More

RIM Q1 Earnings Lower Than Expected

Rim Q1 Earnings

ROB GILLIES   06/16/11 11:05 PM ET   AP

TORONTO — BlackBerry maker Research In Motion Ltd.'s quarterly results on Thursday provided fresh evidence of the company's struggles to come up with a device to compete with the iPhone and smartphones running Google's Android operating system.

The Waterloo, Ontario, company reported a nearly 10 percent drop in its fiscal first-quarter net income.

RIM also said it has been hurt by product delays, announced layoffs and warned that its profit for the current quarter and full fiscal year would come in well below Wall Street's expectations.

It was the second time this year the company has pared back its profit outlook. Its stock fell more than 14 percent in extended trading.

"The existing portfolio of BlackBerry products has been in market for close to a year, and delivering new products has proven more challenging than anticipated," RIM Co-CEO Jim Balsillie said on a conference call with analysts.

The announcements are the latest signs of trouble for RIM. The company dominated the corporate smartphone market and has sought to expand its appeal to consumers, but has recently had trouble with consumers because the phones aren't perceived to be as sexy as its chief competitors.

BlackBerrys are known for their security and reliability as email devices, but they haven't kept pace with Apple Inc.'s iPhones or phones based on Google Inc.'s Android software when it comes to running third-party applications.

Balsillie also acknowledged that the April launch of the company's tablet computer could have gone better. RIM got poor reviews on the Playbook and about 1,000 of the devices had to be recalled because of defective software. The company said it shipped about 500,000 of the tablets in its fiscal first quarter.

"The PlayBook launch did not go as smoothly as we had planned," he said.

Co-CEO Mike Lazaridis made a rare appearance on the conference call as the two defended the business and their role as co-CEOs. RIM has an unusual leadership structure, where two executives, Balsillie and Lazaridis, serve as both co-CEOs and co-chairmen. Dissident shareholders are calling for RIM to separate the roles of CEO and chairman.

Some industry analysts believe RIM is following the same trajectory as Finish handset maker Nokia, which last month warned that its second-quarter sales and margins are expected to be much lower than anticipated because of the competition on devices in both the high- and low-end market.

"We have a strong business," Lazaridis said. "We have made major platform upgrades, and we are almost through this transition."

Lazaridis said RIM was already far along in developing its next-generation BlackBerrys when it realized that U.S. customers wanted higher performance, requiring the company to upgrade the chips used. That posed an engineering challenge and delayed products, he said.

For the three months that ended May 28, RIM earned $695 million, or $1.33 per share. That's down from $769 million, or $1.38 per share, a year ago.

Revenue for the fiscal first quarter rose 16 percent to $4.9 billion from $4.2 billion.

Analysts polled by FactSet expected earnings of $1.32 per share on revenue of $5.1 billion.

Aurion Capital Management analyst Greg Taylor said the results indicate that RIM doesn't appear to have any new smartphones coming out soon.

"Everyone wants to have the newest and greatest device, and they don't have anything to sell right now," Taylor said. "Their guidance shows they're basically not expecting new smartphones this quarter."

For the current quarter, RIM forecast earnings of 75 cents to $1.05 per share, excluding items. Analysts are looking for far higher earnings of $1.36 per share. The company expects revenue of $4.2 billion to $4.8 billion, below analysts' average expectation of nearly $5.3 billion

RIM lowered its full-year earnings outlook sharply. It now expects earnings of $5.25 to $6 per share for fiscal 2012. In April, it had forecast $7.50 per share.

"That guidance was just awful," said Peter Misek, an analyst at Jefferies & Co. in New York. "I'm just surprised at the pace at which this is unraveling right now."

Misek said RIM carriers aren't supporting as before, consumers aren't buying their products as much as before and corporations are looking at alternatives. He said expects further delays in new BlackBerry's and said Apple and Google are "eating their lunch in a multiple of ways."

"As a Canadian, they are national heroes, and watching national heroes lose is not fun. It's kind of like watching the Vancouver Canucks lose. It's not fun," said Misek, referring to Vancouver's loss to Boston in hockey's Stanley Cup Finals.

RIM said earlier Thursday that Don Morrison, its chief operating officer, is going on medical leave.

It also said it is cutting an unspecified number of jobs to reduce costs. Balsillie said the job cuts are "an incredibly difficult decision" but said they do not constitute a restructuring of the company.

"We have grown so much over the past years and we've done 14 or 15 acquisitions over the last bit. This is just a streamlining," Balsillie said. "In no way shape or form would I call this a restructuring."

Lazaridis said company executives understand that recent times have been difficult for shareholders and employees, but said he's confident things will turn around.

Before the earnings RIM's stock was already off 50 percent from its 52-week high. In April, the company slashed earnings and sales forecasts as it faces increased competition. In extended trading after the results came out, RIM's stock fell $5.07, or 14.4 percent, to $30.26. In the regular session, the stock rose 16 cents to close at $35.33 before the earnings were issued.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

TORONTO — BlackBerry maker Research In Motion Ltd.'s quarterly results on Thursday provided fresh evidence of the company's struggles to come up with a device to compete with the iPhone and smar...
TORONTO — BlackBerry maker Research In Motion Ltd.'s quarterly results on Thursday provided fresh evidence of the company's struggles to come up with a device to compete with the iPhone and smar...
Filed by Catharine Smith  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 22
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
09:28 PM on 06/18/2011
the lack of devices coupled with an aging os can only spell further marketshare loss.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
EsterGoldberg
The International Glamour Puss of All Media
12:26 PM on 06/17/2011
I was in the SPRINT store in WEST HOLLYWOOD 2 days ago..not only did they NOT have the BB tablet connected to wifi.. NO one knew anything about it! ..AND..they've moved their blackberrys to the back of the store..OH..and to make matters worse.. ya can't even test out a BOLD! htey only have to blackberry out. I've been with SPRINT for 11 years..I love my plan..but it seems SPRINT is ANTI BLACKBERRY...they have the Samsung tablet ( which Samsung musta paid a placement deal) a featured as you enter the store..just saying.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CaptainObvvious
Calling me a liberal is a compliment!
09:01 PM on 06/17/2011
You put two things in the front and in order of priority new releases and best sellers.

You don't put the poorly selling products in front of the big hits. It isn't anti RIM its good business.
07:53 AM on 06/17/2011
Jim cramer didn't see the crash in 2008 either, he's just drinks too many red bulls and he's the one using all caps.
photo
planetjeffy
On the other hand, you have different fingers.
04:20 AM on 06/17/2011
and for some reason Jim Cramer keeps pumping RIM
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:49 AM on 06/17/2011
Duh, when the three largest OS vendors in the world are fighting each other for market share with all the tremendous resources they have, how could RIM possibly avoid being collateral damage?

There are five main computing market segments: Shared server systems, desktop/laptop personal systems, hand-held personal systems (including smart phones), embedded systems and gaming systems. In four of the five, MS is #1 or #2. In four of the five, Linux is #1 or #2. In two of the five, MacOS is #1 or #2.

How on earth can RIM hope to compete with MS, Linux/Google and Apple, all of which have huge war chests?

RIM is toast.

Anyone that is a student of tech history has seen this scenario play out in the other market segments and in EVERY CASE the vendors that were not MS, Linux/Google or Apple were shoved into miniscule niches, if they survived at all.

Any device that is based on a CPU needs an operating system and any market can ONLY support 2.5 operating systems. That is, TWO will dominate, one will be a meager third and the rest will have niche scraps.

Since Apple, Google/Linux and MS are all trying to carve up the hand-held market, that does not leave very much room for RIM or even HP/WebOS.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:50 AM on 06/17/2011
Cont:

NOTE: while Apple and Linux/Android currently dominate the hand-held market, it is important to know that Linux and Windows dominate the embedded market and have a huge number of proven, reliable resources that can easily be moved into the hand-held market segment, so not only is RIM toast, but Apple could end up dropping to third over time.

I know a bunch of people will say I am nuts, but given the tremendous background MS has in embedded systems, it is perfectly reasonable for it to bump off Apple.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:04 PM on 06/18/2011
The MS/Nokia deal will make or break Nokia and determine MS future in phones.
08:18 AM on 06/17/2011
That's a good read.

Symbian has already been squeezed out, and that was a very strong platform not too long ago. One problem for RIM if that their biggest selling point was always their support for MS Exchange in corporate environments, but now they're competing against a Microsoft OS plus two other platforms with Exchange support. On the consumer side, RIM doesn't have much background in content services, whereas most of their competitors do in one way or another.

I think QNX is a fantastic OS from a design standpoint, but I don't think RIM can make it work as a handheld platform. Maybe if they concentrate on the auto industry, where QNX has some good history, they can get themselves integrated into the center consoles of some cars.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:35 AM on 06/17/2011
Real-time Linux and real-time Windows have marginalized QNX in the embedded system market. At this year's Embedded System Conference, most of the OS vendors from past shows were long gone (QNX was there with a very small booth indicating they didn't have much marketing money).

The problem is, it is very expensive to develop, maintain and extend an operating system so to make a decent profit in the OS business, you either need to be able to have lots of stuff using your OS or be in a niche, like US defense toys, where you can charge a lot for each copy of the OS.

The economics of every device market, except US military toys, is such that OS costs must be minimalism as much as possible by the device makers and the only way to do that is use a widely used OS like Linux or Windows.

Economics wins every time, that is why I say that every device market segment can only support 2.5 operating system.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:54 AM on 06/17/2011
If you said 3 years ago that RIM would be in dire straights people would have thought you were crazy.
Now it looks as though they won't make it long term
photo
Rickter
Action Figure Sold Separately
12:52 AM on 06/17/2011
There are about 70 of us in my office. 2 years ago, about 95% of us were blackberry users. But RIM never inovated, updated or changed their phones, most have gone to an android or iphone.

I love blackberry, and was holding out for the 9900 (after replacing the ball in my 9000 4 times) - but with no release date from RIM, I'm moving on too. Sorry RIM, can't wait forever.
11:34 PM on 06/16/2011
It's almost impossible to use the PlayBook!! It's too heavy and not as simple to use as the iPad.
11:18 PM on 06/16/2011
I do not know one person who has a tablet by RIM. I work in tech and communications.
09:34 PM on 06/16/2011
The "Pearl" series of phones were great and they were almost perfectly timed. Then...BlackBerry went to sleep for 5 years. Their touch screen phones, even the ones with the full, slide-out keyboards were VERY poorly thought out. They did a terrible job of marketing them. Their "Playbook" is an atrocity. They're done. I'd bank on the Palm guys lasting longer.
11:34 PM on 06/16/2011
Those keyboards are a total mess. can't even write on it
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:55 AM on 06/17/2011
HP bought Palm.
09:18 AM on 06/18/2011
Doesn't mean that HP won't eventually shutter it. After all, Dell had a PDA business at one point.
07:10 PM on 06/16/2011
I saw the advert for this new blackberry tablet and it seemed more like an ad for Adobe Flash than the actual product. You are doomed if that is your best selling point.
05:36 PM on 06/16/2011
Hey RIM, here's a hint... make products that people actually want, not some re-hashed version of a phone you put out 5 years ago or a tablet that has no native contacts, email, or calendar... for business users... like... WHAT? Ridiculous.
09:38 PM on 06/16/2011
The Playbook is garbage, but BlackBerries are still the most efficient communication tools out there. Unfortunately, the cell phone has evolved well beyond a mere communication tool. Once mobile search, content consumption and media/entertainment because equal parts of the equation, BlackBerry simply wasn't set up to respond to those demands. Altough BlackBerries are still the best at what they do, it's just not that much.