More

Omar al-Bashir, Sudan President, Should Have Been Arrested In China: U.N.

Omar Albashir Hu Jintao

JOHN HEILPRIN   06/30/11 01:42 PM ET   AP

GENEVA — The U.N.'s top human rights official criticized China on Thursday for failing to arrest Sudan's president so that he can be brought to trial on war crimes charges.

U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights Navi Pillay told reporters in Geneva she was "disappointed" that China welcomed Sudan's President Omar al-Bashir during a visit this week, rather than arrest him to ensure he stands trial.

Pillay said that "the whole world favors trial" for al-Bashir on charges of war crimes, crimes against humanity and three counts of genocide, the first time the world's permanent war crimes tribunal issued genocide charges.

China has a duty to enforce warrants by the International Criminal Court, she said, despite the fact that it's not a member of The Hague, Netherlands-based tribunal. The Sudanese leader defiantly rejects the charges and the authority of the court.

"There is a duty and a responsibility on the part of every government including China to assist the court in bringing to justice individuals who have been indicted by the court," Pillay said. "It's disappointing when states do not deliver on this responsibility."

China's mission to the U.N. in Geneva did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

China may be Sudan's biggest trading partner and international protector, but on Darfur the Chinese have subtly tried to push Sudan, particularly to accept a large U.N. peacekeeping force.

China, which is one of the U.N. Security Council's five permanent members with veto power, sent its own experts to Darfur to back up the peacekeepers.

Like China – Sudan's biggest arms supplier and a heavy investor in its oil industry – the United States is a permanent member of the U.N. Security Council but not a member of the International Criminal Court.

But U.S. officials have pressured to have al-Bashir put on trial by the court, despite Sudan serving as a key U.S. ally, particularly with intelligence, in its fight against terrorism.

Even nations that are members of the ICC, such as Chad and Kenya, have declined to carry out the court's international warrant, citing fears it could derail efforts to create peace in Sudan's western Darfur region.

An arrest warrant for al-Bashir said last year there were "reasonable grounds to believe" that since April 2003 Sudanese forces attempted genocide against the Darfur tribal groups Fur, Masalit and Zaghawa. Judges also issued a warrant in 2009 against the president over crimes against humanity in Darfur. The U.N. says the conflict has left up to 300,000 people dead and forced millions to flee their homes.

The U.N. Security Council granted the ICC jurisdiction over Sudanese war crimes in 2005, but the court has no police force or ability to enforce its orders without cooperation from governments.

The council has authorized a new 4,200-strong peacekeeping force to be deployed in the oil-rich Abyei region, southwest of Kadugli, for six months. The U.N. also has a 10,400-strong peacekeeping force on the north-south border but Khartoum demanded that U.N. troops leave the north when the mandate expires July 9.

South Sudan, which will become independent on that date, wants a U.N. force on its side of the border and the U.N. is planning a new mission for the south.

The Sudanese leader has continued to visit countries where he is not likely to face arrest, such as Ethiopia, which is not a member of the ICC, and Saudi Arabia, where he went on a Muslim pilgrimage.

Al-Bashir, who left Beijing on Wednesday for the eastern Chinese port city of Qingdao, was expected to leave China later Thursday to return to Sudan.

Pillay said she could assure everyone, based on her experience as a judge for the ICC, that it would conduct a fair trial.

"It's not like we're calling for an execution of someone, we're calling for an arrest of someone," she said.

Luis Moreno Ocampo, the ICC's chief prosecutor, told the U.N. Security Council last month that genocide and crimes against humanity have continued in Darfur, masterminded by al-Bashir.

Moreno Ocampo said al-Bashir was behind air attacks on civilians and the killing of members of the Fur, Masalit and Zaghawa. The Security Council referred the Darfur conflict to the court in 2005.

Sudan's U.N. Ambassador Daffa-Alla Elhag Ali Osman told the council, however, that Sudan is not a member of the court and Moreno Ocampo's statement and written report to the council in New York were "overloaded with ... unfounded accusations" of rape, killing, war crimes and genocide.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST WORLD

GENEVA — The U.N.'s top human rights official criticized China on Thursday for failing to arrest Sudan's president so that he can be brought to trial on war crimes charges. U.N. High Commission...
GENEVA — The U.N.'s top human rights official criticized China on Thursday for failing to arrest Sudan's president so that he can be brought to trial on war crimes charges. U.N. High Commission...
Filed by Curtis M. Wong  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 98
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3  Next ›  Last »  (3 total)
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DAE
11:39 PM on 07/08/2011
Bush and Obama are as guilty as Milosevic and al-Bashir when it comes to war crimes. Until and unless they are indicted as well I will hold China or any other country responsible for their arrest or any other indicted war criminals.
08:34 PM on 07/01/2011
Hypocrisy. Why would China be involven in a white man kangaroo court, so white man can further contain China?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
First Blast
won't be fooled again
10:42 PM on 07/05/2011
Go fetch me som won ton soup yellow boy
09:33 AM on 07/01/2011
Because they need their oil.
12:53 AM on 07/01/2011
What about Bush and Cheney?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jayrag123
as salaam 3laykum
11:16 PM on 06/30/2011
China does business with anyone and everyone. China attacks no other country and does not interfer in other countries civil wars.
China buys natural resources and keeps it nose out of their business.

America is at this time involved in wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Libya, Yemen and Somalia.

Which country is better, China or America?
11:25 PM on 06/30/2011
Are you part of the CCP/Great Firewall 50 cent army, paid to flood the internet with party advocacy?
Or are you just somewhere between intellectually dishonest/lazy and misinformed?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DAE
12:58 AM on 07/03/2011
Yakety-yak-yak. If someone disagrees with the US party line and says the obvious they're immediately in the pay of China. Obviously you're afraid of the truth.
12:01 AM on 07/01/2011
China has been running guns into the Sudan, Nigeria, all over Africa. They have advisers all over the continent.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
DAE
01:09 AM on 07/03/2011
Ever hear of the US African Command? The US is all over the place with 700 foreign bases. Chinese bases - zilch. And we are by far the world's largest arms dealer. So what are you talking about? China has as much right as any country to have trade, diplomatic, military and cultural relations with African countries.
photo
LMPE
I connect the most dissimilar things
10:41 PM on 06/30/2011
China not only is in bed with Bashir, but the PRC's government knows that it doesn't HAVE to arrest him. Not after the US was perfectly happy to welcome Suharto in the White House.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BillKen
10:07 PM on 06/30/2011
As long as 'W' and his cronies are roaming our streets, let's not hear anything about this law
and order, a nation under laws or the crap about justice because it's all bull and unfortunately
it makes us all hypocrites.
Semper Fi
09:39 PM on 06/30/2011
China will become a big trouble of the world. The communist regime knows how to make use of the shortsighted western politicians to procure its own interest.
11:18 PM on 06/30/2011
That's the truth.
08:17 PM on 06/30/2011
Compare alleged activities of Bashir to US Civil War...a lot of civilians were slaughtered, no?
Come again, why exactly is he demonized by this kangaroo court? just because there is/was sectarian and tribal violence in Sudan? Compare this to tamils in Sri Lanka. WH supported government there and didn't embargo them even though 80,000+ people were killed and unlike Sudan, tamils didn't get independence. There is kangaroo court on this. Hypocrisy rules.
photo
RMosesNJ
Looking for Gallifrey.
06:12 PM on 06/30/2011
Just further proof of how far you can trust China. They flaunt the welcoming of a genocidal maniac and the state department does what? A press release.
HE KILLED 2000000 PEOPLE.
Evidently a small pittance for the Peoples Party.
08:46 PM on 06/30/2011
O is supporting unjustified and illegal wars.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
frank day
Republican = FAIL
08:51 PM on 06/30/2011
Wrong.
03:46 PM on 06/30/2011
Not likely to be bombed.
photo
LMPE
I connect the most dissimilar things
10:38 PM on 06/30/2011
The US tried it and destroyed a medicine factory.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
BillKen
03:45 PM on 06/30/2011
Maybe if the good old USA would set some example by doing something about our 'admitted
war criminals' we could get other countries to follow our lead. We are not much of an example
when we show disdain for international law and at the sam time excoriate others for their transgressions. We can be a world leader again, we can recoup some of our lost international stature but it won't happen if we continue with this 'do what I say, not what I do attitude' and continue to act as international hypocrites and a 'rogue state'. Come on America lets show the world that we 'have what it takes' right here on earth. Is there a politician out there that has the
guts of the young Marines that they have sent to fight in these worthless wars, stand and deliver, I dare ya! Semper Fi
12:02 AM on 07/01/2011
Sitting members of the UNSC do not arrest their own leaders, you're missing the point of the entire organization.
03:26 PM on 06/30/2011
Well, I think China realizes that Ms. Pillay and the ICC have no credibility whatsoever and since China does not recognize the authority of the ICC it just laughs off such demands and keeps on doing business.

When do investigations for war crimes and genocide begin in Iraq, Afghanistan and Palestinian territories? Maybe then China might think the ICC is really up to some impartiality.
photo
HUFFPOST COMMUNITY MODERATOR
Ourstorian
Free your mind and your ass will follow!
03:54 PM on 06/30/2011
"Well, I think China realizes that Ms. Pillay and the ICC have no credibilit­y whatsoever and since China does not recognize the authority of the ICC it just laughs off such demands and keeps on doing business."

Ms. Pillay and the ICC are totally credible on the issue of Sudan's genocidal policies and Bshir's culpability. What they lack is the power to do anything about it. China, on the other hand, will trade the lives of innocent Africans to gain access to African resources.
04:08 PM on 06/30/2011
Perhaps! Nonetheless, when the rest of the world and China look at other instances of war crimes and crimes against humanity perpetrated by a few powerful nations and Ms. Pillay and the ICC say nothing, let alone do anything about it, they may conclude that the double-standard erases any credibility Ms. Pillay and the ICC may have or claim.
photo
the grange gorman
Rachel Corrie is the greatest person since Lennon
03:15 PM on 06/30/2011
Why dont we all boycott chinese products ?
12:03 AM on 07/01/2011
I have. I do buy from the legitimate government of Taiwan though.
02:11 PM on 06/30/2011
How can Mao arrest Stalin?