iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Federal Reserve Posed To Set 21 Cent-Cap On Debit Swipe Fees

Fed Swipe Fees

First Posted: 06/29/11 04:26 PM ET Updated: 08/29/11 06:12 AM ET

(AP) WASHINGTON — The Federal Reserve said Wednesday that banks can only charge retailers 21 cents each time they swipe a debit card.

The board raised the cap from its initial proposal of 12 cents per swipe. Banks and big payment processors like Visa and Mastercard convinced the Fed that was too low to cover the cost of handling transactions, maintaining networks and preventing fraud.

Banks currently have no limit and charge an average of 44 cents per swipe.

The Fed voted 4-1 to adopt the rule, which was required under the financial regulatory law enacted last year. Gov. Elizabeth Duke opposed the rule. It takes effect Oct 1, later than expected.

It was "one of our most challenging rulemakings" under the financial regulatory law, Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke said Wednesday. He said the Fed will monitor developments in the debit card market "on an ongoing basis" to gauge if it's accomplishing the intended goals.

Fed staff said the higher cap reflects a broader range of costs incurred by banks that issue debt cards. The rule will also allow banks to charge a fraction more to cover the costs of fraud prevention.

It does not apply to government-issued debit cards, prepaid cards or cards issued by banks and credit unions with assets under $10 billion.


The move to limit swipe fees pitted the nation's largest banks and payment processors like MasterCard Inc. and Visa Inc. against Wal-Mart and retailers of all sizes. The decision to settle on a higher cap lifted bank and payment processors stocks in late afternoon trading on Wall Street.

Banks said roughly $16 billion was at stake if the 12-cent cap took effect. That would be more than 80 percent of the $19.7 billion in debit transaction fees paid by merchants in 2009, according to the Nilson Report, which tracks the payments industry.

The banks warned that they would have to make up for some revenue lost by shifting costs to consumers. Many already eliminated unrestricted free checking accounts, and some ended debit card rewards programs. Other potential actions include annual fees for using debit cards, which are already being tested in some markets.

The higher cap may lead some to avoid taking such action, said Brian Riley, a bank card analyst with the consultant The Tower Group. Banks must still review their costs but the rule allows them to avoid a "slash and burn" process for customers that don't provide much profit, he said.

Merchant groups said that their savings would be passed on to customers in the form of lower prices. But many questioned whether retailers would simply pocket the difference.

Staff members said they think it's unlikely that issuers would impose fees on debit card transactions or steer their customers away from using the cards. Merchants in highly competitive regions would likely reduce their prices once fees go down, the staff members said.

Small banks and credit unions argued that the exemption for banks under $10 billion wouldn't help if the cap was as low as originally proposed. That's because it would have invited merchants to discriminate against higher cost cards. Bernanke had acknowledged small banks' concerns in testimony before the Senate last month.

"It certainly appears that the board gave our concerns some consideration," said Mary Dunn, deputy general counsel of the Credit Union National Association.

Separately Wednesday, a federal appeals court in South Dakota ruled that a lower court judge was correct to deny a preliminary injunction against the fee limits taking effect.

The case challenging the regulations' constitutionality was brought in October by Minnesota-based TCF National Bank, the unit of TCF Financial Corp., considered the first bank to offer free checking accounts. TCF is among the banks that no longer offer free checking without requirements such as using direct deposit or maintaining minimum balances.

In a twist, TCF's attorneys argued that the provision of the law exempting small banks and credit unions gave those unaffected banks an unfair advantage.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST BUSINESS
Subscribe to the HuffPost Money newsletter!
(AP) WASHINGTON — The Federal Reserve said Wednesday that banks can only charge retailers 21 cents each time they swipe a debit card. The board raised the cap from its initial proposal of 12 cent...
(AP) WASHINGTON — The Federal Reserve said Wednesday that banks can only charge retailers 21 cents each time they swipe a debit card. The board raised the cap from its initial proposal of 12 cent...
Filed by Maxwell Strachan  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 212
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (7 total)
04:46 PM on 07/01/2011
This was a smart move by the Fed. The banks that had nothing to do with the meltdown won't be forced to lose money on debit cards, they won't have to charge consumers for debit cards, and the merchants get to accept the cards at a deep discount (~45%) and pretend they'll pass that on to consumers in the form of savings. Don't blame banks for this one...thank Senator Durbin!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
ivyteainn
02:46 PM on 06/30/2011
It's all about money. The banks own the Federal Reserve...­its not a government­al agency....­many people are fooled by the name......­the swipe fee is just another power move by the bankers to make money. Little businesses will be hurt; only the huge corporation­ns will be able to live with higher fees and cutting costs. It's just another move by the banks to destroy free enterprise and create a corporative economy. Its all about greed. Our government is too corrupt...­Congress and the White House....D­emocrat and Republican­.....to stop the banks.
03:48 AM on 06/30/2011
That's great, except you know full well banks will come up with another way to screw people and make even more.
02:43 AM on 06/30/2011
Whu don't the Feds start nickel & diming the banks?
02:15 AM on 06/30/2011
I told you to keep your check book handy but you laughed at me. Notice how once they get most of you doing something like swiping and get you addicted, then they start charging. They also don't care if you are defrauded or hacked into because they've already collected fees from you to cover any loss that occurs. Once a ton of companies get hacked into, they will shirk their responsibilities and say they can no longer protect you because its too hard to do. You live by the swipe and you die by the swipe.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
rpopeteacher1
01:45 AM on 06/30/2011
Consumers should just switch to paying in cash.
01:25 AM on 06/30/2011
I agree with many of you. It seems like no matter what happens, we
all ultimately pay the price. I do object to blaming Obama for every
little thing that happens. Remember, he inherited a lot of what is going
on now from our good ole Republican boys. I saw a good documentary/
movie on the Home Box (HBO). It was called "Too Big To Fail". It gave
a pretty good idea of what really goes on between the banks, congress,
FDIC, Federal Reserve, etc. during the financial collapse. I think that
after you watch this movie, you will get a better "hint" of why things
happen as they do.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Dan Crabtree
01:11 AM on 06/30/2011
And the spiral continues.. to the bottom we go..
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
irishlion7
12:33 AM on 06/30/2011
Banks will use any excuse to raise there fees and costs. Any reduction in the swipe fee which the odd are merchants would not pass on. I can remember when banks tried charging you a fee if you used a teller vs going through a machine. And then again there is the costs they charge when you use some one/another banks ATM which can rise up to $5.00 or more. What is needed is more not less regulation of banking fees Let thm charge those who have large accounts over $20,000 in there checking accounts a fee and let thise of us who live month to month pay no fees inculding check fees ether for a checks or for cashing checks.
Some banks that I have dealt with will tell you countrary to Federal Law that they can hold your just deposited check for up to two weeks. Even when the check is drawn on there bank, while it if fact clears within 24 hours.
12:43 AM on 06/30/2011
Banks can hold your deposited checks up to two weeks based on where the check is located. The Federal law on availability of funds let's you have access to a certain amount immediately in the case of government check and cashier's checks.
photo
hewhowaits
If ignorance is bliss, you must be very happy.
12:27 AM on 06/30/2011
The Federal Reserve is owned and composed of bankers..Is anyone really surprised that the swipe fee is higher than expected? When you are stupid enough to let private bankers regulate themselves, this is what you get.
12:12 AM on 06/30/2011
Another job a machine does faster than a human. But yet, somehow the price never cancels out the actual cost of equipment, would it happen to be a union thing or the machines owned by the mafia???
12:02 AM on 06/30/2011
Read the following and then see if you think charging 21 cents per swipe is fair to you the consumer:
Goldman Sachs Plans To Hire 1000 In Singapore While Cutting Jobs in the USA

Jun 28, 2011 ... Goldman Sachs, the country's fifth-largest bank by assets, plans to hire 1000 ... year was accounting for nearly one-third of all U.S. profits. Indeed, in 2011, Wall Street has been cutting a significant number of jobs, ...
12:44 AM on 06/30/2011
Apparently until our wages are lower than Asia's we can expect to see some companies go south or east. Kind of makes you feel helpless.
11:52 PM on 06/29/2011
Now we all will start using cash instead of credit cards (I have already stopped using) and atm cards, and I am one. I refuse to pay .21 cents to buy groceries or anything else I purchase. This is nothing more than the socialists in power to get more of our hard earned money. The federal reserve is so in the back of Obama, I just hope he isn't elected president again, we can not afford this impostor another four years.
12:40 AM on 06/30/2011
If they were socialists, the money would be going to societal costs like healthcare, not to the banks' pockets.
12:46 AM on 06/30/2011
The President holds no sway over the Fed. The Fed is independent of the President and his opinions or desires. Only Congress can rein in the Fed.
01:45 AM on 06/30/2011
THE "FED" IS NOT ACTUALLY A GOVT ENTITY, IT IS A CORPORATION!
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
taina2
Spending my money smarter than government
11:32 PM on 06/29/2011
The Fed is the key to the elite globalists enslaving America.
11:42 PM on 06/29/2011
Prove it, your source please to back it up.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Kirk Allen
Stupid is the new Smart
10:13 PM on 06/30/2011
the creature from jeckel island by G Edward Griffith read it !


NEXT !!!!!!!!!
Michael5555
I built it despite you people
11:04 PM on 06/29/2011
The Feredal Reserve is comprised of greedy individuals that exploit their fellow human beings so they can line their own pockets and the politicians of this country are so incompetant as human beings they allow themselves to be bought and paid for by these parasites of human beings. What a joke, banks are not hurting to make a profit yet they still continue to take more and more money from the masses that are desperately hurting and our political leaders in their incompetance and corruptance continue to allow this, what a shame, these people are inadequate as human beings.