More

Missouri Disaster Aid: Governor Jay Nixon Pledges $100 Million More

Missouri Disaster Aid

By DAVID A. LIEB   07/ 1/11 07:15 PM ET   AP

JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. -- Tapping into better-than-expected state revenues, Missouri Gov. Jay Nixon pledged an additional $100 million in state disaster aid Friday following the deadly tornado in Joplin and continued flooding across the state.

The latest announcement raises Missouri's financial commitment to $150 million after a particularly devastating few months of natural disasters, but Nixon's budget director said that could rise even higher depending on the final cost of the damage and how much the federal government will pay.

"Sitting here today, we don't know if that $150 million will be adequate," said Linda Luebbering, the head of the governor's budget and planning office.

Despite lower than projected income and sales tax revenues, Missouri ended its 2011 fiscal year Thursday with 5.9 percent growth over the previous year and a cash balance of about $300 million, Luebbering said. The revenue growth was fueled primarily by a decline in tax refunds paid to individuals and businesses.

The governor previously announced he was designating $25 million in state aid for the Joplin tornado and $25 million for flooding in southeast Missouri. About 130,000 acres of fertile farmland and rural homes were swamped in early May after the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers blew up a Mississippi River levee on the Missouri side of the river to relieve flooding pressure on the nearby town of Cairo, Ill.

Luebbering said most of the additional money is needed because of the May 22 tornado that killed 156 people and destroyed about 8,000 homes and businesses in Joplin. But she said some could pay for flooding aid. Significant sections of rural northwest Missouri are underwater as result of flooding on the Missouri River, which is projected to continue for weeks and could eventually extend south toward the Kansas City area and into central Missouri.

Following major disasters, the federal government typically pays 75 percent of the cost to clean up debris, rebuild roads and public buildings and help families with various expenses, such as buying clothes or burying relatives who were killed by the storm. For the Joplin tornado, the federal government is covering 90 percent of the immediate debris removal costs, and Missouri has a request pending for full federal coverage.

But when disaster costs reach hundreds of millions – or billions – of dollars, even the comparatively small share paid by states and local governments can strain their budgets. That's particularly true in the current economy, which has forced state governments to trim payrolls and services over the past several years.

Missouri's 2012 budget, which took effect Friday, included just $1 million to match federal disaster aid. But because that $1 million was denoted as an estimate, Nixon is able to cite that as the spending authority for the $150 million he has pledged.

If disaster costs go much higher than that, Luebbering said the state may need to consider tapping its $500 million rainy day fund, which hasn't been used since widespread flooding in 1993. State officials generally have shied away from the fund because the Missouri Constitution requires any money to be repaid during the ensuing three fiscal years, which creates a short-term budget strain.

Senate President Pro Tem Rob Mayer, a former chairman of the chamber's appropriations committee, said he was pleased that Nixon was able to tap into the state's better-than-expected revenues to expand disaster aid.

"Anything to help the community of Joplin and these other cities that have been hit with flooding, I certainly am in favor it," said Mayer, a Republican whose southeast Missouri district was among those hardest hit by flooding earlier this spring.

The Missouri House and Senate each have created committees to study the state's disaster response and recommend whether a special legislative session is necessary.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. -- Tapping into better-than-expected state revenues, Missouri Gov. Jay Nixon pledged an additional $100 million in state disaster aid Friday following the deadly tornado in Joplin ...
JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. -- Tapping into better-than-expected state revenues, Missouri Gov. Jay Nixon pledged an additional $100 million in state disaster aid Friday following the deadly tornado in Joplin ...
Filed by Joanna Zelman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 16
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Brian Novotny
What happened to Democracy?
02:17 PM on 07/05/2011
Good luck and godspeed. I wish you all the best, and here is a thought for you to consider, why not rebuild it like they did in Greensboro, KS. Now that would be something you all could be proud of.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
jsgaetano
Semper Fidelis Tyrannosaurus!
10:57 PM on 07/02/2011
Just hope these welfare staters don't go begging for my tax dollars.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
BoudiccaBlanc
~Yes, my micro-bio is emply! ~
08:25 PM on 07/02/2011
I am in favor of giving people aid to relocate. The fewer people living in vulnerable areas; the better.
What I do not want to see is rebuilt homes that are flooded again and again because people refuse to move to higher ground.
09:03 PM on 07/03/2011
Increasingly, we are all going to be living in vulnerable areas.

These changes are global, and while some regions will be impacted more than others for obvious reasons, There will no longer be safe places to move away to. At least not for any long periods of time.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
Sunwyn Ravenwood
Farewell my friends, time to go...
04:46 AM on 07/04/2011
All areas may be vulnerable to something; tornadoes, fires, hurricanes, etc, but floods that damage property are easy to prevent. One: stop issuing government flood insurance. Two: forbid building any permanent structure in a flood zone that is not necessary, such as roads, bridges, docks, etc. Three: Find depressions along the rivers that can accommodate overflows, move out the people and turn the depressions back into wetlands, flooding the area when waters are high. Four: stop trying to use the same dams for flood protection and irrigation/hydroelectric power. For flood protection the reservoirs must be empty most of the year, for power and irrigation they must be full. You can have one or the other, not both.
ElDru
Just another New Yorker.
07:49 PM on 07/02/2011
I'm honestly surprised that Missouri elects so many Republicans that oppose government funds ("taxpayer dollars") from being used for natural disasters (anywhere, obviously they're going to support it for their own state). It shouldn't be a state's problem because whether you want to admit it or not, a disaster in one region of the country could affect other parts of the country. Farms were damaged in Missouri, which supply us with our food. Even without thinking about our food supply, I'd still want my taxes spent on assisting those that are affected by these natural disasters than being spent on unnecessary wars that kill innocent people.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Gottlieb
hated by left since 1973 and right since 1982
05:30 PM on 07/02/2011
Best wishes to all in Missouri. I don't think I could manage these disasters as well as you are doing.
03:30 PM on 07/02/2011
Reading some of the comments, I have to ask, could it be that repairing a city decimated by a horrific natural disaster isn't a political issue? Democrats and Republicans are not at fault here. What we must acknowledge, though, is that these storms will continue getting worse unless we start making some changes in the way we produce and use energy.
01:46 PM on 07/02/2011
Go Joplin Go!!!!!!!!!!!
12:27 AM on 07/02/2011
if Missouri didn't have a dem for Gov they would be totally F___ed
11:00 AM on 07/02/2011
As I see it most of our problem in Missouri is from the lack of proper planning by the Army Corp of Engineers. The Col. was appointed by our Democratic Commander in chief, Barack Obama. I find it very curious that letters of offers to buy the land that they flooded didn't get sent out until after it was under water....... MMMMMM I think I smell a rat floating in those flood waters.
photo
Watching rock grow
It's a practice in patience
12:45 PM on 07/02/2011
I bet you smell far more than an rat in those waters.
MarkJudiGoet
Diogenes was an optimist
11:40 PM on 07/01/2011
Kinda makes you wonder if these federal funds will be on the chopping block too. Let's see if they fit the bill, desperately needed: check, needed by middle class Americans: check, won't hurt big business if they're cut: check, ok they fit the bill, CUT EM.
10:49 AM on 07/02/2011
The funds discussed in the article are state funds, not federal. They are from an emergency fund that was voted on and paid for by the taxpayers of Missouri.
MarkJudiGoet
Diogenes was an optimist
12:33 PM on 07/02/2011
Bottom of the article," Following major disasters, the federal government typically pays".
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
clr1390
12:34 AM on 07/04/2011
The federal government will end up paying for most of it. If Eric Cantor had his way you would all be on your own. Your taxes would go up, up, and up..LOL Instead my tax dollars will pay for it.