More

Gannett Laying Off 700 More Workers Amid Ad Slump

Gannett

MICHAEL LIEDTKE   06/21/11 07:44 PM ET   AP

SAN FRANCISCO — Newspaper publisher Gannett Co. is laying off 700 workers, or 2 percent of its work force, in the latest cutback triggered by a relentless advertising slump.

The layoffs Tuesday affected most of Gannett's 82 daily newspapers in the U.S., including The Indianapolis Star and The Courier-Journal of Louisville, Ky., but not USA Today, Gannett's largest. Gannett would not say how many of the cuts were in the newsroom.

The cuts marked the company's largest round of layoffs in two years and the latest in a string of austerity measures imposed since print advertising, its main source of revenue, began to fall in 2006.

Like most newspaper publishers, Gannett has been hurt by technological and cultural shifts, which have driven readers and advertisers to the Internet. Newspapers have been attracting more online advertisers, but not enough to offset erosion in their print editions, where ad rates typically have been 10 times higher than on the Web.

Those challenges were compounded by the Great Recession and then a weak recovery. Although ad revenue has been growing again on the Web, radio, TV and even magazines, the biggest U.S. newspapers are still suffering declines.

Gannett's annual revenue has fallen more than $2 billion, or nearly 30 percent, since 2006.

Gannett has reduced its work force by 20,000 employees during the past five years through layoffs, attrition and other actions, such as the sale of a Hawaii newspaper. Before the latest cuts, it had 32,600 employees.

Belt tightening helped Gannett boost its earnings by 66 percent last year. The performance resulted in a $1.75 million bonus for Gannett CEO Craig Dubow, a 21 percent increase from $1.45 million in 2009.

Although cost-cutting has allowed Gannett to remain profitable, it hasn't prevented a sharp drop in Gannett's market value. The company's stock has fallen about 75 percent since the end of 2005. It increased 40 cents to close Tuesday at $14.16.

Gannett's newspaper ad revenue fell 7 percent in the first three months of 2011 compared with a year earlier. That weakness persisted in the current quarter, which ends this Sunday.

"The economic recovery is not happening as quickly or favorably as we had hoped and continues to impact our U.S. community media organizations," Bob Dickey, president of Gannett's U.S. community publishing division, wrote in a memo to employees Tuesday.

The division consists of all of Gannett's U.S. newspapers except USA Today and the Detroit Free Press. The latest cuts amounted to 3 percent of the division's payroll of 22,400 workers.

Without providing details, Dickey wrote that ad revenue had been hurt by high unemployment, sagging home sales and, more recently, softening demand for automobiles.

Gannett, which is based in McLean, Va., will announce its second-quarter results next month.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST MEDIA

SAN FRANCISCO — Newspaper publisher Gannett Co. is laying off 700 workers, or 2 percent of its work force, in the latest cutback triggered by a relentless advertising slump. The layoffs Tuesday...
SAN FRANCISCO — Newspaper publisher Gannett Co. is laying off 700 workers, or 2 percent of its work force, in the latest cutback triggered by a relentless advertising slump. The layoffs Tuesday...
Filed by Jack Mirkinson  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 121
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
07:59 AM on 06/24/2011
Journalism takes another hit. Pretty soon there won't be any reporters to keep an eye on local government officials, schools, courts and the like. A healthy democracy needs a strong, independent press. I believe we as a people might be in trouble.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
liberaldawg
What are you looking at?
08:49 PM on 06/23/2011
What do you expect from a company that owns so many print newspapers.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TFlint
07:16 PM on 06/23/2011
35 staffers laid off Thursday at the Cincinnati Enquirer, a Gannett paper. Gannett plans to replace all local papers with USA Today.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TFlint
02:23 PM on 06/23/2011
Under President Reagan Gannett appointed every member of the Supreme Court to a seat on the board of one of its newspapers. They were paid $500,000 a year to attend one half- hour meeting per year. Then they got the court to rule that newspaper reporters are professionals like doctors and lawyers, and so exempt from workers rights laws and regulations. They destroyed every union at every newspaper they owned and have treated reporters like dirt ever since.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jswift1121
11:05 AM on 06/23/2011
Everyday I feel a little bit dumberer for majoring in journalism.
10:36 AM on 06/23/2011
Gannett several years ago went on a newspaper buying binge in which they paid way, way too much for most of the papers they bought (thanks to cheap money at the time) and now that money is not so cheap and the bills still come due, Gannett is paying the price.

In Wall Street terms, I suppose you could say that Gannett is "over-leveraged".
04:10 PM on 06/22/2011
A song parody brilliantly nails the impact of the digital revolution and the
decline of old media and ad industry. Some laid back fun about the media crisis:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6CqRcCHk_Pc
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
den1953
The best politicians are for free!
12:45 PM on 06/22/2011
You know if the papers would use a little of reverse engineering they would think about printing foreign newspapers, like China stealing American jobs try a reverse affect........
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gary Storch
Democracy is NOT for Sale!
09:48 AM on 06/22/2011
People are hungry for "real" news, not entertainment wrapped in newslike presentation.
People don't believe what they see in newspapers because its superficial coverage with no deep thought in any of its writings.
The country is getting screwed while our so called media is asleep at the wheel.
Bye, bye newsprint....hello internet.
Our choices are limited to find truth.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jswift1121
11:09 AM on 06/23/2011
I would actually argue quite the opposite. The majority of people could care less about reading anything, much less "real" news stories.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gary Storch
Democracy is NOT for Sale!
03:33 PM on 06/24/2011
I see your point...tough to argue with. We just keep dumbing everyone down.
photo
TheRevV
My micro-bio is microbial.
09:39 AM on 06/22/2011
The loss of ad revenue is probably partially the result of poor journalism on Gannett's part. Since it was bought by Gannett, our local paper has drastically declined in quality. I stopped buying it years ago because of poor quality, but still pick it up and scan through it if I see it lying around. The paper, which once sent journalists into the community to cover local stories in-depth now regurgitates AP stories which I can read anywhere. The writing itself has gone into steep decline. The last place one should find glaring typos and grammatical errors is in a newspaper. 
I'm sure some advertisers feel the same way.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:48 AM on 06/22/2011
The person who destroyed Gannett is Al Neuharth, who sacrificed the other Gannett papers in order to develop the piece of useless garbage that is USA today. The othe papers were put on pay- and hiring freezes in order to subsidize this news-free total piece of junk. And many of the best reporters were transferred to Virginia -- where USA Today is based, where they got to rewrite stories from papers that still did their own reporting, and from the AP. USA Today, is basically an aggregator -- given away for free at hotels.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TFlint
07:19 PM on 06/23/2011
You are so right! Neuharth was evil.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:42 AM on 06/22/2011
What's especially galling to real journalists is when mental midgets such as those who are employed at HP and -- especiallt -- AOL, censor out real information. HP to AOL = bad to worse.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TFlint
07:20 PM on 06/23/2011
They don't "censor out" anything. They don't acquire real information to start with.
07:10 AM on 06/22/2011
Electronic news still need reporters the problem is today i believe many reporters are liars and bough and paid for because they are not truly interested in facts .

Regardless if you are Republican or Democrat tell your friends if they politically opposite of you how much they believe what they are reading from the newspaper is true or do the stories sound like ALL opinion without any facts?

I have done the above and from both political sides tell me they hate the quality of the news papers they read because where are the FACTS and good reporting.

As i said reporters today do not have the ethics as many in the past . I do not want anyone to take this personal because there are always exceptions but many are puppets and writing as if we are morons.
This comment has been removed due to violations of our [Guidelines]
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rubiconski
NOTE: I advocate for anti-BSL...
05:57 AM on 06/22/2011
My partner is a freelancer who does a lot of work for Gannett..I'm sure we'll be feeling this.