iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Bible's Different Authors Revealed By New Language Software

By MATTI FRIEDMAN   06/29/11 12:46 PM ET  AP

JERUSALEM -- Software developed by an Israeli team is giving intriguing new hints about what researchers believe to be the multiple hands that wrote the Bible.

The new software analyzes style and word choices to distinguish parts of a single text written by different authors, and when applied to the Bible its algorithm teased out distinct writerly voices in the holy book.

The program, part of a sub-field of artificial intelligence studies known as authorship attribution, has a range of potential applications – from helping law enforcement to developing new computer programs for writers. But the Bible provided a tempting test case for the algorithm's creators.

For millions of Jews and Christians, it's a tenet of their faith that God is the author of the core text of the Hebrew Bible – the Torah, also known as the Pentateuch or the Five Books of Moses. But since the advent of modern biblical scholarship, academic researchers have believed the text was written by a number of different authors whose work could be identified by seemingly different ideological agendas and linguistic styles and the different names they used for God.

Today, scholars generally split the text into two main strands. One is believed to have been written by a figure or group known as the "priestly" author, because of apparent connections to the temple priests in Jerusalem. The rest is "non-priestly." Scholars have meticulously gone over the text to ascertain which parts belong to which strand.

When the new software was run on the Pentateuch, it found the same division, separating the "priestly" and "non-priestly." It matched up with the traditional academic division at a rate of 90 percent – effectively recreating years of work by multiple scholars in minutes, said Moshe Koppel of Bar Ilan University near Tel Aviv, the computer science professor who headed the research team.

"We have thus been able to largely recapitulate several centuries of painstaking manual labor with our automated method," the Israeli team announced in a paper presented last week in Portland, Oregon, at the annual conference of the Association for Computational Linguistics. The team includes a computer science doctoral student, Navot Akiva, and a father-son duo: Nachum Dershowitz, a Tel Aviv University computer scientist, and his son, Idan Dershowitz, a Bible scholar at Hebrew University in Jerusalem.

The places in which the program disagreed with accepted scholarship might prove interesting leads for scholars. The first chapter of Genesis, for example, is usually thought to have been written by the "priestly" author, but the software indicated it was not.

Similarly, the book of Isaiah is largely thought to have been written by two distinct authors, with the second author taking over after Chapter 39. The software's results agreed that the book might have two authors, but suggested the second author's section actually began six chapters earlier, in Chapter 33.

The differences "have the potential to generate fruitful discussion among scholars," said Michael Segal of Hebrew University's Bible Department, who was not involved in the project.

Over the past decade, computer programs have increasingly been assisting Bible scholars in searching and comparing texts, but the novelty of the new software seems to be in its ability to take criteria developed by scholars and apply them through a technological tool more powerful in many respects than the human mind, Segal said.

Before applying the software to the Pentateuch and other books of the Bible, the researchers first needed a more objective test to prove the algorithm could correctly distinguish one author from another.

So they randomly jumbled the Hebrew Bible's books of Ezekiel and Jeremiah into one text and ran the software. It sorted the mixed-up text into its component parts "almost perfectly," the researchers announced.

The program recognizes repeated word selections, like uses of the Hebrew equivalents of "if," "and" and "but," and notices synonyms: In some places, for example, the Bible gives the word for "staff" as "makel," while in others it uses "mateh" for the same object. The program then separates the text into strands it believes to be the work of different people.

Other researchers have looked at linguistic fingerprints in less sacred texts as a way of identifying unknown writers. In the 1990s, the Vassar English professor Donald Foster famously identified the journalist Joe Klein as the anonymous author of the book "Primary Colors" by looking at minor details like punctuation.

In 2003, Koppel was part of a research team that developed software that could successfully tell, four times out of five, if the author of a text was male or female. Women, the researchers found, are far more likely to use personal pronouns like "she" and "he," while men prefer determiners like "that" and "this" – women, in other words, talk about people, while men prefer to talk about things. That success sparked debate about how gender shapes the way we think and communicate.

Research of this kind has potential applications for law enforcement, allowing authorities to catch imposters or to match anonymous texts with possible authors by identifying linguistic tics. Because the analysis can also help identify gender and age, it might also allow advertisers to better target customers.

The new software might be used to investigate Shakespeare's plays and settle lingering questions of authorship or co-authorship, mused Graeme Hirst, a professor of computational linguistics at the University of Toronto. Or it could be applied to modern texts: "It would be interesting to see if in more cases we can tease apart who wrote what," Hirst said.

The algorithm might also lead to the creation of a style checker for documents prepared by multiple authors or committees, helping iron out awkward style variations and creating a uniform text, Hirst suggested.

What the algorithm won't answer, say the researchers who created it, is the question of whether the Bible is human or divine. Three of the four scholars, including Koppel, are religious Jews who subscribe in some form to the belief that the Torah was dictated to Moses in its entirety by a single author: God.

For academic scholars, the existence of different stylistic threads in the Bible indicates human authorship.

But the research team says in their paper they aren't addressing "how or why such distinct threads exist."

"Those for whom it is a matter of faith that the Pentateuch is not a composition of multiple writers can view the distinction investigated here as that of multiple styles," they said.

In other words, there's no reason why God could not write a book in different voices.

"No amount of research is going to resolve that issue," said Koppel.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST RELIGION

Filed by Bryan Maygers  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,649
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (26 total)
06:42 PM on 07/25/2011
Now ya gotta wonder, does this site intentionally post silly articles about Christianity? The multiple authorship of the Old Testament and the use of authoritative names to author some of the books in the New are only 100 years or so old. Now there's software that says so?! Wow!
11:33 AM on 07/18/2011
Hit Isaiah up next and see if it maps out as most understand it.
07:55 AM on 07/17/2011
Not new. Stylistic analysis done pre-computer achieved much. Mostly ignored.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Talossa
Liberal. Pro-Israel. Recovering atheist.
11:02 AM on 07/16/2011
Cool stuff! Let's try it on the Qur'an.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DianaLynn1967
It's a great life if you don't weaken!
09:24 PM on 07/16/2011
And all the books of the Bible on which it has not as yet been tried.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Talossa
Liberal. Pro-Israel. Recovering atheist.
12:59 AM on 07/17/2011
Fair enough. We have nothing to lose from knowledge. The only thing we have to be afraid of is blind prejudice.

Most Christians have long since dispensed with the simplistic "God wrote the Bible" theory. But the equally foolish and simplistic "God wrote the Qur'an" dogma is not only alive and well and the majority position in Islam, it is absolutely the only position allowed.

If you can find me one respected Muslim writer who believes that Muhammad did the best he could as a human being trying to recall and record his various experiences, and that his efforts were colored by the various prejudices and errors of his time and people, then please do let me know.
03:39 PM on 07/10/2011
Nifty, but Graf and Wellhausen did this in the 19th c. without computers.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
cookgoose
05:30 PM on 07/06/2011
God is the sole author of a Book>.. He doesn't direct movies, provides medicine to the sick, doesn't drive a car or fly a plane etc, etc.. You see where i am going with it... The all knowing, all powerful God only writes a Book..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Talossa
Liberal. Pro-Israel. Recovering atheist.
11:03 AM on 07/16/2011
Ergo, any professor who relies on graduate students to do a lot of his work doesn't really exist.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
taoistpunk
because the monks wouldn't have me..
03:48 PM on 07/06/2011
How long until we can use this on code? I’d really like to figure out who wrote the virus that my computer caught last month…
08:26 PM on 07/05/2011
Just want to weigh in one more time before I leave this topic. I've read through several posts, and it's come to my attention that some people here (won't name names) are purporting to be Christians but are babbling like wackos.

If you're skeptical, then be skeptical. Anything worth its salt is able to stand scrutiny. Question, dig around, ponder possibilities. I don't think there's anything wrong with that. God wouldn't have given us a brain if He didn't want us to use it.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nabil Muhammad
03:08 AM on 07/06/2011
did you, scrutinized, dig around and question? did you arrive at your conviction departing from a skepticism, from a neutral position?
07:21 AM on 07/06/2011
You're a thick-headed SOB. Did I or did I not tell you I'm not discussing this with you any longer. How many times do I have to tell you that?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TheWM
aka The Wrong Monkey
03:15 PM on 07/06/2011
"some people here (won't name names) are purporting to be Christians but are babbling like wackos"

And... you see some contradiction there?
04:31 PM on 07/06/2011
Look, if you read my posts, the full content not just what you think you can bicker about, you'll see they all have the same theme: Christianity is there if you want it. If you don't want it, just move on. No one is chasing after you begging you to be their friend. And when I said, "how many times do I have to tell you that" was I talking to you? I don't think so, you're just looking for a place to be obnoxious.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bill J4321
05:27 PM on 07/05/2011
What?

You mean Jesus didn't write the entire thing word for word?? It's just the rantings of madmen???

That's just so hard to believe seeing as though it is such a kind, compassionate, and scientific tome.
08:12 PM on 07/05/2011
Jesus didn't write one word of the Bible although he's often quoted. Who ever told you that Jesus wrote the Bible?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Bill J4321
08:23 PM on 07/05/2011
Jesus, God, Holy Spirit. Aren't they considered some sort of' Trinity' or something Matrix-y like that? They are all one and the same, no?

And if the bible is 'the inherent word of god' as 'christians' claim, then, yes, the bible, even if through other men, was written by Jesus. Or God. Or the Holy Spirit. Or all of them. Together. Or individually. Or via Skype and Cisco's TelePresence. Who knows. Or cares.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Talossa
Liberal. Pro-Israel. Recovering atheist.
11:05 AM on 07/16/2011
What is kind and compassionate about science?
07:12 PM on 08/17/2011
Discovering the cause and in a lot of cases cures for disease, discovering ways to clean unsafe drinking water, ways to fix our bodies when they are broken just to name a few. Kind and compassionate are human qualities. What humans do with science determines if it will be used for good or for pain.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
season555
Allaah knows best
09:03 PM on 07/04/2011
What do people mean when they say God inspired? Sarah Palin is always talking about being God inspired or God talking to her doesn't mean people take her words as the Truth?
08:17 PM on 07/05/2011
Inspiration is one of my favorite topics, but I might go all Wallace Stevens on you. I tend toward the idea that all inspiration and creative is divinely inspired and comes to us formless. The Greeks called this the Muse. They had, what was it, seven Muses?

Then being thus enlightened, we give form to this inspiration. Maybe some people get a clarity or true enlightement of the Divine, and others create form in art, literature, music, statesmenship, etc.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nabil Muhammad
12:37 PM on 07/07/2011
what they mean is precisely that, that God had whispered to them through the holy ghost.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rini1946
08:58 PM on 07/03/2011
to be honest for the longest time we did not know that paul revere did not do the ride by him self. In another forty years people will think that the kids at kent state were shot because the national guard had nothing better to do than come to kent state there will be no account of the famous girl in the picture was 13 years old and runaway, there will be no account that the national guard was call because of the kids raiding and destroying property every one will think it was a peaceful demostration. so if the history is wrong for 40 years ago then how can you belive somthing that happend thousands of years ago. Do you think japans history is the same as ours. So take the bible for what it is worth stories. so backed up with some fact some just made up.
12:15 PM on 07/07/2011
If you used some punctuation, your comments would be easier to read.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nabil Muhammad
12:37 PM on 07/07/2011
i agree
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ManuOB1
A voice crying in the wilderness
03:34 PM on 07/03/2011
This is nothing new. Catholic scripture scholars have long maintained different authors penned the Bible over many centuries. How else could the books of Moses recount the death of Moses? God inspired, but humans wrote the Bible.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TheWM
aka The Wrong Monkey
06:33 PM on 07/03/2011
"How else could the books of Moses recount the death of Moses?"

It's simple: Moses could have written everything else in the Torah but the description of his own death, and someone else, Joshua, for example, could have filled in the rest.

I'm just playing devil's advocate there. I don't doubt that the Torah was woven together from several sources, and I don't take it for granted that Moses is an historical.and not a legendary figure. It's just that I've heard that objection to Moses' sole authorship before, and in and of itself it doesn't seem to me to be such such a huge head-scratcher.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ManuOB1
A voice crying in the wilderness
09:59 AM on 07/04/2011
Through linguistic and stylist analysis, scholars identified four distinct authors, or more accurately "schools". Elohist and Yawhist account for two differing creation myths (and I use this in the Joseph Campbell sense), the Priestly account inserts all the parts about rituals, Temple worship, uncleanliness and the seven-day-week, and the Deuteronomic about, well, Deuteronomy. The genius of the Torah and other texts is that EVERY hero has a flaw.
photo
RealityBaseCamp
My micro-bio did not meet someone's guidelines!
07:42 PM on 07/05/2011
"He must have died while carving it."
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DeliciousDemon
Brevity is the soul of wit.
08:48 PM on 07/03/2011
Any half decent biblical scholar would also understand that Moses wasn't a real person.
photo
lokitheviking
new triple bottom line ; profit, people, planet
11:24 AM on 07/04/2011
Abraham, Moses , Jesus ......... each a symbolic messenger messiah to herald the arrival and transition to a new age in the procession of the equinoxes. Something that was much more meaningfull then than now.
Too bad they get historcized to serve the purpose of state religions.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
truly moderate
Paleo-conservative and Anti-tea party
11:27 AM on 07/03/2011
This is a good discovery for Christians, and I hope it leads to good understanding among those of us that aren't overly fundamentalist and overly judgemental - aka those of us that live our life in love, not complain and hate, hehehe.

Anyways, I think discovering which parts of the old testament were written exactly by who (as there were a lot of authors) is imporant because different authors had different intent. Intent is important because we must understand what audience they are speaking to and also the time period in which they are speaking (what is going on politically, where/how/why have people went astray from God's instruction, ect). For those that can accept that we live in a world of new discoveries yet still we find relevant timeless truths, this is indeed a good discovery. :)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DeliciousDemon
Brevity is the soul of wit.
04:49 PM on 07/03/2011
Your comment might have some truth in it if the bible had anything to offer us that we couldn't figure out without it, unfortunately it doesn't, it's an irrelevant anachronism.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ManuOB1
A voice crying in the wilderness
07:40 PM on 07/03/2011
The Bible gives insights into human nature that have proven true for millennia. Sibling rivalry, f'rinstance.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
01:13 AM on 07/03/2011
I would love to test this software on my college papers. I doubt all of my papers have many similarities in style. Another test would be an entire collection of news articles from reporters.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Nabil Muhammad
06:50 PM on 07/04/2011
can a single paper/article have several different styles in it?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
TheWM
aka The Wrong Monkey
09:32 AM on 07/05/2011
Yes.

I was going to demonstrate that a single post of less than 250 words can have several radically-different styles, but I haven't had my coffee yet.
08:13 PM on 07/02/2011
Wow it is truely amzing how all of the articles from the Huffington Post are anti reiglion, anti christian, anti bible, anti faith. At least there is a forum for all Atheists and Agnostics outnumbered as you are by believers and people of faith. To prop each other up and your narrow views.
Most of the greatest thinkers of Human History were believers in God. Even DARWIN on his death bed cried out to the Almighty to save accept him.You just do not understand the bible at all.
Why, you are simply too closed minded to even explore anything beyond your own narrow views.It is the message of God. Not so much the delivery.
But that does not fit into your misunderstanding of the Bibles origins. Try reading it, get some facts. Then formulate a real opinion and not the usual Liberal bumber sticker rhetoric.
Think little sheep, think.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
taoistpunk
because the monks wouldn't have me..
09:17 PM on 07/02/2011
Thanks for stopping by, but your post is full of lies and misconception. Darwin did not have a death bed conversion, though many Christians love to tell that lie because they think it makes their lies about evolution seem more palatable. Most of human history is populated with people who believed in gods other than the Judeo-Christian one. Also, most great thinkers even in the Judeo-Christian tradition, were such because they believed in science first and religion second, if at all.

Having read and studied the Bible I can tell you that, like your post, getting facts there is no easy proposition.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Koeiseun
10:03 PM on 07/02/2011
It's simply a book of fiction...nothing more...nothing less...