More

Belo Monte Dam Threatens Brazilian Amazon (PHOTOS)

The Huffington Post   First Posted: 06/29/11 07:12 PM ET   Updated: 08/29/11 06:12 AM ET

From Cristina Goettsch Mittermeier:

It is a bitter loss. The wild river that along its lengthy journey gives life to so much and so many will be tamed forever. Where I stand on the shores of the Xingu River, just a few miles from the city of Altamira, I can see the markers where the main wall of the Belo Monte dam will be built. Across the main waterway of the Xingu, 14 meters (or 46 feet) high, the dam will muzzle the flow of the river and will create a gigantic lake almost 600 square kilometers in size. When the city of New Orleans, which is roughly that size, was flooded after hurricane Katrina, the entire world shrieked in horror. As an equivalent area of Amazonian rainforest is scheduled to be flooded, barely anybody outside this area is paying attention. For over 20 years, the ploy to dam the tributaries of the Amazon has been bounced around and finally the idea of damming the Amazon's tributaries as a solution to Brazil's energy challenges has won. The walls will go up and the character of this vital ecosystem will be changed forever.

All photos and captions courtesy of Cristina Goettsch Mittermeier.

1 of 16
A Kayapo Indian girl bathes in the Xingu River, village of Kedjam.

Cristina Mittermeier, Belo Monte
Total comments: 215 | Post a Comment
1 of 16
This Picture
Okay
Stunning

  • 1

  • 2

  • 3

  • 4

  • 5

  • 6

  • 7

  • 8

  • 9

  • 10
Top 5 Images
loading...
Users who voted on this slide
loading...

What the dam will mean to the people who live along the river below the wall is a seasonal state of drought. The thousands of indigenous people and peasants who scratch a living out of the forest and the river will see their main source of drinking water and food dwindle. More dramatic, however, is the loss of their only means of transportation. There are no roads here and the only way to travel for the vast majority is by boat. Once the flow of river is blocked and the flow diminishes, people will become trapped in their communities. They have no other choice than to relocate. One can sense the fear and the frustration in their faces. The newspapers talk about the government's plans to compensate, educate and facilitate relocation, but no one has come to these small villages to explain how that process will work.

For the people on the other side of the wall, the threat of seeing their homes under water has finally become a not-so-distant reality. They too will need to relocate somehow. The flood will reach all the way to the city of Altamira and no one is surprised to know that the most vulnerable people are also the poorest inhabitants of the city; the ones that live in the "favelas" or informal settlements along the river's floodplain. Without any services -- electricity, running water or sanitation ­-- these people are used to rough conditions and to being marginalized. They too have heard the promises of compensation for their relocation, but so far no one has come here to ease their fears and certainly no one believes any promises the government is making. They have heard it all before, and at this point, the only thing that is certain is that they too have no idea of where they will go.

The indigenous people who live in the interior, some nearby and others hundreds of miles from the construction site, have long opposed the idea of the dam, as they too will be affected. Although some indigenous territories lie outside the area of direct influence of the dam, the thousands of workers that will come to the region to build the dam's infrastructure will likely stay. They too will need services, food and opportunity to thrive. That means more Amazonian rain forest will need to be deforested to make way for more agriculture, homes, and infrastructure to feed, house and create new jobs for the newcomers.

For decades now, the indigenous people here have been fighting the avalanche of invasion to their lands from illegal logging, mining, cattle ranching and soybean plantations. As more people settle in the area, the pressure on the forest is only going to increase.

I have spent some time in remote villages in the Amazon and it has always surprised me how little they need not only to survive, but to thrive. A fishing line, some locally made bows and arrows and a machete are the only tools a head of household in an Indian village needs in order to provide food for his family. It is what they want but cannot have that makes them poor: they want more western clothing, television sets, more fancy foods like cookies and sugar. It is understandable for all people to want to improve their lot in life. Buying a mosquito net or seeds to grow vegetables is a legitimate need, especially in a place where diseases like malaria and malnutrition take a heavy toll on the population, but to threaten the very source of all nourishment, transportation and livelihood in exchange for a few bags of beans seems tragic.

There is no stopping this dam now. It has been approved by a government who insists this is the solution to the energy needs of the country. 70% of the energy produced by the dam will go to households hundreds of miles away from the Xingu, while 30% will go to support the mining industry. There is one major blind spot in this scheme. This dam, which is being built on a river that runs almost dry a large part of the year, will be a very inefficient project ­running at 10% of its capacity during the driest months. The energy produced will go to mines that extract resources that are then shipped to other countries, where "things" are manufactured. Brazil is squandering its future potential in "freshwater and carbon" trading, and is shipping raw materials to create jobs elsewhere. Not a very smart strategy for a country that has so much potential. I suggest that the international media starts paying attention to this damming scheme. We all know that this is an inefficient project -- one that may be better than a coal or nuclear plant but far from ideal. If you dare follow the money, you are likely to find the reason why projects that make no sense from a social or environmental standpoint go through anyway.

So, here is my farewell to a wild river. This will be the beginning of the end of the Amazon region as we know it. One day we might look back at Brazil's Amazonian legacy and wonder if they could have done things differently. Until then, the people of the Amazon, the people of Brazil and the people of the world will be left to deal with the environmental consequences.


Cristina Goettsch Mittermeier is a Mexican-born photographer based in Washington, DC. Although her first career was as a Biochemical Engineer specializing on marine sciences, it was her passion for conservation and the challenges of effectively communicating the relevance of environmental issues to our everyday life that led her to photography. Today she is blazing a trail in the field of conservation communications and she is one of the most innovative thinkers and visionaries in this field.

Cristina has served as President of the iLCP (www.ilcp.com) since 2005, she also serves on the Chairman¹s Council at Conservation International (CI) and she is a member of the Steering Committee of the Commission on Communication and Education of the IUCN. She is a Board Member of the WILD Foundation and Lighthawk, serves on the Advisory Board of Nature¹s Best Foundation and the Blue Ocean Film Festival and she is a member of the Society of Environmental Journalists.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

From Cristina Goettsch Mittermeier: It is a bitter loss. The wild river that along its lengthy journey gives life to so much and so many will be tamed forever. Where I stand on the shores of the ...
From Cristina Goettsch Mittermeier: It is a bitter loss. The wild river that along its lengthy journey gives life to so much and so many will be tamed forever. Where I stand on the shores of the ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 215
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (6 total)
FreeHat
Really?
06:51 PM on 07/20/2011
Rich westerners telling people how they should live. Priceless. Nature does far better when the people living in it prosper. Go to the third world sometime and smell the garbage burning out in the open.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ThomasPaine1776
Left is right; Right is wrong
03:31 PM on 07/13/2011
HUMANS ARE A HORRIBLE HORRIBLE DISEASE
jm26dream
gaining fans despite posting ridiculous things
03:23 PM on 07/13/2011
Polluting the environment makes me horny
jm26dream
gaining fans despite posting ridiculous things
03:21 PM on 07/13/2011
Let's nuke the Amazon!
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
03:21 AM on 07/13/2011
This was a story on 60 minutes Australia last Sunday

http://sixtyminutes.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=8270648
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Robert Blackburn
12:17 PM on 07/12/2011
With the name of the game being to make as much as you can as quick as you can, we sit back and watch everything we depend upon for life destroyed: our rain forests, air, lakes, rivers, soil, and climate. If I didn't know better, I'd think mankind is really born with original sin. Instead we have another little animal on earth with a survival; however, unlike all other animals, this one has been tricked in its societies about just what is supposed to survive. In case of the Amazon, wealth wins out.

See RevolutionOfReason.com and YouTube: RobertLBlackburn
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Sunwyn Ravenwood
Farewell my friends, time to go...
12:52 AM on 07/12/2011
I feel a deep sympathy for the people who will be displaced above and below the dam, but the "changed forever" is fortunately, inaccurate. The average lifespan of a dam is about 500 years, after that it fills with silt and becomes useless. In tropical countries with lots of erosion it takes less time. 200 years from now the lake created by this dam will be filled to the brim with silt and the top few meters will be a mosaic of beautiful wetlands.

All over the East Coast of the U.S. and the Missouri-Mississippi uplands beaver dams created pockets of topsoil. When the beaver pond silted up the beavers moved to another place. The dams slowed erosion and prevented flooding. If we really wanted to prevent flooding in the U.S. we would replicate the work of the beavers by building small silt dams everywhere to catch the sediment and create wetlands.

If Brazil wants to improve its agriculture it should build small silt dams on the upper reaches of the small tributaries. A thousand small dams would be a whole lot more useful and a few big ones. They would provide small-scale hydropower for local use, run year land, and wouldn't displace anyone. When one silted up they could just remove the power generator and move it to another location. Eventually the upper reaches of the Amazon Valley would become terraced fields where the local people could grow food in abundance.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
lakkotasue
02:10 PM on 07/11/2011
*WHY* do human beings continue to think they can make major changes in entire ecosystems without major consequences?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
blurredmolly
Was you ever bit by a dead bee?
02:45 PM on 07/17/2011
They know it. They just don't care.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Westies
01:05 PM on 07/11/2011
Incredibly tragic for so many people and animals alike!!! I certainly wouldn't support it!
10:33 AM on 07/11/2011
(part 2)
However, I do not see it coming at the same pace and concern as we have displayed in the past, when it comes to building this Belmonte Dam. I do not want to go too romantic about the issue, supporting only the natives' (which in so many other areas are profitting from the burning up of trees in protected areas...but this is not the issue here) pleas now, or towards the mere preservation of nature as it is, pure and simple. We can profit from it, and we should, we need to do it. But deeper studies must be made (so far, they are highly disputable) so that we can decide even about the real need for this specific dam, let go of the consequences it would bring which can be tragic.I for one miss a lot the Seven Falls Cascade, a nature wonder that simply disappeared with Itaipu, along with dozens of vilages and small towns in the area. But it was inevitable. Let us make sure that this one is too,or forget about it.
10:33 AM on 07/11/2011
People said pretty much the same terrible things when Itaipu Dam was build (tripple frontier : Brasil, Argentina, Paraguay) back in the 70's. After all the huge environmental changes in the region, people are still standing there and prospering (well, concept is a bit fluid here), and mother nature just as well. Besides, it produces more electrical power than any other plant in the world, so far. That being said, I must add that what authorities did back then in terms of preserving wild life and the river-bank populations' life and sustainability was a huge success, in a time when discussions about these matters did not use to set hearts and minds in flames as they, righteously so, do today.
I don't see how Brasil would have moved towards a more prosperous future if the Itaipu Hidroelectrical Plant had not been built. (part 1)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Louige Damion
CEO / Executive Producer
10:22 AM on 07/11/2011
O que isso?? meu tribo viver no mundo de Amazona.
Porque porque porque??????
09:27 AM on 07/11/2011
Thank you for posting this article and raising awareness about an outrageous injustice that threatens both a region of sensational biodiversity and the people who have inhabited it and conserved it for thousands and thousands of years. This is unfortunately one of multiple dams under the umbrella of Brazil's Accelerated Growth Programme, and the lives and lands of many more Amazonian peoples are under the same dire threat. Please find out more information here and write a letter to the Brazilian government on behalf of the tribes in danger:
http://www.survivalinternational.org/about/madeira-dams
10:47 PM on 07/10/2011
What a discrace. The brazlian government should be held accountable by the world body.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
11:48 AM on 07/10/2011
This is bullsht. What right do they have???