iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Sea Shepherd Activists, Tuna Fishermen Battle In Libyan Waters

Sea Shepherd Battle Fishermen Libya Tuna

DON MELVIN   06/11/11 03:32 PM ET   AP

ABOARD THE STEVE IRWIN — Tuna fishermen battled environmentalists on the Mediterranean, hurling heavy links of chain at them as the environmentalists attempted to disrupt illegal tuna fishing under the no-fly zone north of Libya on Saturday.

The fishermen also attempted to lay a rope in front of the activists' boat, the Steve Irwin – owned by the U.S.-based Sea Shepherd Conservation Society – hoping to disable it. Environmentalists responded with fire hoses and stink bombs.

Several hundred feet above the fray circled a French fighter jet, summoned by the fishermen – who claimed, falsely, that activist divers were trying to cut their net.

The 60-meter (195-foot) Steve Irwin, named after the Australian conservationist who died in 2006, left the Sicilian port of Syracuse early Friday, heading for a rendezvous with a smaller, faster sister ship, the Brigitte Bardot, just north of Libyan waters. The Bardot had traversed the area and reported that more than 20 purse seiners were operating there.

Purse seiners are boats that deploy large nets that draw closed like a purse, ensnaring the tuna. The fish are then sometimes put in floating net-cages and slowly towed to port.

Sea Shepherd is on a mission to disrupt boats that are fishing illegally. The stock of bluefin tuna, which spawn in the Mediterranean and then swim out to the North Atlantic, has been depleted to the point that some experts fear it will soon collapse.

Late in the day, having broken off the earlier confrontation, the Irwin and the Bardot entered Libyan waters in search of illegal fishing boats there.

Saturday's confrontation began to take shape at first light as the sun lifted and blazed a blinding stripe across the sea. Ten purse seiners were working several miles from the Steve Irwin in one direction, and five were spotted in another direction

The ship's crew are true believers; only vegan fare is served on board. But Captain Paul Watson, the Sea Shepherd founder, and other officers say they only go after boats that are fishing illegally – if they are not allotted a quota by ICCAT, the International Commission for the Conservation of Atlantic Tunas, or have exceeded it, or their catch includes too many juveniles.

As the Steve Irwin approached the group of five boats Saturday to determine their identities and inspect their catch, high stakes maneuvering began at close quarters.

The boats were Tunisian, and at least one, according to the Steve Irwin's crew, was not licensed to fish and they did not respond to radio calls.

The Sea Shepherd environmentalists, who have no official enforcement powers, deployed a small launch to inspect the cage, while the Tunisians suddenly scrambled two, then three small dinghies to protect their net. Others tried to cut off the Steve Irwin or chase it away.

Fishermen in the larger boats threw heavy links of chain at the environmentalists – hitting no one, but eventually forcing the launch to retreat without being able to determine if there were tuna in the cage.

A larger Tunisian boat pulled alongside the Steve Irwin and the crew pelted the environmentalists with chain links. The crew of the Irwin responded with stink bombs containing, they said, rancid butter.

A Tunisian dinghy also towed a rope in front of the Steve Irwin, hoping it would get tangled in the propeller and disable the ship.

Meanwhile, the Tunisians could be overheard radioing the French military for help, saying environmentalist divers were in the water trying to cut their nets.

That was not the case. However, the Sea Shepherd volunteers are prepared to do that to free the tuna, if they determine the fishing to have been illegal – and they have cut nets in the past.

The Irwin's officers deemed sending in divers at this point too dangerous. The Tunisians were aggressive, and they had deployed divers to protect their cage, which could have led, in effect, to hand-to-hand combat in the sea.

A French military jet appeared on the scene in short order and flew over the area at an altitude of a couple of hundred feet as the drama unfolded below. The pilot later scolded the crew of the Steve Irwin for endangering human lives.

Eventually, the Steve Irwin broke off contact. Officers on the ship said at least one of the boats had no quota assigned. Watson and other officers on the Irwin said they found the Tunisian's behavior suspicious. But a man claiming to be an ICCAT inspector radioed from on board, and the Sea Shepherd activists could not determine for certain that the activities were illegal.

On Saturday evening, the two ships entered Libyan waters. The Brigitte Bardot went ahead and radioed that it had found some possible targets.

___

Don Melvin can be reached at http://twitter.com/Don_Melvin

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

ABOARD THE STEVE IRWIN — Tuna fishermen battled environmentalists on the Mediterranean, hurling heavy links of chain at them as the environmentalists attempted to disrupt illegal tuna fishing un...
ABOARD THE STEVE IRWIN — Tuna fishermen battled environmentalists on the Mediterranean, hurling heavy links of chain at them as the environmentalists attempted to disrupt illegal tuna fishing un...
Filed by Travis Donovan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 142
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
04:33 AM on 06/14/2011
Next: Sea Shepherd decides to go back to Japan to harass the fishermen who are too polite to fight back
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QUcfAyTTFd0
photo
bad spelling grammar
Help save Big Cats from extinction!
01:32 PM on 06/14/2011
keep telling yourself that
08:56 PM on 06/14/2011
I'm curious; you watched the entire video and had no problem whatsoever with SS's idea of international relations?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tony Pepperoni
Where did all the good Republicans go?
06:00 PM on 06/13/2011
I appreciate what these guys are trying to do (and I am a former fisherman) but Watson is a total Deebag.
photo
bad spelling grammar
Help save Big Cats from extinction!
05:22 PM on 06/13/2011
I have read multiple comments that the Sea Shepherd should not be trying to save the world oceans because they don’t have the right to do so and we should leave it up to local governments and diplomacy. Well since there is no evidence of local governments or diplomacy trying to prevent illegal fishing, should we just wait around for the local governments to start enforcing the law or take actions into our own hands? If there are no local governments enforcing the law would you be comfortable with bluefin tuna going extinct? The problems with all your statements are that you would prefer the Sea Shepherd to not take action and to allow overfishing to destroy bluefin tuna for good without providing any real solution. I would love to hear your opinion after the species is extinct, maybe asking yourself “man I wish there was someone who could have prevented this from happening”. Well Paul is trying, and waiting until the species is extinct is not an option. Anyone who disagrees with the Sea Shepherd should post a viable solution to the problem instead of running their mouth about how the SS are a bunch of losers while providing no solution. Since most of you have no background in conservation or diplomacy I would love to hear a realistic solution that has documented results.

PS trying to get local governments to enforce the law does not work (look at the evidence) so you need to think something else.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
IndependentBadger
09:00 PM on 06/13/2011
Yes, we SHOULD "wait around" for the world's governments to start making laws and enforcing them. It's called THE RULE OF LAW. You can't just throw it out the window as soon as your favorite World Wildlife Foundation mascot has a case of the Mondays.
photo
bad spelling grammar
Help save Big Cats from extinction!
09:53 PM on 06/13/2011
International law is a touchy subject and is never enforced because the UN is worthless. There are plenty of human rights laws that are broken everyday by country and no one is there to enforce them except private organizations who fight on behalf of the people or animals who cant fight for themselves. If we just wait for the local governments to act millions of people/ animals would be killed while waiting, I guess your ok with that.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kwaut lizard
Reductio ad Absurdum
07:55 AM on 06/14/2011
So you have no frame of reference here, Donny. You're like a child who wanders into the middle of a movie and wants to know...
- Theodore Donald 'Donny' Kerabatsos
04:50 AM on 06/14/2011
Would you be okay if some random group of vigilante foreigners decided that they were the World Police and came over (without the US gov't's blessing) to enforce proper culling methods, monitor the treatment of farm animals or inspect random deer/game hunters? I'm pretty sure that it wouldn't go over too well, justified or not.
photo
bad spelling grammar
Help save Big Cats from extinction!
10:23 AM on 06/14/2011
Well since the SS doesn't harm anyone with there actions. I wouldn't mind at all.
photo
oldwarhorse
USCG SEMPER PARATUS
08:27 AM on 06/13/2011
"The Sea Shepherd environmentalists – who have no official enforcement powers". This would lead one to believe that the sea shepard crew is leaving themslves open to attack and rightly so.
07:12 AM on 06/13/2011
Ok - heres another idea, how about restocking the fish themselves? Open a few hatcheries and replensih their numbers so that hungry humans can go out with their own efforts to help put more foood on the table , as opposed to waisting our time slapping them on the wrists for trying to provide for their families? Well?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
IndependentBadger
08:12 AM on 06/13/2011
Yeah, but that doesn't allow us to live vicariously through narcissistic reality-show boys like Captain Vegan and Company. Not glamorous enough.
05:15 AM on 06/13/2011
"The Sea Shepherd environmentalists – who have no official enforcement powers"

It doesn't matter if the tuna fishermen are fishing legally or illegally. As the author points out, SS has no authority to "enforce" anything. The fishermen are not obligated to allow SS to inspect their boats or catch. In fact, they are not obligated to answer to SS in any way, shape or form.
09:24 PM on 06/12/2011
Don Melvin-please remember that you are a journalist first. You are doing a story about Sea Shepherd Conservation Society going after illegal tuna fisherman. Please keep your comments unbiased. While I applaud the Society going after the illegal tuna fisherman, let them do their jobs and you do yours. Your article is biased. Because of your article, I question what is correct in what you have written. By the way,if you are not a journalist,please make sure that it is clearly stated so we know that you are publishing an opinion.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
IndependentBadger
08:14 AM on 06/13/2011
I happen to think that the Sea Shepherd folks are a bunch of egomaniacal brats. But that's besides the point. There's no such thing as an unbiased journalist. Journalism is all about making observations, and then drawing conclusions. You can't be "unbiased", because there is no one standard of truth. A good journalist has to be both biased, and willing to allow anyone on Earth to scrutinize his or her work constantly and repeatedly.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
IndependentBadger
09:15 PM on 06/12/2011
How many American vessels were fully licensed, when we had just forced the Brits to leave us alone, and had just become a fledgling democracy? Our economy was in near-ruins at the end of the American Revolt turned Revolution. We sit back and applaud like viewers of gladiators when our Rich Boy Hobby Ship goes after people trying not to STARVE TO DEATH. But also do virtually nothing to prevent Tunisia's population from starving while its folks sort out decades of nepotism, and a next door neighbor flooding it with refugees. HYPOCRITES.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kwaut lizard
Reductio ad Absurdum
02:18 PM on 06/13/2011
What is the point of quotas, laws, treaties, agreements , ... if the issue of enforcemen t is moot. These vessels are clearly and blatantly breaking internatio nal laws. The long-term prognosis for this behavior is clear ... loss of jobs, lack of income in regional fisheries, malnutriti on in coastal communitie s that rely on these stocks, the collapse of the deep ocean ecosystem that relies on these top-end predators ... the list of goes on. And for what .... selfish greed! Fisheries have been allowed to operate with complete impunity for too long. This attitude of out of site out of mind, or Gods wealth be plundered, or whatever it is that allows you to exhibit such apathy is not shared by me ... esp. in regard to common resources.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
IndependentBadger
06:19 PM on 06/13/2011
But I could make the same point. What is the point of laws and treaties if we're going to let random, privately funded reality show people selectively enforce laws whichever way they see fit? How do you think Americans would react if Chinese privateers started flamethrowing state troopers who enforced abrogations of treaties signed with Native American groups? You have to draw a line somewhere. I hate overfishing and multi-national corporate power too, but this doesn't excuse this type of behavior. Besides, you ever watched those shows? These guys are seriously the most stuck up, pretentious snobs I've ever seen. The Paris Hiltons of the activist world, if you ask me. I'll take a nameless, faceless SEIU organizer or ACORN worker any day of the week.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kwaut lizard
Reductio ad Absurdum
04:57 PM on 06/13/2011
Here's a short biblio of the US's illustrious post-Revolutionary maritime history before the British summarily and deservedly stepped on its neck: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slave_ship

Oh, and here is another chunk of that history a bit later down the line: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gunboat_diplomacy

Interestingly enough, this one has two rather big chapters that take place on the Tunisia coast. Enjoy
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
IndependentBadger
06:28 PM on 06/13/2011
Thanks for the links.

I still can't put AMerica in the same boat as the UK in that time. We were a colony, and we went more than broke forcing IOU's on all sorts of entities to throw off the yoke. We did what we needed to do in order to survive. I can't really see how it's fair to hold Tunisia to the same standard as 2011 America or Japan or Norway, in terms of whaling or overfishing. That country is only two or three steps ahead of starvation, given circumstances way out of its control. Commodity prices, Gaddafi, and that self-immolation at once? Cut those folks a break. I'll respect Sea Shepherd when he goes after American naval vessels for killing whales with those frequencies they use. But that wouldn't fly with the network, would it? And in the end, that's the important thing, isn't it? MOO, and LAH.
photo
oldwarhorse
USCG SEMPER PARATUS
07:27 PM on 06/12/2011
lets hope the fisherman fight back with as much zeal. let the bullets fly.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
nofriendofrepublicans
Mother friendly.
08:33 PM on 06/12/2011
Let's hope you get run over by a bus.
photo
oldwarhorse
USCG SEMPER PARATUS
08:33 AM on 06/13/2011
and I may.... won't you be happy... one can only wish the same fate for Watson
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kwaut lizard
Reductio ad Absurdum
04:48 AM on 06/13/2011
As someone touting the US Coast Guard mantra, you should be wholly ashamed that public interests have taken it upon themselves to enforce international maritime laws.
06:59 AM on 06/13/2011
Sorry to say that the USCG has no jursiticion in those waters. Because the USCG, is our costal defense force. The only ones whom could have done anything would have been NATO or Our Navy - and that assumes we even have an interest in such maters. Further compounding the problem is that we have no USCG bases within range, and that assumes the UN wants us to enforce the law in that area or not [which is questionable]. I am thinking they would want us to focus on lybians killing lybians at the moment.
photo
oldwarhorse
USCG SEMPER PARATUS
08:23 AM on 06/13/2011
The USCG would never let this activity go on in our waters. Eco terrorists are not the answer to the problem. I am surprised this bunch has not gotten blown out of the water before now.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
hagagaga
You can't take the sky from me.
07:01 PM on 06/12/2011
Sea Shepherd is definitely overzealous with whales, but I agree fully with this.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lenguss
03:36 PM on 06/12/2011
These so-called environmentalists are pirates and should be treated as such. Self-appointed police, they have no right to endanger other vessels. I'm surprised that the fishing vessels don't simply sink them.
04:58 PM on 06/12/2011
but the fishing vessels have the right to break the law and endanger the livihood of all other fishermen by overfishing?..........I do agree a gov. agency should enforce the law but none seems interested in doing it
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
IndependentBadger
09:17 PM on 06/12/2011
But the vigilante in question has liberal street cred, so it's ok?

Psshhh. Whatever. Cry me a river when someone finally kills these rich kids.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kwaut lizard
Reductio ad Absurdum
05:35 PM on 06/12/2011
What is the point of quotas, laws, treaties, agreements, ... if the issue of enforcement is moot. These vessels are clearly and blatantly breaking international laws. The long-term prognosis for this behavior is clear ... loss of jobs, lack of income in regional fisheries, malnutrition in coastal communities that rely on these stocks, the collapse of the deep ocean ecosystem that relies on these top-end predators ... the list of goes on. And for what .... selfish greed! Fisheries have been allowed to operate with complete impunity for too long. This attitude of out of site out of mind, or Gods wealth be plundered, or whatever it is that allows you to exhibit such apathy is not shared by me ... esp. in regard to common resources.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sam green 31605
Support Israel
10:26 AM on 06/12/2011
i support these guys and wish i can be out there with them. What we as humans have done to our seas is damming. "legal" operations supported by ICCAT is unsustainable and with some individual fish reaching over 200K illegal operations are adding to the quick demise of these creatures. They will be getting a donation from me by the end of the day! When it comes to the environment me not care political affiliation...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Christy Sargent Anderson
Sheeple, wake up!
08:39 PM on 06/12/2011
fanned. these environmentalists are now fighting fire with fire. there is no one on the water to police and enforce the treaties and legislations that are passed. these people are risking their lives for the ocean and the creatures that inhabit it and for our future. many times, gov't regulators are in the pockets of the corporations that do this illegal activity or the gov't that employs them defunds the regulators. there is no one to do the job correctly yet these people are!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
IndependentBadger
08:17 AM on 06/13/2011
Thank God Martin Luther King didn't lose his resolve like this.

"Fire with fire"?

That's sounds cool and glamorous, until you look for the moral high ground and it's no longer there. Once we have handpicked a particular vigilante clique to dispense with lawbreakers or people who disagree with us, we have sunk beyond the level of those whose moral worth we have made a target of scorn and ridicule.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jhnnxn
Won't say it face to face? Don't post it online!
08:27 AM on 06/13/2011
If SS starts fighting fire with fire they're hypocrites. Libs don't believe in private citizens owning weapons.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
caroline gray
artist : ) animal lover
10:09 AM on 06/12/2011
Wow this reads like an action film to me. God speed SShepherd!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
09:54 AM on 06/12/2011
There are ways we can help support the brave people who are risking their lives without contributing a dime to their cause, and it's simple.

Boycott Atlantic bluefin tuna, in any form, whether canned or for sushi.

In sushi bars here, it's called "hon maguro" It is also called that in the Japanese markets here in the US also. It costs over $40 a pound, that's how you can tell aside from the labeling. Some people just label it as "tuna" and leave out the bluefin part for obvious reasons but the price gives it away.

Greed, humankind's greatest failing.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
caroline gray
artist : ) animal lover
10:14 AM on 06/12/2011
Thank you for this information. I always inform any Japanese restaurant on this subject(rarely run by Japanese these days).
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Tony Pepperoni
Where did all the good Republicans go?
05:56 PM on 06/13/2011
I do love sushi, but I am cheap, so avoiding bluefin has never been a problem.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Greatest Darthfruit
So, you the brains of this outfit, or is he?
01:47 AM on 06/12/2011
I'd use machine guns against fishermen who have over fished our oceans
02:20 AM on 06/12/2011
I wonder what you would say if some anti abortionist said that about an abortion clinic.
05:45 PM on 06/12/2011
They already do, and have actually bombed them! Missed that, huh?
photo
French Toast
MAPLE SYRUP
07:31 PM on 06/12/2011
Use machine guns against them as well.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
IndependentBadger
09:19 PM on 06/12/2011
Good thing you're not in charge of anything.