iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Thomas Drake Gets Plea Deal In NSA Classified Leaks Case

Thomas Drake Nsa Whistleblower

DOUGLAS BIRCH and PETE YOST   06/ 9/11 11:45 PM ET   AP

BALTIMORE — A former senior official with the National Security Agency reached a plea agreement Thursday with the Justice Department, bringing a quick end to a case that pitted the government's need to keep secrets against the public's right to know.

Thomas Drake will plead guilty to exceeding authorized use of a computer, a misdemeanor, and the government will drop 10 felony counts that could have sent him to prison for the rest of his life, according to court documents. In return, prosecutors say they won't oppose a sentence that spares the 54-year-old Maryland man a prison term.

Drake was scheduled to appear in federal court in Baltimore on Friday morning, with formal sentencing likely to follow at a later date. The deal was struck after nearly a week of negotiations between prosecutors and Drake's defense attorneys, and averted what was expected to be a three-week trial.

The prosecution's case appeared to unravel after it announced in court files Sunday that it planned to withdraw some evidence rather than risk exposing an unidentified telecommunications technology targeted by the NSA's vast electronic spying network.

Had Drake been convicted in a trial, he could have faced up to 35 years in prison on charges of obstruction of justice, lying to the FBI and illegal possession of classified NSA documents under the seldom-used Espionage Act of 1917, even though he was not charged with spying. Under the deal, Drake faces no more than one year in prison and supporters expect him to be sentenced only to supervised probation.

Those supporters say that if prosecutors had pursued the case, it would have discouraged government officials from reporting waste and abuse, especially in the U.S. intelligence community.

"The case clearly collapsed," said Jessalyn Radack of the Government Accountability Project, a whistle-blower advocacy group. "It was a case built on sand, and when the government was put to the test, I think it shows that whistle-blowers are not spies and that the Espionage Act is a particularly heinous tool that should never be used to cover up government wrongdoing and punish whistle-blowers who oppose it."

Justice Department spokeswoman Laura Sweeney declined to discuss the case.

In earlier court documents, William M. Welch II, the senior prosecutor, had warned that U.S. "national security would crumble if every individual could anoint himself a whistle-blower ... and immunize themselves from prosecution for the most damaging of classified information disclosures."

Under the agreement, the government and Drake agreed that if the case had gone to trial, prosecutors would have proved that from February 2006 through about March 2007, Drake intentionally logged into a system called NSANet, obtained official NSA information and provided it orally and in writing to another person who was not permitted or authorized to receive it.

Drake "knew that NSA restricted the use of and access to its computers and NSANet to official use only" when he accessed them, the plea documents said.

Court papers did not name the unauthorized person who received the information. But the indictment said Drake leaked to a newspaper reporter, identified in other court documents as Siobhan Gorman, who wrote an award-winning series of articles on the NSA for the Baltimore Sun. Spokeswoman Renee Mutchnik said late Thursday the paper had no comment.

Gorman, who now works at The Wall Street Journal, did not respond to a request for comment.

The NSA is one of the government's largest spy agencies, employing an army of linguists, cryptologists and computer experts to snoop on electronic communications across the globe from its headquarters at Fort Meade, Md., south of Baltimore. The need for secrecy is drilled into NSA employees, who sometimes joke the initials stand for "Never Say Anything," and "No Such Agency."

But from the start, the government appeared to struggle to craft a case that avoided the use of at least some of NSA's cherished secrets.

The last straw may have been U.S. District Judge Richard Bennett's recent decision, detailed in a June 5 letter from prosectuors, rejecting efforts to mask references to "NSA's targeting of a specific telecommunications technology" in six documents entered into evidence.

As a result, the prosecution said, it was withdrawing four of the documents and would eliminate any reference to the technology in two others.

The government never publicly described the classified documents it says it found in Drake's Maryland home, beyond their titles and the fact they were secret.

But the documents are thought to relate to the NSA's internal debate over TrailBlazer, an ill-fated project launched in 2002 to use contractors to overhaul the agency's vast computer systems to capture and screen information flooding into the agency's computers from the Internet and cell phones.

The project eventually cost $1.2 billion, but never worked as intended. It was ended in 2006.

Drake supported an in-house system that was much cheaper and which he said could have gathered critical information about al-Qaida before the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. He was also critical of the NSA's domestic spying after 9/11.

On learning of the plea agreement, Steven Aftergood, head of the Federation of American Scientists' Project on Government Secrecy, said the government had overreached.

"The whole experience has been shattering," Aftergood said. "But I think the primary message is to the government that not every security infraction is or ought to be a federal case. You can break the rules without committing a felony. And the government should not overreact to every little deviation from the rules."

The government's decision to prosecute Drake in the first place surprised some supporters of President Barack Obama.

As a candidate, Obama called for a more open government and lauded federal workers who report wrongdoing. But his administration has aggressively tried to plug national security leaks, pursuing cases against five government leakers under espionage statutes, more than any of his recent predecessors.

___

Yost reported from Washington.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
Filed by Nick Wing  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 208
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
01:33 PM on 06/10/2011
Patriot Act = Police State Act
Espionage Act of 1917 = ?
what do you think is a good name for it?
photo
ProgressivePartisan
Retired CWA/USMC vet
11:30 AM on 06/10/2011
As time goes on our increasingly paranoid U.S. government would do well to revisit an observation made by Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn:
"You only have power over people so long as you don't take everything away from them. But when you've robbed a man of everything he's no longer in your power - he's free again."
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Chubbster
Partisanship is a mental illness
10:18 AM on 06/10/2011
He was about to be reamed for opening his mouth. That's the story. It connects with TSA rape-scans and the mentality that sent a SWAT Team ordered up by the Dept of Education into the house of someone who defaulted on their student loan.
photo
drp103
SYSTEM ON
10:17 AM on 06/10/2011
A true American. I might have the b.a.l.l.s. to do what he did. I might not.
CognitoErgoSum
CogitoErgoSum was taken when I signed up.
12:30 PM on 06/10/2011
And where were people's b.a.l.l.s. during the Bush administration? It seems like the people who spoke out when the zeitgeist was to be all hooah/paranoid/John-Yoo-says-torture-is-legal were the REALLY brave ones.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:47 AM on 06/10/2011
This story should gather a lot more arrention than Weiners weiner. But that won't happen. Do a little research. It's not easy to get to the real meat. I don't have the smarts or the right tools but someone does. The 1.3 BILLION (wonder what the interest is on that alone) money that was totally WASTED on the Trailblazer project...and look at the DATES it was happening. Long before Obama. All for the Bush administration to be able to illegally wiretap anyone and everyone.

The billions and billions of dollars for contracts that's been awarded to SAIC isn't something that can stand the light of day. ALL the contracts
And every person behind handing them out should be investigated and it should be made public. And the sad part.. There sure has to be some huge hanky panky for so much money being handed over to a company that always does such a bad job.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:37 AM on 06/10/2011
Did he break the law ?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ray newman
Reality has a Liberal bias
11:34 AM on 06/10/2011
Yes !! He spoke truth to power, What do you think this is , America or something ??
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
AZreb
equal-opportunity Independent heathen
09:17 AM on 06/10/2011
"Espionage"? Attempting to bring to the forefront a private contractor dream with $1.2 billion in costs as opposed to another plan for millions of dollars using the programs that were already in place is now "espionage"?

He went throught the proper channels with no results - no one in government cared about saving the billion dollars. ANYONE in government who faces its irresponsible practices and brings them to the attention of the public should be commended, not vilified.

Unconscionable that the case was even brought to court. If the government had such an iron-clad case against a person, why wasn't it pursued? Perhaps because our government doesn't want us to know just how much is wasted - our tax dollars.
photo
GEORGE W TUSH
To Republicans, Earth is a MILF.
08:55 AM on 06/10/2011
Every time they blow a whistle we learn that our government is more nefarious than our wildest imaginations allow. We should never learn how double-dealing and downright evil it is. Lives are at stake, lives that must have a multi-million dollar high-tech stake driven through their hearts. Innocence is not a defense. They must be liberated of life. Business must be protected at any cost (which we will fund). We must live up to the credo: We will spend billions to protect you, but we will spend nary a dime to keep you healthy. It's a credo we can live with ... providing we're kept in the dark and dumb enough.
photo
fairwayhill
1948 Palestine belongs to the Palestinians
08:22 AM on 06/10/2011
This is such a simple case, ..... whistle-blowers are not spies, so the Espionage Act cannot apply. Why Obama was trying to apply the Espionage Act against someone who is not a spy?
12:11 PM on 06/10/2011
Because he has become worse than W.
CognitoErgoSum
CogitoErgoSum was taken when I signed up.
12:34 PM on 06/10/2011
There was the issue of unauthorized disclosure. If someone logged into a system that stored classified information to access the information to give to someone not authorized to have it, what would you call it?
photo
fairwayhill
1948 Palestine belongs to the Palestinians
03:34 PM on 06/10/2011
I would call it "leaking", "unauthorized access to information", ... etc... anything but spying. Spying has a precise meaning, which is to give secret information to the enemy. If the Espionage Act applies to this case, it means that the press is the enemy of the US government, in which case the US government would be the enemy of the people it represents.
08:21 AM on 06/10/2011
How about un-gagging Sibel Edmunds?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
frank day
Obama cares about all of U.S.
08:18 AM on 06/10/2011
This seems like a reasonable end to an unreasonable situation.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Vegan Girl
Compassion for all
07:40 AM on 06/10/2011
This is good news. But still, this is no way to treat a hero that stood up for the American people.
07:36 AM on 06/10/2011
Please support the Government Accountability Project

GAP: Protecting Corporate, Government, and International Whistleblowers since 1977
http://www.whistleblower.org/about
07:30 AM on 06/10/2011
Thank you for your courage, Mr. Drake.
03:31 AM on 06/10/2011
The increased public scrutiny made them drop it. This guy went through every legal means to protect American security and funds and got nowhere. He shouldn't be getting a plea deal, he should be getting a medal.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
HKR07
04:25 AM on 06/10/2011
I agree, and read this article by Glenn Greenwald at Salon.com...they are going after a former boyfriend of Bradley Manning...is this the 50s where gay men looked as vulnerable to espionage, and now subject to intimidation that Manning has been subjected to? Yeah, Obama is a pal to the community....NOT! Who IS this man that was elected? He's no socialist, that's for sure.
12:12 PM on 06/10/2011
"Who IS this man that was elected?" Essentially, a republican.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
HKR07