iPhone app iPad app Android phone app Android tablet app More

Future Of New York's Fracking Moratorium In Question (UPDATED)

Fracking Moratorium

First Posted: 06/30/11 04:08 PM ET Updated: 08/30/11 06:12 AM ET

Environmental groups were up in arms on Thursday as news percolated that New York State's moratorium on natural gas exploration using a contentious technique known as hydraulic fracturing -- in place since late last year -- could soon be coming to an end. Yet a variety of lingering administrative hurdles would seem to make any such decision unlikely, at least in the short term.

The state's Department of Environmental Conservation announced late Thursday that it would be issuing on Friday a long-anticipated update to its environmental review and proposed rules for fracking, a technique involving the high-pressure injection of a mixture of water, sand and chemicals deep underground to break up layers of rock and stimulate the release of gas.

The agency said the new review would recommend, among other things, that hydraulic fracturing be prohibited in the New York City and Syracuse watersheds, as well as around primary aquifers and within 500 feet of their boundaries. Surface drilling would also be banned "on state-owned land including parks, forest areas and wildlife management areas," according to the agency's announcement.

"High-volume fracturing will be permitted on privately held lands under rigorous and effective controls," the agency also said, "and DEC will issue regulations to codify these recommendations into state law."

Concerns over the environmental impact of the process, including its potential to pollute groundwater, led to a temporary hold on its use in the state. The moratorium, which was put in place by former Governor David Paterson, was initially designed to last until the state DEC issued its report.

New York's state Assembly had voted earlier this month to extend the moratorium for another year, but the measure was never taken up by the Senate.

The New York Times reported on Thursday afternoon that New York Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo was planning to partially lift the moratorium based on recommendations made in the forthcoming report -- although a spokesman for the governor's office was quoted in the same article as saying the suggestion that Cuomo had made such a decision was "baseless speculation and premature."

Environmental groups have argued that far more analysis needs to be done before the full impact of natural gas development on the state is understood. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is currently conducting its own analysis of the impact of fracking on drinking water, and a Department of Energy panel is expected to issue a report on the process later this summer.

"Governor Cuomo has pledged not to allow this practice until it has been proven safe, and we're confident that he'll uphold his promise," said Claire Sandberg, the executive director of the New York-based group Frack Action. "Given all we know about the inherent dangers of fracking — compounded by the new revelations that this industry is in fact just a giant Ponzi scheme that may well bankrupt the state — we expect that Governor Cuomo will not move forward under current circumstances."

Currently, the natural gas industry and the fracking process are largely governed by a hodgepodge of state-level regulations that critics say have proven inadequate.

New York is among several states, including Pennsylvania, parts of Ohio and West Virginia, that sit atop a vast deposit of deep-shale gas known as the Marcellus Shale. The oil and gas industry touts the advent of advanced hydraulic fracturing techniques as being key to opening up previously unreachable or uneconomical gas resources like the Marcellus Shale to development.

“We’re eager to give this forthcoming document a thorough analysis, and remain hopeful that it genuinely seeks to balance the responsible development of American natural gas in New York State with common sense environmental safeguards," wrote Kathryn Klaber, the president of the natural gas trade group the Marcellus Shale Coalition, in an email. "Our industry is as committed as ever to helping to put New Yorkers back to work and responsibly delivering clean-burning natural gas to families, consumers and small businesses across the entire region.”

Access to these new deposits has also been highlighted by the Obama administration as a key component of the nation's energy future -- particularly as it relates to reducing reliance on foreign sources of energy.

But New York's temporary ban on the process was welcomed by environmental groups as a necessary check on an industry that has exploded in a regulatory vacuum.

"New York is rushing into uncharted and dangerous territory," said Dusty Horwitt, senior council with the Environmental Working Group, in an e-mailed statement. "With drilling companies dumping radioactive wastewater into rivers just across the border in Pennsylvania while flagrantly violating federal law by injecting diesel fuel underground without permits, New Yorkers cannot be assured that drilling can be conducted safely. We must have more guarantees that the industry and regulators can operate responsibly before opening the doors to drilling."

The new environmental study from the state DEC comes roughly three years after the agency first began to examine the potential impacts of fracking and natural gas development in the state. In September of 2009, it first issued an 800-page draft of the study, which is designed to lay out environmental guidelines for the industry.

That analysis was widely criticized as being inadequate -- including by the Environmental Protection Agency, which called for the state's review to be "significantly expanded."

In December of last year, Paterson issued Executive Order 41, which ordered the state DEC to revise the environmental analysis and deliver a new draft by this summer.

The new environmental study would be followed by a period for public comment of at least 30 days.

Bruce Ferguson, a representative of the group Catskills Citizens for Safe Energy, said he expects the deliberative process to take much longer, given the technical complexity of document and the requirement that the agency review all public comments -- which have run into the tens of thousands in the past.

He also suggested that Gov. Cuomo would be unlikely to pre-empt the federal analysis currently underway at the EPA. The earliest results from that study are not expected until the end of 2012.

"Will New York want to wait to consider the EPA findings," Ferguson said, "or will it issue its plan for fracking without benefit of this study?"

But Chris Tucker, a spokesman for Energy In Depth, a coalition of independent oil and gas producers, said that while deliberations were far from over, his industry was "very much looking forward to producing this resource in a responsible way in and for New York State."

"DEC took its time on this issue, talked to a lot of folks, gathered its own data, ran its own analysis, and is now poised to release what's likely to be among the most stringent and comprehensive regulatory roadmaps ever assembled.”

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

Environmental groups were up in arms on Thursday as news percolated that New York State's moratorium on natural gas exploration using a contentious technique known as hydraulic fracturing -- in place ...
Environmental groups were up in arms on Thursday as news percolated that New York State's moratorium on natural gas exploration using a contentious technique known as hydraulic fracturing -- in place ...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 247
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4  Next ›  Last »  (4 total)
09:24 PM on 07/05/2011
I would be much more empathetic with the New Yorkers who oppose fracking in New York if they were not so happy to consume cheap natural gas produced by fracking in Pennsylvania and West Virginia.
D-Driller
my micro-bio is empty
01:37 PM on 07/03/2011
The real test here of the people of NY's resolve in stopping gas drilling in their state is to see if they pay back with interest, not only state lease sale monies but also force themselves, friends and neighbors to pay back the private lease sale monies that they received from the gas companies before the moratorium was put into effect. If they put their money where their mouth is, then they will have real credibility going forward. However, if they do not, then they will run up against the issues that plague western Colorado on a similar subject, where the ranchers quite agreeably leased their lands for gas development, but when it was time to drill, formed coalitions to keep the gas companies out; they defrauded them of millions of dollars. Granted, oil and gas companies are hard to sympathize with, but what many mineral owners did was extremely low, illegal and unethical.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BobHiggins
Living on the brink of was.
10:50 AM on 07/05/2011
The gas companies and their representatives have sold fracking to a naive public as a safe, environmentally sound practice that in no way affects the underground water supply and does not use carcinogenic or toxic chemicals. They are and have been guilty of the commission of a massive fraud against the public.

Throw them out...keep the money.
D-Driller
my micro-bio is empty
02:29 PM on 07/05/2011
As you know, fraccing has NEVER been linked to contamination. Ever. In fact, many a court case has been lost on the merits due to that fact, and that is something that the media is really at fault for, by giving and facilitating the notion that it has been proven to be unsafe, where the opposite is actually the truth - many studies, such as MIT's or Dukes, as well as various industry studies (which, understandably, are dismissed out of hand) show that it is indeed safe. However, you bring up an interesting point that i had not thought of - do the landmen for the gas companies, and more importantly in the wording of the leasing documents - do they indeed state that no carcinogenic or toxic compounds will be used? If so, I agree with you - that would be terms to break the contract. However, honestly, I have never seen an actual leasing document for let's say the Marcellus, so can not confirm. Do you have a link that you could provide to show that the gas companies promised no toxicity but turned around and used chemicals that were?
09:05 AM on 07/03/2011
Fracking- intrusive-invasive- coming to a neighbor hood near you- Beware NY your next.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Hank Chiappetta
11:50 AM on 07/02/2011
Strike America shut these corporations down do not by or do business with them
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Malcolm Hensley
Last of the Reagan Republicans
01:45 AM on 07/04/2011
I suppose you want us to buy Russian natural gas and Chinese made stuff not the American stuff?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
NWBrunette
Blessed Girl
02:22 AM on 07/02/2011
The Cons will destroy the commons at the drop of a hat if they can make a drop of profit doing it. And gleefully lie about it every step of the way. The modern version of fracking is just the latest example.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WESmith
Energy Conservation can save you M-O-N-E-Y!!!!!!!!
07:41 AM on 07/02/2011
How is the modern version of fracking different from last year's version? Or for that matter 60 years ago?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Eileenla
Author, "Sacred Economics"
02:10 AM on 07/02/2011
If we took all the capital being invested in lobbying for fracking and the fracking process itself, combined it with all the mental and physical energy we're expending either pushing for fracking or doing battle against it, and applied all the above to imagining a new way to fuel our machinery that doesn't involve fossil fuels, just imagine what we might invent...
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WESmith
Energy Conservation can save you M-O-N-E-Y!!!!!!!!
07:44 AM on 07/02/2011
We did all of that in the 1970s. No one was interested. They wanted their muscle cars, pickup trucks and SUVs left intact. We had many non-fossil fuel vehicles then. They sat on the car lots and then were taken away and junked when they couldn't be sold. Today is no different.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Eileenla
Author, "Sacred Economics"
08:55 AM on 07/02/2011
Well there's where I can say with absolute certainty that you're wrong. Anyone who believes that today is no different from yesterday - let alone no different from forty years ago - isn't paying attention.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Malcolm Hensley
Last of the Reagan Republicans
01:48 AM on 07/04/2011
Well the fracking industry has invested almost $1,000,000.00 in lobbing congress.

The green energy groups like wind and solar have invested about $25,000,000.00.

Seems we are not getting as much as we would hope for!
04:13 PM on 07/01/2011
The Federal government should commission a study
on fracturing as it relates to newly discovered seismic
activity from once thought dormant faultlines....

I wonder how safe fracturing is....

it certainly would be money well spent
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WESmith
Energy Conservation can save you M-O-N-E-Y!!!!!!!!
07:45 AM on 07/02/2011
You trust the government? They US Government tried fracking with nuclear devices in Colorado.
09:00 AM on 07/03/2011
Yeah we have quakes here in Tx, but of course they are naturaly occuring.
D-Driller
my micro-bio is empty
07:49 PM on 07/04/2011
People have been feeling these quakes? I've been reading about them, and there is a alot of hype being put out there, but in the fine print, it says they are like a 2 on the Richter scale - humans can't even detect them. Has that changed? Got a link?
02:28 PM on 07/01/2011
It's clear that Gov. Cuomo is pandering to Republican interests in the hope of an eventual presidential bid. What choice does he have? He'll never be re-elected governor after this. I think it's time to hold public officials as well as corporate officials criminally responsible for the damage they do. The whole idea of hiding behind a corporate "person" is bogus. Time has come to undo this flagrant injustice.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WESmith
Energy Conservation can save you M-O-N-E-Y!!!!!!!!
02:20 PM on 07/01/2011
Denatured alcohol “ethanol that has additives to make it more poisonous or unpalatable, and thus, undrinkable”
Octylacrylamide polymer Scientific name: 2-Propenoic acid, 2-methyl-, 2-(1,1-dimethylethyl)aminoethyl ester, polymer with methyl 2-methyl-2-propenoate, 1,2-propanediol mono(2-methyl-2-propenoate), 2-propenoic acid and N-(1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl)-2-propenamide Warning: Do not flush to sewer or waterways.
Stearoxytrimethylsilane “When heated to decomposition, material may emit toxic fumes.”
Glycerin Scientific name: 1,2,3-Propanetriol “Keep away from heat. Keep away from sources of ignition. Ground all equipment containing material. Do not ingest. Do not
breathe gas/fumes/ vapor/spray. Wear suitable protective clothing. If ingested, seek medical advice immediately and show the container or the label. Keep away from incompatibles such as oxidizing agents.” “Repeated or prolonged exposure to the substance can produce target organs damage.”
Diethylhexyl Syringlydenemalonate Benzene compound
Tocopherol “PPE needed: Splash goggles. Full suit. Boots. Gloves. Suggested protective clothing might not be sufficient; consult a specialist BEFORE handling this product.”
Retinyl Palmitate “Environmental precautions: Do not let product enter drains”
Caprilic/Capric Triglyceride “Environmental Precautions : Prevent material from contaminating soil or entering sewerage and drainage systems.”
What is it?
Kid's sunscreen.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
observingstupiditydaily
Nice to be important,but more important to be nice
04:44 PM on 07/01/2011
And there are alternatives if you don't want to use toxic sunscreens on your children, what's the alternative for fracking without toxic chemicals WE?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WESmith
Energy Conservation can save you M-O-N-E-Y!!!!!!!!
07:45 AM on 07/02/2011
K-Y Jelly
D-Driller
my micro-bio is empty
01:27 PM on 07/03/2011
That is an excellent point. As you know, many fracturing operations use a simple water and sand mixture; others use more exotic applications, including nitrogen and industrial chemicals. I believe strongly that natural gas resources should be developed, but I also see an opportunity here for small business's to step in and develop biodegradable materials. Having said that, hydraulic fracturing has never been linked to water contamination, only bad cementing, which is a completely different issue. I feel sometimes that the wrong battle is being fought - to blame contamination on fraccing has, so far, been a non-starter; so little progress has been made in the courts on the contamination issue. Once people begin to learn more about the drilling process and realize where their real concerns should lie, then i am afraid the fight will already be over, and they will be left with poor legislation that does not address the root of the problem. Can you imagine the uproar if, tomorrow, we banned all frac operations, and the next day wells became contaminated? As it stands, that is exactly what could happen.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
10:17 AM on 07/01/2011
Battlestar Galactica fans will not miss the sense of irony of "fracking" the land for natural gas.
09:49 AM on 07/01/2011
Pure Capitalism has NO public Safety protections, or environmental Protections...which eventually will lead to all Water, Air, and Soil being Polluted to points exceeding levels that destroy all life...and the argument will be "if we don't pollute it then they will and they'll get the money"...just like greenhouse gasses etc. Don't get me wrong...I'm all about competition in the marketplace and fair market practices. But absolutely with Anti-Trust Laws, and Safety Laws aka Regulations to Protect our little Planet so that it can sustain Life...Including Human Life. but who do you think has spent more on Politician bribes lately, Big OIL & Gas? or Average Joe American who Can't afford to import his shower water from Mars?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
WESmith
Energy Conservation can save you M-O-N-E-Y!!!!!!!!
12:50 PM on 07/01/2011
Average Joe American(s) own the vast majority of the coal, oil and natural gas in the US and offshore. We are letting lying Politicians handle the money involved in selling it. What is happening to the money? What is happening to the taxes involved in these products? We need the transparent government McCain and Obama both promised. Only problem? Congress doesn't want a transparent government. We might see all of the Hidden taxes we pay and they might not get re-elected.
01:18 PM on 07/01/2011
We need Transparency, we need complete Bans on all forms of Cash for legislation, or Politician Briber. Campaign Contributions, Lobbying, Interest free loans, etc. etc. Once we do that we'll start to see anti trust laws, and anti trust law enforcment. We'll see MSHA, OSHA, FDA, FAA, etc. start to work for the american people again. As their Employers our Politicians start to work for we the people again....do I think this'll happen No. Corruption is much more profitable for those in power....Sorry sir but I don't believe a work of the "average joe american owning the majority of the coal....", etc. average Joe works a 7-6 job and hopes he doesn't get Cancer from the water he drinks because he Knows that His health insurance death Panel won't cover it.....and he owns no coal.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Malcolm Hensley
Last of the Reagan Republicans
01:52 AM on 07/04/2011
I think pure communism was worse. And imagine it was all done for the good of the worker.
09:38 AM on 07/01/2011
It's all Blatant Proof of PLUTOCRACY pulling the Strings in Govt.
09:37 AM on 07/01/2011
We no longer live in a Duel Party System...it's now a Single Party PLUTOCRACY and "We the People" are now "We the Cash Cattle" to be milked and slaughtered and Poisoned if it profits the Campaign Contributing Elite 1% who with their Monopoly Gotten Blood Money OWN out Politicians...Who without the Elite's contributions wouldn't be able to Run!.

mmmMMMMMOOOO!!!!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
PAGasDriller
01:26 AM on 07/05/2011
You do realize that the largest owners of these "EVIL COMPANIES" are the average middle class American, through their 401K's and mutual fund investments, right? There's no evil madman in an underground lair somewhere counting all this money he's making. It's distributed to you, the people.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Max Shelby
Purveyor of tar and feathers
01:43 AM on 07/01/2011
NYT has a very informative recent investigative piece (with docs) on the viability of the NG industry that's quite the eye opener:

"Energy Information Administration employees also explain in e-mails and documents, copies of which were obtained by The New York Times, that industry estimates might overstate the amount of gas that companies can affordably get out of the ground."

"They discuss the uncertainties about how long the wells will be productive as well as the high prices some companies paid during the land rush to lease mineral rights. They also raise concerns about the unpredictability of shale gas drilling. "

All is not as it appears.

http://goo.gl/CLlPO
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Malcolm Hensley
Last of the Reagan Republicans
02:32 AM on 07/01/2011
the eye opener is when you consider an equivalent energy content to a gallon of gasoline cost less than $0.50.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:49 AM on 07/02/2011
"I got a bizarre call from the New York Times reporter, who wanted me to respond to sections of an email that he read to me, but he wouldn't supply us with the actual email so we could read it in context," he said. "He wasn't very professional."

Quote from:http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2011/07/01/natural_gas_bubble_report_market_tinkering_or_shoddy_reporting.html

Of the only two experts quoted (the rest were "anonymous" sources the NYT is so famous for) one runs an investment fund that invests in oil tar sands in Canada and is anti NG because it competes with the investments in his fund. The other is a dairy farmer.

NYT is a joke.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Chia Shrek
errrrrm?
12:41 AM on 07/01/2011
http://english.aljazeera.net/programmes/witness/2011/06/20116227153978324.html

Tar Sands in Alberta
Fracking in NY
Cancer is our rightful heir.