iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Intercontinental Hotel Attack: NATO Helicopters End Kabul Hotel Siege That Leaves At Least 19 Dead

Intercontinental Hotel Attack

First Posted: 06/28/11 04:17 PM ET Updated: 08/28/11 06:12 AM ET

KABUL, Afghanistan (AP) -- Afghan President Hamid Karzai vowed Wednesday that his army and police would be ready to take over from foreign forces as planned despite a brazen assault on one of Kabul's premier hotels that left 19 people dead - including all eight attackers.

The more than five-hour standoff at the Inter-Continental - one of the biggest and most complex attacks orchestrated in the Afghan capital - ended when NATO helicopters fired rockets at Taliban gunmen on the roof. The attack appeared designed to show that the insurgents are capable of striking even in the center of power at a time when U.S. officials are speaking of progress in the nearly 10-year war.

Last week, President Barack Obama announced the beginning of a U.S. troop withdrawal. The transfer of security responsibility to the Afghans is due to officially begin in seven areas of the nation, including most of Kabul province, in coming weeks.

Militants, armed with explosive vests, anti-aircraft weapons and grenade launchers, began the attack around 10 p.m. Tuesday, on the eve of a conference in the capital about transition plans.

Ashraf Ghani, chairman of the transition commission, opened the conference Wednesday with blunt words for militants.

"The transition process will be done, and these coward enemies will not stop our plans," Ghani said.

As Afghan leaders work on transition, violence continued in other parts of the nation.


The U.S.-led coalition said a NATO service member was killed by insurgents Wednesday in southern Afghanistan, bringing to 62 the number of foreign troops killed so far this month. No other details were disclosed. Also in the south, the director of religious affairs for Kandahar province, was gunned down Wednesday morning in the provincial capital of Kandahar.

Security at the Inter-Continental and other key installations had been tightened for the conference and other official events taking place in the city. Officials said they were investigating how the insurgents were still able to get through and infiltrate the building.

After hours of fighting, two NATO helicopters opened fire at about 3 a.m. on the roof of the six-story hotel where militants had taken up positions. U.S. Army Maj. Jason Waggoner, a spokesman for the U.S.-led coalition fighting in Afghanistan, said the helicopters killed three gunmen and Afghan security forces clearing the hotel engaged the insurgents as they worked their way up to the roof.

A final explosion occurred a few hours later when one of the bombers who had been hiding in a room blew himself up long after ambulances had carried the dead and wounded from the hotel, according to Kabul Police Chief Gen. Mohammad Ayub Salangi.

The U.S. Embassy in Kabul, the coalition and Karzai all condemned the attack.

The militants are "enjoying the killing of innocent people," Karzai said in a statement.

"Such incidents will not stop us for transitioning security of our country" to Afghan forces, Karzai said.

U.S. Rear Adm. Vic Beck, director of public relations for the international military coalition, said Afghan security forces responded quickly and professionally to the scene - even though NATO helicopters were later called in to attack militants on the roof of the hotel. NATO said coalition mentors also were partnered with some of the units involved in the incident.

"This attack will do nothing to prevent the security transition process from moving forward," Beck said.

Afghan police were the first to respond to the attack, prompting firefights that resounded across the capital. A few hours later, an Afghan National Army commando unit arrived to help.

"We were locked in a room. Everybody was shooting and firing," said Abdul Zahir Faizada, head of the local council in Herat province in western Afghanistan, who was in town to attend the conference. "I heard a lot of shooting."

Jawid, a guest at the hotel who only gave one name, said he jumped out a one-story window to flee the shooting.

"I was running with my family," he said. "There was shooting. The restaurant was full with guests."

Latifullah Mashal, the spokesman of the Afghan National Directorate for Security, said five of the suicide attackers blew themselves up and three were killed on the roof by coalition helicopters.

The 11 civilians killed included a judge from an unnamed province, five hotel workers and three Afghan policemen, Mashal said. The Ministry of Interior said a Spanish citizen also was among those killed, but no other information was disclosed.

The ministry said 18 people were wounded in the attack - 13 civilians and five policemen.

Nazar Ali Wahedi, chief of intelligence for Helmand province in the south, called the assailants "the enemy of stability and peace" in Afghanistan.

"Our room was hit by several bullets," said Wahedi, who is attending the conference elsewhere in the capital. "We spent the whole night in our room."

The Taliban claimed responsibility for the attack in the capital - an apparent attempt to show that they remain potent despite heavy pressure from coalition and Afghan security forces. Taliban spokesman Zabiullah Mujahid later issued a statement claiming that Taliban attackers killed guards at a gate and entered the hotel.

"One of our fighters called on a mobile phone and said: 'We have gotten onto all the hotel floors and the attack is going according to the plan. We have killed and wounded 50 foreign and local enemies. We are in the corridors of the hotel now taking guests out of their rooms - mostly foreigners. We broke down the doors and took them out one by one.'"

The Taliban often exaggerate casualties from their attacks.

Before the attack began on Tuesday, officials from the U.S., Pakistan and Afghanistan met in the capital to discuss prospects for making peace with Taliban insurgents to end the nearly decade-long war.

"The fact that we are discussing reconciliation in great detail is success and progress, but challenges remain and we are reminded of that on an almost daily basis by violence," Jawed Ludin, Afghanistan's deputy foreign minister, said at a news conference. "The important thing is that we act and that we act urgently and try to do what we can to put an end to violence."

The hotel, which is frequented by foreigners and dignitaries, has long been considered one of the most secure sites in the capital.

Guests and visitors must pass through a roadblock and guards posted at the bottom of a hill that winds up to the building, then another checkpoint along the road before reaching the hotel where more security guards are set up in a building with metal detectors.

"We believe that there was a loophole in the security," Mashal said. "So far, we don't know how they infiltrated. The intelligence service and the Ministry of Interior will jointly investigate this. We do have a few clues."

The Inter-Continental - known widely as the "Inter-Con" - opened in the late 1960s, and was the nation's first international luxury hotel. It has at least 200 rooms and was once part of an international chain. But when the Soviets invaded Afghanistan in 1979, the hotel was left to fend for itself.

It was used by Western journalists during the U.S.-led invasion of Afghanistan in 2001.

Twenty-two rockets hit the Inter-Con between 1992 and 1996, when factional fighting convulsed Kabul under the government of Burhanuddin Rabbani. All the windows were broken, water mains were damaged and the outside structure pockmarked. Some, but not all, of the damage was repaired during Taliban rule.

Attacks in the Afghan capital have been relatively rare, although violence has increased since the May 2 killing of Osama bin Laden in a U.S. raid in Pakistan and the start of the Taliban's annual spring offensive.

On June 18, insurgents wearing Afghan army uniforms stormed a police station near the presidential palace and opened fire on officers, killing nine.

Late last month, a suicide bomber wearing an Afghan police uniform infiltrated the main Afghan military hospital, killing six medical students. A month before that, a suicide attacker in an army uniform sneaked past security at the Afghan Defense Ministry, killing three people.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

KABUL, Afghanistan (AP) -- Afghan President Hamid Karzai vowed Wednesday that his army and police would be ready to take over from foreign forces as planned despite a brazen assault on one of Kabul's ...
KABUL, Afghanistan (AP) -- Afghan President Hamid Karzai vowed Wednesday that his army and police would be ready to take over from foreign forces as planned despite a brazen assault on one of Kabul's ...
Filed by Cara Parks  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,362
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (55 total)
08:58 PM on 06/30/2011
The military attack on the hotel in Kabul after ten years of war shows the war isn't over yet. During World War II, Korea and Vietnam they had the military draft and able-bodied people who avoided military service were called "draft dodgers." It's a sad state of affairs and one has to be alert, watchful and ready for any sudden national or worldwide emergency.
06:02 AM on 06/30/2011
Somehow I cannot see the Afghan forces being ready in time. If they're not then when Nato leaves it will just leave a vacuum for more civil war with proxy fighting by groups sponsored by Iran, Pakistan and even Uzbekistan.
12:09 PM on 07/05/2011
Who is responsible for all these troubles?
The invasors.
01:51 PM on 07/05/2011
Hi Westdude

Before the current fighting it was civil war with rival groups sponsored by Uzbekistan, Iran and Pakistan and the Taliban. The Taliban gave shelter to an international terrorist organization in the form of Al-Quaeda and provoked the US intervention. Before that civil war between rival warlords and same old sponshorship. Before that war with the USSR. Before that civil war against the communist regime that provoked the soviet intervention. It just goes on and on.

Pulling the western troops out now will leave another power vacuum unless there is genuinely a national force capable of taking over security. If there is not then I fear it will be back to civil war again between the ethnic and political and tribal factions in a fragmented country. Each of its neighbours sponsoring groups favourable to its own objectives or favouring their ethnic relations. I am not very hopeful. Are you?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Doug Sandlin
We See The World Not As It Is But As We Are
08:15 PM on 06/29/2011
Here's an interesting (hour and twenty minutes, for those who have the patience) overview by General David Petraeus, about status in Afghanistan, as of March 2011.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DopE4JM8WCk

The attack on the Inter-Continental becomes rather obvious, in its intent, per the overview. Since 2005, the Taliban was gaining ground, until 2010 - and since then, they've been beaten back, including in the region around Kabul.

And so, attacking a major target, in Kabul, is the Taliban's way of saying:

"See? We're still a major force to be reckoned with".

(As the Taliban sees things.)
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
07:59 PM on 06/29/2011
A high profile failure.
As usual, poor small people suffer the worst of it.
Thanks a lot.
Liberty, you call it?
You don't even let women go to school.
10:09 AM on 06/30/2011
I don't think they're calling it "liberty". I think they're calling it "get the f^$# out of our country, or else".
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rubiconski
On Crisis Standby Mode
07:20 PM on 06/29/2011
It's not just the Taliban, Afghans want the US to LEAVE!!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Rubiconski
On Crisis Standby Mode
07:18 PM on 06/29/2011
Get the friggen message: US/NATO OUT OF AFGHANISTAN!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mxytsplyk
De gustibus non est disputandum
12:49 AM on 06/30/2011
Absolutely right. 6 months after we leave the country reverts back to savagery. If we stay 10 more years, then 6 months after we leave, the country reverts back to savagery.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FavorProgress
03:32 PM on 06/29/2011
Imagine a world of peace and prosperity; it is not impossible.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kodimirpal
teacher
12:27 PM on 06/29/2011
A sad story by a former Russian soldier.
After twenty years of trying, I have failed to understand why my friends died in Afghanistan.

At the May 2006 memorial for Bombardier Myles Mansell in Victoria. People vowed that Canada would never forget her soldiers.

Like the Soviet-Afghan war, this one is fought in the name of state-security, a peaceful Afghanistan, and women’s rights. Canadians fight the same people the Soviets fought between1979-1989: terrorists, extremists, insurgents, and bandits

So how do we stop the cycle? I kept asking myself this question after Andrew’s funeral. The Soviet people did not vote to send troops to Afghanistan. Neither did we in Canada. It was unpatriotic to criticize the Soviet role in Afghanistan. Questioning Canadas mission now means being unsupportive of our soldiers.

The Soviet slogan Support our troops!Âť that I heard in the 1980s has become a Canadian one. Many Canadians choose not to educate themselves on this issue, and some still believe that our soldiers are peacekeepers in a country, in which many Afghans see us as a part of a US occupation and our soldiers die in active combat.

If, in wilful or blind ignorance, we do not challenge our government to change the role of our troops from aggression to genuine peacekeeping and reconstruction, we are all responsible for the Afghan and Canadian lives about to be lost.

http://www.zcommunications.org/canada-in-afghanistan-by-nikolai-lanine
photo
AvgJoeBlow
We are smarter than any of us.
12:15 PM on 06/29/2011
TET anyone?
photo
EcnelisDoogod
B the change you want 2C
12:14 PM on 06/29/2011
The war profiteers don't want an end to the conflict. The MIC needs to justify it's continued expansion for the American tax dollar. All the attackers were killed...

Everybody's worried about stopping terrorism. Well, there's a really easy way: stop participating in it.
Noam Chomsky
05:35 PM on 06/29/2011
Sure, that sounds simple enough! Well, Noam Chomsky doesn't get it! You're obviously under the mistaken impression that if we stop fighting terriots they'll stop attacking us. How truly naive! The acts of 9/11 should have made it clear terrorist do not care whether we participate or not. They want to destroy us! If they don't decide to 'man up' to the peace process and disavow violence as the way to attain their political objectives maybe you can explain how we stop participating?
photo
EcnelisDoogod
B the change you want 2C
04:25 AM on 06/30/2011
This may come as a surprise, but not everyone believes the official government version of these events because people and organizations lie. Hold onto tour hat because there is more; people will even lie to cover up their own self interests. If you can handle the cognitive dissonance, watch this BBC documentary THE POWER OF NIGHTMARES:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=2081592330319789254
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
turnkey44
Support your local Animal Shelter
12:13 PM on 06/29/2011
This selective police action needs to stop, how much profit does the war mongers need?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Vincent Stevens
Midwest American
08:27 PM on 06/29/2011
Depends how much is left in your pockets.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Runofthemill
10:26 PM on 06/29/2011
Their need is endless.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
sexywhiteboy53
America First!!
12:11 PM on 06/29/2011
This is Obama's right War he rubber stamped it when made it bigger!! now giveing the enemy the dates that we will draw down our troops, plus talking with the Taliban, how is that working out?? see attack yesterday???
photo
WaveRhydr
DIEBOLD-WE VOTE SO YOU DONT HAVE TO
12:06 PM on 06/29/2011
Can anyone say "Tet Offensive"? Time to end this mess and bring our troops home.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gilruth
03:15 PM on 06/29/2011
yes waverider and send them all home. not just a few here and a fewe there
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kodimirpal
teacher
12:06 PM on 06/29/2011
Women in Kabul were relatively free under the Russian occupation and the Russian backed Najibullah government that followed, possibly more so than now, though they did have to worry about attacks from U.S.-backed radical islamists, like Hekmatyar,

Such considerations suggest that Afghans really would welcome a foreign presence devoted to aid and reconstruction,

A valuable perspective on such prospects is provided by Sir Rodric Braithwaite, a specialist on Afghanistan who was UK amabassador to Moscow during the crucial 1988-92 period when the Russians withdrew (and the USSR collapsed), then became chair of the British Joint Intelligence Comittee...

He reports that they were "contemptuous of President Hamid Karzai," regarding him as another one of the puppets installed by foreign force.

Things were, they said, better under the Soviets. Kabul was secure, women were employed, the Soviets built factories, roads, Russian soldiers fought bravely on the fround like real warriors, instead of killing women and children from the air. Even the Taliban were not so bad: they were good Muslims, kept order, and respected women in their own way. These myths may not reflect historical reality but they do measure a deep disilluisionment with the "coalition" and his policies
http://www.politicalforum.com/political-opinions-beliefs/157073-war-afghanistan-differences-between-urss-invasion-usa-nato-invasion.html
11:42 AM on 06/29/2011
This was supposed to be one of the most secure areas in all of Aphganistan. This is a real embarrassment to NATO, but even more, it goes to show that the Aphgan security forces are and never will be ready to take on the Taliban. We can stay there for another 10 years, train them and they still will never be ready. This has been a lost cause all along. Bush dropped the ball in 2003 when he decided to go on his adventure into Iraq and now they are talking about staying in Iraq beyond the end of the year. Iraq is going to turn out to be a lost cause as well. Sadr and his Shiites backed by Iran and Syria will be ruling Iraq in 2 years. This is what happens when we go all over the world looking for adventures. I still don't know what we're doing in Libya. Gadaffi was not a threat to the homeland. This is one heck Mess we've got ourselves into
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
gilruth
03:19 PM on 06/29/2011
train them to do what? something that we xcannot do