iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Netroots Nation Bloggers Consistently Disappointed With Obama (VIDEO)


First Posted: 06/20/11 06:25 PM ET Updated: 08/20/11 06:12 AM ET

MINNEAPOLIS, Minn. -- Barack Obama’s approval rating among self-identified liberal Democrats consistently hovers in the 90-percent range, but those numbers conceal reservations that bode poorly for his 2012 reelection campaign’s ability to raise small-dollar donations and marshal the type of grassroots army that helped carry him to victory in 2008.

Asked broadly about support for the president, the overwhelming majority of liberals will answer that they approve of his job performance. Gallup, for instance, breaks out their daily tracking by subgroup once a week and finds liberal Democratic support of Obama averaging out to 86 percent. It peaked at 94 percent in early 2009 and stands at 87 percent as of this writing. But it’s the strength of that support that translates – or doesn’t – into the kind of help Obama's reelection campaign wants and needs.

Gallup doesn’t break the support down by intensity, but the Democratic polling firm Democracy Corps last month found that of the 92 percent of liberal Democrats who back Obama, 64 percent strongly approve and 28 percent are only somewhat supportive. If that 28 percent is comprised largely of the most active Democrats, his base will be less likely to go out and work for him.

At Netroots Nation last week, a gathering of progressive bloggers and activists, a similar survey found strong support for Obama -- 80 percent -- but with 53 percent only "somewhat" backing the president.

HuffPost set up a camera and asked as many people at the conference about Obama as we could find. The result was a remarkably consistent critique of the president.

WATCH:

Clarification: An earlier version of this report identified the poll respondents simply as liberals, when they in fact self-identified specifically as liberal Democrats.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
MINNEAPOLIS, Minn. -- Barack Obama’s approval rating among self-identified liberal Democrats consistently hovers in the 90-percent range, but those numbers conceal reservations that bode poorly for ...
MINNEAPOLIS, Minn. -- Barack Obama’s approval rating among self-identified liberal Democrats consistently hovers in the 90-percent range, but those numbers conceal reservations that bode poorly for ...
MINNEAPOLIS, Minn. -- Barack Obama’s approval rating among self-identified liberal Democrats consistently hovers in the 90-percent range, but those numbers conceal reservations that bode poorly for ...
MINNEAPOLIS, Minn. -- Barack Obama’s approval rating among self-identified liberal Democrats consistently hovers in the 90-percent range, but those numbers conceal reservations that bode poorly for ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 937
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (12 total)
photo
EdCorner
Now what - more of the same...
05:05 PM on 06/21/2011
I don't care, I'm voting for Ron Paul. I just checked with the state voting board and I don't even have to change parties to do it. Just request a ballot - which is another freakin year out.

Why is Obama running for Pres this early? There's not more important things to do than schmooze?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Justin Stamper
03:06 PM on 06/21/2011
These people seem brainwashed too.
11:41 AM on 06/21/2011
It is one sad commentary that the singular defense of Obama is fear mongering of how unspeakably bad the other side is.
If obama actually lifted a finger to oppose them rather than jumping to play patty cake with them at every turn--then it would be a worthwhile point. As it is, there has been a lack of representatuion on an entire spectrum of issues and his true belivers and partisan hacks tend to ignore the glaring evidence..
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
FoxyOldBroad
10:44 AM on 06/21/2011
The "bloggers" took a straw poll of the people who attended the conference. President Obama polled at 80%. Some of these netroot bloggers want 100% of everything. Ain't gonna happen. I don't care who you put in the WH. No President has EVER gotten 100% of what they wanted. The don't seem to understand that we have a C0ngress who now has a House controlled by Repubs because of frustration that everything they wanted either wasn't accomplished in 2 years and/or because President Obama didn't fulfill everything he said during the campaign. They don't believe in incremental steps to enact legislation and some actually thought that the President was going to undue the entire financial system and the entire medical system in 2 years. Some just like to hear themselves talk. Personally, I am furious at the actions they took during the 2010 elections. Instead of pushing for what they want, they pouted like 2 year olds, stayed home and allowed many of the teabaggers to win very close races. Now we have a House who wants to repeal DADT, cut education to the bone, get rid of Medicare/Medicaid and Social Security; refuse to invest in green technology and infrastructure; eliminate the EPA and give the uber-rich and corporations everything including the kitchen sink.
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
FoxyOldBroad
10:47 AM on 06/21/2011
Oh, and a House who has passed 3 or 4 ab0rt!on bills instead of focusing on JOBS. Why are the Netroots all over the Repubs for what they are or aren't doing? I never see ANY of them on the TV bashing the Repubs. If I didn't know better (and I don't) I'd think they were working for the Repubs.
stumanchu35
Tolerance is a one way street.
10:11 AM on 06/21/2011
You all will be sending moneyto and voting for obama. Enough of this "We're not happy" crap.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Forrester1
09:44 AM on 06/21/2011
So who are progressives and liberals going to support in 2012?
Bachmann?
Romney?
Perry?
Tpaw?
We elected President Obama and then turned on him in 2010 and voted in a bunch of whackos. We elected him and then expected him to do it alone.

Liberals, independents, and the young all failed to turn out for particularly state elections. I thought the one lucid point in the video was that the White House needs to get back to the roots. We need to see the dems take on at least some liberal issues.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
dweav
10:39 AM on 06/21/2011
We LIBERALS will support someone who reflects our values. Green or something other than Republican or Republican Lite. When there was really a Democratic party Obama would be a Rockefeller Republican. In most areas Obama is to the right of Nixon.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sleepytoad
apparently I have a micro-bio
10:49 AM on 06/21/2011
Please stop putting all "liberals" under a small umbrella where you call the shots for the group. It doesn't make sense. And sure, vote for the green party. If you really don't think this country went in the wrong direction after 2010, then you won't have anything to complain about when a Huntsman or Romney gets into office and starts appointing justices. If Obama is so Republican Lite, explain why the Republicans fight against most of the things he has tried to do. Or don't. Ignore the laundry list of things he has accomplished historic opposition. Ignore what people like Walker, Scott, Snyder, and Daniels are doing to this nation. When they seize near complete control and we go even further right then the Bush years, you can sit there with your narrow and self defining principals, laughing with all the Palins, Bachman's and Becks. If you think this is hyperbole, just take a look at 2010 again.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:15 PM on 06/21/2011
As with most of the people I know, I'm voting against the GOP. I don't like it, I don't expect Obama to have done everything I wanted exactly as I would have wanted it (though to be fair, I'm not that liberal), but he has been disappointing. Just that I'd rather have the Dems half-@$$ing and compromising on a slow decline than the GOP, which has gone so far to the right they're in bat$#!% crazy town.

Liberals have criticized me for this position, but don't knock it, you need the tepid support of people like me to win.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Forrester1
07:26 PM on 06/21/2011
Any one of the crisis he inherited would have been enough to keep a President busy. Two wars and a simultaneous economic meltdown are what President Obama walked into.
On top of that, he faced a united political opposition from the GOP from the beginning.

He has been successful on every front, Maybe not as fast as we'd all like the progress to be, but it is moving in the right direction. His steadfastness and methodical approach are working out solutions.

Give him a Congress to work with and who knows.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sleepytoad
apparently I have a micro-bio
08:43 AM on 06/21/2011
It would be nice to live in a world where people who call themselves progressive understood how progress works, much less how politics work. And the truth is, both imperfect and both messy. Instead, there seems to be a growing portion of the left who are single issue voters, impatient voters, or just spoiled. Instead of looking at what progress has been made, despite a massive effort to block anything Obama tried to do. The reason we have a watered down healthcare bill (still a huge step forward), a reversal of DADT, more funds for stem cell research, partner patient visitation rights, is because he calculated the chances of success and found ways to accomplish them. Is he perfect? If that's what people were expecting, they should find a religion or something. He's hasn't done everything I wanted. Some things I strongly disagree with. But it's not even a recent phenom of certain people in the left getting impatient. A lot didn't even wait a year and a half into the administration to claim failure. Standing with crossed arms really worked well in 2010. The republicans will rally behind their nominee no matter what. The whole tea party split is BS and they know it. In the end it's about defeating Obama and getting their president, their judges, and their cronies in the right positions. But perhaps that will give people what they want, more things to complain about.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kay360
09:23 AM on 06/21/2011
"It would be nice to live in a world where people who call themselves progressiv­e understood how progress works, much less how politics work."

Ditto

"The reason we have a watered down healthcare bill (still a huge step forward), a reversal of DADT, more funds for stem cell research, partner patient visitation rights, is because he calculated the chances of success and found ways to accomplish them. Is he perfect? If that's what people were expecting, they should find a religion or something."

Ditto

"The republican­s will rally behind their nominee no matter what. The whole tea party split is BS and they know it. In the end it's about defeating Obama and getting their president, their judges, and their cronies in the right positions. But perhaps that will give people what they want, more things to complain about."

Amen
10:38 AM on 06/21/2011
To me, Obamas tactics are akin to a general calling a retreat a "redeployment". I wanted a FIGHTER for the progressive agenda. As somebody on the radio said, he has the bully pulpit, so be a bully!!!" My first misgivings came with the appointment of Guithner and Summers as his top economic advisors. This is like asking the fox to clean up the hen house he has just raided. No one better, you say??? How about Elizabeth Warren?? How about some criminal investigations of some of the Supreme Court Justices questionable associations and economic practices, perticularly Justice Thomas and his wifes connection to raising money for teabaggers? How about some really pressure on the FTC and CFTC for some real regulation??? These are things that are within his power, and he ignores them. So, maybe he is better than a repub candidate; but not that much. I'm voting green party.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sleepytoad
apparently I have a micro-bio
11:00 AM on 06/21/2011
Okay, the Green Party. Given that they have 0% chance to win a national presidential election, what have you done to grow them? What local elections have you volunteered for in the Green Party? How far have you driven to support that party and grow it from the ground up? Have you ran as a Green? Have you helped raise donations large enough to make a dent in those elections? Buy TV spots and such. How many doors have you knocked on for the Green Party? Because until they become viable through local and state growth, the "teabaggers" are going to count on this kind of sentiment to propel them into office, in mass.
07:41 AM on 06/21/2011
So I used to be an electrician back when two guys and a truck made $100K. Was a lot of work! Now I live in an RV park. Its not so bad, I just think we need to quit expecting so darn much from my President. I know he is trying, sometimes things just don't work out. Oh well... This should be his next great speech--"Quit expecting so darn much America!". Obama 2012!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:07 AM on 06/21/2011
yea I had 3 jobs, always busy... always had money. Considering what Obama inherited from Bush he is doing great. Unsupported by wall street and the GOP party of NO-

No president since FDR has increased spending as a percentage of GDP by more than George W. Bush, taking it from 18.4 percent of GDP to 22.8 percent.

Hella situation.
10:41 AM on 06/21/2011
He is doing great? really? How many years will Obama recieve from his fans before the economy is his? You do realize that 95% of the Bush years were some of the best economic times we have ever had.

I would love to have 5.4% unemployment again.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:56 AM on 06/21/2011
If Obama had any competition, he'd be toast. The best Americans ever get is frick and frack.... We can vote for the corporate crook or the crazy corporate crook that hates Americans.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
tnanimation
01:53 AM on 06/21/2011
Wow! Only 90% support! Looks like Obama's in trouble!
Confused and scrambled article. HP is going downhill since
the AOL takeover. More an more of this 'filler'.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:57 AM on 06/21/2011
Not to mention that the 10% will vote for him anyway because they have no place else to go. If Obama had any competition, if Americans had any real choice, both parties would be history.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
HappyBalance
People BEFORE Profits
08:33 AM on 06/21/2011
Don't believe the polls. Obama's support is declining among libs, rapidly.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kay360
08:41 AM on 06/21/2011
Don't believe Gallop but I should believe you? Who are you again? LMAO
01:23 AM on 06/21/2011
The young lady at the end of the video said, "let us, help you" -- I found that quote poignant and profound. Let's make the transparency more transparent. Mr. President, explain your actions in more depth to your base. Explain your political obstacles in more depth.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kay360
01:51 AM on 06/21/2011
Funny, I found that part the most pathetic. If you're an activist why are you asking the government to help you get active on the issues. I thought activists worked for causes--not people.

That's my whole problem with this kind of critique. It focuses on Obama and his work on the issues. But, it does not come from a place of actual activism. What does Netroots do? The activists I know don't attend their conference because they don't spend enough time online. They are actually doing the work.

When Netroots gets something done, then I'll take them seriously. Whining is not winning. Obama is in the game and has a winning track record. Wtf do these people do?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:28 AM on 06/21/2011
Kay, you've got a little kool aid on your chin there.
12:59 AM on 06/21/2011
Obama has betrayed us and made our brand synonymous with dithering cowardice and a rationalized sellout of the productive manufacturing and tech workers and engineers to financial interests and concentrated wealth who see economic suppression as an opportunity to consolidate gains and further enrich themselves.
He also has wounded the National spirit by essentially defunding NASA's return to the moon.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
StillMadMatt
Offending the right people is its own virtue.
02:08 AM on 06/21/2011
The heck with the moon. Get jobs going is the key.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
marijam
Independent
07:10 AM on 06/21/2011
Going to the moon would have created jobs. Instead, cutting the program has cost jobs. Get it?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
StillMadMatt
Offending the right people is its own virtue.
11:50 AM on 06/21/2011
Not that many jobs and after the landing then what? Get real. The moon ain t gonna change a dang thing for USA USA USA!!! You have blown your collective wad. And the Corporate Pimps ho ya'll out. Got it?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kay360
02:12 AM on 06/21/2011
Just in case you haven't noticed, the Democratic brand has been accused of cowardice for years--from Carter to Mondale to Dukakis. The list goes on.

Anyway, your second sentence made no sense, but you could use this mishmash to describe Clinton and much of the DLC. By the way, manufacturing, technology, and engineering is often a partnership between government and corporations. "Selling out our manufacturing base" is a great talking point, but these jobs were likely to move out of the US no matter who was President. Obama saved the manufacturing of the American automobile on US soil. But, I guess he deserves no credit for that major push back against the trend.

Finally, NASA is not shutting down. It is joining an international community of space scientists in the realms of space travel and the space station. Many of the western nations are consolidating their space programs because it costs less and yields greater results.

If you want to stop the concentration of wealth in this country. Keep Obama and give him FDR's Congress--75 Democrats-- for the next four years. Then vote Democrat again in 2016. When progressives win successive electoral victories, then we can talk about the left driving the agenda. In a democracy, it is all about the votes. Period.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
marijam
Independent
07:12 AM on 06/21/2011
Get rid of the Blue Dog democrats. Would he have pushed for single payer if he had had 75 Democrats?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:32 AM on 06/21/2011
Trade agreements with countries that don't have minimum wages killed our blue collar jobs. Pretty soon even WalMart will be too expensive for most of us. It began with Nixon and continued with every corporate sellout president since, all of them. Shame.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
Boereworsrocks
One of the sinking middle class!!
12:56 AM on 06/21/2011
I really wish there was another choice for us progressive in 2012 but Obama is it or you vote Republican. HELL NO!! So Obama will be my "TLOTE" choice, (The Lesser of Two Evils) Sad but true :-(
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
HappyBalance
People BEFORE Profits
08:35 AM on 06/21/2011
Nooo, you can vote 3rd party and show Obama some accountability for being the Corporate Sellout that he is.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Loi Sagato
09:40 AM on 06/21/2011
A third party candidate will never win. The party most likely to win is the one you mostly dislike.
photo
knewsreply
PhD: International Educator and Marketer
12:40 AM on 06/21/2011
Is there something wrong with moving to the center and representing more Americans as President the the United States?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kevin Rayburn
GET YOUR GOVERNMENT OUT OF MY LIVINGROOM
12:53 AM on 06/21/2011
one possible porblem with that.....it would be bad for the ratings of the news media. i swear i think those clowns feed on the left vs right thing, which doesnt leave any room for common sense or for actually getting anything accomplished.
photo
Helzapoppin
Don't Piss Down My Back And Tell Me It's Raining.
03:06 AM on 06/21/2011
the problem is, the center is far left of where Washington is
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
HappyBalance
People BEFORE Profits
08:35 AM on 06/21/2011
Bingo.

Well said.

:)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Frank Foley
Blue Lion
12:40 AM on 06/21/2011
I would love to see disenfranchised progressives not turn out for the 2012 elections and Obama lose. Ok, not really, but if you guys think he's bad, see how Romney, Pawlenty, or Bachmann treats ya.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
flossophy
the unfamous anti-establishment classical liberal
12:42 AM on 06/21/2011
I think Newt will treat the disenfranchised Progressives quite well. 

There will be lots of economic growth and job opportunities for everyone.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Frank Foley
Blue Lion
12:46 AM on 06/21/2011
The big question is...Will any of those job opportunities be on the moon?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
StillMadMatt
Offending the right people is its own virtue.
02:09 AM on 06/21/2011
I like to eat insects and raw meat. Newt 2012. LMAO