More

Google Confirms FTC Antitrust Investigation

Google Ftc Antitrust Investigation

MICHAEL LIEDTKE and JOELLE TESSLER   06/24/11 09:13 PM ET   AP

SAN FRANCISCO — Google may be entering a make-or-break phase in its colorful history now that U.S. regulators have opened an investigation into whether the company has been abusing its dominance of Internet search and advertising to stifle competition.

The probe by the Federal Trade Commission, confirmed by the company Friday, will require Google to convince regulators that its closely guarded recipe for search results is designed to give people the best recommendations, not bury links to its rivals.

If you search for a local business, for example, Google might highlight its own listing, from a service called Google Places, instead of one on Yelp, a popular review site and Google competitor.

Requests for directions may turn up Google Maps, and queries for a video might point to the company's own site, YouTube. Or if you type "mortgage" in Google's main search box, the top ad might be for Google Advisor, which lists the lowest interest rates.

The inquiry also is expected to peer into Google's financial engine: the advertising links tied to the subject of each search request. Some of these commercial messages appear, shaded in color, at the top of the results page, while others are stacked in the right-hand column.

Even as Google has expanded into video, mobile phones and television, the text advertising that pops up alongside search results and other Web content generates most of Google's revenue – an amount expected to exceed $35 billion this year.

Some websites contend Google has rigged its system in a way that drives up the ad prices, even though Google says the rate is determined by bids submitted in an auction. Others say Google purposely blocks their ads from appearing because the company views them as competitive threats. A coalition of Internet travel companies, including Expedia, Hotwire and Kayak, have welcomed the investigation.

The FTC is following the lead of European regulators who launched a similar investigation last November. The Texas attorney general has been looking into Google's business practices, too.

The search engines for Microsoft and Yahoo also sometimes feature their own services in search results. The big difference: Google processes about two-thirds of all search requests in the U.S. and handles an even larger volume of advertising. Microsoft's Bing and Yahoo combined have less than 30 percent of the market.

Danny Sullivan, who follows the industry closely as editor-in-chief of the trade journal Search Engine Land, said what Google is doing is not unlike a newspaper running an ad to promote one of its products.

"From what I have seen so far," he says, "Google doesn't seem to be doing anything wrong."

Melissa Maxman, an antitrust attorney in Washington, said the FTC wouldn't have opened its inquiry unless it thought the complaints were credible.

"There is smoke if not fire," she said.

The FTC's investigation threatens to put Google on the same course as nemesis Microsoft, which was the target of a Justice Department lawsuit that began in the 1990s and dragged into the next decade. That case alleged that Microsoft used its dominant Windows operating system to kill competing software makers.

"It's right out of the same playbook," Maxman said of the FTC's probe into Google.

Although Microsoft thwarted an attempt to break up the company, it was distracted for years, and the company has never been quite the same. The investigation may have made Microsoft more vulnerable to companies such as Google during the late 1990s as the Internet emerged as an important new platform on computers.

Now, Google faces some of the same threats as it tries to figure out how to counter the rising popularity of services such as Facebook.

In an extreme scenario, the FTC's inquiry could be the first step in a long process that ends with Google having to spin off YouTube and some of the other pieces of the empire it has built for 13 years. Although it doesn't have to, the FTC could hand its case off to the Justice Department, as it did in the Microsoft inquiry.

"Inevitably, if we get to the point where Google is found to have abused its power, we are going to be talking about divestiture because divestitures are always a better way to go than trying to regulate something like this," said Gary Reback, an antitrust lawyer in Silicon Valley who is representing some of the companies complaining about Google's practices.

Other antitrust attorneys think the investigation could result in less radical solutions, such as prohibiting Google from featuring its own services at the top of its search results. Google could also agree to periodic audits of how it programs its search engine, much as did earlier this year in a settlement of an FTC investigation into its privacy practices.

Google is expected to put up a fierce fight. The investigation is aimed at the heart of its business, its formula for ranking the quality of websites and ads, which has evolved since Google co-founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin began working on it at Stanford University. The company views the recommendations that it produces as a matter of opinion protected by the First Amendment.

"It's still unclear exactly what the FTC's concerns are, but we're clear about where we stand," one of Google's top search engineers, Amit Singhal, wrote Friday on the company's blog. "Since the beginning, we have been guided by the idea that, if we focus on the user, all else will follow."

Google has been preparing for this battle since it was almost sued by the Justice Department over a proposed Internet search partnership two and a half years ago. The Justice Department drew up a complaint alleging Google had built a monopoly in Internet search, but never filed it because Google scuttled its agreement with Yahoo to avoid going to court.

Google has been under increasing government scrutiny since then. It has prevailed in the key confrontations and won regulatory approval for several key acquisitions, including its $3.2 billion purchase of online ad service DoubleClick in 2008, last year's $681 million purchase of mobile ad service AdMob and a $700 million purchase of airline fare tracker ITA Software in April.

To prove Google abused its dominance, regulators will have to get it to turn over sensitive documents that it has resisted sharing in the past. And Google probably won't be shy about fighting for the right to adjust its search formula to deliver more useful results to its audience.

The company says it needs to fine-tune search results to weed out the sites that try to game its system and win a high ranking even though they have little to do with whatever a person was searching for.

___

Tessler reported from Washington. AP Technology Writer Barbara Ortutay in New York contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

SAN FRANCISCO — Google may be entering a make-or-break phase in its colorful history now that U.S. regulators have opened an investigation into whether the company has been abusing its dominance...
SAN FRANCISCO — Google may be entering a make-or-break phase in its colorful history now that U.S. regulators have opened an investigation into whether the company has been abusing its dominance...
Filed by Bianca Bosker  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 152
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
03:58 AM on 06/25/2011
This will go nowhere.  If users wanted to see links from Google's competitors (Read:  Yahoo and Microsoft), users would go to Yahoo or Bing.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
msjimmied
06:12 PM on 06/24/2011
Remember Ma Bell and the whole divestiture drama? Now Google? These guys actually create great jobs and are a global business. How come the government doesn't spend some energy on the banking sector, the corruption there is horrendous! Leave our good businesses alone and go get you some real crooks.
05:46 PM on 06/24/2011
this is a joke. Google is a Business and not a charity. they don't have to be "fair" in their rankings.

In most cases where they show their services (like Google Maps) over another listing its because that google listing is more useful.

if you don't like yellow pages on the first result instead of Google Maps go somewhere else.

Google is not a charity
05:19 PM on 06/24/2011
How did they get this candid shot of Frank Luntz?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Edward Class
05:08 PM on 06/24/2011
I think while they're at it they should investigate the Obama family finances and trace all small donations to the Obama 2008 election fund to see where they really came from.
05:43 PM on 06/24/2011
really your concerned about the "poorest" president in American history. Obama is the poorest president when elected to office. They are people in congress worth 10x more than Obama.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
06:14 PM on 06/24/2011
Read your history, he is hardly the poorest. George Washington had to borrow money to get to his inauguration. And Michelle was making over $300,000 a year at her job when Obama got elected. That's hardly poor
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Edward Class
07:36 PM on 06/24/2011
Granted there are many in Congress who are very wealthy. A lot of them are Democrats. For a man working as a community activist who only moved to the mainland to go to college 35 years ago. He's done pretty well...a paid off $1.5 million home in Chicago, royalties of over $4 million on a couple of books (ghost written by who?).
photo
RED66
We must return to a Constitutional government.
05:07 PM on 06/24/2011
Remember the antitrust suit against Microsoft in the 90s?

They had no lobbyists.

They do now.

I wonder if Google had any.
06:01 PM on 06/24/2011
Of course they do.

Google sent a lobbyist to the mobile phone privacy hearing.
Danlar
"It's fun to have fun but you have to know how"
05:03 PM on 06/24/2011
Bing, MSN, Yahoo....and Google is that a monopoly?

ya know I work in the private sector, have a wife and a kid, total income last year 50k....still we have managed to save in a ROTH IRA...my main holding is GOOGLE I'm still ahead but shhhsh
....they gotta buy off some more politicians like EXON Mobile...who don't get investigated they get handouts! wow
...recall that Obama and GOOGLE were kinda chummy, I can't help but to think this is somewhat partisan
And remember how GOOGLE actually did stand up for human rights, and freedom of speech in China unlike other companies and our own government
photo
iRock
and that's all that needs to be said...
04:54 PM on 06/24/2011
Well google does have good ideas that make it easier for users who have basic uses for the internet.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
JohnnyAce Okeke
GRAND MASTER SEN$Ei {{-_-}}™
04:43 PM on 06/24/2011
Frivolous. {{-_-}}
04:40 PM on 06/24/2011
Anyone else notice that Huffington post has had an anti-google article on their homepage for the last five days? Perhaps this is aol's way of putting google down to prop itself up. Where are the articles against microsoft, aol or Facebook. Nowhere... Lame.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
aztrukin
I'm just here to make you mad.
08:29 PM on 06/24/2011
I think it had something to do with HuffPo having links to other sites redirecting to them and they changed that so now not as many do. I don't remember exactly, did not pay much attention to it. Think they are mad.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
04:19 PM on 06/24/2011
I use google for mail ( paid version) and I've used some of their apps. I also use google for adwords. I've noticed that the more money I increase to spend that month my site goes higher on the rankings. When I decrease funding I can be found on page 4. They are penalizing people who don't spend money or an amount they think you should pay.

I spend very little with bing and yahoo and I'm on the 1st page.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DCMetroGuy
“Think and wonder, wonder and think.”
04:27 PM on 06/24/2011
Bing ...... you do know that bing is microsoft, money spent on any microsoft product, is money spent on bing. and Bing does tie into the microsoft verified patch you uploaded the first time you authorized any microsoft product.

And Yahoo shows you your listing based on the cookie. Just because you see it on the first page does not mean everyone else does. They also get a customized view based on thier history and preferences.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:41 PM on 06/24/2011
Actually yahoo use bing for their advertising now. Yes I know Bing is MS and for as much as I can not stand them they actually did a good job on Bing.

BTW, I'm referring to the organic placements not the paid ad placement.
05:50 PM on 06/24/2011
i use both. and as for adwords, the less you spend, yes the lower your ranking will be its an auction, if you spend more money your bidding to be the highest, meaning your ad will show first, and the less you spend the less likely you ad will be shown.

as for bing, you first there because theyre less advertisers.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
11:39 PM on 06/24/2011
I don't mean where my ad appears, Yes I know the more you spend the higher it is. I am saying within the organic searches.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DCMetroGuy
“Think and wonder, wonder and think.”
03:52 PM on 06/24/2011
LOL .....Shouldn't the US Government be careful, I mean the employees at Google are doing a better job of finding out which hackers in China are breaking into US Government and Company Networks and websites than the government is. If they aren't nice Google may not tell them who is raiding them anymore!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DCMetroGuy
“Think and wonder, wonder and think.”
03:49 PM on 06/24/2011
Google is where they are .... because they provide a good service.

They are fairly non-intrusive with thier products, and work pretty much on an opt in model.

Alot of companies slide things onto peoples computers when you go to thier website, You do not necessarily know they are putting things on your computer.

Google products and add ons usually have several notices anytime they are updating or changing anything on your computer.

They got to where they are by providing products and information people want and CHOOSE to use. Yes they are huge, but it is because people have chosen to use them.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
westcoastsc
Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhe
03:42 PM on 06/24/2011
How much you wanna bet that this is an attempt to bring information more under control, especially information that condemns the crimes of the Bush Administration? Management will be dismantled.

It seems that they have allowed merger after merger of media companies, making them much more easy for a message to be controlled. Google has made itself a good name by allowing and giving access to relevant information. Why would they want, AGAIN, to reinvent the wheel like they did with the regulations put in by Roosevelt such as Glass Steagle and laws that ensured diverse ownership in the media?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stewart Goss
03:48 PM on 06/24/2011
Exactly. Control the search engines and you master of information on the internet.

Perfect for a despot.
03:41 PM on 06/24/2011
For all you anti-Google folks, I have a question about your "monopoly concerns"....

How much money has Google EVER asked you to pay using their search engine, maps, or Youtube? HOW MUCH - Zero.

That is where the FTC is wasting their time. MSN's antitrust case was valid - not this one.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Stewart Goss
03:56 PM on 06/24/2011
Technology is making a mockery out of anti-trust.

Remember when Blockbuster had a "monopoly"? Then the free market created Netflix?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NunyaBus99
04:08 PM on 06/24/2011
Perfect example of a big company that got complacent and others were more innovative like Netflix. Under some of the logic in this thread they should not have been able to be successful because Blockbuster was so big. The market worked as it should. Something better came along and people starting switching. If Google is so bad then the customers can switch. There are other competitors.