iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Obama Pushes High Tech Partnership to Fix Manufacturing Woes

Obama Innovation

First Posted: 06/24/11 03:21 PM ET Updated: 08/24/11 06:12 AM ET

Joking that "one of my responsibilities as commander-in-chief is to keep an eye on robots," President Obama on Friday announced a new public-private sector partnership that will be tasked with driving "a renaissance of American manufacturing."

In a speech at Carnegie Mellon University's National Robotics Engineering Center in Pittsburgh, Pa., Obama laid out plans for the "Advanced Manufacturing Partnership" (AMP) .

According to the president, the group will bring together top engineering universities, beginning with Carnegie Mellon, Stanford, University of California-Berkeley, Georgia Institute of Technology, MIT and the University of Michigan, and leading U.S. manufacturers including Johnson & Johnson, Honeywell, Caterpillar, Northrop Grumman and Corning.

Led by Susan Hockfield, President of MIT, and Andrew Liveris, the CEO of Dow Chemical, a White House press release explained AMP will work across sectors to "create high quality manufacturing jobs and enhance our global competitiveness." The release noted that the partnership will "leverage existing programs and proposals" and invest more than $500 million to jumpstart the effort.

Among the initial investments announced as part of the AMP launch, the government will direct $300 million towards development of high-powered batteries, advanced composites, metal fabrication, bio-manufacturing, and alternative energy. Another $100 million will go towards the "Materials Genome Initiative," which will focus on advanced materials that will speed development in manufacturing, clean energy, and national security.

Making good on the president's promise to monitor those robots, the White House announced the AMP will put $70 million towards research in next generation robotics -- machines that will work in tandem with human operators and provide support across fields ranging from healthcare to manufacturing.

In addition, the Department of Energy has set a goal of leveraging $120 million of its budget to develop innovative manufacturing processes, in a bid to cut the costs of manufacturing while conserving energy.

The president has long been a proponent of an innovation agenda, and he has advocated increasing American investment in green technology and skilled manufacturing since he took office.

"I have a larger vision for America," he said on Friday, "an America where our businesses lead the world in new technologies like clean energy. Where we … invest in what our economy needs to grow: world-class education, cutting-edge research, and building the best transportation and communication infrastructure anywhere in the world. That’s what it’s going to take for us to win the future."

Indeed, the creation of the AMP comes on the heels of several government-supported innovation initiatives. Last week, the Department of Energy announced a $150 million dollar investment in cutting-edge solar power research and development, as part of a pilot innovation investment program known as the Advanced Research Projects Agency - Energy (ARPA-E). Energy Secretary Stephen Chu has called the technology "a game-changer."

While Obama contended that innovations by professors and students at places like Carnegie Mellon had "created more than 300 companies and 9,000 jobs over the past 15 years," some in the manufacturing sector remained skeptical that such high tech investments alone were enough to revitalize the sector.

Scott Paul, Executive Director of the Alliance for American Manufacturing, a coalition of manufacturers and the United Steelworkers union, said in a statement that the AMP showed "promise," but that "the effort will be futile unless our manufacturers also have a solid foundation of support for challenges like unfair trade practices, currency manipulation, developing a skilled workforce, and a more efficient infrastructure."

While the manufacturing sector has shown recent strength -- adding 129,000 jobs this year alone -- the overall number of manufacturing jobs has decreased by 8 million since a peak in 1979 of 19.6 million jobs.

At present, manufacturing accounts for about 11.7 percent of gross domestic product and roughly 9 percent of total employment.

Combating skepticism that any investment in high tech innovation would not create jobs in the near future, Obama was quick to underscore the immediacy of AMP's mandate.

"Let's face it," he said. "As cool as some of this stuff is, as much as we are planning for America’s future, this partnership is about new, cutting-edge ideas to create new jobs, spark new breakthroughs, reinvigorate American manufacturing today. Right now. Not somewhere off in the future -- right now."

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
Joking that "one of my responsibilities as commander-in-chief is to keep an eye on robots," President Obama on Friday announced a new public-private sector partnership that will be tasked with driving...
Joking that "one of my responsibilities as commander-in-chief is to keep an eye on robots," President Obama on Friday announced a new public-private sector partnership that will be tasked with driving...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 294
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Highlights
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
10:51 AM on 07/24/2011
Why don't we go to companies like Apple who is making zillions of bucks in the US and say, bring the jobs home! Look at all your I-stuff do any of them say made in the USA?
It's time. They are part of the 1% holding all the wealth of the country.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BocaMom
02:40 PM on 06/27/2011
At least, President Obama is doing SOMETHING regarding the terrible economy and helping to help the 20 millions Americans out of work. It's a start, but we have a very long way to go.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ThomasPaine1776
Left is right; Right is wrong
02:57 AM on 06/27/2011
He's basically saying "You're not CLEVER enough. THAT's the problem."

No. The problem is free trade. Free Trade is an economic philosophy that has replaced "The American System" of Economics, which was based on tariffs.

Free trade = 0% Tariffs
American System: 25% or so Tariffs on imported goods.

A tariff raises the price on imported goods, making goods that are made HERE in the USA more attractive by comparison. More factory orders for American made products, means more sales and more employees, etc. This creates a scarcity of American workers, which results in increased employment and higher wages as well. Good times. This is what built America. Anyone that says tariffs don't work or whatever, are arguing with over 200 years of American history. Free trade is why jobs go overseas.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
SitandStay
Lorenzo&BushH8ter
01:42 AM on 06/27/2011
Obama is funding the priorities we need:

UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA $186,000 Grant Trans-NSF Recovery Act Reasearch Support THE KEY TO BETTER UNDERSTANDING OF SUPERCONDUCTORS HINGES ON VORTEX DYNAMICS. THE PHYSICS OF MAGNETIC FLUX QUANTA (VORTICES) WHICH PENETRATE THE SUPERCONDUCTOR DURING APPLICATION CONDITIONS. AN EXCITING PROBLEM IN VORTEX DYNAMICS CONCERNS EFFECTS OF THE FINITETE SIZE AND ELECTRONIC STTUCTURE OF THE CORE OF EACH OF THESE VORTICES. THE PROJECT AIMS TO EXAMINE EFFECTS ON DYNAMIC FLUX FLOW PHASES, BUT UNLIKE PREVIOUS WORK THIS WILL BE COLLABORATIVE STUDY WHICH WILL COMBINE ON-SITE DC TRANSPORT MEASUREMENTS WITH OFF-SITE MEASUREMENTS OF MAGNETIZATION, HEAT CAPACITY, AND NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE (NMR) ON THE SAME SET OF HIGH-QUALITY SAMPLES...
This spending item is part of a $186,000 allocation.

You are very naive if you think you know even a small part of what he is funding for us.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AmosKnows
Educating The American Idol Masses
11:06 PM on 06/26/2011
The globalist wants to fix manufacturing. Well now we manufacture our infrastructure in Chin as well.

Bridge Comes to San Francisco With a Made-in-China Label

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/26/business/global/26bridge.html
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ThomasPaine1776
Left is right; Right is wrong
02:48 AM on 07/09/2011
Tariff China and India.
photo
LeftCoastEng
Obsessed with failed trade
08:15 PM on 06/26/2011
I'm all for innovation. But why do we think the resulting jobs will remain in this country very long? I wish the President would read: Free Trade Doesn't Work, by Ian Fletcher http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ian-fletcher for some insight on how to reform our trade policies. Then maybe innovation and education improvements will create sustainable jobs that stay in the US.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ThomasPaine1776
Left is right; Right is wrong
02:51 AM on 07/09/2011
Free Trade does not work. I agree.

This history teacher agrees with you totally.

Tariffs spurred the American Industrial Revolution and can again.

It's so frustrating, knowing that you and me are right, and that the president, everyone in Congress and the media are wrong, or unaware of the basic concept of Tariffs.

Grrr.
Keep up the fight!
01:44 PM on 06/26/2011
Our government taxes our taxes (I'm taxed at over 30%) to give money away to research in automation. So the automation isn't natural. It wasn't produced by a free market. The computer industry wouldn't be as advanced today without 30 years of direct federal support. The Internet was created by DARPA. And the cheap availability of programmers today is directly due to command economics of the US federal government interfering in the labor market (student visas, H-1b work visas, B-1 visas, and on and on).

So there is NOTHING natural about the level of automation. Just as the railroads would never have been built the way they are without the railroad acts (there were several railroad acts that combined gave away land the size of Texas to a few thus creating the barons). And it's the same story with TARP bailouts, or the use of our military to secure "national interests" which is just a way of saying "for a few corporations".

Or just look at our history of 400 years of slavery! That again was the US supporting a few rich people by giving them special rights over a large group of workers. Yes, I know only 100 years of slavery was under the US government but the culture has remained. The US today still has the same culture that believes the government should take from workers and give to the rich and all for the greater good. Its a type of communism. Notice that today you will never
iam99
To know what you prefer...
12:49 PM on 06/26/2011
The right hand is totally unaware of what the left hand is doing, it seems.. We are blind to the consequences of our congress' actions. As since year 2000 we have lost 32% of our manufacturing jobs because of the trade agreedments. Do you need an example of an education system not working, or what can be accomplished with a government that is conflicted between representing the people that elects it to office, and the demands of the moneyed corporations that buy it; look no further than our congress and administrations in WA considering dire straits it has put our nation into.
5
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
msbeal
Let no neo-con lie go unchallenged
12:39 PM on 06/26/2011
One of the things that got us out of the Great Depression were two of the largest and highly successful socialist programs ever run in America, WWII and the GI Bill of Rights. It brought the consuming middle class into life and the rest is history.

It is the consumer side that needs stimulus.
photo
Jack Daniels Esq
Hold the ice
11:55 AM on 06/26/2011
Rhubarb & Custard - he's clueless - go back to school - teach political science 101
photo
cef911f1
Dog loving, liberal old white guy living in SC.
06:28 AM on 06/26/2011
What utter nonsense. I work for a muti-national. We engineer here (innovation) and manufacture in China and other "low cost countries". Until we either decide we will work for a couple of dollars an hour or apply tariffs on goods coming from China and other low wage countries, we will not have a manufacturing base. It's pretty simple economics.
08:34 AM on 06/26/2011
I'm not sure why people can't see this. not only that, but they don't understand that our own government has helped to create this debacle. Both parties have pushed to help the developing countries, giving them aid and sharing our financial resources as well as our methods for manufacturing....then we entice our larger companies to go over there and set up shop.....then we support the unions here, pushing for higher wages and better benefits...then we empower the epa to basically shut manufacturing down in the states...it truly is that simple.....it is simple economics....it's not just corporations....Our government did this and is still doing this (resources for driling in Brazil, just months ago).....
photo
hypnotoad72
Real democracy = living wages.
08:05 PM on 06/26/2011
Mostly agreed, but most of it smells more like manipulation than mere simple economics.  (a lot of the 'free market' proponents can't be bothered living the system that they say works.  Two examples:

http://www.progress.org/cwfedex.htm
http://www.mydd.com/story/2007/2/7/184312/5388
)

I don't mind helping people live better, but we've been lied to on that claim as well:
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/04/13/general-motors-ceo-urged-to-address-indian-workers-complaints/

(ouch, literally.)

And with the best government that money can buy, in terms of 'return on investment'... 

Not sure how unions fit in, what with a large quantity of them having declined over the last few decades and all, which also whittles down their clout...

Still, as for the environmental aspect, none of us would want to live in a polluted dump... I think... 

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/10/world/asia/10pollute.html
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/11/06/60minutes/main4579229.shtml
(and since it's "simple economics" to dump than to properly recycle, we value a lot less than we claim we do.  Pity... but some  CEO needs another $50 mil, and (s)he'll never get to cut himself or have mercury seep into his/her water source... (s)he won't care. Out of sight, out of mind.)

Do you have any links with the EPA advocating shutting down here in America?  Or being shot down when advocating for cleaner power sources?  Either way, those alternatives still hamper somebody's profit, so they wouldn't fly either way.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
msbeal
Let no neo-con lie go unchallenged
01:24 PM on 06/26/2011
It's not really the Chinese that are bringing in Chinese goods. It's American companies, as you noted, looking for a low cost high profit return that are bringing stuff in from China. And, part of the overhead of bringing in low cost Chinese goods is the lobbying bill to defend against tariffs.

We don't have [more] tariffs because powerful Americans don't want it.
photo
hypnotoad72
Real democracy = living wages.
07:58 PM on 06/26/2011
100% Agreed.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
robert horwitz
05:27 AM on 06/26/2011
"Why Good Ideas Will Always Fail In America". First someone has to have an idea. That's not really much of a problem. Most American's have plenty of ideas and most of them are so ridiculous its really pretty easy to pick out the good ones. Next everyone and their Brother In Law has to study the Idea. If after a few years of study we decide to go ahead with the Idea if just one person for whatever reason doesn't like it, the idea winds up in the Judicial System for a few more years. If the Idea survives that and comes out the other side in essentially one piece and after a few more years financing is secured one of two things happen. This process has taken so long the the Idea is now outdated or its just plain too expensive to put it together here and we build it and ship it in from another country.
photo
hypnotoad72
Real democracy = living wages.
08:07 PM on 06/26/2011
Fixing patent laws would be nice as well... Not just cleaning up after patent trolls, but making them more accessible (lower cost since wages have been going down), which means the big corporations might have to take a back step and stop devouring all the potential competition daring to take away their profits.  (Competition is good for ideas and borrowing them, but they do rob big companies of profit and we can't have that...)
photo
TomTheSeal
Represent our wishes; best interests are arguable
11:40 PM on 06/25/2011
You dont "fix manufacturing woes" with technology that will just be offshored like all of the technology to date has been offshored.

You "fix" manufacturing woes by bringing manufacturing back to America.

People are beginning to realize that this guy, Obama, is just another corporate stooge placed at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue so that he can continue to pursue the policies and trade agreements that continue to tank our jobs, our people, and, eventually, our economy.

Isn't it time we started to realize that America's biggest enemy is its own government ? Isn't it time we started to realize that the real traitors to America are in our House of Representatives, our Senate, our White House, and our Supreme Court.

Isn't it time we pulled the plug on a system of governance that will not protect our borders, that will not rebuild America's infrastructure, that will not protect our jobs and our manufacturing, that will not refrain from entering into wars without a Congressional declaration of War as mandated by our Constitution, and will not respect and honor not only the will and the wishes of the governed, but also will not respect and honor the best interests and needs of the governed ?
08:37 AM on 06/26/2011
Absolutely, 100% spot on.......now we have to unite and start electing that person for president, much like we did in November......Our goverment has used the two party system to keep us divided, utilizing social issues to do it while they destroy us from the inside out....it's time for people to quit worrying about party lines and start worrying about the basic fundamentals of the country....or there won't be one soon......
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
msbeal
Let no neo-con lie go unchallenged
02:00 PM on 06/26/2011
And exactly what candidate do you see on the horizonn that's above being 'bought out'?
photo
hypnotoad72
Real democracy = living wages.
08:11 PM on 06/26/2011
Except the people who came in after November elections were pretty much pro-corporate patsies as well.  Their records are replete, never mind their antics of recent (they were in power last decade and didn't mind not putting their foot down over spending issues...  amongst other things...  it's all a show, this "debt ceiling showdown".)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ThomasPaine1776
Left is right; Right is wrong
02:57 AM on 07/09/2011
Tom: Tariffs. The solution is tariffs. Tariff China and India. Prices go up on imports, Americans start building things here. Bingo.

TARIFFS.
photo
TomTheSeal
Represent our wishes; best interests are arguable
10:11 AM on 07/09/2011
ThomasPaine1776,

I agree ! TARIFFS !!

I have often thought why would Wal Mart **NOT** allow anyone and everyone who has a product to sell, to just march right in to a Wal Mart store, put their stuff on the shelf, and sell it there ? Of course, the answer is that that would be a very foolish thing to do.

Well, it **IS** foolish ! But our government, in effect, does the very same thing. We allow access to the most prolific and profitable market in the world, the U.S. market, AT NO CHARGE ! FREE ! Which does not make one whit of sense.

TARIFFS !
10:11 PM on 06/25/2011
More Obama dream ideas for future jobs based on US innovation. Still when the US creates a new product, the product gets built in China. The only way to create jobs is to end the trade imbalances with tariffs so US manufacturers can make the prodicts in the USa with USA workers . All the other dreams are smoke screenx by Obama to keep up his baloney change campaign slogans floating. . Nothing has changed. 14 million workers are still out of work with no real prospects for a livable wage job two years after he got elected.
08:40 AM on 06/26/2011
I agree with your premise....but not your fix......ending the trade embalances will not completely fix the problem....we must cut tax rates for those that manufacture in the states, we must stop the support of the unions and let manufacturing labor rates fall where they should through equalization....we must pull the reins back on the epa, who empower crippling regulations....I"M NOT SAYING DEREGULATE completely, just pull back some.....it's rediculous at this point......only then, will you see manufacturing return....but it is necessary that we do what's necessary to bring it back.
05:11 PM on 06/26/2011
US workers cannot compete with $2.00 a day foreign labor. The only fix is tariffs to protect US workers to allow them to make livable wages. All our so called free trade partners ship more to the US than they buy. So either they trade fair by buying US products and services to balance trade or pay tariffs. It is the only way to stop the outflow of jobs. Corporations will never bring US jobs back to the USA when they realize big profits or are forced to meet competition because their competators import instead of manufacture in the US
photo
hypnotoad72
Real democracy = living wages.
08:15 PM on 06/26/2011
"tax cuts create jobs" did not work last decade.  Why would they work now?

Also, if you were skilled in this area, would you live on the 50 cents/hr wage that is the form of "competitiveness" that might bring back companies?

Keep in mind all the tax breaks, tax cuts, and other entitlements they've received over the last few decades.  With tax money subsidizing them, the fact they continue to destroy American worker livelihoods just to line their billfolds with more money, which was one factor in the banks wanting bailouts as well...

The spiral must end.  $2/hr wages won't cut it.  Quite the contrary, with the current cost of living, education, and everything else.  Never mind what these corporations have done by taking tax money and then running off with it...

If you want to "do what's necessary", you can work for $1/hr for a while and then let us know how it works out.  Do some research, some companies in those other countries have workers signing "no suicide" pacts as well.  They even stage parades to try to induce happiness in their workers.  Do you really want to live like that?  Truly?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ThomasPaine1776
Left is right; Right is wrong
12:26 PM on 07/09/2011
The word you're looking for is "TARIFF".

Start using it in your arguments.
07:01 PM on 06/25/2011
Number One: Changing the patent system to provide the patents to first filers, instead of to first inventors, essentially turning patent-rewards over to the financier-speculators and cutting the innovators out of them, is not a way to encourage technological and innovative advancing. It is the way to discourage those. After all, why invent when the system is going to give what you invent to a speculator who filed your idea afte3r having overheard you describe it to a friend over coffee?

Number Two: What has happened to all the great inventing and innovating we carried out here in America through the last fifty years, since, say about 1960? Has anybody noticed that American Companies have taken the innovations overseas, to have the products manufactured over there? How many regular people are there per inventive American engineer here in America? How many of them contribute to American engineers' educations, school systems, books, labs, equipment, prototype building, and how many of them have been getting jobs, for themselves and their kids, for their contributions?

Number Three: Most of the manufacturing done in America nowadays is of military equipment and munitions haven't trusted cheaper workers to build (but we are starting to), and that we ship overseas to destroy, both our equipment and munitions and the people over there, whose surviving kids will hate our kids, and dream of coming to kill ours in return.

The United States today is one sick puppy.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ThomasPaine1776
Left is right; Right is wrong
12:33 PM on 07/09/2011
Nice post.

do you have a source on patents? Rich people are rich, as i've often said, simply by stealing the ideas of smart people.

There are people in here that worship rich people. So many people think that if you're rich you must deserve it; you must be very very smart. Money, they think, is a measure of virtue, or intelligence or ambition, or "Hustle", or some other positive trait. I think rich people are mostly thieves of other peoples ideas and have screwed over someone really deserves the credit. The most famous of these is probably Bill Gates.