/15/2011
mggwa: this is an example of what you are proposing, apparently

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xhCY-3XnqS0
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:50 PM on 06/15/2011
Excellent!
photo
Publicola
Reality has a scientific bias
11:47 AM on 06/15/2011
U.S. National Academy of Sciences, 2010:
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Some scientific conclusions or theories have been so thoroughly examined and tested, and supported by so many independent observations and results, that their likelihood of subsequently being found to be wrong is vanishingly small. Such conclusions and theories are then regarded as settled facts. This is the case for the conclusions that the Earth system is warming and that much of this warming is very likely due to human activities.

http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=12782
photo
Publicola
Reality has a scientific bias
11:45 AM on 06/15/2011
hey Fumes..

when are you going to stop denying basic scientific fact..

such as your repeated and patently false claim that downward infrared radiation does not exist?

you'll never understand basic climate science..

until you stop denying science.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
fumes
Midnight Toker
08:15 AM on 06/15/2011
Sluggish Sun May 'Sit Out' Next Solar Cycle

14 June 2011 by David Shiga

The eerily lethargic sun shows no signs of perking up, solar physicists say. The sun may wallow in inactivity for the next decade – or longer, which could affect Earth's climate. The sun has been unusually placid lately. In 2008, the solar wind slowed to a 50-year low, coinciding with the least active point in the 11-year sunspot cycle. That dip in activity has also been deeper and longer than usual.

Now, other diagnostic measurements of the sun also point to weird behaviour, suggesting the normal sunspot cycle may be interrupted.

"The sunspot cycle may be going into hibernation," says Frank Hill of the National Solar Observatory in Sunspot, New Mexico. He and other researchers are presenting their findings this week at a meeting of the American Astronomical Society's Solar Physics Division in Las Cruces, New Mexico.

An onset of quiet behaviour might also help scientists clarify how much the sun affects Earth's climate. The sun's solar cycle was interrupted once before during the so-called Maunder minimum from 1645 to 1715, when almost no sunspots appeared.

Some scientists have suggested this 70-year lull may have triggered or contributed to the pronounced cooling observed in northern Europe during this period.
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn20575-sluggish-sun-may-sit-out-next-solar-cycle.html
photo
Publicola
Reality has a scientific bias
11:43 AM on 06/15/2011
You seem to have somehow missed this below, fumes - here it is again:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Pop quiz for you fumes:

Given that the Sun has in the past few years been at a minimum in its sunspot cycle and the Earth has nonetheles­s gone through some of its warmest years on instrument­al record, how in your mind will an extended reduction or lack of sunspots cause another "mini ice age within a decade"?
photo
Publicola
Reality has a scientific bias
01:34 PM on 06/17/2011
New Scientist Magazine, 26 February 2010
----------­----------­----------­----------­----------­----------­----------

A quiet sun won't save us from global warming

EVEN if the sun were to quieten down appreciabl­y for the rest of this century, it would still be business as usual for global warming.

The sun goes through an 11-year solar cycle during which its luminosity varies according to the number of sunspots appearing on its face. The normal cycle has a small effect on Earth's weather. But sometimes lulls in sunspot activity can last several decades, driving down the sun's luminosity to a "grand minimum". The Maunder minimum lasted from 1645 to 1715 and may have contribute­d to the little ice age.

Stefan Rahmstorf and Georg Feulner of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research in Germany modelled what would happen to temperatur­es on Earth if a grand minimum started now and lasted until 2100. They found that while temperatur­es would go down by as much as 0.3 °C, global warming would push up temperatur­es by 3.7 to 4.5 °C - more than negating any effect of a global minimum. (Geophysic­al Research Letters, DOI:10.102­9/2010GL04­2710)

http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg20527494.700-a-quiet-sun-wont-save-us-from-global-warming.html
photo
gallon
Those who fail to remember history are, um
01:42 PM on 06/15/2011
fumes: "Some scientists have suggested . . ."

Get back to us when you have more than mere 'suggestion' fumes.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jimboy71
Hen Diapheron Heautoi
11:52 PM on 06/15/2011
Only vapors.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
fumes
Midnight Toker
07:50 AM on 06/15/2011
End of the Sunspot Cycle?
by Richard A. Kerr on 14 June 2011, 6:06 PM
A 10-year prediction has the sun devoid of sunspots when it should be covered with them. Things may be about to get very dull on the sun. Three different measurements of solar activity, reported by scientists at a press conference today, suggest that the next 11-year-long solar cycle will be far quieter than the current one. In fact, it may not happen at all: Sunspots, the enormous magnetic storms that erupt on the sun's surface as the cycle builds, might disappear entirely for the first time in approximately 400 years. Taken together, the scientists say, the three trends suggest that no visible solar cycle will begin at the next expected start time, around 2020. Such a gap last happened during the Maunder Minimum 400 years ago.
http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2011/06/end-of-the-sunspot-cycle.html
photo
gallon
Those who fail to remember history are, um
01:40 PM on 06/15/2011
You didn't answer the replies to you previous post on this off topic subject. Are you going to keep top posting without answering? Spam all day long?
06:36 AM on 06/15/2011
Obama is wasting BILLIONS to pay people to 'study' this global warming nonsense. http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/FY12-climate-fs.pdf While all that money goes down the toilet - how much is being spent to figure out what is happening to all the bees?

I have dozens of rhododendron in full bloom now but this year I don't see even ONE bumble bee in sight on any of them. What's going on? That scare me, global temperature going up or down a few tenths of a degree over a decade does NOT.
photo
DocSkull
My questions aren't rhetorical.
08:11 AM on 06/15/2011
"Obama is wasting BILLIONS to pay people to 'study' this global warming..."

You must be really upset about how Bush and Cheney have no idea what happened to 6.6 Billion while chasing the myth of WMDs.

"...how much is being spent to figure out what is happening to all the bees?"

I don't have a number, but there are a number of federal agencies working on the problems with bee populations. You should google first, then make accusations. That sloppiness might be okay on Fox News, but not here.
09:00 AM on 06/15/2011
"...no idea what happened to 6.6 Billion while chasing the myth of WMDs. "

And what exactly has over THIRTY billion wasted on chasing 'global warming' done for us? What did that do for us (other than create a thankfully FAILED HR 2454 two years ago that would ended the USA as we know it). Obama alone has already spent over $8 billion on CAGW, http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/FY12-climate-fs.pdf

If the feds are serious about studying this bee extinction in progress - it ought to be headline news.

From http://tinyurl.com/62dtrxh -

This includes $321,932 in CSREES critical issues funding awarded to Penn State and the University of Georgia and the pending $4.1 million CAP grant that will fund work on pollinator health at several collaborating universities. However I believe the magnitude and timeliness of the response has not matched the scale and the urgency needed to save an industry valued at more than $14 billion. A quote by one of our CCD working team colleagues helps put the situation into perspective, “How would our government respond if one out of every three cows was dying?”
-----------
Can we agree to just put the CAGW nonsense on HOLD for a little while, (after over 20 years of failed GCM predictions) and turn our attention to this real problem? If so you'd all suddenly find people like me on your side.
photo
Publicola
Reality has a scientific bias
10:53 PM on 06/15/2011
SarahCuda2: "...over 20 years of failed GCM prediction­s..."

Science denier talking points never d|e, no matter how many times a st@ke has been driven through their hearts.

http://www.realclimate.org/index.php/archives/2011/01/2010-updates-to-model-data-comparisons/
photo
Bienville
Make levees, not war
10:26 AM on 06/15/2011
Would you like to know whether the few tenths of a degree scares the bumblebees?

What if the "global warming nonsense" is the thing affecting bumblebee populations and habits?

The bumblebees that are ignoring your rhododendr­ons might also be ignoring hundreds of food crops, too.

I wonder if all this "circle of life" stuff is connected, don't you?
photo
Publicola
Reality has a scientific bias
11:00 PM on 06/14/2011
In related news....
-----------------------------------

USGS Study Finds Recent Snowpack Declines in the Rocky Mountains Unusual Compared to Past Few Centuries

06/09/2011

WASHINGTON – A USGS study released today suggests that snowpack declines in the Rocky Mountains over the last 30 years are unusual compared to the past few centuries. Prior studies by the USGS and other institutions attribute the decline to unusual springtime warming, more precipitation falling now as rain rather than snow and earlier snowmelt.

The warming and snowpack decline are projected to worsen through the 21st century, foreshadowing a strain on water supplies. Runoff from winter snowpack – layers of snow that accumulate at high altitude – accounts for 60 to 80 percent of the annual water supply for more than 70 million people living in the western United States...

“Over most of the 20th century, and especially since the 1980s, the northern Rockies have borne the brunt of the snowpack losses,” said USGS scientist Gregory Pederson, the lead author of the study. “Most of the land and snow in the northern Rockies sits at lower and warmer elevations than the southern Rockies, making the snowpack more sensitive to seemingly small increases in temperature... Forest fires were larger, more frequent and harder to fight, while Glacier National Park lost 125 of its 150 glaciers.”

http://www.doi.gov/news/pressreleases/USGS-Study-Finds-Recent-Snowpack-Declines-in-the-Rocky-Mountains-Unusual-Compared-to-Past-Few-Centuries.cfm
photo
Publicola
Reality has a scientific bias
10:28 PM on 06/14/2011
National Academy of Sciences, 2010
-----------------------------------------------------------

What is Known about Climate Change

Science has made enormous progress toward understanding climate change. As a result, there is a strong, credible body of evidence, based on multiple lines of research, documenting that Earth is warming. Strong evidence also indicates that recent warming is largely caused by human activities, especially the release of greenhouse gases through the burning of fossil fuels.

Global warming is closely associated with other climate changes and impacts, including rising sea levels, increases in intense rainfall events, decreases in snow cover and sea ice, more frequent and intense heat waves, increases in wildfires, longer growing seasons, and ocean acidification. Individually and collectively, these changes pose risks for a wide range of human and environmental systems. While much remains to be learned, the core phenomenon, scientific questions, and hypotheses have been examined thoroughly and have stood firm in the face of serious scientific debate and careful evaluation of alternative explanations.

http://dels.nas.edu/resources/static-assets/materials-based-on-reports/reports-in-brief/Science-Report-Brief-final.pdf