More

Office 365: Microsoft Confronts Google By Putting Office In The Cloud

Microsoft Office 365

First Posted: 06/28/11 08:38 AM ET Updated: 08/28/11 06:12 AM ET


By Bill Rigby
SEATTLE | Tue Jun 28, 2011 6:24am IST
(Reuters) - Microsoft Corp is making its biggest move into the mobile, Internet-accessible world of 'cloud' computing this week, as it takes the wraps off a revamped online version of its hugely profitable Office software suite.

The world's largest software company is heaving its two-decade old set of applications -- including Outlook email, Excel spreadsheets and SharePoint collaboration tools -- into an online format so that customers can use them on a variety of devices from wherever they can get an Internet connection.

It wants to push back against Google Inc, which has stolen a small but worrying percentage of its corporate customers with cheaper, web-only alternatives, which remove the need for companies to spend time on installing software or managing servers.

"It's obvious that Microsoft has to do this if they're going to remain competitive with Google," said Michael Yoshikami, chief executive of money manager YCMNET Advisors. "It's something they have to do."

Microsoft shares rose 3.7 percent on Monday, the largest gain in a single trading day since September, partly buoyed by hopes that it can ultimately boost profits by extending its software dominance to the growing cloud sector.

"If they execute effectively and it's adopted, it could be a game changer," said Yoshikami. "Whether or not that will happen is a whole other story."

Microsoft has offered online versions of some Office programs -- chiefly Outlook email -- for its corporate customers for several years, and last year rolled out free versions for individual home users.

Chief Executive Steve Ballmer is set to present an overhauled and updated set of offerings -- collectively called Office 365 -- at an event in New York City on Tuesday morning, underlining the company's newfound online focus.

GROWING MARKET

The market for web-based software services is heating up, and every company, government department and local authority is getting pitches from Microsoft and Google whenever they re-evaluate their office software.

It's a new challenge for Microsoft, which built itself up on expensive versions of software installed on individual computers. That business model turned the Office unit into Microsoft's most profitable, earning more than $3 billion alone last quarter.

Microsoft's plan is to make up for smaller profit margins from web-based applications -- due to the cost of handling data and keeping up servers -- by grabbing a larger slice of companies' overall technology spending.

Last October, when it rolled out a test version of the new service, Microsoft said it planned to charge from $2 per user per month for basic email services to $27 per user per month for advanced offerings. Google charges a flat fee of $50 per user per year for its web-based Google Apps product, which offers email, calendars, word processing and more online.

Microsoft, like Google, will host users' data remotely, and maintain all the servers in vast data centers. Unlike Google, it will also allow companies to put their data on dedicated servers if they choose, or keep the data on their own premises.

The full launch of Office 365 will spice up the lively competition with Google for new users.

Earlier this month, Google snagged InterContinental Hotels Group as a major customer, moving 25,000 of its employees onto Google email from Outlook.

Google, which has had the most success in the small and medium-sized business range, says there are now 40 million users of online Google Apps suite. Microsoft does not publish equivalent numbers, but research firm comScore has estimated 750 million people worldwide use Office in some form.

But Internet-centric Google -- whose success is based on its dominance in web search -- is confident it has the upper hand in the cloud.

"Compared to what they (Microsoft) have in the market today, they have nowhere to go but up," said Dave Girouard, head of Google's worldwide enterprise business. "We feel we're years ahead of them in terms of building a viable cloud solution that just works."

(Reporting by Bill Rigby; Editing by Phil Berlowitz)

Copyright 2011 Thomson Reuters. Click for Restrictions.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST TECH

Filed by Bianca Bosker  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 107
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2  Next ›  Last »  (2 total)
photo
steama
just a common rock
02:38 PM on 06/29/2011
If you want an excellent (and FREE) office replacement try open office.
photo
PenguinLinux
got root ?
05:20 PM on 06/29/2011
Make that LibreOffice. Most of the development team left Oracle and OpenOffice.org once the Sun buyout was completed and the mighty Orrfical started killing OO,
photo
steama
just a common rock
06:10 AM on 06/30/2011
Thanks for the hot tip. I just downloaded, installed, and tested LibreOffice 3.3—I love it. I just jettisoned Oracle's OpenOffice. It is nice to be completely away from a huge aggressive company like Oracle. It feels like LIBERTY!
08:54 AM on 06/29/2011
This Cloud stuff, I don't know.

So now, whenever you want to use your non-online stuff, word processing, music, spreadsheets, etc., you need to go online and subject yourself to the possible intrusions and monitoring that comes with on-line.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
elpaulo
09:07 AM on 06/29/2011
Kinda like emails and websites? Same thing.
09:39 AM on 06/29/2011
No, it's not the same thing. When you're reading or sending emails or browsing websites you are knowingly subjecting yourself to whatever consequences lie from being on the web. When I'm listening to my music or composing or reviewing documents in my word processor I don't need to be sharing that on the web. You just know that eventually some miscreant will break into or monitor your stuff. Why subject yourself to that?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Shawn Wolfe
A clear conscience is the sign of a fuzzy memory
10:13 AM on 06/29/2011
I agree.. I am in IT and the movement to cloud based everything seems to be the norm.. It provides convenience but at what cost? In the last two months we have seen hacks in to Sony.. In to Sega.. In to police departments in Arizona in to Citi-Bank.. Any IT security person will tell nothing is completely hack proof. So where does that leave our data? And yes even on our home computers it is hackable but our home computers are not a big a target as Google or Microsoft or Apple. The user agreements that you have to agree to for use of these cloud services pretty much exempt the companies from any loss or compromise of your data.. Now yes if you can prove they had negligence on the security breach you then can have some sort of recourse.

The biggest problem is this.. Programmers and security experts for these cloud companies have deadlines.. they have budgets, they have politics to deal with.. Hackers do not have that. They just hack.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
05:19 AM on 06/29/2011
This is a bit like the legend of the band on the Titanic playing as the ship sank. It didn't do any real good, but it kept people distracted.

I've been looking forward to reading microsoft's obituary for years. Ever since they stole the windowing gui concept from Xerox/Apple.

bi bi Ballmer.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kmuzu
Rolling dem bones
04:51 AM on 06/29/2011
SkyDrive is not very easy to use. You can't get to it directly without going through Bing and Hotmail. and then most times it won't load into MS Word and just keeps popping up into some kind of browser word processor. MS abandoned Source Safe so there are no real iteration or revision controls. Forget trying to transpose from MS to CSS or any other format for that matter. Just a mess really ..
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jgeurian21
09:22 AM on 06/29/2011
Um...you can map a Skydrive folder so you can have a lettered drive in Explorer. Pretty easy and takes less than 5 minutes. Then you don't have to use Bing or Hotmail for the service. I have been doing that for the better part of a year now and it works great.
10:06 PM on 06/28/2011
The cloud will eventually old your data hostage if you dont pay the vig.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MaxPowerXP
08:49 PM on 06/28/2011
The Cloud:2011::Push Technology:1998
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
theveggiedude
my body is a temple, not a living graveyard
10:47 PM on 06/28/2011
And if we had built the infrastructure, Man could have landed on Mars in 1998.
Just because we had the technology back then doesn't mean it was the right time to implement it. Most people were still on dial up in '98!
photo
Highball
In Blackest Night
10:58 PM on 06/28/2011
Well said.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
General Public
liberal, progressive, atheist, Democrat, SubGenius
06:20 PM on 06/28/2011
Talk about Cloud Strife!
photo
PenguinLinux
got root ?
04:57 PM on 06/28/2011
...and trust Microsoft to make sure that MS Word is secure. Nope. No online macros here... no injection of any kind into that MS Access database either... These are not the driods you are looking for.
photo
DRaymond
Network administrator, voiceovers
06:19 PM on 06/28/2011
Actually one of the few advantages of cloud versions of the software is that you don't have to worry as much about users who have disabled all security features.
photo
PenguinLinux
got root ?
05:22 PM on 06/29/2011
Most users leave the default settings alone. How many people using Windows really go and configure it, let alone understand what they are doing (and why - along with any ramifications from their actions) while they are doing it?

not many.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
llibsetag
04:36 PM on 06/28/2011
Microsoft's Cloud Computing Software "Azure" is in reality by definition " The color of a cloudless blue green sky "...Nice R&D / PR there Microsoft.

Microsoft: "Where do you want to go today?"

BaldyBot thinks he's in the "clouds" but in reality he's in a "fog".
04:24 PM on 06/28/2011
Businesses: If you plan on using ANY CLOUD architecture, ask the vendor to provide you with indemnity insurance, to meet any regulatory, business continuity or SLAs, if your data is accessed by unauthorized sources.

If you find a vendor that will offer indemnity insurance for their product, please post it.

As an example, if a medical company posts client data in the cloud, and those records are compromised, there is a government fine of over $1,000 per record accessed. If you have 100,000 records, you're hosed.
04:33 PM on 06/28/2011
I've asked folks to post company's that will provide insurance, because...

I DON'T THINK THERE IS ONE OUT THERE WHO WILL!

What does that say about how secure cloud computing is?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
09:14 AM on 06/29/2011
while I can acknowledge the security and privacy issues with cloud computing I also understand its a new format for most companies/users. We could eventually see a new market for such liabilities if cloud computing ever takes off, but thats a BIG IF.
photo
DRaymond
Network administrator, voiceovers
06:24 PM on 06/28/2011
The strange thing is that the nature of the cloud service itself is likely to represent a compromise of security. irrespective of anything that a hacker might do.   For example compare the requirements of HIPPA or your standard NDA with Google's TOS and you may have a de-facto violation right there.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thepoliticalcat
Eradicate your microbioflora
12:13 AM on 06/29/2011
Exactly. Some of the companies we sold our software to were so uptight about security that NO ONE in their office, with the sole exception of IT, were even allowed to access the 'Net.
photo
DRaymond
Network administrator, voiceovers
04:23 PM on 06/28/2011
Microsoft will have the advantage of several levels of performance.  First will be the ability to simply run the office software off of your PC, and let's be clear that will forever be the highest performance option.  The network is a bottleneck, period.  I manage the technology of a small accounting firm, and it is FAR more economical to provide them with a good new laptop every 3 years than to try to maintain the kind of bandwidth that would allow them all to have snappy response to Google's servers, even if Google had unlimited processing capacity available to each user. It is also, for such intensive information workers, cheaper to buy them basic laptops than to try to buy and maintain the kind of centralized server farm that will allow them to have ready access to an equivalent level of processing power.

The second choice will be to run it off of your corporate servers which will be simpler to maintain than individual PC installations and will be faster than a remote installation.  Also what a lot of people fail to consider is that this is very likely the only 'cloud' approach a lot of firms can legally take.  If they have any information that is covered by an NDA or confidentiality you can't put it on a cloud server because even the most basic NDA prohibits you from putting the information in places not under your direct control.  If we were to put a comany's books on Google's servers and they leaked we would get our pants sued off and if we tried to blame Google it would be "hey, read the TOS'.

Finally for those who do not mind the network bottleneck they can go the full cloud route, and I suspect that Microsoft's TOS will be stricter than Google's.
photo
Jack Daniels Esq
Hold the ice
04:36 PM on 06/28/2011
What he said
03:18 PM on 06/28/2011
I'm surprised that M$ didn't try to rebrand cloud computing and claim that they invented it. Ballmer could call it “Microsloth Fog Computing”. The only thing I can imagine that would be less secure that microsloth on your desktop would be M$ in the cloud ... raining data, your data.
04:25 PM on 06/28/2011
Steve Jobs is already making that claim for Apple.
photo
Highball
In Blackest Night
11:01 PM on 06/28/2011
Link?

I didn't think so.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
thepoliticalcat
Eradicate your microbioflora
12:15 AM on 06/29/2011
Raining that data on everyone not entitled to access it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kcwookie
Well behaved workers seldom prosper.
02:14 PM on 06/28/2011
Microsoft is the tail trying to wag the dog. Monkey Boy has lost sight and is trying anything to gain traction and relevance. My biggest worry is Skype, I'm sure they will screw it up.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
02:19 PM on 06/28/2011
google does everything Skype does for free.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kcwookie
Well behaved workers seldom prosper.
02:44 PM on 06/28/2011
I might have to look into that. My worry is that it's free. Someone is paying and I don't have control, is it ad based or are they selling my info?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kmuzu
Rolling dem bones
04:54 AM on 06/29/2011
Skype is peer to peer .. Google and Apple are cloud.
01:56 PM on 06/28/2011
There are other FREE alternatives to Microsoft's products, which I am using. The operating system (OS) on my main computer is Ubuntu 11.04, which is based on Linux and it's FREE! I also use LibreOffice, which is also an open source alternative to MS Office 2007/2010. Ubuntu does is in my opinion is more secure than Windows and Mac OS, and users do not need to buy these expensive "security suites," which using slow computers and performance. I use Firestarter firewall (FREE) and Clamav anti-virus scanner (FREE) on my Ubuntu OS, although some think that they are not needed. BE FREE, USE Open Source! FREEDOM for ALL! NO Hypocrisy!
03:00 PM on 06/28/2011
Yes, without a doubt Linux is superior to M$ on every level. I've used Linux for fifteen years and don't miss any of the headaches I used to have with winslows.
photo
DRaymond
Network administrator, voiceovers
04:00 PM on 06/28/2011
I don't miss any of the headaches I had with windows 15 years ago either.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MaxPowerXP
08:45 PM on 06/28/2011
ahahaha 15 years eh? I bet you missed the "headache" of having hardware that actually worked.

To pretend Linux is superior to...I believe the 14 year olds call it "M$"?...not clear how an OS is superior to a company, but anyway....displays a laughable ignorance.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
MaxPowerXP
08:46 PM on 06/28/2011
If you're going to yammer about "FREEDOM" so much, you should only ever use GNU-approved applications.

Anyway, LibreOffice and OpenOffice are both junk. They're worth exactly what you pay for them.
09:01 PM on 06/28/2011
I am tying this reply in LibreOffice Writer (I am doing so that I don't make the silly spelling mistakes I usually make without running LibreOffice super fast/accurate sell-checker). After I finish writing this comment I will copy and paste it in my browser (Google Chrome 64 bit, which automatically updates in my Ubuntu 11.04 64 bit). If you are happy with Microsoft products (I am NOT the person who used M$ to refer to this company), I respect your choice. I was expressing my opinion and preference. I truly believe that open source is effective, and I personally have no problem with hardware. In fact, I am now watching TV on my PC using Hauptmann  WinTV 950Q. Freedom for ALL! No Hypocrisy!
photo
PenguinLinux
got root ?
11:37 AM on 06/29/2011
If only Windows and Microsoft Office (and any other MS product) was worth what you paid for it.
photo
hypnotoad72
Real democracy = living wages.
01:32 PM on 06/28/2011
http://www.conceivablytech.com/671/business/rtfm-you%E2%80%99ve-just-sold-your-soul
(includes many examples, but Google's ubiquitous terms are spelled out very succinctly.)

Not much left to say, except I may nor care for Microsoft, but of the lesser of two evils, to the best of my knowledge so far, Microsoft's TOS, EULA, etc, don't say they take a royalty-free copy of your intellectual IP created on the system and use it for their own profit, even if they say you still own the data - their copy makes yours worthless, due to their size and stature compared to yours...  (only intellectually-challenged students would be on Google's side, since Google will be able to profit from it far more than those giving it away.  We're only as free as market forces dictate.)