iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

NATO Hits Rebel Forces In Libya

ADAM SCHRECK and DON MELVIN   06/18/11 08:56 PM ET   AP

TRIPOLI, Libya — NATO said Saturday it mistakenly struck a column of Libyan rebel vehicles in an airstrike near an eastern oil town two days earlier and expressed regret for any casualties that might have resulted.

The alliance has accidentally hit rebel forces before in its air campaign to protect civilians in the civil war between Moammar Gadhafi's military and the fighters trying to end his more than four decades in power. The rebels have also complained that NATO's strikes have not helped them gain decisive momentum against the Libyan leader's better trained and equipped military, which still has firm control over most of western Libya. The rebels control much of the east.

The alliance statement gave no figures on casualties from Thursday's airstrike, but said it regretted "any possible loss of life or injuries caused by this unfortunate incident."

NATO meanwhile continued to strike targets in the capital Tripoli into the early hours of Sunday. The thump of an explosion could be felt in the center of the city about 1 a.m. It wasn't clear what had been hit or if there were casualties.

In the accidental strike on rebel forces, NATO said its forces spotted a column of military vehicles near the frequent flashpoint town of Brega where forces loyal to Gadhafi had recently been operating and hit them because they believed they posed a threat to civilians.

"NATO can now confirm that the vehicles hit were part of an opposition patrol," the statement said.

International military forces have had some trouble in hitting government troops because of their proximity to civilians. Gadhafi's troops have also used civilian vehicles, making them difficult to distinguish from rebel forces.

A doctor in the nearby city of Ajdabiya said the bodies of four rebel fighters were brought to his hospital around the time of Thursday's strike, but it was not possible to confirm whether they were killed in the bombardment.

A rebel military spokesman, Abdel-Rahman Abu-Sin, said Saturday that they appreciated NATO's efforts and understood the difficulty in differentiating between the two sides along shifting front lines.

Thursday's airstrike was similar to one on April 7 in which NATO hit a convoy of rebel tanks, killing at least five fighters, as the rebels were closing in on Brega. NATO officials said at the time they did not know the rebels had any tanks, a statement that raised eyebrows as footage of the fighters with tanks had been on YouTube for weeks.

A week earlier, NATO mistakenly targeted rebels as they tried to retake Brega. The rebels said 13 of their fighters were killed in that attack.

Earlier Saturday, NATO accused Gadhafi's forces of using mosques and children's parks as shields for his military operations and said the Libyan leader is "brutally attacking" his people.

At least two NATO airstrikes shook Tripoli during a daylight raid Saturday, hours after Gadhafi lashed out against airstrikes in a speech Friday night, insisting "NATO will be defeated."

In Brussels on Saturday, NATO spokeswoman Oana Lungescu dismissed Gadhafi's speech as "outrageous."

The alliance, which has a mandate to protect civilians, has been ramping up the pressure on Gadhafi's regime as a four-month uprising devolved into a civil war. Though most airstrikes happen under cover of darkness, daytime raids have grown more frequent.

Libya's Health Ministry released new casualty figures that put the number of civilians purportedly killed in NATO airstrikes through June 7 at 856. The figure could not be independently verified, and previous government-announced tolls from individual strikes have proven to be exaggerated.

Lungescu rejected the casualty figures.

"We are saving countless lives every day across the country," she said. "We are conducting operations with utmost care and precision to avoid civilian casualties. Civilian casualties figures mentioned by the Libyan regime are pure propaganda."

She also accused Gadhafi and his regime of "systematically and brutally attacking the Libyan people," saying government forces "have been shelling cities, mining ports and using mosques and children's parks as shields."

Lungescu's comments also countered allegations from Libyan Prime Minister al-Baghdadi al-Mahmoudi, who accused NATO on Friday of a "new level of aggression" and said the military alliance has intentionally targeted civilian buildings in recent days, including a hotel and a university.

Defense officials in London on Saturday gave details of British airstrikes over the previous two days, indicating an upswing in fighting along the Tunisian border in the far west.

Maj. Gen. Nick Pope, chief of the Defense Staff's Communications Office, said British fighter jets destroyed three armed Libyan trucks and badly damaged a fourth in the mountainous region around the rebel-held city of Nalut.

Abdel Salam Othman Abou el-Qassam, speaking by phone from the operations room of rebel western mountain military council, said Gadhafi forces tried to advance Friday on Nalut. They cut electricity and water supplies, after pounding the city with mortar fire for several days.

The rebels blocked the advance, he said, in heavy fighting with hundreds of pro-Gadhafi fighters. Eight rebel fighters died.

A day earlier, Pope said, jets used Paveway guided bombs to destroy a convoy of four armed trucks 60 miles (100 kilometers) south of Misrata. Rebels have been fighting for weeks to break out of the port city toward Tripoli, 125 miles (200 kilometers) to the west.

Officials took journalists Saturday to visit a university building that the government claims was hit by a NATO airstrike.

Students and faculty told reporters that an explosion that tore a hole in a three-story building housing classrooms and offices happened sometime midday Friday, though accounts differed on the timing.

One English-speaking student interviewed by The Associated Press was being told what to say in Arabic by a plainclothes government official standing nearby.

No one was reported injured or killed. The campus sits a few hundred yards (meters) from what appears to be a military installation. The building that was damaged was an aging concrete structure next to what students said were new university buildings under construction.

A coalition including France, Britain and the United States launched the first strikes against Gadhafi's forces under a United Nations resolution to protect civilians on March 19. NATO, which is joined by a number of Arab allies, assumed control of the air campaign over Libya on March 31.

Senior delegates from the Arab League, the European Union and the African Union along with envoys from the U.N. and the Organization of the Islamic Conference met in Cairo to review the developments in Libya.

Arab League chief Amr Moussa said the NATO mandate is not about bringing down Gadhafi's regime and a political solution is urgently needed.

"The situation has gone beyond what was expected. It is only natural that we speed up the search for a political solution and achieving a cease-fire," he said.

___

Melvin reported from Brussels. Associated Press writers Hadeel al-Shalchi in Dafniya, Libya, and Sarah El Deeb in Cairo contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

TRIPOLI, Libya — NATO said Saturday it mistakenly struck a column of Libyan rebel vehicles in an airstrike near an eastern oil town two days earlier and expressed regret for any casualties that ...
TRIPOLI, Libya — NATO said Saturday it mistakenly struck a column of Libyan rebel vehicles in an airstrike near an eastern oil town two days earlier and expressed regret for any casualties that ...
TRIPOLI, Libya — NATO said Saturday it mistakenly struck a column of Libyan rebel vehicles in an airstrike near an eastern oil town two days earlier and expressed regret for any casualties that ...
TRIPOLI, Libya — NATO said Saturday it mistakenly struck a column of Libyan rebel vehicles in an airstrike near an eastern oil town two days earlier and expressed regret for any casualties that ...
Filed by Joanna Zelman  |  Report Corrections
 
 
  • Comments
  • 1,422
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (25 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
melchar
Stop the Genocide in Libya, Now!
01:50 AM on 06/20/2011
The sooner NATO starts bombing the rebels the better. How many years did America wait before bombing Alqaeda after being allied with them in Afghanistan against the Soviets? And look at what it cost them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
melchar
Stop the Genocide in Libya, Now!
01:53 AM on 06/20/2011
I say Bomb away NATO. Bomb away to save your own lives.Because after Ghadaffi, they will be coming aftre you!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
willowraven
It must be something in the water!!
05:49 PM on 06/19/2011
OH CRAP is this another war where I need a score card to keep track of the player? just for the record, who's side is NATO on anyways???
05:59 PM on 06/19/2011
Its own.
05:05 PM on 06/19/2011
Gee, what a shame! (sarcasm) Reminds me of days of War "NATO versus Saddam Hussein", when "Patriot" hit British jet plane, and another British pilot striked that Patriot....
02:49 PM on 06/19/2011
Great coordination NATO. I see this you are really getting organized with the Rebels you are trying to support. This is the reason all of Europe couuldn't defeat Germany in WWI and WWII.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
garylinn
Disabled USAF Veteran (God bless America)
01:46 PM on 06/19/2011
I sure wish we would pull out of this WAR that we are not having. :-)
02:43 PM on 06/19/2011
It's not a war.. We are "protecting" civilians... wink wink nudge nudge.. say no more.
05:06 PM on 06/19/2011
Indeed, its not a "war"... It's a "Police Action". Like in Korea, in early 50's...
01:44 PM on 06/19/2011
I'll start caring about the rebels once they start caring about the Libyan people. until then, who cares about them. hope NATO hits them some more.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:34 PM on 06/19/2011
This entire 'military' action is about keeping Africa weak and dependent on Western sources. Also so to ensure that Africa is pillaged of all it natural resources for as long as possible. Gaddafi isn't a great man, but he was trying to unify Africa as a collective voice. That would ruin the western world as well as the others that continue to be snake oil salesman to Africa. No matter which President is in office they will all follow this same script. I truly thought Obama was different (crazy me). I thought he would stand on his own principle atleast some of the time.. Heck maybe this is his principle.. I wonder if this is also how Michelle feels and if not how can she bear to leave with such a weasel of a person.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
willowraven
It must be something in the water!!
05:51 PM on 06/19/2011
are you a little taking your meds today?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
03:37 AM on 06/20/2011
"a little taking..." wth...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:14 PM on 06/19/2011
It is naïveté beyond belief to imagine for one minute that the ‘experts’ who formulate the foreign policy initiatives of the west are concerned with saving civilians from the deprivations of their tyrannical rulers. The question to ask as always is – who gains by this?
12:47 PM on 06/19/2011
Boom, boom, boom, Boom, Obama's Bombs rain down.
Saving civilian lives sounds so profound
You better learn duck, You better learn to run
Boom, boom, boom, Boom, here comes another one.
12:35 PM on 06/19/2011
Whoops !
12:26 PM on 06/19/2011
Oh No, NATO hit the Al Qaeda rebels. Man, Obama is gonna be upset about his Muslim jihad brothers getting bombed!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cybersense
12:43 PM on 06/19/2011
Somehow your screen name kind of fits/
01:09 PM on 06/19/2011
Well thank you but yours doesn't.
01:44 PM on 06/19/2011
lol
02:25 PM on 06/19/2011
Which American racists are you referring to? The white, black, brown, red or yellow ones? The love man wants to know.
12:13 PM on 06/19/2011
obama is sending humanitarian relief by NATO jets.
Time is of the essence.
01:45 PM on 06/19/2011
hheh
12:07 PM on 06/19/2011
forget the bombs, bullets, dead people..this is not a war..Omama
01:45 PM on 06/19/2011
Omama bin laden
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:42 AM on 06/19/2011
"Arab League chief Amr Moussa said the NATO mandate is not about bringing down Gadhafi's regime.."

What a great sense of humor that guy has.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:54 AM on 06/19/2011
NATO, fair and balanced bombing.
11:07 AM on 06/19/2011
NATO is the protector of free peoples in this world - and won the cold war against a brutal empire that was set on world domination - and occupied and destroyed dozens of nations.

The citizens of Libya are very grateful for the NATO bombings, and WANT MORE.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:39 AM on 06/19/2011
They need to be careful what they ask for, they may well get it.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:43 AM on 06/19/2011
"brutal empire that was set on world domination - and occupied and destroyed dozens of nations."

Sounds familiar doesn't it? Go USA!
12:27 PM on 06/19/2011
roudy, your post is great. More please! :)