More

Student Visa Program: New Rules, Same Problems

J1 Summer Work Travel Program

HOLBROOK MOHR and MITCH WEISS   06/20/11 06:05 PM ET   AP

JACKSON, Miss. — The State Department is publicly acknowledging that one of its most popular exchange programs leaves foreign college students vulnerable to exploitation, but it's unclear if new regulations the agency is pushing will do enough to stop the abuses.

The revised rules aim to shift more responsibility onto the 53 entities the department designates official sponsors in the J-1 Summer Work Travel Program. Historically, many sponsors have farmed out those duties to third-party contractors, making the sponsors "mere purveyors of J-1 visas," according to the State Department's proposed new rules published this spring in the Federal Register.

Federal auditors have criticized the department for years for depending on sponsors, some of whom make millions of dollars off J-1 students, to oversee the program and investigate complaints. Yet the new regulations would require little or no direct oversight by State Department employees, leaving sponsors free to continue policing themselves and their partners.

The changes are to take effect July 15, too late for thousands of students already in the country for another season of cleaning hotel rooms, waiting tables and working checkout counters.

Students visiting under J-1 visas make ideal victims since they are here temporarily and may not know how to seek help. An Associated Press investigation published six months ago found that many participants paid thousands of dollars to come to the U.S., only to learn the jobs they were promised didn't exist. Some had to share beds in crowded houses or apartments, charged so much for lodging and transportation that they took home no pay. Others turned to the sex industry, while some sought help from homeless shelters.

In posting the proposed new rules, State Department officials detailed problems that largely mirrored the AP's findings, then blamed lack of oversight by the sponsors, and expressed confidence the changes will help clean up the program, partly by requiring sponsors to verify that students have jobs and that the employers are legitimate.

A review of the new regulations shows they have few teeth, however. While the changes spell out how sponsors are to vet third-party brokers and how often they are to touch base with visiting students, the rules are vague on how vigorously the State Department will check to verify those duties are done.

The proposed rules call for sponsors to compile reports, including background checks, on overseas brokers who put students in touch with them, and to submit those reports to U.S. consulates. The department also will conduct a spot check of the biggest sponsors.

But the agency has just a handful of employees who keep track of this and other foreign exchange programs, which handle more than 300,000 participants, according to the Economic Policy Institute, a nonpartisan think tank that plans to publish a report on the program.

While the State Department acknowledged that housing and living conditions have been a problem, there's nothing in the new regulations that addresses oversight of those issues. The revised policies also contain no mention of penalties if sponsors are found lacking.

State Department spokesman John Fleming said rules already on the books allow sanctions ranging from written reprimands to revocation of sponsors' designations.

But the department also acknowledged that no Summer Work Travel sponsor has ever been removed from the program for its treatment of students, despite years of complaints of exploitation and deplorable living and working conditions, according to documents obtained by the AP. And only a few sponsors have ever been reprimanded, according to the State Department.

"You can have all the rules and the regulations in the world, but if you don't have enforcement, the rules are worthless. They're not worth the paper they're written on," said George Collins, an Okaloosa County, Fla., sheriff's inspector who has been complaining to the State Department for 10 years about the problems.

Prompted in part by the AP project and by complaints from visiting students, the House Judiciary Committee's immigration subcommittee had planned a hearing on the program Wednesday, but the hearing was postponed.

The Summer Work Travel Program allows foreign college students to live and work in the United States for four months. It brought more than 130,000 men and women to the United States last year alone.

Participation has increased dramatically over the last decade, but so have the problems. In one of the worst cases unearthed by the AP, at least two J-1 students from Ukraine were beaten and forced to work in strip clubs in Detroit. One said she was raped by her captors.

"This is a dangerous program because the State Department has outsourced its oversight role to the program sponsors and employers who hire the participants," said Daniel Costa, an immigration policy analyst who is working on the Economic Policy Institute's report.

State Department officials insist the "safety and well-being of all J-1 exchange participants is our top priority," and note that the vast majority of visitors under the sprawling program enjoy their stays and return home with little trouble.

The new regulations also promise closer scrutiny of participants from several nations, including Belarus, Bulgaria and Russia, that are "known sources of the types of criminal activity that the State Department wishes to avoid," according to the Federal Register. Students have been used to launder money stolen from U.S. banks, and women forced into the sex industry through the J-1 program often come from Eastern Europe.

The State Department, again shifting blame, said in the Federal Register that it wanted to publish the proposed rules changes sooner but waited after sponsors complained they had already signed contracts to provide workers this season to resorts and other employers.

"Inadequacies in U.S. sponsors' vetting and monitoring procedures contribute to potentially dangerous or unwelcomed situations for these participants," the State Department said in the Federal Register. "This past summer the Department received a significantly increased number of complaints from foreign governments, program participants, their families, concerned American citizens."

Yet the AP found that while law enforcement and others had complained to the State Department for years about abuse in the J-1 program, the agency didn't start tracking complaints until last year – after the AP asked for the documents in a Freedom of Information Act request. Once the agency began keeping a log of complaints, the list quickly grew into the dozens, according to documents the AP obtained through the Freedom of Information Act.

The AP investigation found abuse of hundreds of students in more than a dozen states. More recently, the AP obtained emails between several Thai students and their sponsoring organization, the International YMCA, based in New York. The emails said 12 foreign students were each paying $400 a month – a total of $4,800_ to live in the Florida Panhandle in a mobile home infested with cockroaches and rodents.

The Thai students complained to U.S. Rep. Jeff Miller, R-Fla., saying they were afraid of a third-party labor broker, Ivan Lukin, who arranged for their housing and jobs. They said Lukin threatened them with deportation when they complained, and that the State Department and the International YMCA did little to help them.

"We are afraid of Mr. Lukin and fear for our personal safety, but the YMCA has dismissed our concerns, even after we have informed them of our fears," one of the students wrote to Miller.

When the AP asked about Lukin, the State Department said in an email the agency cuts ties with people or businesses that violate established procedures. Yet Florida police warned the State Department as far back as 2007 that Lukin was subjecting students to crowded living conditions in violation of housing codes, according to emails obtained by the AP. There also were concerns the students weren't being paid.

Lukin declined to comment about the allegations. He said he would only answer questions by email. The AP sent him questions, but he didn't respond.

At first, the YMCA said "a small number of participants from Thailand who Lukin had placed" complained to the State Department and the Thai embassy, rather than with the YMCA, and that those complaints "were not related to health or safety issues."

When the AP produced an email to the YMCA showing the students complained about their health and safety, it agreed there were problems and said it would look into the situation.

"We take the students' allegations very seriously and have asked outside consultants to undertake an independent and comprehensive investigation so that we can fully determine the facts," said Ellen Murphy, the Y's spokeswoman.

That includes an "immediate and comprehensive review of the International's Y's dealings with Lukin," she said.

The State Department is accepting public comments on the proposed rule changes through June 27.

___

Weiss reported from Charlotte, N.C.

___

Online:

Proposed new regulations: http://bit.ly/kqyhzk

FOLLOW HUFFPOST COLLEGE

Around the Web:

J-1 Exchange Visitor Visa

Filed by Rebecca Harrington  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 12
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Recency  | 
Popularity
09:36 PM on 06/21/2011
Yes, a true exchange is transformative, but if we are denying such jobs to Americans who need them, I still must question it. What works in a booming economy doesn't necessarily work in a bad economy. I wonder if the motivation for the employer is possibly that the employee has no advocate or knowledge of the country's systems and can be abused.

I just don't believe Americans are not good employees. I think that is a prejudice fueled by business desire to avoid healthcare or benefits. Maybe the folks running these programs don't understand how many American kids are suffering now while our government continues a number of wars. On the bottom, people are going without. When people are hungry, they wonder why their government has betrayed them and given jobs to others.
01:42 PM on 06/20/2011
U.S. citizens benefit from the J-1 program in the form of reciprocal programs that are offered to provide employment to Americans in places like Australia. Anyone who has traveled overseas in their late teens or early 20's can attest to the transformative impact such experiences can have on a young person's life...imagine the implications of enough young people from countries normally at odds with one another working together in a small business in the U.S. for a summer. Lifetime friendships have been forged out of young people's participation in the J-1 program. Yes, like any well-intended government program there have been missteps and even some abuses, but when one weighs such risks against the tremendous amount of good this program has done in its 50+ years of existence, the scales tip dramatically in favor of programs like J-1 that foster improved intercultural understanding while helping countless local economies and small business owners.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CommonSense411
I live my life by my conscience.
03:07 PM on 06/20/2011
Okay, your trying to make apples into oranges here JimDay98. I am sorry, but no "amount of good" justifies illegal slave labor. These are people kids.
03:09 PM on 08/01/2011
I don't know how much experience you actually have with the J-1 program, but my wife works with this program directly and I can tell you that the people running it (especially the YMCA) do not tolerate any sort of "slave labor"...the students are paid the same wage as Americans to perform the same work. Yes, there are a few bad apples, like in any large program, but the people I have come into contact with have been incredibly generous and caring for these kids...some of them run nonprofits dedicated just to seeing to it that they have a good experience by providing things like transportation, home-cooked meals, etc. There's two sides to every coin, and in my opinion this article is only presenting one side of the story. Talk with some of the kids that have had a good experience through this program in addition to reading stories like this before forming your opinion and I think you might have a different point of view.
01:39 PM on 06/20/2011
At first blush it seems like the J-1 Visa Program is importing foreign students to compete with Americans for jobs, but if you dig a bit beneath the surface that isn't what is actually happening. This program is used to staff the small businesses in places like the outer banks of North Carolina, which only has a local population of 500 but requires over 2,000 low-skilled laborers to keep its small businesses operating during the tourism season (summertime). These places have tried relying on American workers, but has never been able to recruit enough Americans to fill all these minimum-wage jobs. The bottom line is without the J-1 visa program the real losers would be the small business owners all over the country whose livelihood depends on doing business during a particular season. These students also rent space that otherwise would be left vacant, so their presence helps real-estate owners as well. I would agree that this is a program that might be hurting our economy if the J-1 students were pocketing the money they were making here and bringing it back home, but that's not the case. The wages that are paid to these students get immediately re-invested back into the local economy in the form of food and rent expenses (the jobs don't pay enough for the students to save much money).
12:34 PM on 06/20/2011
I used to be in favor of exchange programs. In Aspen, Colorado, the influx of people from other countries created the original base of its ski economy, and the ski economy of Colorado also. Swedish people brought with them wooden sticks they could travel over snow on. Today we call them skis. I had an opportunity to interview a number of people in Aspen who are credited with building its ski economy; they were immigrants after WWII from the war zone, many of them Germans or Austrians. Hans Lull, a very successful restauranteur in Aspen, told the story of being put before a firing squad but someone's gun jammed, so he jumped out a window and ran and lived.

But it is folly to ignore when times change.

Why does our government assist in exporting jobs and money? Because it is owned by the businesses whose top priority is to avoid paying for Americans' benefits and healthcare.

If heathcare is provided to Americans by our government, then businesses would have no need to attempt this avoidance.

If businesses were made to be responsible for all healthcare costs of illegal immigrants they hire, then they would make a better choice.

Today in Colorado, illegal immigrants are let out of legal requirements on Americans, such as having a driver's license and insurance.

So if you are in a wreck with a Mexican who has no idea who has rightofway, then YOUR insurance had better be enough.
12:25 PM on 06/20/2011
In Denver, our school board president Nate Easley brags about his straight As in college while writing his doctoral thesis about goals for Mexican immigrant students.

My complaint is that DPS offers NO GOALS WHATSOEVER for anybody but minority students. They intend to "close the achievement gap" here by using deception to destroy the true choices of "caucasian" kids.

My daughter, 13, was in the highly gifted and talented program until Easley came along. He doesn't quickly return phone calls from white parents.

DPS used deceit to eliminate all our "choices" and then stuffed her into an ROTC school with Army instructors.

THAT's how you close the achievement gap. Send the white girls to practice spinning rifles and clicking their heels. That is not a job skill unless you intend to send my daughter to war.

How about replacing the lottery system allowing Americans to be supplanted with a system that grants the desirable school enrollments to kids who actually listen and achieve.

Provide summer school to anybody wishing to improve, as well as tutors and all other resources possible. Eliminate the lotteries. Make the kids decide to achieve to get into those good schools.

I am stating that Denver Public Schools discriminated against my daughter because she is white.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
whatwasthat
Hakuna Matata
01:55 PM on 06/20/2011
What drivel. You offered very few(in fact no) hard facts. All you said is very subjective and quite frankly anti-minority.
"..supplanted with a system that grants the desirable school enrollment­s to kids who actually listen and achieve " Seriously? So minority kids don't listen and achieve?
Also, no offense, you are a white person in America. It's incredibly hard to feel sorry for you because of your race.
09:31 PM on 06/21/2011
I live in a portion of Denver where whites are a minority in schools. IN our elementary school, the parent meeting with the principal is conducted in Spanish and they did not have an interpreter for me.

The high quality schools are awarded by lottery, not achievement. So your words twist the truth. But I advocate they should be awarded by achievement. Or the high quality schools should accept all applicants instead of only about one third.

There is a pronounced achievement gap when immigrant children arrive without English skills, and a long debate about how best to provide education: in Spanish or English? Our elementary school had great interracial fistfighting in the second and third grades.

My parents were missionaries in the Congo. It is your prejudice you express.

What I offered was the history my child is going through right now with DPS, which seeks to convert Montbello's failing schools into having 40 to 50 percent minority teachers. It seems the minority kids who don't make great grades have blamed it on having white teachers. They openly display disrespect for white teachers. I was there. You weren't. So the plan is to increase the number of minority teachers by firing the white teachers who haven't done anything wrong. They are being fired for the color of their skin, not the content of their character. I have seen those same teachers put their backs into it. For my child and everybody else's.
12:20 PM on 06/20/2011
The Denver Post reported yesterday that it was 320,000.

I seriously object to importing students from other countries when our own students in the USA need those jobs. Especially when we discover so much abuse unchecked.

Why is it so many programs favor anybody except American students?

I will be phoning my Congressional representatives to request that this program be eliminated until it is truly an EXCHANGE program instead of a USURP program. Nowhere in these articles did I see any mention of American students being EXCHANGED.

I am totally in favor of real EXCHANGE, but that is evidently not what is occurring.

These employers should be investigated and prosecuted.

Further, if Americans designed the healthcare programs to provide healthcare without cost containment to Americans, we would not have employers importing and outsourcing like they do. Our federal and state governments continually fail to investigate and prosecute employers. In Colorado employers own our state government in several offensive repugnant ways.

I currently have filed in the U.S. Supreme Court because Colorado's worker's comp system failed, refused and neglected to enforce the law to provide due process. Judges, AKA "sludges," continually refused to require the employer, Lennar Corporation, to provide my personnel file in full. Normally that would be a default judgment. Not in Colorado.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jason Vineyard
Dem turned Repub Constitutionalist
11:29 AM on 06/20/2011
We need to put more restrictions on how many student visas can be issued a year. We need to put American students to work before we even think about importing people to take our good paying jobs!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Amalek
Highly decorated HP warrior
08:30 AM on 06/20/2011
Shame on the YMCA.