More

Philip Morris Threatens Australia Over Brand-Less Packaging Plan

Philip Morris Austrailia

First Posted: 06/27/11 09:11 AM ET Updated: 08/27/11 06:12 AM ET

SYDNEY (Michael Perry) - Tobacco giant Philip Morris (PM.N) is threatening to sue the Australian government for possibly billions of dollars over its plan to be the first country to introduce plain, brand-less packaging for cigarettes.

The tobacco firm is fearful that plain-packaging will damage its cigarette brands like Marlboro and Alpine and reduce their ability to compete against other brands.

The Australian government argues that reducing brand identification will make smoking less attractive and in turn reduce smoking rates and the health costs associated with smoking, which is said by Australian health authorities to kill 15,000 people a year in the country.

The fight over cigarette packaging is being closely watched by other tobacco firms and governments, with New Zealand, Canada and Britain among countries considering similar laws.

Analysts also say plain packaging would hit tobacco firms in emerging markets where they are seeking to lure smokers away from cheap brands to more expensive ones and, if widespread, could lead to takeovers in the industry to cut costs.

Philip Morris Asia said on Monday it had served a notice of legal claim on the government under Australia's bilateral investment treaty with Hong Kong, which holds the government responsible to protect Hong Kong investments in Australia.

The notice sets a mandatory three-month period for the two sides to negotiate an outcome. If there is no agreement, Philip Morris Asia said it would seek compensation.

"Failing that, we aim to go ahead with a compensation claim for the loss to our business in Australia that would result from plain packaging," said Philip Morris Asia spokeswoman, Anne Edwards.

Compensation would be decided under United Nations trade rules.

"It will be up to the panel that will operate under the United Nations international trade rules to look at which evaluation method they would use determine the loss to our business," said Edwards.

"We estimate it may be in the billions (of dollars), but ultimately it will be up to this panel to decide."

Edwards told Reuters that Philip Morris could not be more specific about compensation because it was still calculating the value of its brands in Australia.

Prime Minister Julia Gillard said on Monday she would go ahead with the new packaging laws, which are expected by January 2012.

"We're not going to be intimidated by Big Tobacco's tactics, whether they're political tactics, whether they're public affairs kind of tactics out in the community or whether they're legal tactics," Gillard said.

"We're not taking a backward step. We've made the right decision and we'll see it through," she said.

The legal action is not expected to delay the new laws. It may take months to even be heard, said law professor Donald Rothwell from the Australian National University.

"NANNY STATE"

The tobacco industry has been running TV advertisements against the plain packaging laws, asking Australians do they want to live in a "nanny state."

British American Tobacco (BATS.L), whose brands include Winfield, Dunhill and Benson & Hedges, has said the government's plans would infringe upon international trademark and intellectual property laws and has also raised the possibility of pursuing legal action.

"The tobacco industry is watching this with obvious interest and it's aiming to put as much pressure on as many states as possible who are thinking of pursuing this type of action," said Jurgen Kurtz, director of international investment law at the University of Melbourne.

The new laws would restrict tobacco industry logos, brand imagery, colors and promotional text appearing on packs, with the only distinguishing marks being the brand and product name in a standard text and color.

Olive green packaging had been decided upon because research showed smokers found it the least attractive color.

Philip Morris said it had manufactured and sold cigarettes in Australia since 1954 and built up well-known brands such as Marlboro, Alpine and Longbeach.

It said plain packaging would "rob" Philip Morris of its ability to use these brands to differentiate its brands from those of its competitors, effectively turning tobacco products into a commodity.

Analysts say that if plain packaging succeeds in commoditizing the tobacco industry, it could raise pressure for takeovers to cut costs.

Smoking-related illnesses kill more than 15,000 Australians each year and cost the economy A$31.5 billion in health costs, according to Australian government health authorities. Smoking is the largest preventable cause of disease and death.

Australia already bans all outdoor and media advertising of cigarettes and cigarette packets are covered with graphic photographs of the affects of cancer.

Australia's tobacco market generated total revenues of A$9.98 billion ($10.4 billion) in 2009, up from A$8.3 billion in 2008, although smoking generally has been in decline.

($1 = 0.953 Australian dollars)

(Additional reporting by Sonali Paul in MELBOURNE; Editing by Ed Davies and Matt Driskill)

Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
Filed by Maxwell Strachan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 310
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hypocrites are Watching
If I agreed with you we’d both be wrong.
09:51 AM on 06/29/2011
Wow that is a genius plan the Australian government is on to something.
photo
AbeMartin
The best person fer a job is never a candidate
08:15 AM on 06/29/2011
Atria (Philip Morris):  Liars, research manipulators, legislative corrupters, murderers.  They, Liggette and Brown lost their ability to market to kids and teenagers in the United States.  They had to ante-up billions to the states for what (was supposed to be anti-smoking programs), They were banned from advertising on television and sporting events.  They lost their double digit return on investment in the U.S. as the percentage of cigarette smokers in the country has slowly declined.

What to do?  Oh, no hay problemo.  Let's market aggressively to kids, advertise a sporting venues, pay-off legislators, and kill people in Asia, South America, Europe, and Oceana.  After all the one certain American export is death, either in the guise of defensive military actions or selling poisons.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WeCanDoMore
Enjoying a fact based reality.
11:32 PM on 06/28/2011
YEAH, you go Australia!
Fight those corpos who only want our money and don't care if we die. Green blooded CEO's have no soul.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
krayonc
Travel is fatal to prejudice & bigotry.
10:15 PM on 06/28/2011
I was a two pack a day smoker (just a month ago), switched to an ecig and LOVED it. You have to play with the fluid a bit to get it where you like it but I recommend it highly to anybody that's trying to quit.
05:05 PM on 06/28/2011
Interesting Idea
02:28 PM on 06/28/2011
It's still fascinating to me, this concept of the drug-dealer-as-victim.

It's safe to say which Party this company favors more than God Himself.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mgrant33301
07:52 AM on 06/28/2011
having lost family members to tobacco-caused disease, and being a nicotine addict who has struggled my whole life to shake the habit (addiction), anything the goverment can do to stop this product from hooking one more person is a valiant and good thing.
the best thing we could do would be to over a not so long period of time reduce nicotine in tobacco to zero so that people would then have a choice not to smoke, not an addiction that forces them to continue to hasten their own death.
01:44 AM on 06/28/2011
I think instead of putting such huge animated warnings on cigarette packages, why not put a limit as to how many packages of cigarettes each individual is allowed to smoke per week. How about a limit of no more than one pack (about 20 cigarettes) per week? That is about three cigarettes per day. How do we do this? Probably the same way people on welfare get food stamps???? I don't know, maybe that would not work.
photo
knewsreply
PhD: International Educator and Marketer
12:12 AM on 06/28/2011
Shouldn't Australia threaten Philip Morris with a demand to pay the total cost cigarettes is costing Australian taxpayers for health problems and related non-working days?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Christopher Hull
Democratic Socialist
12:58 AM on 06/29/2011
How dare you make sense!
12:11 AM on 06/28/2011
Australia, has a very compelling idea! Recent development here have resulted in stupid appearing actors, simulating cancer, and other ill health dramatic scenarios on the cover of cigarette packages; which does nothing to deter smokers. However, the idea of removing marketing and the accompanying illusions of sophistication and sex just may make an big impact on cigarette sales. No wonder Big Tobacco is having a hissy- fit!
08:33 AM on 06/28/2011
One of the resons that the images are so powerful is that they are all real. We also have adds that have people discussing the cancers they have gotten from smoking and these are then run on TV after they have died.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TomFox
07:21 PM on 06/28/2011
I am thinking a yellow package, with big black letters, Cigarettes.
12:01 AM on 06/28/2011
Stupid companies forcing people to smoke!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Eleanor Ruby Moon
Writer, Air-race Pilot, Australian
10:47 PM on 06/27/2011
I'm happy to be Australian. It's a country with big, brass ones.
photo
daily randy
Danger, Will Robinson! Danger!
06:17 PM on 06/27/2011
Oh Oh. Looks like Free Market, Corporate America is finding out that people in other countries are not so eager to just lie down and be walked on by big business. Maybe American citizens should pay attention and learn.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Ryan Magdangal
Pirate Satellite
06:11 PM on 06/27/2011
And we give out subsidies to these poison factories so that they can spread more poison.
12:11 AM on 06/28/2011
Very good point! Fanned and favored!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
bobWal
05:43 PM on 06/27/2011
Good grief ! Spend some time in any Hospital visiting those with lung,throat or mouth cancer. No one I knew ever said "wished I'd have smoked more" suffering at the end of life. Cigs should cost a hundred bucks apiece for the damage they do.