More

Yukiya Amano, IAEA Head, On Nuclear Safety: 'We Need To Have A Sense Of Urgency'

Yukiya Amano Iaea Nuclear Safety

By GEORGE JAHN   06/20/11 10:34 AM ET   AP

VIENNA -- The head of the International Atomic Energy Agency on Tuesday urged a worldwide review of safety measures to prevent new nuclear disasters, but acknowledged that since his organization lacks the authority to enforce rules any improvements are only effective if countries apply them.

While some countries at the 151-member IAEA's meeting want any new safety regime to be mandatory, most prefer them to be voluntary and don't want a regulatory role for IAEA. If the IAEA cannot enforce safety standards, those rules will be only as good as they are being enforced by IAEA nations.

"Even the best safety standards are useless unless they are actually implemented," Amano said.

Asked outside the meeting if he would like to see the IAEA have the same authority against safety violators as it now has against nuclear proliferators – which includes referral to the U.N. Security Council – he said: "I do not exclude that possibility."

But he said a sense of post-Fukushima urgency dictated action now under existing rules.

"We have to move by days, weeks, months, and I cannot wait years" – the time it would take to revise the IAEA's mandate for the 35-nation board – he said. "We need to have a sense of urgency."

Outlining a five-point plan to strengthen nuclear reactor safety, Amano called for strengthening IAEA standards and ensuring they are applied; establishing regular safety reviews of all the world's reactors; beefing up the effectiveness of national regulatory bodies; strengthening global emergency response systems, and increasing IAEA input in responding to emergencies.

A draft of the conference's ministerial statement made available to The Associated Press showed that the gathering was content to work on upgrading present safety practices and emergency measures without giving the IAEA an enforcing role.

It called only for "a strengthened role of the IAEA in emergency preparedness and response by promoting and possibly expanding existing IAEA response and assistance capabilities." And it urged countries on the threshold of civilian nuclear programs to "create a nuclear safety infrastructure based on IAEA safety standards."

Amano also urged that the INES scale – which classifies nuclear incidents on a seven-point scale – be revamped. The March accident at Japan's Fukushima Dai-ichi accident was upgraded to seven - the highest on the scale – only on April 12. That was more than a month after a 9-magnitute earthquake and a devastating tsunami overwhelmed the Fukushima reactor's cooling system and radiation started leaking into the atmosphere.

"Safety standards ... in particular those pertaining to multiple severe hazards such as tsunamis and earthquakes should be reviewed," Amano told the meeting. He proposed "IAEA international expert peer reviews" to complement national safety checks, and establishing stockpiles of emergency equipment by reactor operators to try and prevent a replay of Fukushima.

"Many countries have accepted (peer reviews) already; European countries, Japan, the United States," he told reporters outside the meeting. "I would like to expand it, so that all nuclear power plants will see a peer review on a random basis."

Speaking for Japan, Economics Minister Banri Kaieda pledged that his country "will take drastic measures to ensure the highest level of safety" for its reactor network.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

VIENNA -- The head of the International Atomic Energy Agency on Tuesday urged a worldwide review of safety measures to prevent new nuclear disasters, but acknowledged that since his organization lacks...
VIENNA -- The head of the International Atomic Energy Agency on Tuesday urged a worldwide review of safety measures to prevent new nuclear disasters, but acknowledged that since his organization lacks...
Filed by Travis Donovan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 86
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CaptD
Freedom From Nuclear Fascism...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jeffrey Williams
Don't worry ! Nothing is going to be OK !!!
02:18 PM on 06/21/2011
I would bet that in 25 years (the time it took for Chernobyl to be foreshadowed) that Fukushima will still be spewing radiation from the 3 reactor corium blobs and the sfp in building # 4
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SLS11
Its all there, if we just open our eyes...
08:19 PM on 06/24/2011
Yep, and I'll bet that what's left of the nuclear industry by then, a few aging and mostly memory challenged cheery nukeleaders, will be typing..."But, but... Fukushima is just back ground radiation!"
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jeffrey Williams
Don't worry ! Nothing is going to be OK !!!
01:54 PM on 06/21/2011
The Nuclear Industry will have to use a TURBO to help them spin the amount of issues being uncovered... Good luck with your Renaissance !

Tick tick tick KABOOM goes the industry and their LUCK !

Sadly, what they have promised the world is destroying it instead and they can't admit it. Thanks for the novel idea though....SAFE,CLEAN,CHEAP just are not in the equation
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
aligatorhardt
I DO NOT pity the fool
11:06 AM on 06/21/2011
At the least we could be much less irresponsible about keeping reactors near heavy population centers and environmentally sensitive areas.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CaptD
Freedom From Nuclear Fascism...
11:31 AM on 06/21/2011
Who wants "The least we can do"?

Not me!
10:55 AM on 06/21/2011
Nuclear energy is too costly and too dangerous.

Poisoning the air, land, water and food supply is too high a price to pay.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CaptD
Freedom From Nuclear Fascism...
11:43 AM on 06/21/2011
Faved
Thanks for seeing what is before all of US!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
mrJJ
09:52 AM on 06/21/2011
Source: http://houseoffoust.com/group/?p=1244

Estimated Contamination Potential of Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Plant

In order to better understand the threat posed by Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant group member Edano has created some very rough estimates. These numbers are based on the worst case scenario numbers created by the British in this recently declassified document.
These estimates for Fukushima are for the total potential fuel on site, not for what has actually been released.

The estimated total potential material at Fukushima only includes cesium 137 and iodine 131. It does not include important isotopes such as stronium, plutonium and a long list of others.

A. Fukushima
3 reactors / coriums:
cesium 137: 1e18 Bq = 1,000,000 TBq = 1,000,000,000,000,000,000 Bq
iodine 131: 7.2e18 Bq = 7,200,000 TBq = 7,200,000,000,000,000,000 Bq
6 Spent Fuel Pools:
—-> cesium 137: 2.2e18 Bq = 2,200,000 TBq = 2,200,000,000,000,000,000 Bq

B. Chernobyl (all isotopes)
4 – 6.4e18 Bq = 4,000,000 TBq – 6,400,000 TBq = 4,000,000,000,000,000,000 -
6,400,000,000,000,000,000 Bq

Chernobyl total: 6,400,000 TBq (all isotopes)
Fukishima estimated total of partial isotopes: 10,400,000 TBq (partial isotopes)

http://www.scribd.com/fullscreen/58313487?access_key=key-1amf2uutax7h93geh699
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
aligatorhardt
I DO NOT pity the fool
11:10 AM on 06/21/2011
It is worth saying that the Fukushima crisis is not over by any stretch.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CaptD
Freedom From Nuclear Fascism...
11:32 AM on 06/21/2011
Faved
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
mrJJ
09:19 AM on 06/21/2011
TEPCO investigated the contaminated water treatment system that was halted [when the radiation on the Kurion's subsystem exceeded the limit (4 millisieverts/hour) set by TEPCO] and announced on June 20 that the problem was caused by the flow of the water that contained much more radioactive materials than expected. TEPCO is conducting the test again to measure the radiation level.




Well, over 100,000 tonnes of highly contaminated water at Fukushima I Nuclear Power Plant are estimated to contain 720,000 terabecquerels of radioactive materials.

If Kurion's vessel absorbed enough radioactive materials in 5 hours and it should have taken 30 days, as I wrote in my previous post, the water was 144 times as radioactive as the system had anticipated.

If the water actually turns out to be 144 times as radioactive, the Fukushima accident would need a new INES category and should not be placed in the same category (Level 7) as the Chernobyl accident which released only 5.6 million terabecquerels of radioactive materials. Maybe it should be simply called "Level Fukushima".

http://ex-skf.blogspot.com/2011/06/contaminated-water-processing-at.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CaptD
Freedom From Nuclear Fascism...
10:35 AM on 06/21/2011
Faved
+ Here are my additional numbers:

--> 8 Core breach with meltdown w/ Local death and mass evac.'s (Decade).
--> 9 Core breach with meltdown w/ Local death and mass evac.' (Gen.'s).
--> 10 Core breach with meltdown causing world wide death's!
photo
maslin
At 6 bn km, it's mostly small stuff.
10:37 PM on 06/20/2011
Excellent news, and the right response.

'Amano also urged that the INES scale – which classifies nuclear incidents on a seven-point scale – be revamped.'

Also, just because I am human: I called this a month or more ago. Fukushima and Chernobyl will not remain classed in the same level.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SLS11
Its all there, if we just open our eyes...
10:47 PM on 06/20/2011
I agree with you, 100 %. I believe that at the end of the day, Fukushima is going to be a level 8 or 9, much worse than Chernobyl.
Just like you, I called this as well.
photo
maslin
At 6 bn km, it's mostly small stuff.
10:58 PM on 06/20/2011
If they expand the scale, Chernobyl will go to the top. Fukushima will not.

It could not possibly be more obvious, but since you're showing admirable resistance to using your eyes for anything:

Zero people have died from exposure to radiation at Fukushima. You know it, I know it, the IAEA knows it.

Additionally, it's quite clear that the dispersion and subsequent exposures are different, in a way that favors my argument, not yours.
09:25 PM on 06/20/2011
The organization is a marketing arm for industry. A sense of urgency to close all plants is what is needed.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CaptD
Freedom From Nuclear Fascism...
09:29 PM on 06/20/2011
Because of the Trillion Dollar RISK per Reactor Complex,
... should Nature or some other event happen to them!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SLS11
Its all there, if we just open our eyes...
10:21 PM on 06/20/2011
That's why I am a fan already!
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
HLL
Women, their rights & nothing less ~ SusanBAnthony
04:30 PM on 06/20/2011
There ONLY way to deal with nuclear energy is — shut it down. Close every one of the 104 nuclear power plants in the USA, and shut down the rest all over the world.

Fukushima is still vomiting radiation into our atmosphere, oceans, Earth, marine animals, humans, all Pacific rim countries, including the USA. E-N-O-U-G-H!!!!!!!

Germany and Switzerland are phasing out of nuclear power. The Italian people and Japanese people want to also. Longing for the USA to jump on the NoNukes bandwagon.

Meanwhile, we have our own nuclear crisis here in the USA right this minute ~

Sand shortage causes concern for flood fighters, June 20, 2011
http://www.statesman.com/news/nation/sand-shortage-causes-concern-for-flood-fighters-1550158.html

Electrical Fire Knocks Out Spent Fuel Cooling Pool At Nebraska Nuclear Plant, June 19, 2011
http://planetsave.com/2011/06/19/electrical-fire-knocks-out-spent-fuel-cooling-pool-at-nebraska-nuclear-plant/
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CaptD
Freedom From Nuclear Fascism...
09:30 PM on 06/20/2011
More "For lack of a Nail" thinking,
... which could any one of our Reactors
... into jeopardy!
Genders
Love, Tolerance, Enlightenment
04:22 PM on 06/20/2011
Nuclear fission power cannot be made safe. The require tons of radioactive core material will always be a threat from disaster and terrorism. The tech to recycle and refine the fuels will always be the tech for making bomb materials. The waste will last longer than modern humans have existed! The radiation caused cancers are lab proven linear no threshold (except leukemia) . So any radiation release and population exposure will kill people from cancer, but it's they perfect mass murder, since the cancers cannot be proven to come from a participial radioactive release. Reason enough to stop all nuclear power.

Big companies will always cut corners till things break. The Nuke folks are operating reactor past their design lifetimes and capacity. These reactors are a power failure away from a meltdown and explosion( not nuke, duh).

rooftop pv solar is already cheaper than nukes, faster to install, safe clean and forever.

http://www.ncwarn.org/2010/07/solar-and-nuclear-costs-the-historic-crossover/
http://www.grist.org/article/2011-06-16-german-rooftop-solar-price-averages-less-than-4-per-watt

Rooftop pvs solar, offshore wind, waste bio char bio fuels, some geothermal and unfracked gas can provide all the world energy needs 24/7.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SLS11
Its all there, if we just open our eyes...
03:54 PM on 06/20/2011
Lack of will on implementing Fukushima nuclear lessons

Although the draft final statement contains general proposals to strengthen existing safety rules and mechanisms, it is short on actual commitments.

“I think this will be more a photo-opportunity than a substantive conference,†one Arab diplomat said.

Diplomats from several countries, who spoke on condition on anonymity, said the United States, India and China were among the countries that had worked to water down the final document.

For example, the U.S. tried -- unsuccessfully -- to prevent reference to an action plan that Director General Amano will be tasked to formulate by September.

http://www.thehindu.com/sci-tech/energy-and-environment/article2112284.ece
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CaptD
Freedom From Nuclear Fascism...
09:32 PM on 06/20/2011
More US Nuclear Baloney Salesmanship!

We need a strong UN Inspection team to certify EVERY reactor on Earth!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
undsoweiter
but I know where to look it up
02:09 PM on 06/20/2011
Cool, it's the CaptD channel, all CaptD, all the time.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
SLS11
Its all there, if we just open our eyes...
03:56 PM on 06/20/2011
Feel free to change channels....
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
HLL
Women, their rights & nothing less ~ SusanBAnthony
04:23 PM on 06/20/2011
x 2!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
CaptD
Freedom From Nuclear Fascism...
09:35 PM on 06/20/2011
They will love your arrogance at the Pro-Nuclear site of
Atomic Insights: http://atomicinsights.com/

Maybe I can appear on The Daily Show next!
carpediemfriends
Stranger in a strange land
02:05 PM on 06/20/2011
Cesare Silvi: Human history is full of madness, full of catastrophes. Imagine if we had nuclear reactors when we fought wars in the past. If you try to consider all the events that might happen over the years, you start to ask, ‘What are the benefits of such an effort, especially when you have opportunities to get electricity in many other ways?

http://www.grist.org/list/2011-06-15-ex-nuclear-engineer-says-it-can-never-be-safe
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
NoMoreNukes2012
Fukushima Opened My Eyes
01:56 PM on 06/20/2011
The crippled Fukushima nuclear plant is still leaking and, judging from the experience at Chernobyl, Japan’s recovery won’t be measured in years, but centuries.­­†Watch the special Fallout! 13:04 Minutes
http://simplyinfo.org/
CENTURIES. And you've been SILENT all this time. Shame on YOU IAEA!