iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Americans For Prosperity Hosts Wisconsin Phonebank At RightOnline Conference

Walker

First Posted: 06/19/11 12:50 PM ET Updated: 08/19/11 06:12 AM ET

MINNEAPOLIS, Minn. -- Wisconsin was a central theme at the dueling conservative and progressive conferences for online activists here, with both sides gearing up for the summer's state Senate recall elections that are widely seen as a referendum on Gov. Scott Walker's (R-Wis.) fight with public unions.

At the RightOnline conference, conservative activists were calling Wisconsin residents about the nine recall elections at a phone bank sponsored by Americans for Prosperity (AFP), the conservative group funding the conference. Midday on Saturday, about 10 people were in the small room making calls.

"It's called the Wisconsin Freedom Phonebanks," said Matt Seaholm, state director of AFP-Wisconsin. "It's set up for citizen identification, asking people where they stand on the issues -- just kind of identifying people to see what they think of the recalls going on, but also the governor's plan on collective bargaining."

A "Frequently Asked Questions" list given out to participants told them the purpose of the calls was not to educate residents about the candidates but "merely to get the pulse of the community." It also told callers that they could give out the names of the candidates in the recall elections but could not show preference for any of them.

Nevertheless, it was clear that RightOnline participants are on Walker's side in the fight.

Marjorie Haun, a public school teacher in Colorado, said she was closely following events in Wisconsin and decided to phonebank because she felt the collective bargaining issue was a national fight.

She called about half a dozen people. Two hung up, one was unsure on the issue, and one replied, "I have to think about it."

"The main question I had was, 'Do you support Scott Walker's efforts to balance the budget by limiting the public sector union ability to collectively bargain?'" Haun told The Huffington Post.

"I've been very concerned about the way that the unions in Wisconsin have reacted to his effort to balance his budget -- through not taking away what they have, but through limiting the way that they can take taxpayer money to support their pensions, which are huge and very lavish, especially compared to the one I have in Colorado," she added.

According to Seaholm, there were approximately 150 activists from Wisconsin at the conference. Collective bargaining rights came up in several of the major speeches, and on Friday, the Wisconsinites at the event gathered together for a "brainstorming session" about the recalls and other policy matters.

"Everyone wants to know what's going on in Wisconsin," said Seaholm. "It's such a unique experience to live through, to put it nicely."

Wisconsin was also on the tip of everyone's tongues at the progressive Netroots Nation conference happening at the Minneapolis convention center, just a few blocks from RightOnline.

One of the event's main speakers was former Wisconsin senator Russ Feingold, who is many activists' first choice to run for U.S. Senate or governor in the state. Labor leaders were also present at the conference, and there were at least two panels focused on the fight in Wisconsin.

On Sunday, Democracy for America (DFA) was busing participants over to Wisconsin to knock on doors on behalf of candidates in the recall elections. According to a tweet from DFA Deputy National Field Director Nick Passanante, about 20 volunteers joined up with them to canvass.

AFP's Phonebanking FAQ Sheet:

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
MINNEAPOLIS, Minn. -- Wisconsin was a central theme at the dueling conservative and progressive conferences for online activists here, with both sides gearing up for the summer's state Senate recall e...
MINNEAPOLIS, Minn. -- Wisconsin was a central theme at the dueling conservative and progressive conferences for online activists here, with both sides gearing up for the summer's state Senate recall e...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 5,614
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (59 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
riverwester
Indignant Badger
10:49 AM on 06/21/2011
Recall Scott Walker Countdown Clock

http://recallwalkercountdown.appspot.com/
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:29 AM on 06/21/2011
IMO, it isn't going to happen. Six months from now the public will understand that Walker made the right moves for the state, the schools will still be open and functioning, property taxes will not have gone up and the sun still rises in the East. Voters will remember which party tried to derail democracy by running from their legislative duties. Sure, the unions will get a lot of signatures in Dane and Milwuakee counties, but they will never recall Walker.

I think they might win two seats at most in the Senate recalls, if they play it right and that's assuming the Democrats don't lose THEIR recalls. They couldn't even muster a large protest group last week in Madison and the national figures who were prodding them along 4 months ago didn't bother to show up. I don't think the protests in February and March did anything to sway the opinion of the middle voters, in fact they probably did more harm to their cause.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
riverwester
Indignant Badger
11:55 AM on 06/21/2011
i don't care about tr0// opinions. i care about what real people in my state are going to do. recall the corporate tools.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
riverwester
Indignant Badger
10:29 AM on 06/21/2011
Let me just post the top 5 stories that appeared in my facebook feed today. Ready?
1. Extension of aid to jobless goes unused. (10K lost benefits on April 16 b/c state didn't act. wouldn't) http://www.jsonline.com/news/statepolitics/124238398.html

2. Voucher schools have created a separate, unequal system. (walker is expanding out of milwaukee and into racine co. expansion into green bay rejected. walker also lowered the income requirements so suburban "haves" can send their kids to private/religous school on taxpayer dime. at the same time took away eight hundred, thirty-four million dollars from public schools in the state.

3. New WI Budget Grants Broad Power to Gov. Walker to Remake State Health Programs.
http://www.thenation.com/blog/161550/new-wisconsin-budget-grants-broad-power-gov-walker-remake-state-health-programs
http://thinkprogress.org/health/2011/06/20/248741/wisconson-governor-scott-walker-to-cut-medicaid-without-public-hearings/

4. Gov Walkers War on Wind Energy Claims Another Victim; 2nd Wind Farm Canceled.
http://www.windturbines.net/news/Gov-Walker-s-war-on-wind-energy-claims-another-victim-2nd-wind-farm-cancelled-REVE-vbp

5. Dane County judge declares state's domestic partnership law constitutional.
http://host.madison.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/article_f03827f0-9b82-11e0-b614-001cc4c002e0.html
photo
WakeUp2021
57% Approval and Growing!
07:36 PM on 06/20/2011
I hope we shall crush in its birth the aristocracy of our monied corporations which dare already to challenge our government to a trial by strength, and bid defiance to the laws of our country.

Any idea who said that, "Igotowned6"?
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Quinxy von Besiex
My micro-bio is empty. :(
06:51 PM on 06/20/2011
I once read an article by an economist who suggested that if the US government ever got serious about immigration, and cut off the supply of migrant workers, produce would triple in price and something lkie 80% of farms would be forced to shut down within five years, leaving us dangerously reliant on food from overseas.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:42 PM on 06/20/2011
I'd pick your peach's any day : )
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
We Should Care
We Prefer the Truth, Please
01:44 PM on 06/20/2011
It seems like maybe WI Supreme Court Justices would be worth taking a long hard look at by investigative lawyers; as plenty of Kroch money surrounds them one way or another finding this information on the subject: Apparently, Justice Michael Gableman took $6,859.52 from KochPAC in March 2008, and Justice Annette Ziegler took $8,625 from them in March 2007. Ziegler also benefitted from a whopping $2.2 million ad, telephone and direct mail campaign by Wisconsin Manufacturers and Commerce when she ran in 2007, and another $400,000 from Club for Growth Wisconsin. WMC threw its weight behind Gableman as well, to the tune of $2 million. Gableman, of course, was found in 2009 to have violated two separate provisions of the Wisconsin code of judicial ethics" as a result of his campaign's ads that outright lied about incumbent Justice Louis Butler's record. The Supreme Court later deadlocked on the case. Unsurprisingly, it was Justices Prosser, Ziegler, and Roggensack (who joined Gableman in striking down Judge Sumi's decision) who didn't feel as though their colleague's ethics violation were serious enough to warrant actual disciplinary action. if it quacks like a duck......
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
0pseud0
guns don't kill people... video games do.
08:46 AM on 06/21/2011
and people are okay with all this? unbelievable...
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:35 AM on 06/21/2011
Where do the liberal judges get their campaign contributions from?
pistol13
Don't sweat the guard dog, worry about the Smith&W
01:00 PM on 06/20/2011
The main thing the unions are concerned about is that they can no longer have union dues deducted from workers paychecks. Look at the most recent suit. The fat cat union officials are worried because in New York after an illegal stirke the courts found that union dues were "voluntary" and could not be deducted fom payroll checks. The union dues payments went down abot 37 %. Have you ever heard of union officials not getting paid during a strike? A prolonged strike NEVER hurts the union officials that called the strike, only the workers. I wonder how many strikes there would be and how long they would last if the union officials also did not get paid during the strike. HMMM?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DrippingColors
02:32 PM on 06/20/2011
This is total BS. Public sector unions presidents are union members and public employees. No one gets paid during a public employee strike. Of course you're right about union dues. The primary and sole purpose of this action is to defund unions and eliminate the only viable opponent to the top seven out of ten PACS, all conservative, like Club for Growth and FreedomWorks. Here in Ohio, the good citizens have collected more than a MILLION signatures to repeal the power grab. There are only 350,000 public employees in the state. Clearlt the citizens of this swing state aren't buying what the new GOP guv is selling.
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
gino618
04:51 PM on 06/20/2011
If the union members are so supportive of the union, then voluntarily sending in their payments, instead of creating more work for government accountants at taxpayer expense, shouldn't be an issue for them, right? They should be HAPPY to send in their dues by themselves, rather than having them automatically deducted. (Incidentally - if that is true, then why, where these changes have been implemented, do union dues collections drop significantly?)
12:49 PM on 06/20/2011
Somebody please hurry up and usher in the age of "Igotbanned7".
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
houseofd
An educated, informed American is a true Patriot.
01:10 PM on 06/20/2011
LOL nice ;)
photo
igotbanned6
What's right is right
12:36 PM on 06/20/2011
Unions are tyrannical.

"To compel a man to furnish funds for the propagation of ideas he disbelieves and abhors is sinful and tyrannical."

— Thomas Jefferson
12:43 PM on 06/20/2011
Your quote is actually unsupportive of your opening statement as union members *voluntarily* contribute funds to their union. And if your argument is from the perspective of a tax payer being "compelled" to furnish funds for something you believe is tyrannical, then you are calling the government as a whole tyrannical, as they are the employer (Read: Paymaster) of all of these people, they simply formed a group to represent themselves as one unit. Their existence is not at the behest of the unions, but the other way around.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
houseofd
An educated, informed American is a true Patriot.
01:19 PM on 06/20/2011
Wow. I think he should change his handle to "igotowned6."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
saileyboy
living on land sucks
08:48 PM on 06/20/2011
Here's an old republican favorite "if you don't like the job get another". Of course it likely won't pay as well as a union job becuase that's what a union does. Remember "united we stand, divided we fall"?
02:43 PM on 06/20/2011
*facepalm at the st.upidity*
12:32 PM on 06/20/2011
This is a national conservative effort to benefit large business at the expense of the worker. I am totally 100% behind the unions but I must also say that some unions must be willing to renegotiate during fiscally down times so as long as management does the same and the pain is shared across the board. The idea behind a strong union in my mind is to form a partnership with a company to share in its wealth, guarantee quality work, handle it's own human resources issues, but also help to find ways for the company to succeed as their own jobs depend on the overall health as well. In some ways the United Auto Workers behaved in this fashion I believe appropriately, however, it did not appear that management did as well. How can the upper echelon brain trust continue to reap massive benefits while labor is asked to take a bath? That's the imbalance I believe is wrong. I stand against "Right To Work" legislation on every front. If business has the power of the Chamber Of Commerce, Industry Think Tanks, Lobbyists, Political Contributions, then why is it that a worker cannot attempt to have some measure of bargaining in big businesses much vaunted "Free Market"?
photo
igotbanned6
What's right is right
12:41 PM on 06/20/2011
I suggest you start reading some Thomas Jefferson, this has nothing to do with corporations...this is about liberty and freedom and described by our Founding Fathers.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Whitemellon
01:24 PM on 06/20/2011
If your so up on Jefferson than you know one of his big fears was that corporation would grow to the point of destroying our democracy. Why do I get the feeling you have a famous quote book and never read a full page of anything Jefferson wrote.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KDog76A
Radical Centrist
12:10 PM on 06/27/2011
Then why do big businesses donate more to the Democratic party?

You've bought the propaganda hook line and sinker.... all the dollars from Banks, Pharmaceuticals and the Insurance Industry went to the people who brought us Obamacare...

Why??? Because these industries will get billions and billions of taxpayer dollars. If you don't think the Democrats are bought off to benefit businesses, why did they bailout the banks?
01:54 PM on 06/27/2011
First off if you are insinuating that big business gives more to Dems than Repubs then you have been either watchin too much Fox News or not paying attention to the very tenets of the Repub Party...Enron, Koch Brothers, Exxon, etc. etc...The Republicans whole entire premise is based upon supporting big business because they believe that when business does good that the profits "trickle down" to the workers...Doesn't happen and didn't happen under Reagan, either Bush or Obama...Clinton was the only one whose econo policies worked...and he raised taxes!! Who supports a 0% tax rate for corporations? Republicans...Who believes the top 1% of wealth should not be taxed? Republicans...Who props and supports the Nat. Chamber of Commerce? Republicans...As for the bailout..You either don't follow economics or don't understand it because it was neither a Dem or Repub issue...Repubs under Clinton removed regulation that governed the type of investments Wall St. banks could make which opened the flood gates to CDO's and the derivatives markets to the point that it all fell apart when housing collapsed. Hank Paulson (Repub) was put into a situation where he had to do something drastic to keep the Wall St. banks collapse from undermining the credit markets which would have frozen ALL businesses due to lack of available funds for commercial paper from which business uses to run its ops...I hated the bailouts. Reality was that there was no other way out.
photo
igotbanned6
What's right is right
12:31 PM on 06/20/2011
"That government is best which governs least, because its people discipline themselves. If we are directed from Washington (heads of an organization) when to sow and when to reap, we will soon want for bread."

— Thomas Jefferson
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
01:15 PM on 06/20/2011
"And no matter where you go, there you are." try dealing with the present Mr. Peabody.........
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
0pseud0
guns don't kill people... video games do.
09:20 AM on 06/21/2011
no, we need government to build prisons... where nutcases like you belong!
photo
igotbanned6
What's right is right
12:29 PM on 06/20/2011
"If people let the government decide what foods they eat and what medicines they take, their bodies will soon be in as a sorry state as the souls who live under tyranny."

— Thomas Jefferson
photo
igotbanned6
What's right is right
12:28 PM on 06/20/2011
"A government big enough to give you everything you want is strong enough to take everything you have."

— Thomas Jefferson
photo
igotbanned6
What's right is right
12:27 PM on 06/20/2011
"A wise and frugal government which shall restrain men from injuring one another, which shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned. This is the sum of good government."

— Thomas Jefferson
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dee50
Vouchercare-No Way!
12:30 PM on 06/20/2011
So how much does Koch pay these days?
photo
igotbanned6
What's right is right
12:32 PM on 06/20/2011
I love that typical ignorant statement from Liberals. Shows they cant win the debate and resort to attacking the messenger.

Sorry Lib, Jefferson knew that you are all the bane of this country. our Founding Fathers gave us freedom from YOUR type.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
KDog76A
Radical Centrist
12:11 PM on 06/27/2011
Less than Soros
photo
igotbanned6
What's right is right
12:24 PM on 06/20/2011
"The purpose of government is to enable the people of a nation to live in safety and happiness. Government exists for the interests of the governed, not for the governors."

— Thomas Jefferson
photo
igotbanned6
What's right is right
12:23 PM on 06/20/2011
"To preserve our independence, we must not let our rulers load us with perpetual debt. We must make our election between economy and liberty, or profusion and servitude."

— Thomas Jefferson
photo
mtnlife96
No apology
01:00 PM on 06/20/2011
It remains a fascination that those who so often spout random quotations of Thomas Jefferson also support the effort to delete all reference to him from American taxtbooks.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DJ40
01:50 PM on 06/20/2011
You got all that from a quote? Are you Cleo? You're sitting infront of a crystal ball right?
photo
dave6686
upholder of for the people by the people
01:18 PM on 06/20/2011
I prefer to follow the teaching of Jesus... Who said help those in need. greed and selfishness are mortal sins.. and the famous. A camel can sooner pass through the eye of a needle than a rich man can pass through the gates of heaven....
photo
daily randy
Danger, Will Robinson! Danger!
01:34 PM on 06/20/2011
I've been thinking a lot about the latter statement (about the camel). I always assumed that meant that it would be hard for a rich man to get into the kingdom of god. But I'm starting to think that it is actually saying that a rich man will NEVER get into the kingdom of god ... that it's an impossibility. I'm not really sure .. and I don't take the Bible all that serious anyhow ... but it makes me wonder if it is saying that it is impossible for the rich to get into the kingdom of god. Because, if that is what it is saying, then Christians have a lot or rethinking to do.