More

Targeted Drugs: The Future Of Cancer Treatment?

First Posted: 06/09/11 02:52 PM ET Updated: 08/09/11 06:12 AM ET

Future Cancer Treatment

In the future fight against cancer, doctors are looking beyond afflicted organs -- whether lung, brain or stomach -- and finding new answers by disrupting the genetic mechanisms of specific tumor cells.

Novel cancer drugs at the center of a major medical meeting this week point to a future in which patients are more routinely tested for gene mutations underlying their cancer to match them with a targeted treatment.

That would represent a major shift from the current medical paradigm, in which a patient's disease is more closely identified with an area of the body to determine what battery of chemotherapy or other one-size-fits-all regimen is needed.

"We are not waging a single war against a single enemy," said Dr. Harold Varmus, director of the National Cancer Institute. "It is literally hundreds of different diseases ... in every domain of cancer there is a puzzle to be figured out."

Advances in genetic sequencing are helping scientists to solve some of those puzzles, and the number of experimental compounds has mushroomed. New data on several targeted drugs released this week at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology showed the progress made in making this mode of treatment a reality after many years of research.

"We have proof of principle in some tumors where we have identified a target ... we can actually make an enormous difference in the outcome," said ASCO President Dr. Michael Link.

In one of the most talked-about studies, advanced melanoma patients given an experimental pill, vemurafenib, developed by Roche and Daiichi Sankyo were 63 percent less likely to die than patients given chemotherapy.

Vemurafenib is designed for use in patients with tumors that have a mutation in a gene known as BRAF that allows melanoma cells to grow. About half of all melanomas have the genetic aberration.

"This agent is producing responses that have really been unheard of with chemotherapy," said Sandra Horning, head of global development for oncology at the Roche's Genentech unit.

She declined to talk about market expectations for the drug, but did say Roche would launch it with a companion test for diagnosing the BRAF mutation.

Another study presented at ASCO found that matching therapies, most still experimental, to the genetic markers led to higher rates of tumor shrinkage and survival for patients with advanced cancer.

And while there is still a high correlation between genetic mutations and specific types of cancer as we know them, researchers are also finding links between the different categories, opening up new possibilities for treatment.

"What we are finding out is that the molecular abnormalities cross tumor types," said Dr. Razelle Kurzrock, professor and chair of MD Anderson's Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, which conducted the study.

CANCER DRUG SALES LEAD INDUSTRY GROWTH

Unlike traditional chemotherapy drugs, which work by interfering with the entire body's system of cell replication, newer targeted drugs aim to block specific pathways that cancer cells use to grow and reproduce. The targeted therapies ideally cause fewer harsh side effects, but they also work only in patients with the specific gene mutation.

Cancer drug sales -- which doubled between 2005 and 2010 -- are expected to continue leading pharmaceutical industry growth. The sector will grow 8 percent a year, reaching $93 billion in 2016, according to Natixis. Much of that growth is expected to come from such targeted therapies, which have already revolutionized the treatment of a few specific cancers, such as leukemia, certain stomach tumors and a subset of breast cancers.

Close to 900 more cancer medicines are currently being tested in humans, according to the NCI.

But the new drugs are also expensive, with a course of treatment typically priced at tens of thousands of dollars.

"The cost issue is tremendously important," said Dr. Robert Burger, director of Fox Chase's Women's Cancer Center in Philadelphia. "The political lobby, the pharma industry, and healthcare insurance providers need to sit down and figure out how to make these types of treatments more affordable."

Also fueling the cost issue, major drugmakers are looking at ways to combine targeted therapies. They say it will lead to an even more effective treatment by blocking multiple pathways needed by cancer cells.

The combination of two experimental pills developed by GlaxoSmithKline PLC -- one BRAF-blocker and another designed to inhibit a gene known as MEK -- were shown in an early-stage trial to shrink tumors in a majority of patients with advanced melanoma. Roche has teamed with Bristol-Myers Squibb to test vemurafenib in combination with Bristol's ipilimumab, an antibody designed to spur the body's immune system to fight off the cancer.

Since most tumors eventually find a way to get around blocked pathways, "there is widespread understanding that we are going to need to learn how to combine two or more targeted therapies to block the main road and the side road and the dirt road," said ASCO Chief Executive Dr. Allen Lichter.

Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST HEALTHY LIVING

In the future fight against cancer, doctors are looking beyond afflicted organs -- whether lung, brain or stomach -- and finding new answers by disrupting the genetic mechanisms of specific tumor ...
In the future fight against cancer, doctors are looking beyond afflicted organs -- whether lung, brain or stomach -- and finding new answers by disrupting the genetic mechanisms of specific tumor ...
Filed by Amanda L. Chan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 44
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
11:49 AM on 06/13/2011
This is ridiculous. They are going to take single gene-targeted drugs and combine them in a futile attempt to address the many hundreds of genes involved in cancer. When they finish piling 50 or 60 of these drugs on top of each other we will have a cure at the cost of a billion dollars. Meanwhile, cancer researchers are not forthcoming that natural molecules like resvertrol (grapes, red wine), quercetin (apple peel, onions), ferulic acid (coffee bean, asparagus, rice bran) that influence hundreds, even thousands of genes at very low cost.
01:24 PM on 06/13/2011
Cure is not something that any drug company or the for that matter any organisation that raises huge moneys wants ; nor is prevention high on their list really expensive treatment is the key to the business model.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
onionboy
Blessed are the Cheese Makers
11:56 PM on 06/14/2011
Why are "cancer researcher­s" involved in this supposed cover up?
photo
froidytoidy
Underwhelmed Independent
01:13 AM on 06/13/2011
"What we are finding out is that the molecular abnormalities cross tumor types," said Dr. Razelle Kurzrock, professor and chair of MD Anderson's Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics..."

Thank you MD Anderson for the outstanding research and for treating patients and family with the utmost sensitivity, respect, and up-to-date knowledge possible.
07:41 AM on 06/12/2011
How serious are those in change about curing rather than 'treating and profiting from cancer, An eye opening documentary " Burzynski: Cancer Is Serious Business " http://vimeo.com/24821365
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:26 AM on 06/13/2011
Thank you for posting the video link! Makes one angry though--an amazing medical advancement forced into the trenches and off the public radar for decades now!
12:37 AM on 06/12/2011
The drug vemurafenib represents a major advance. However, drug resistance develops and disease progression occurs. Drug resistance and disease progression have been observed all for anticancer drugs that target genetic alterations. The fundamental problem is that cancer is an enormously complex, unpredictable evolutionary process characterized by extreme genetic and epigenetic diversity that occurs within the patient.

The evolutionary nature of cancer implies, contrary to conventional wisdom, that the essential features of any therapy for the consistent cure or control of cancer must be independent of the particular pathways of tumor cell evolution, and independent of any particular genetic or epigenetic alterations.

To cure (or control) cancer requires the comprehensive detection and destruction (or control) of an enormously diverse, unpredictable, evolving population of cancer cells in a patient. This is a solvable problem. However, it will require a new way of thinking about cancer.

To learn more and for a more detailed discussion of requirements for the prevention and cure or control of cancer, please read or listen to the three-part New Cancer Mentality interview series, Cancer in the Post-Genomic Era: Where do we go from here? What will it take to prevent, cure, or control cancer?

The interviews can be viewed at http://newcancermentality.blogspot.com/ A transcript can be downloaded at http://www.curecancerproject.org/beta/media/New%20Cancer%20Mentality%20Interview_Cancer%20in%20the%20Post-Genomic%20Era.pdf

An Overview on the Requirement for the Cure of Cancer is at:
http://www.curecancerproject.org/beta/media/Overview%20on%20Requirements%20for%20Prevention%20and%20Cure%20of%20Metastatic%20Cancer.pdf

Thank you. Arnold Glazier, M.D.
MommyMD
MD, Professor, Mom
02:33 AM on 06/11/2011
Bless all those who are suffering. But we were learning exclusively about targeted drugs as pre-meds in 1996. The article (while mentioning some of the great highlights of ASCO) reads like a time warp. Big Pharma makes big bucks....but R&D is a huge component. Just to study a tiny aspect of the BRAF mutation, labs spend millions. Worth it? To the patients who benefit.
02:29 PM on 06/10/2011
I sure pray they will do or have something to help so many that are suffering so. I don't trust the pharmacutiecul co. though. They only care about their $ and how much they can make. ALL CANCER PATIENTS PRAY JEREMIAH 30:17, BELIEVE IN THE LORD JESUS. He has done great things for me! I love Him so!! Eat organic, jump on a mini trampoline for 3 min. a day, for your lymph nodes, walk, juice, take Paul Stamets mushroom suppliments, do accupunture, massage therapy, chiropractor, drink 1 teas. of baking soda, w/water to keep yourself alkaline, and most of all PRAY! GOD BLESS ALL THE CANCER AND OTHERS WHO ARE SUFFERING HEALTH WISE!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Cayce58
12:26 PM on 06/10/2011
Psychic Edgar Cayce was successfully treating cancer in 1930. You think the AMA has ever done any research on his cures? Your Dr is a saint, the AMA is evil.
02:39 PM on 06/10/2011
I don't trust the AMA either. It is big $$$ they are getting nukeing people. I am not telling anyone not to do it, if they think it best, but I am not telling them to do it either. It is a hard dilemma to face, PRAY, JESUS, CAN AND WILL HELP! HE KNOWS WHAT IS BEST!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
onionboy
Blessed are the Cheese Makers
12:01 AM on 06/15/2011
He channeled all that awesome Atlantis medical knowledge I guess.
10:25 AM on 06/10/2011
Everyone knows or has someone in their family who's suffered from cancer, it's heartbreaking and tough to watch loved ones suffer with it. Then the REAL tradgedy begins - - dealing with the lousy insurance companies , watching what my mom went thru they might just as well have told her " hurry up and die , you're costing us too much money ". But it's how they operate & make money , it mystifies me how ANYBODY can be against a " medicare for all " system ?
photo
Bettaman
Another Veteran For Obama 2012!!
01:30 PM on 06/10/2011
Agreed. I've been battling stomach cancer for more than 3 years now and even worse than the chemo and the surgeries has been dealing with the insurance company and fighting with them almost daily just to provide basic care. We need Medicare for all like the rest of the civilized world!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ronniesbrain
man is the only animal that blushes, or needs to.
02:28 PM on 06/10/2011
I get my healthcare from the VA. Single payer for all might just save this country.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
evilkittiebaby
02:01 PM on 06/10/2011
I know someone that has cancer and is on medicaid and she doesnt seem to care that there are so many people out there suffering cause of the bills and she gets a free ride while treating the cancer like a cold. The therapy won't help if u dont take care of yourself when you're at home. Guess that's why it turned into something she will have for the rest of her remaining life.

I feel so bad cause there are people out there that wouldnt have taken advantage of the treatments and would do so much to be cured. I'm glad I donated my hair to locks of love so that I can at least help a kid that can no longer have hair due to their intense chemo.

I also agree with you about medicare for all. Cause a lot a doctors refuse to take medicare and its really hard to find a good one that will accept it.
10:02 AM on 06/10/2011
All I can say is we need better ways of working on cancer. Cost needs to go down, treatments need to work better and lives need to be saved. There are so many people going through this. Its horrible to get news you have cancer, not just you but how family deal with this. There are some very good Doctors out there who have great bed side manners. People get overwhelmed by cancer. I never knew there were so many types of chemotherapy before going through it. I watched how people suffer, hurt heal. I dont have answers for all of this, just feelings. I would like cancer doctors to treat the whole package. The cancer the person the family. Yes its a lot to ask, but nessesary. Any knew technology is worth looking into and working with.
10:27 AM on 06/10/2011
My Dad has been fighting prostate cancer and bone cancer since Nov. 2010. A friend told me about a place north of Chicago http://www.cancercenter.com/. They have been Awesome in treating him, I strongly encourage everyone to check it out.
09:35 AM on 06/10/2011
This is a major issue Suzanne Somers wrote about in her book "Knockout!" She did her homework and interviewed doctors doing radically different things to improve and extend the lives of their patients. Thank you Suzanne! and doctors who really care.
12:58 PM on 06/10/2011
I was surprized by Suzanne Somer's success. When I first heard the news that she had cancer and was refusing traditional treatments, I gave her six months to live. She's done very well.
OverseasVet
Stationed not deployed
09:31 AM on 06/11/2011
Her success was due to conventional cancer treatment. The primary treatment is lumpectomy and she had this surgery followed by radiation therapy. Her book promotes therapies which have been proven to be less effective than no treatment at all. Why anyone would take the word of an actress known for playing a ditzy blonde rather than the advice of someone who spent their live studying cancer is beyond reason.
OverseasVet
Stationed not deployed
12:53 PM on 06/11/2011
One of the doctors she interviewed who does radical things is Dr Gonzoles. He uses 130+ suppliments a day plus caffeine enimas to treat pancreatic cancer. In a 2009 Journal of Clinical Oncology article his protocol resulted in shorter survival times with more pain. This is what you get when you trust uneducated stars like Somers, McCathy, and Oprah to help you make choices that really require a medical degree.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
onionboy
Blessed are the Cheese Makers
12:06 AM on 06/15/2011
Yes, and medical degrees don't always help...not when there's money to be had on TV. Seen what Dr. Oz shills lately?
08:57 AM on 06/10/2011
my husband just went thru genetic cancer and treatment the last 2 yrs -- we were fortunate enough that it looks like it could have been caught in time -- he has a rare gene mutation that only 5 people in the world have been showed to have, 2 of the 5 are my husband and his half-sister -- we were also fortunate enough to have doctors that understood and knew what Lynch Syndrome was so he was able to have the RIGHT surgery (which is the #1 thing) and chemotherapy that wasn't even available to his brother who died of the same cancer just 7 yrs earlier.

we now have to fear for our daughter having the gene mutation, so any news that shows progressive and targetted treatments is good news to me!
08:42 AM on 06/10/2011
Cancer is FUNGAL in many many cases. Sugar feeds fungus, sugar feeds cancer (that's how a PET scan works - Positive Emission Topography). They feed you a radioactive sugar that glows and goes immediately to the cancer and outlines it - feeds it!

So, look at antifungal treatment especially diet! You may have die-off effects of yeast (fungus). Think about it!
02:15 PM on 06/10/2011
THANK YOU FOR THIS INFO ABOUT THE PET SCANS!! I didn't know they had sugar in them! I had one about 6 mons. ago to see if any cancer was in my body, as I HAD ovarian cancer. It came back negative. I had decided not to have anymore Pets, as the radiation. I was told I didn't need any chemo, then they said 3 cycles, then 6. I decided NOT to have any chemo and prayed and JESUS has made me cancer free. THANK GOD!! I juice everyday, eat organic, stay away from sugar, diary, exercise, take baking soda, a teaspoon w/water, to make myself alkaline, cancer can't live in an alkaline body, take Paul Stamets mushroom vitamins, he is a brillant man! I plan to take MRI's, are they safe from the sugar? If you know, would you please tell me? THANK YOU SO MUCH! AND THANK YOU AGAIN FOR THIS VALUABLE INFORMATION, I WILL PASS IT ON!
01:14 AM on 06/11/2011
Thank YOU for the reminder about baking soda, one teaspoon day with water to stay alkaline. My husband, and the reason I have learned so much about cancer, has recently had a bout with kidney stones. To prevent them from forming, he needs to remain about 65% alkaline!

Arne is 73, had upper left lobe of his lung removed for cancer in1999 and prostate cancer in 2001. We have learned a lot! It is good to share because mainstream medicine prefers to keep us as chronic patients.

He is cancer free since we have changed our diets and lifestyle. One thing he learned is that he needs MAGNESIUM (not calcium channel blocker drugs) for regular heartbeat, colon health, keep blood pressure normal. He must not drink dark-colored colas or he will dissolve his bones and require surgical removal of his parathyroids that regulate blood calcium.

We all need to share our experience, strength and hope! Yes, God does help if we seek his will!

There is much more. For the very best available whole-person treatment (state-of-the-art conventional medicine plus alternatives) call Cancer Treatment Centers of America1-800-For-Help!

I have had all my fillings replaced and have environmental sensitivities to nickel, aluminum, mercury, pesticides, petroleum products, black rubber, artificial food colors, partially hydrogenated oils, We have gone organic and changed our diets and lifestyle. Arne has been cancer-free for the past 10 years. We need reminders now and then. Thanks!
OverseasVet
Stationed not deployed
09:41 AM on 06/11/2011
Having personally looked at cancer under a microscope and looked for any evidence of fungi which are easily identified, I can say with authority that fungi do not cause cancer. This is simply a cold hearted way to sell baking soda at extraordinarily high prices and fleece the public. The fact that people fall for it proves PT Barnum right.
02:30 PM on 06/12/2011
Okay, if all fungi are so easily identifiable, do you understand the 69,000 known species of fungi? Parasitic fungi alter genetic code. Cancer patients have altered DNA. Whether you studied all the similarities (such as sugar feeds cancer, sugar feeds fungus), it would be prudent to STOP EATING REFINED FUNGUS-FEEDING SUGARS, take baking soda to maintain a healthy Ph balance (which BTW is a necessity to keep from getting painful kidney stones!).

People who ridicule common-sense solutions proven by not-for-profit or simple products usually have a vested interest in COMPLICATED pretend solutions that make lots of money. Did you KNOW that in medical school, doctors get one HOUR of nutrition training? My husband was about to be cut ear-to-ear by a surgeon at Tampa General to remove all 4 parathyroid glands which regulate your calcium JUST TO STAY ON A CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKER drug when all he needed was a balance of MAGNESIUM and to get off Pepsi? Our MD, turned alternative doc, weaned him off the drug raising his blood calcium levels to unacceptable highs and onto MAGNESIUM which is destroyed by heat and, therefore, sadly lacking in our pasteurized American diets. (You must be BALANCED in cal/magnesium for 60 different body functions from heart beat to colon health to headaches to muscle relaxation to normal blood pressure). Our alternative doc told us the drug companies do not tell the MDs about magnesium because they can't patent it & it only costs pennies!
08:32 AM on 06/10/2011
All cancer treatments cost so much. New treatments would be wonderful. Treatments with less side effects, cost less and work better. When I went through chemotherapy ,I felt sick all of the time, tired, lost all hair on my body. Lost weight my whole body just hurt. To touch me felt like pins. To be able to help another person going through this kind of treatments would be nice. Where not only do they have a better chance at survival, but while going through treatments their life has better quality. Less pain, side effects and fear. After treatments you fear cancer will come back. This goes on for years. Im still waiting, watching and being tested.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Wake Up Call
Poking your brain with a pointy stick.
07:38 AM on 06/10/2011
This is news? This has been the approach now for over 20 years.
08:54 AM on 06/10/2011
No it has not been -- most doctors still don't know about genetic cancers, I know this for a fact!
02:19 PM on 06/10/2011
Right, all they do is say get chemo. I heard nothing about diet, exercise, alternatives.
OverseasVet
Stationed not deployed
09:51 AM on 06/11/2011
All cancers are genetic. P53 is the most commonly mutated protein but all cancers are due to some genetic mutation. Doctors do know about this and test cancers regularly. This is how we have imatinib and other drugs targeted to specific mutant proteins.
06:44 AM on 06/10/2011
Happy to hear this BUT we need more drug companies to invest in research of cancer treating drugs...there is a shortage of some drugs at the current moment.
09:43 AM on 06/10/2011
NO! ABSOLUTELY NOT! Drug companies are in it for the MONEY! Not because they want a cure. If there was a cure there would be NO NEED for drugs. Just the same as if there was no demand for illegal drugs there would be no drug cartels and the killing in Mexico would stop. It is the phenomenal amount of money it generates and money is the "killing machine."