iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Free Trade Agreements: Congress, Obama Administration Break Stalemate

Free Trade Agreements Obama Congress

JULIE PACE   06/28/11 09:50 PM ET   AP

WASHINGTON — The White House and congressional lawmakers reached a deal Tuesday to propel three coveted free trade agreements toward a vote on Capitol Hill, though the ultimate fate of the pacts with South Korea, Colombia and Panama remained uncertain.

Key lawmakers from both parties struck an agreement with the administration to extend aid for American workers displaced by foreign trade. The White House, acknowledging concerns from labor unions, had threatened to hold up passage of the pacts unless the Trade Adjustment Assistance program, or TAA, was renewed.

But the process for ensuring passage of the trade deals and the assistance for workers was unclear Tuesday.

Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus, D-Mont., said he planned to attach TAA to the Korea deal, the largest and most desirable of the trade pacts, when his committee began discussing the agreements on Thursday.

But top Republicans balked at that proposal. Sen. Orrin Hatch of Utah, the top Republican on the Finance Committee, said it was a "highly partisan decision" that "risks support for this critical job-creating trade pact in the name of a welfare program of questionable benefit at a time when our nation is broke." Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell said he would oppose any trade deal in which the worker assistance program was embedded.

Republicans generally support both trade and worker assistance programs, so Baucus' move could put GOP lawmakers in the awkward position of either having to vote against issues that traditionally have GOP support or handing President Barack Obama a victory on a top priority.

Baucus negotiated with House Ways and Means Chairman Dave Camp, R-Mich., and top White House economist Gene Sperling to reach a deal on the substance of the worker assistance. Their plan would make benefits available to service as well as manufacturing industries, provide money for retraining and make affordable health care available.

Camp said in a statement Tuesday the decision on how to move the trade deals and TAA through the House was an issue for Republican leadership to determine. A spokesman for House Speaker John Boehner said the worker assistance program should be dealt with separately from the trade agreements.

Obama frequently cites passage of the three trade deals as an economic imperative for the U.S. He has touted the pacts as an opportunity to open overseas markets to U.S. companies and make American products more attractive in the global marketplace.

White House press secretary Jay Carney said Tuesday: "Now is the time to move forward with TAA and with the Korea, Colombia and Panama trade agreements."

The pro-business U.S. Chamber of Commerce also urged lawmakers to move quickly to pass the pacts.

"I urge members of both parties to seize a reasonable compromise and move the trade agenda forward," chamber president Tom Donohue said in a statement. "The time to act is now."

The TAA program was expanded two years ago as part of Obama's stimulus package to include aid for more displaced workers, but the expansion expired in February. The extension agreed to in negotiations is smaller than the 2009 package and would continue through 2013.

Administration officials said continuing TAA would be paid by spending cuts, though Camp's office said the details of where the cuts would come from were still being worked out.

The U.S. signed the trade pacts with South Korea, Panama and Colombia in 2007 under President George W. Bush. But the then-Democratic-led Congress never brought the agreements up for vote, giving the Obama administration time to renegotiate areas it found objectionable.

U.S. trade officials spent months negotiating outstanding issues on the pacts, reaching an agreement with South Korea in December. The pact would boost U.S. exports by $11 billion a year, according to the administration.

Deals were struck this spring with Panama, one of Latin America's fastest-growing economies, and Colombia. The administration says a final pact with Colombia will boost U.S. exports by more than $1 billion per year.

All three agreements need congressional approval.

Labor unions and key Democrats continue to have deep concerns in particular over the deal with Colombia, a country considered extremely dangerous for union organizers. While Colombia has agreed to implement an action plan for protecting worker rights and ending violence against union groups, the top Democrat on the House Ways and Means Committee, Rep. Sander Levin of Michigan, said Monday that he would oppose the trade deal if it did not include specific language committing Colombia to carry out those steps.

_____

Associated Press writer Jim Abrams contributed to this report.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST POLITICS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Hill newsletter!
Filed by Alexander Belenky  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 29
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
06:42 PM on 06/28/2011
The politicos are more than willing to sell out American workers with "free trade". In the first part how is it free? No work, no jobs, no taxes. How is that free? In the second part it's up to the American consumer who holds the power. Look for the Made In The USA label.
06:20 PM on 06/28/2011
Another "free trade" deal to suck more jobs from America. Thanks Obama.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
SPQR1052
06:36 PM on 06/28/2011
No  grassphopper  you are misinformed. THE REPUBLICANS HAVE BEEN HOLDING UP  GOVERNMENT  UNTIL TH PRESIDENT  SIGNS OFF OFF ON THESE  GOP DEALS.

Hope you can hear me!
06:39 PM on 06/28/2011
Whose signature will be on it? If he agrees to it and signs it it is his doing.
photo
HUFFPOST PUNDIT
SPQR1052
06:37 PM on 06/28/2011
'....Senate Republicans put the White House and Senate Democrats on notice they intend to block Senate action on all trade related nominations including Commerce secretary until the president sends to Congress free trade agreements for Columbia, Panama and South Korea....''
Read more: http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20043082-503544.html#ixzz1Qc4NFgua
06:40 PM on 06/28/2011
So what, he can do a recess appointment, he is getting good at those.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Hopalongpoppyseed
May you reap what you sow.
05:05 PM on 06/28/2011
Oh thank you, thank you great leaders. Now I can get trained to work for Wal Mart when my jobs go overseas. Bas***ds.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
AleMaker
Republicans: protecting aristocracy since 1981
04:53 PM on 06/28/2011
"President Barack Obama frequently cites the three trade pacts as deals that would give a boost to the U.S. economy, in part by making overseas markets more widely available to American companies."

Yeah, overseas LABOR markets. How much revenue are American companies really going to generate from opening up Columbia's consumer market? These "free-trade" deals really only benefit companies that gain access to cheaper labor. Here in America, we suffer from the loss of jobs to those cheaper labor markets.
04:30 PM on 06/28/2011
and how many jobs is this free trade going to cost the US ? There is no such thing as free trade
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
eddw88
05:44 PM on 06/28/2011
Agree!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
J S K
04:25 PM on 06/28/2011
say good by to some more American jobs
Free Trade is destroying american jobs
SAY NO
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Jawbey
03:39 PM on 06/28/2011
Wait! The REpubs still have time to say NO.
03:26 PM on 06/28/2011
NO !!!!!!!!!!!

NAFTA has destroyed this countries middle class, working class, entire cities, and the economy.

NO more FREE TRADE DEALS !!!!!

U.S. corporations destroy the countries they do business in. They pollute, they pay below slave wages, and they cause destruction on a massive scale.

U.S. workers will get the shaft and corporations will get the money and benefits.

JUST SAY NO !!!!!

Only CEOs and politicians are in favor of Free Trade Deals.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
HarryP
FORWARD
06:35 PM on 06/28/2011
don't quite get you - Europe has free trade agreements (ie. Germany) and they are not doing too bad? Just don't give those American companies the incentives to create jobs overseas and get the American Education Level UP to higher standards, than the companies wouldn't have to go and look for qualified workers somewhere else.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mamiller517
On thin ice? DANCE!
03:07 PM on 06/28/2011
Here is a thought I've had in the back of my mind since before Obama was elected. The economy is collapsing nearly everyone agrees. The fact is that it began to crumble while GW was in office. Is it not at least a little convenient that McCain chose an idiot as a campaign partner which pretty much sunk his run at the Presidency? Is it not possible that the Republicans WANTED Obama to win so that a Democratic man, in fact, not only a Democrat but a BLACK man could be blamed for the biggest financial crisis in American history? I hate conspiracy theories but I can't help but wonder that the Republicans realized they would not be able to fix this mess so let the Democrats and Obama take the blame. It is just a thought.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:40 PM on 06/28/2011
Whether they planned it or not, they're doing everything they can to make it happen.
04:31 PM on 06/28/2011
agreed
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mamiller517
On thin ice? DANCE!
09:02 PM on 06/28/2011
I believe they knew they were about to be in a train wreck and didn't want to be the ones driving the train at impact. I believe the Republicans knew the effect of having Republicans in office when we hit bottom would impact their party for years to come. They may not have planned this during the Bush terms but they eventually saw where we were headed and there was no fix. They helped put a Democrat in office so Democrats would take the blame for the crash that couldn't be avoided.
photo
fugmo
Reality leaves a lot to the imagination.
02:46 PM on 06/28/2011
Does this mean we can finally start selling our cars in S. Korea like they've been able to do here for years? The U.S. HAS to compete with the world and I welcome all comers as long as that competition is based on EQUAL trade agreements and not the one-sided hose-jobs we've agreed to in the past.
MrStat1
I believe in the rule of law
03:59 PM on 06/28/2011
If no one wants to buy an American car you cannot force them. They are not stupid. They know quality in a car and it isn't American. A truck would be a different story but not a car.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
eddw88
05:48 PM on 06/28/2011
Yet, all these American produced cars run just as well as the imports. Travel out of the country some time and you will see that many other people want American made cars (and trucks).
photo
fugmo
Reality leaves a lot to the imagination.
08:39 AM on 06/29/2011
American cars are just as high in quality standards (well, maybe not Chrysler yet, but they're getting there) as any foreign brand. You're opinion is still stuck in the 80's and 90's. As someone who has spent over twenty years as a Quality Manager/Engineer in the automotive business, and spent the first ten to fifteen of that bad-mouthing Big Three arrogance, I can honestly say that I'm buying American, and with full confidence.
02:08 PM on 06/28/2011
We don't need more free trade deals like NAFTA that screw working Americans.

These must job killers be stopped.

Go to www.americanjobsalliance.com and email your congressman now. Tell them to vote NO or you will vote against them next year.
03:28 PM on 06/28/2011
Thank you for the link.

Signed and sent.
MrStat1
I believe in the rule of law
04:00 PM on 06/28/2011
How will you stop it since it looks like a done deal?