iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Muslim Woman Weightlifter Fights To Compete, Honor Faith

By PAUL NEWBERRY   06/ 9/11 08:29 PM ET   AP

Kulsoom Abdullah
(AP Photo/Kulsoom Abdullah)

ATLANTA -- Looking to get stronger, Kulsoom Abdullah took up weightlifting a couple of years ago. She quickly grew to love the male-dominated sport, entering local competitions and even allowing herself to dream of one day making it to the Olympics.

She'd like to see how far this passion might take her, but not if it means compromising her religious beliefs.

Seems perfectly reasonable.

Yet Abdullah, a 35-year-old Atlantan, has been barred from entering the U.S. senior nationals in Iowa next month. The problem: Her Muslim faith requires that she cover her arms, legs and head – which violates international rules governing weightlifting attire.

"I'd hate to think that just because you dress a certain way, you can't participate in sports," Abdullah said Thursday. "I don't want other women who dress like me to say, 'I can't get involved in that sport' and get discouraged. It would be nice to have an environment where it wouldn't be an issue of how you dress or having different beliefs and faiths."

She's right. It's time for sports to show the rest of society how to bridge the gap between legitimate concerns and religious tolerance.

"What we hear all the time is, 'You've got to empower Muslim women around the world,'" said Ibrahim Hooper, a spokesman for the Council on American-Islamic Relations, which has taken up Abdullah's cause. "Well, how can you empower a Muslim woman more than being a weightlifter? She should be encouraged and helped along in this process. There shouldn't be arbitrary roadblocks placed in her path."

Abdullah got a bit of good news Thursday when USA Weightlifting agreed to take her case to the IWF later this month.

This, of course, is a bigger issue than any one sport, any single athlete.

We've seen virulent protests erupt over plans to build an Islamic center near the site of the World Trade Center in New York. We've heard Muslims complain about being singled out in France, where authorities have tried to enforce the nation's secular foundations with a ban on burqa-style veils.

It's an ongoing struggle in sports, too – with some compromise, but not nearly enough.

Muslim women have competed in track and field wearing neck-to-ankle bodysuits and the traditional headscarf known as a hijab, most notably Roqaya Al-Gassra of Bahrain, who made it to the semifinals of the 200 meters at the Beijing Olympics.

Then again, Iran's female soccer team recently had to forfeit an Olympic qualifier match in Jordan because the players wanted to wear Islamic head scarves. International governing body FIFA, which hasn't exactly come across as the most upstanding institution in recent weeks, defended its decision by saying the scarves are banned for safety reasons.

As if to show it wasn't singling out any particular religion, the organization also has prohibited neck warmers used during chilly winter matches in the English Premier League. FIFA president Sepp Blatter said the so-called "snoods" could be used to "hang somebody."

Hey, if soccer is worried about someone trying to strangle a player by grabbing a hijab or a neck warmer, there are bigger issues to address. And Iran's youth team already had been allowed to take the field last year at a major Olympic-style event wearing specially designed caps that protected their modesty.

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad weighed in the latest row, describing FIFA as "dictators and colonialists who want to impose their lifestyle on others." As tough as this is to say, the open-collared despot is right about this one.

Every religion has its own peculiarities, which might seem odd to those on the outside but are perfectly reasonable to the faithful. Stifling religious traditions and practices is a very slippery slope indeed, one that sport should make every effort to avoid.

Of course, there are rules that might run afoul of a particular religion but legitimately prevent someone from gaining an unfair advantage. For instance, swimming has banned high-tech bodysuits that led to a rash of world records, ruling they compromised the integrity of the sport. These days, females can only wear shoulder-to-knee suits that leave their arms and lower legs exposed.

If a Muslim women wanted to wear a full-coverage swim suit on religious grounds, she would clearly have an advantage in the pool.

Abdullah isn't trying to gain any sort of competitive edge, however.

She merely wants to abide by her beliefs when she's snatching a bar full of weights above her head. When first starting out, she was allowed to enter local meets wearing garb that made her comfortable on the inside and out: Loose-fitting exercise pants, a tight-fitting long-sleeve shirt with a T-shirt over it, and the head scarf.

As she attempted to move up to higher-level competitions, she ran up against International Weightlifting Federation rules, which forbid suits that cover either the knees or elbows because judges must be able to see that both have been locked out to complete a lift.

OK, that's understandable. But Abdullah said a tight-fitting shirt allows judges to get a good look at her elbows. And, if it meant ensuring a level playing field, she'd certainly be willing to wear a leg covering that conforms to her religion but allows the judges to determine whether she's completed a lift. Considering all the advances in athletic apparel, that shouldn't be a major issue.

If the IWF agrees to alter its rules, she might still get a chance to do some snatches and clean-and-jerks at next month's national meet. While she's not yet lifting at an Olympic level, she hasn't given up on that dream.

"She's not seeking any kind of advantage. She's seeking to maintain her religious principles," Hooper said. "In an atmosphere of goodwill, these things can always be resolved."

Seems perfectly reasonable.

___

Array

FOLLOW HUFFPOST RELIGION

ATLANTA -- Looking to get stronger, Kulsoom Abdullah took up weightlifting a couple of years ago. She quickly grew to love the male-dominated sport, entering local competitions and even allowing herse...
ATLANTA -- Looking to get stronger, Kulsoom Abdullah took up weightlifting a couple of years ago. She quickly grew to love the male-dominated sport, entering local competitions and even allowing herse...
Filed by Bryan Maygers  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 571
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (8 total)
09:52 PM on 06/29/2011
Congratulations to Kulsoom Abdullah. The IWF just determined that she can wear her hijab and full body clothing.

"Weightlifting is an Olympic Sport open for all athletes to participate without discrimination on the basis of race, colour, religion, sex, age, or national origin in accordance with the principles of the Olympic Charter and values. This rule modification has been considered in the spirit of fairness, equality and inclusion."
05:17 PM on 06/25/2011
The tail is definitely trying to wag the dog in this situation.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ron Diaz
Fiscally Conservative Pragmatic Independent Democr
06:47 AM on 06/25/2011
Such a restrictive mythology one can be trapped in...
photo
flyonfriday
Ignorance and apathy will kill us
12:13 AM on 06/16/2011
Right off the bat, let me say that I am an atheist and definitely not a muslim, and I never will be.

Now that that's out of the way, I think this is absolutely ridiculous. I'd like to know more about this woman: I find her inspirational. She has the courage to follow her passion while staying true to her beliefs (which, yes, yes, I find irrational, etc.). That's something to applaud, something to raise an eyebrow (and a wine glass, except if you're muslim, or LDS, natch) to. That she would be barred from her sport by a technicality is absurd. Any attempt by the policy makers of her sport to claim, for example, safety standards or concerns, is just a whole lot of misdirection.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
07:55 AM on 06/16/2011
Those "technicalities" are called rules and they are no minor matter in sports.
photo
flyonfriday
Ignorance and apathy will kill us
08:20 AM on 06/16/2011
Blah, blah, blah. Rules can and do change. Based on your logic, American Football would continue to rule the forward pass as an illegal play. Rules so superficial as to regulate non-safety-related attire in an individual sport do not, in any way, affect the integrity of the sport. This "rules are rules, deal with it" attitude is pedantic at best.
09:51 PM on 06/29/2011
The IWF disagrees with you, as they have just ruled in her favor.
photo
yoyodyne666
Just here to spool you up.
11:33 PM on 06/14/2011
They should make all the wieght lifters wear what she wears to make it fair .......including a bra, or a bro.
photo
robin360
dog is god spelled backwards
07:43 PM on 06/14/2011
Some of you have posted replies to my comments, which I appreciate. We are having a good dialogue without many insults, despite the enormous differences of opinion. Unfortunately, for some reason, there is no reply button under some of your comments, so I'll wrap it up by saying the following: 1. I wish this gal good luck. 2. I don't think she should be able to compete without removing the head scarf. 3. When one "chooses" a religion, they don't always get to choose the laws. 4. Many religeous rules/beliefs are made as an indication that women are less than. 5. I believe this is one of them. 6. It's a shame that any girl should be made to feel immodest simply for showing hair, scalp, arms, or some leg. Regards to all.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
iLdoRight
Encouraging The Rightest Rightness
06:07 PM on 06/14/2011
Please don't hurt me. Quran 22:19+
12:56 AM on 06/15/2011
It seems you took that verse out of context. God is talking about His punishment in Hell. It is not an instruction for others. If you kept reading, I'm sure you would have realized that.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
iLdoRight
Encouraging The Rightest Rightness
07:36 AM on 06/17/2011
While it may be possible to show another light on the reading of Quran 22:19+, "But for those who have disbelieved, garments of fire shall be cut out; the boiling water shall be poured down on their heads: All that is in their bowels, and their skins, shall be dissolved:...thence, back shall they be turned into it: and- "taste ye the torment of the burning.", it may be also that some have used these words as an invitation to do evil. While in comparison the Quran also says at 2:80+ & 5:45-55 that its writer also gave the Scriptures to the Jews and to the Christians, yet I have heard that some Muslims refuse to study the Bible because they feel it has been so corrupted that there is not much of anything to learn from it even though it says things like, "Let him eschew evil and do good" 1 Peter 3:11 and "Do good...for with such sacrifices God is well pleased" Hebrews 13:16 and "Let us do good unto all men" Galatians 6:10 and "Love your enemies, do good to them that hate you" Luke 6:27 and "Follow not that which is evil, but that which is good...he that does evil hath not seen God" 3 John 1:11. With good things like this to compare to 22:19, how can many Muslims feel, "Too much corruption in the Bible, not enough good to learn there"?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wbthacker
Can YOU pass the Turing Test?
06:01 PM on 06/14/2011
I quit reading at this line:

"Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad weighed in the latest row, describing FIFA as "dictators and colonialists who want to impose their lifestyle on others." As tough as this is to say, the open-collared despot is right about this one."

For once, that tin-pot, lying, Ringo Starr lookalike said something true, though he doesn't realize it. Someone is imposing their lifestyle - Muslims. Newberry himself admitted it when he wrote, "The problem: Her Muslim faith requires that she cover her arms, legs and head...."

"Requires" is a red herring, and that word is the real dictator in this story.. It makes it sound like Abdullah has no say in the matter, which is false. She lives in America. She can choose any religion she wants The fact that she chose one with a difficult and ridiculous dress code doesn't mean the rest of society has to change every rule to accommodate her.

Maybe Abdullah should take up football, whose uniforms satisfy her dress code.
01:01 AM on 06/15/2011
I don't know if you realize that you have contradicted yourself. You stated: "She lives in America. She can choose any religion she wants."

YES. She chose Islam. The First Amendment to the Constitution affords that right to every citizen. As such, she is free to choose what she wants to practice. To freely practice her religion, there are requirements that she must follow, just as people who choose to follow Christianity and Judaism try to conform to their guidelines.

What it appears that you are saying is that everyone in the United States is free to follow whatever religion they choose.... except MUSLIMS.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wbthacker
Can YOU pass the Turing Test?
04:46 PM on 06/15/2011
I'm scratching my head at your reply. I don't know how to address your point more clearly than what I wrote before.

Being Muslim has nothing to do with it. If she chose to be Amish she would have the same problem. (Amish women must wear calf-length dresses, in plain, drab colors, with no buttons or zippers.)

If the league can change its rules to allow people with bizarre clothing fetishes to participate; I think that would be nice. But that takes time, work, and money; a lot of people have to agree to change the rules. You're demanding they do all that, for free, that for one person who's lifted for 2 years?

How about a little patience? The weightlifting federation is going to discuss her case with her next month. Could you at least wait until then before you call them "dictators and colonialists"?

What you demand -- accommodating any possible religious belief -- isn't truly possible. Just as Ms Abdullah is free to chose a faith that requires covered knees, another woman is free to choose one that requires BARE knees. You can't accommodate both.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
April Pells
02:37 PM on 06/14/2011
I am all for equality, religious and otherwise, which is why I don't understand this issue. She wants to compete in a sport that requires the viewability of joints to prove they are locked to prove the quality of a lift. She wants to compete in a sport known more for grunting and proud peacocking behavior than for modesty. It sounds to me that she may not know what's most important to her.
01:02 AM on 06/15/2011
If you scroll up to the top of the page and view the picture, you can clearly see that her elbows are locked, despite wearing a black shirt.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
April Pells
04:33 PM on 06/16/2011
Not really- you are left assuming they are locked; and that aside, you still have to be able to see that her knees are locked, which you cannot do when she insists (according to the article) on wearing loose fitting pants.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:31 PM on 06/14/2011
Big news people… problem solved.

G-D has just disowned Christianity Judaism and Islam. He has been emotionally very disturbed for the last few thousand years by people claiming they know him better than himself. He is currently gone on a long vacation and thinking of moving out of this universe. He said he hasn’t got such a headache since the big bang.
01:04 AM on 06/15/2011
Mark, sorry to be the bearer of bad news, but those voices inside your head are not God speaking to you.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:56 AM on 06/15/2011
This is sad news

Rochdale child 'prostitution ring' charges

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-13694250

Eight men have been remanded in custody over allegations of grooming and committing sexual activity with teenage girls in Rochdale, Greater Manchester.

The charges against them include rape, paying for sexual services of a child, trafficking a child and controlling child prostitution. Those charged are among 26 arrested in relation to the sexual exploitation of teenage girls since 2008. The charges are based on allegations by four teenage girls from Rochdale.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:00 AM on 06/15/2011
This is also sad

Canadian woman seeks help
http://arabnews.com/saudiarabia/article454145.ece

According to reports, Morin, who was grilled by the police for two-hours, was told that she would be charged with kidnapping her three children, aged two, four and eight, because she was trying to leave the apartment while her husband was away.

The charges are being vehemently denied by Morin's mother, who is waging a public battle to repatriate her daughter and grandchildren back to Canada. Durocher said that it was urgent for Morin to leave Saudi Arabia.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
intellifran
insert clever line here...
09:15 AM on 06/14/2011
Plus, the title needs to be changed. Her decision to cover herself has nothing to do with honor. It has to do with her culture. That is like saying that women who do not cover their arms are dishonorable and that is complete b.s.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Zahriya
01:02 PM on 06/14/2011
Reading comprehension. It doesn't say "her honor", it says "honor her faith". Her faith says to cover up and dress modestly. By doing so, she honors her faith. That's what this whole article is about - women having the right to compete in sports while wearing something that covers their bodies so that they may honor their faith. Women who do not cover up modestly may honor their faith in other ways, but in this particular aspect of their faith, they would not be honoring it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
02:23 PM on 06/14/2011
Yes honor her faith.... What a great faith it is too.

Isn't this why women cover up in the religion of peace?

A COMPREHENS­­­IVE GUIDE TO A WOMAN'S NAKEDNESS (AWRA)

http://www­.huffingto­npost.com/­social/Mar­k_Webber/b­lame-the-m­uslims-vio­lenc_b_824­008_779089­20.html

The Awra in front of non-Mahram males... consists of the whole body except the face, hands and feet. It is similar to that which is considered Awra in prayer (salat).
03:36 AM on 06/15/2011
intellifran, in newspapers and magazines (and now in online news media), there is limited space for a headline, so usually a comma in a headline means "and". The title thus would read:

"Muslim Woman Weightlifter Fights to Compete and Honor Her Faith". The word "honor" in this case is a verb and not a noun.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
RusStyles
Author of Getting Back in the Game!
08:04 AM on 06/14/2011
As long as her headwear doesn't create a safety hazard or competitive advantage, I can't comprehend why the rules can't be amended for a special circumstance such as a person's religious beliefs. In the sprit of cooperation and goodwill, let this woman compete. It's not unprecedented for rules to be changed or amended when the rule was challenged for fairness and/or logic...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
madjanssen
Neurotic mother of one displaced in Europe
08:34 AM on 06/14/2011
Thank you Rus that is very well said. I'm a Muslim myself and though I come from a moderate climate, I still empathise with my less-fortunate (and I mean those who don't enjoy the same freedom I do) female Muslim peers. This is the same as the recent controversy about the Iranian women's football team. I would think that we share the same distaste for the Taliban and everything extremist. This only solidifies the discrimination against Islam and justifies all the anti-Western sentiments.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/jun/13/fifa-iran-women-football-strip
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
04:48 PM on 06/14/2011
They need to be able to see that the joints are locked.
Can you see through clothing?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Todd Sullivan
10:17 PM on 06/13/2011
i've played sports that have had dress codes and i've had to follow the rules. why is it that muslims feel that they can change the rules simply because they want to? the inanity of these types of articles is incredible. i'll be sorely disappointed if IWF allows her to get away with this because it just encourages other muslims to engage in similar conduct.
06:14 AM on 06/14/2011
The rules in question are general rules, to which there are exceptions. The Ted Stevens Olympic and Amateur Sports Act requires that USA Weightlift­ing not discrimina­te based on "‘race, color, religion, sex, age, or national origin.

As to encouraging Muslims to dress modestly, I don't think that there would be any ill-effects in society if Muslims continued to dress modestly.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Zahriya
01:05 PM on 06/14/2011
Because it encourages other Muslim women to want to participate in sports and be part of American society? There's no winning with people like you unless they abandon their religion all together, is there? Explain how her wanting to wear long sleeves and pants is "sorely disappointing"? Yeah there are dress codes, but there are almost always alternate wear as well. If there isnt, it's not always because the sport cant be done without the dress code, it's because they've never felt a reason to change it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Todd Sullivan
07:52 PM on 06/14/2011
not sure how asking muslims to abide by the dress code everyone else is abiding by is equated to making them leave their religion altogether. and as you know, it's sorely disappointing because she's allowing an old, male dominated worldview to still hold sway over her today. this "clothing covering" is about men treating women as their property. the fact that so many muslim women still haven't figured that out is quite disapponting. and your last comment about, "...because they've never felt a reason to change" is so ironic coming from someone who is defending a muslim's right to not change. why is it that these muslim women have "never felt a need to change?"
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
08:07 PM on 06/13/2011
In the interest of fair and balanced commentary: By leaving until the end of this piece the reason for the USCOC to ban Kulsoom Abdullah wearing clothing that conforms to her Muslim beliefs, you risk misleading readers so that readers who haven't read the entire blog would surmise that reasons for the weightlifter's ban are arbitrary.

Regarding the Iranian soccer team, my understanding is that prior to the match they agreed to wear caps that would conform to Muslim clothing requirements as well as FIFA regulations. When they showed up for the match, however, team members were wearing scarves, so they were banned. The soccer team apparently broke their agreement; FIFA did not arbitrarily bar them.