More

Toll Road Privatization: As Ohio Considers It, Indiana Serves As Cautionary Tale

Indianatollroad

First Posted: 06/16/11 02:25 PM ET Updated: 08/16/11 06:12 AM ET

WASHINGTON -- In two weeks, the cost of traveling the 157-mile length of the Indiana Toll Road will rise more than 2 percent, from $8.80 to an even $9, for those who pay the toll in cash. The fare will jump a full buck for truckers hauling semi-trailers, from $35.20 to $36.20.

The July 1 toll hike may not seem so painful, until you consider that those tolls were about half of their soon-to-be rates only five years ago -- and that they hadn’t risen for two decades prior to that. Even harder to swallow for some drivers, truckers in particular, is the fact that their growing contributions go not to the State of Indiana but to overseas investors who've leased the toll road from the state.

"Saying we're less than thrilled would put it really mildly," says Todd Spencer, executive vice president at the Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association, a trade group that represents truckers. "In Indiana, over the span of a few years, we've watched truck tolls more than double."

In 2006, under the orchestration of Gov. Mitch Daniels (R), the state struck a deal to lease the road for a period of 75 years to Australia-based Macquarie Group and Spain-based Cintra. The investors paid the state $3.8 billion upfront in exchange for the right to collect tolls. The investors are required to maintain and upgrade the road for the duration of the lease.

It's still too early to tell how good or how rotten a deal the state got. In fact, there are those who believe Macquarie and Cintra may have greatly overpaid for the highway, and Daniels himself has gloated that the arrangement was "the best deal since Manhattan was sold for beads." (Daniels' office did not respond to questions about the deal.)

But what can't be denied is that the road is getting more expensive to travel on. And no one knows how expensive it might get. (So far the rates have not been raised on drivers with transponders, but that will change in 2016, when those drivers will start paying the cash rates.) The road's leaseholders can now raise the toll annually at one of three rates -- at a flat two percent, at the percentage increase in the consumer price index or at the percentage increase in gross domestic product -- whichever is highest. Over the course of the coming decades, Hoosiers can expect to learn a hard lesson in compound interest, long after Gov. Daniels is gone.

"I think they're going to regret promising the toll road operators that they could do that," says Jose Gomez-Ibanez, a professor in public policy at Harvard's Kennedy School of Government who's studied road privatization for years.

Such is the bargain some cash-strapped states are willing to make in order to mortgage their infrastructural assets. Whether it's parking meters, government buildings or highways, privatization deals look awfully tempting these days, with state budgets strained to the breaking point and many Republican-leaning states in an anti-government fervor. These long-term deals can provide sitting politicians with an immediate windfall, but they can place a considerable burden on taxpayers two or three generations from now.

We're likely to see more of these deals made in the future. In its most recent annual report, investment bank Goldman Sachs noted that “recent market conditions may lead to an increase in opportunities to acquire distressed assets,†such as toll roads, airports and shipping ports. Such deals, the report went on, “expose us to new and enhanced risks,†including “greater regulatory scrutiny†and “reputational concerns with the manner in which these assets are being operated or held.†The public wouldn’t want to get gouged at the tollbooth -- and certainly not by Goldman Sachs.

"If you want to cast a broad brush, you would say that leasing an existing asset is essentially the most problematic use of privatization," says Oregon Rep. Peter DeFazio (D), a senior member of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee. "Look how desperate some states are, leasing their lotteries. It's pretty short-sighted. One of the most basic things government does after public safety and law enforcement is infrastructure, and we've known that since the first Congress." DeFazio described toll-road privatization as the “outsourcing [of] political will†in a 2007 Mother Jones story probing the Indiana deal, since it leaves to private companies a duty that few politicians have the courage to do: raise tolls.

Although former Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell (D) never saw the Pennsylvania Turnpike privatized like he'd hoped, in recent months Ohio Gov. John Kasich has voiced his support for leasing the Ohio Turnpike and its future tolls to investors for $3 billion, which, after writing down some $600 million in debt, would leave the state with a $2.4 billion payday.

"I can take that money and I can put a billion dollars in infrastructure," Kasich said earlier this year, according to the Cleveland Plain Dealer. "Wouldn't that be fantastic, instead of having an asset that is underutilized in the state at a time when we are in a crisis? I think so."

What Kasich would like to undertake is often called an "asset monetization†project, wherein a government leverages an existing asset expressly to tap private capital markets. Ibanez-Gomez, for one, believes road privatization projects can be done well, but he tends to get uncomfortable when politicians like Kasich seem to have no motive other than to essentially borrow lots of money.

Much of the public, too, tends to squirm when we talk about leasing long-held government assets under contracts that span the better part of a century. Kasich's musings haven’t escaped Ohio Congressman Tim Ryan (D), who believes leasing the Ohio Turnpike long-term could be disastrous.

"I think it's a bad idea," Ryan says. "It’s a quality roadway, and I think we really risk an increase in tolls and a decrease in quality if this thing gets privatized.... To me it's another example of pure ideology, where everything that government does needs to be abolished or privatized."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
WASHINGTON -- In two weeks, the cost of traveling the 157-mile length of the Indiana Toll Road will rise more than 2 percent, from $8.80 to an even $9, for those who pay the toll in cash. The fare wil...
WASHINGTON -- In two weeks, the cost of traveling the 157-mile length of the Indiana Toll Road will rise more than 2 percent, from $8.80 to an even $9, for those who pay the toll in cash. The fare wil...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 914
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (23 total)
  1 of 3  
COMMUNITY PUNDITS
realpolitic 05:49 PM on 06/16/2011
One day we will wake up and our tollroads, parking meters, and infrastructure will be owned by Dubai and other countries. If there is a neighborhood fair, Chicago must reimburse the parking meter licensing company for lost revenue.  As said, we are  leasing to the private sector decisions generally made entirely for the well being of the citizenry. Cities and states may need the instant revenues,  Read More...
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
healthanalyst
Banned from commenting, so?
02:54 AM on 06/25/2011
Australia-based Macquarie Group and Spain-based Cintra are going belly up and into the red. Nice try Mitch.
10:16 AM on 06/19/2011
Mr. Jamieson:

There is no doubt that the privatization of toll roads in Indiana is a GREAT deal of the state:

a) It allows the state to monetize sunk cost in an infrastructure and put it to good use somewhere else, say paying down state debt so taxpayers are not burdened with it.

b) Privatization shifts maintenance of the roads away from the government/taxpayer and shifts it to an private entity, whose profit-centric model, ensures that it is not conflicted when it bids out maintenance contracts, something that governments cannot do since they are restricted to hiring only union labor or are limited in who they can choose. This conflict of interest does not provide the taxpayer with the most cost efficient result.

c) In addition privatizations greatest benefit is that it transfers the real cost of the use of the toll roads to those that actually use it, instead of forcing taxpayers, who are not using the roads to foot the bills for operating the roads and subsidizing these long-haul truckers etc. It is time they paid the real cost of the state infrastructure they are using instead of making some poor taxpayer subsidize them.

I live in Hong Kong now. Almost al our infrastructure is privatized. We have 15% income tax and run budget surpluses. Our infrastructure is some of the cheapest yet most world-class in existence today.

More privatization, not less, is the way forward.

Kai
photo
PuSencer
Where are we going in this handbasket?
11:22 AM on 06/19/2011
comparing a metropolitan area like hong kong, with a staggering amount of public transportation to a sprawling US population that is so dependent on the automobile is at least a little fallacious.
Why don't we compare our carbon footprint with that of malawi?
10:21 PM on 06/19/2011
PuSpencer:

I disagree. Firstly, Hong Kong Island is extremely dense, but the new territories and he outlying islands are less so. The infrastructure in low density areas are also privatized, not to mention the private participation in infrastructure projects connecting Macau and Mainland China. In all cases, the results are far superior to what we would get from government-owned infrastructure.

But if that is your argument, then let’s not compare Indiana, etc. Let’s compare it to another high-density city in the US, say New York and New Jersey. The two cities/sates cannot even build infrastructure in a high-density corridor because the government costs are too high. Of bigger concern is the ongoing costs of running the infrastructure using public labor. Even now, the costs of government overhead and public union labor costs forces the subways to run at a loss, and to crowd out funds needed for repair and upgrade, which is why the NYC subway is awful. Come to Hong Kong. The subway is well-lit, modern, has shopping, restaurants, and cheaper than anything you will find in NYC. And privately run and generating a profit (US$7Bn over 10 years), of which some is paid to the government as a dividend.

There is no sound reason not to privatize. It is a taxpayer blessing and it puts the cost of running and maintaining the infrastructure on the right people, those who use it, not the taxpayer.

Kai
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
healthanalyst
Banned from commenting, so?
02:57 AM on 06/25/2011
You're comparing a puny piece of land to a state run road. No comparison. Its a major thoroughfare with more traffic that you can think of.

And it was paid for by the people. Its a public road, and a public asset.

When the Chinese finally end their experiment in HK, don't ask for a US visa.
05:17 AM on 06/25/2011
Healthanalyst:

You state, ‘You're comparing a puny piece of land to a state run road. No comparison­. Its a major thoroughfa­re with more traffic that you can think of.’

As I stated above, you are right that Hong Kong is small, but the calculus is the same whether small or large. Unless you can prove differently, which I know you cannot. Epic Fail on your part.

But I will make it easier for you, as above, let’s just compare Hong Kong and New York. Both have similar population densities and both have similar large populations. Hong Kong has byfar and away better infrastructure than NYC, more modern, cheaper for consumers, profit making for the government, and convenient. Our airport typically ranks number one or two globally. I come in an out of the airport about once a week, and I use is an ID card and a thumbprint. Clearing customs takes about 1 minute, and the highspeed train to the center of the city from the airport takes 22 minutes. All privately paid for, run, and maintained, with the government making a dividend every year that goes into pension funds for our government workers, lessening tax for the populace, which is a flat 15%.

I was born and raised in North Dakota and later Phoenix and I travel to NYC and LA frequently for work. They are all run down and third world compared to Hong Kong. I am not worried about getting a visa to the US.

Kai
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
osofar
America once was Exceptional
12:34 AM on 06/19/2011
When the Indiana toll road was built, it was suppossed to be free once it was paid off. Alas, only the politicians were paid off.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
healthanalyst
Banned from commenting, so?
03:01 AM on 06/25/2011
Lots of states said that, once they get the tolls running in, they're not going to stop it.
12:45 PM on 06/18/2011
Another Republican big business boondoggle. The average American suffers while big business and the top 2% get richer.
photo
unionave
Old Codger
12:19 PM on 06/18/2011
Indiana is the last horse out of the barn . Da Mayor long term leased everything he could lay hands on for bundles of cash that disappeared in the bottomless pit , never to be seen again .

All of these are revenue income leases . Revenue income the local governments will lose for several years . Money that will not circulate locally for many years .

And most of the leases are for guaranteed profits . Which means the local tax payers must make up the difference during bad economic times .

And with these leases going to foreign entities it increases the flow of US currency out of the USA . Our governments have thought of and implemented on a regular basis new ways to export our currency and with it our opportunities . As our currency evaporates bank lending decreases .

There is no other nation where the law makers assault the citizens "means to earn a living" and "their welfare" as here in the USA . Then ask the citizens to vote for them . Only in America .
05:06 AM on 06/18/2011
Let me guess the private company that leased the highways are raising tolls but pay toll collectors non-union wages with little or no benefits (thus contributing to a weaker tax base and and more people on the rolls of Medicaid), while the private company make billions in profit and sticks it to the ordinary driver and those working in the trucking industry. When are Americans going to realize that nationalization of the public's assets (including oil) is the only move that will benefit the ordinary citizen and immigrant.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
procrustes13
03:29 AM on 06/19/2011
In more enlightened times public control of the public domain was considered to be essential for reducing the cost of living, of doing business and thus making the jurisdiction more competetitive.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
loki
Better to die fighting, than live on knees
06:35 PM on 06/17/2011
exhibit A: Oklahoma privatized toll roads.

You want those in Indiana or anywhere else? I sure dont.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
healthanalyst
Banned from commenting, so?
03:02 AM on 06/25/2011
It was fun in the last blizzard...
photo
herkyc130
telling the truth and pulling the blinders off
05:58 PM on 06/17/2011
this is one take of what can happen to the individual families because of decision made by people who are bought by big business look what these cities are doing if you are late on your tax bill or water bill your house will be sold to these banksters for nothing and if you try to buy it back they tack on thousands in fake legal fees, repuglicans will have you believe all is lost, give into the corporate GOP politician­s agenda. If Americans take a stand and realize that corporatio­ns are making trillions in profits and only paying a couple of billions in taxes and shipping jobs overseas with tax cuts they should join the organizati­on called http://usu­ncutsd.org­/ and start protesting like I have against this assault on the American middle class,
AMENâ€
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lulubelle1956
05:52 PM on 06/17/2011
Nice going with trashing that Indiana economy Mitch Daniels, but I guess it really is no surprise since you already helped drive the national economy into the ground under Bush as his Budget Director:

State of Indiana Debt Clock
- 2 visits - 5:49pm
State of Indiana Real Time Debt Clock.
www.usdebtclock.org/...debt-clocks/state-of-indiana-debt-clock.html - Cached - Similar
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
healthanalyst
Banned from commenting, so?
03:03 AM on 06/25/2011
The clueless keep voting his ilk in. State legislature is a stepping stone to nice lobbying jobs.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
loki
Better to die fighting, than live on knees
05:35 PM on 06/17/2011
Cry for me Argentina !!

No really, they should. They know what its like. Privatization of gov owned entities started in 1989. they sucked up everything they could get their hands on. It was hailed as capitalist saving Argentina from total destruction and bankruptcy. You know what, they totally screwed everything up in their need for greed and it abruptly ended in 1990.
http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/uploadedFiles/moynihan/dst/ariceta7.pdf?n=2523
Its long but you have to read it if you at all interested in the privatization of America. It will kill us, and make a small few super wealthy.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
loki
Better to die fighting, than live on knees
05:29 PM on 06/17/2011
Just for fun, lets assume someone had property that laid between a toll road, and a non toll road a few miles away. I wonder what would happen if that person built their own road on private land that bypassed the toll road, then charged a lot less than the corporate owned. I would imagine the corporations would have the gov shut that persons private road down.
Capitalist, hate capitalism. They dont want competition, they want the gov to protect them, bail them out when they make mistakes, stop competitors, and force the public to pay them what they want. We dont have capitalism when it comes to the larger companies, wall street and banks. We have ivy greed capitalism, which is worse than the Mob.
04:09 PM on 06/18/2011
This happened when the railroads were expanding across the plains states during the late 19th century. Each railroad company had its own rail gauge (no company's cars or locomotives could fit on competitors' tracks), and would each build tracks to various cities to compete for market share. Some towns of 5,000 found themselves served by multiple railroads. When the market became so saturated with railroad capacity that it harmed everyone's business, the smaller companies were forced out of business, and the larger ones reorganized themselves into regional networks. Because gauges were incompatible, some towns lost service altogether, as long segments of track found themselves abandoned due to lack of profitability, direction, or interest on behalf of the larger company, even after tracks were retooled to standard gauge later on. This is one reason big why rail transit is nearly nonexistent outside of California, New England, and the Midwest.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
loki
Better to die fighting, than live on knees
06:32 PM on 06/17/2011
yeah, I saw that one. This is what privatization does for you. Sucks dont it. I bet the firefighters get paid for shat too.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jody Dobis
02:17 PM on 06/17/2011
Private security firms verses municipal police forces. Which entity would you trust more with your safety? One in which operations is private and not open to the public or one in which the public has a stake in? If your not convinced that a municipal police force is they answer, think of the security guards at the local mall or gated community.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
loki
Better to die fighting, than live on knees
06:33 PM on 06/17/2011
and no transparency or ways to change things in a private company like you can with a gov operation. Privatization is very dangerous for everyone but the ivy greeders.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
healthanalyst
Banned from commenting, so?
03:05 AM on 06/25/2011
Try private jails. Now what do you think is going to happen to the legal system where they're in place? No cheating.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jody Dobis
01:50 PM on 06/17/2011
75 years? Why not 100 or 200 years? As a resident of NW Indiana and a user of the toll road, until it went private, we also have an alternative; 80/94. While 80/94 doesn't run perfectly with the toll road, if you have a choice, which route do you think most motorists are going to choose? While 25 and 50 year marriages are a rare occurrence, what would you expect a 75 year marriage to look like? If the state is forced to cancel the contract in the future, what would be the costs to the tax payers of the state such as myself. As they say, if it's to good to believe, it probably is. PS: As you approach the western end of the Indiana Toll Road you are seamlessly welcomed by another private toll road; Chicago Skyway. Happy motoring.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
healthanalyst
Banned from commenting, so?
03:06 AM on 06/25/2011
You can blame Daley for that one. Not to mention privatizing the parking meters in Chi town. And that money was blown in 2 years and they have 73 to go...
photo
D-Barger
...and then I said and then...
12:57 PM on 06/17/2011
Indiana has toll roads? At least that's in line with the state motto:

Indiana. We look great in your rear-view mirror.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
healthanalyst
Banned from commenting, so?
03:06 AM on 06/25/2011
There are more than a few states that have that motto....