More

Sage Grouse Lawsuit: Judge Rejects Government Bid To Delay Protections

Sage Grouse

By MATTHEW BROWN   07/ 1/11 08:24 PM ET   AP

BILLINGS, Mont. -- A federal judge has rejected the government's attempt to delay a lawsuit seeking protections for imperiled sage grouse across the West in a case with sweeping implications for grazing, oil and gas drilling, and residential construction.

With the order from Judge B. Lynn Winmill in Idaho, the 11-state sage grouse case is shaping up as an early test of an Obama administration proposal to settle endangered species claims on hundreds of plants and animals.

Among the most pivotal of those species is the greater sage grouse, a ground-dwelling game bird that has lost half of its once-vast range and also suffered from the deadly West Nile virus.

The Interior Department wants to prolong until 2015 its decision on whether the birds should receive Endangered Species Act protections. That's under a pending settlement with two wildlife advocacy groups in a separate federal court case in Washington, D.C.

However, Winmill said in his late Thursday ruling that a third group, Western Watersheds Project, can proceed with its lawsuit calling for more immediate measures to stop the bird's decline. Winmill turned down the government's request to suspend the case.

Federal officials decided in 2010 that sage grouse deserved protections. But the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service said other species took priority, relegating the birds to a long list of "candidates" for protection.

"We think we can do better than 2015," said Tom Woodbury, Western Watersheds' Montana director. "The scientists all agree that it's in danger of extinction and that things are only getting worse."

By putting off the decision on whether to give more protections, administration officials are buying time to avoid a threatened or endangered listing that could lead to prohibitions on grazing, limits to future drilling and possibly curbs on residential and commercial construction.

The government would use the next several years to boost struggling populations of the bird. During the last year, the U.S. Department of Agriculture has committed more than $70 million to conserve sagebrush landscapes and take other steps to protect grouse.

A lawyer for several farming groups attempting to intervene in the Idaho case said hitting industries with new restrictions to help the birds even more would be "the last thing we need with this economy."

"It really seems the intent of the environmental groups is to bring on a full listing of the species, which would result in grazing restrictions throughout the region," said Brandon Middleton with the Pacific Legal Foundation in Sacramento, Calif.

A chicken-sized bird known for its elaborate mating display, the greater sage grouse is found in Wyoming, Montana, Idaho, South Dakota, North Dakota Nevada, Utah, Washington, Oregon, eastern California, Nevada, Utah, western Colorado.

The Obama administration's proposed settlement with the two wildlife advocacy groups – the Center for Biological Diversity and WildEarth Guardians – would set timetables for the Fish and Wildlife Service to consider whether more protections are needed for sage grouse and 250 other plant and animal species. It still needs court approval.

Some of the species have been waiting on the candidate species list more than three decades for a decision.

Fish and Wildlife spokeswoman Vanessa Kaufmann declined to comment on the implications of the sage grouse case for the broader settlement.

The Center for Biological Diversity and WildEarth Guardians also are plaintiffs in the sage grouse case, although WildEarth Guardians has agreed to work with the government to dismiss the lawsuit.

The group's Nicole Rosmarino said a delay in the sage grouse decision was a concession her group had to make for the government to act on other species in need of protection.

"We very much wanted (sage grouse) listed, but looking at the whole list there are some candidates facing extinction right now," Rosmarino said. "There are tough choices involved."

The rift among the plaintiffs is similar to a recent court dispute over gray wolves. The Center for Biological Diversity was among groups that agreed to a government deal to take the predators off the endangered list, but WildEarth Guardians, Western Watersheds and others opposed the deal.

U.S. District Judge Donald Molloy in Missoula rejected the wolf settlement citing in part objections from the dissenting groups. Congress later stepped in and stripped the species of protection through legislation inserted into a federal budget bill by Western lawmakers.

FOLLOW HUFFPOST GREEN

BILLINGS, Mont. -- A federal judge has rejected the government's attempt to delay a lawsuit seeking protections for imperiled sage grouse across the West in a case with sweeping implications for grazi...
BILLINGS, Mont. -- A federal judge has rejected the government's attempt to delay a lawsuit seeking protections for imperiled sage grouse across the West in a case with sweeping implications for grazi...
Filed by Joanna Zelman  | 
 
 
  • Comments
  • 45
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Recency  | 
Popularity
photo
Evil Twin Rove
No struggle, no progress
09:14 AM on 07/06/2011
Good... a win for the good guys...

why would you delay protecting an animal that is endangered? Are they hoping by 2015 that maybe there won't be any left, and then there would not even be an issue at that point?
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
FrogLight316
09:15 AM on 07/03/2011
Maybe when we are all living in caves again there will be enough of these Sage Grouses to make a decent meal for our families.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:54 AM on 07/03/2011
All the comments seem to be about "big oil" etc... No one considers the affects of this decision on ranchers and farmers.... Just ask the farmers in California's Central Valley when the water that was used to irrigate their fields was cut off to protect the Delta Smelt, a two to three inch minnow. The west side of the Valley has thousands of acres of fallow farm land and in one area (Mendota) the unemployment rate is up to 40%. Just last month a judge refused to turn the pumps to the farms back on.....

I'd hate to see what would have happened when the dinosaurs were going extinct..... we'd have dinosaur preserves now if it were up to the extreme tree-huggers.
09:48 AM on 07/03/2011
To consider the farmers and ranchers would be to consider the biggest abusers of all. The below comments about oil should be appreciated. Between water use, ag. run off, land use per family, subsidies, illegal employment/out of country employment, farmers and ranchers are the worst. Clinging to old ways are killing these species and this economy.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
10:59 AM on 07/03/2011
Illegal employment can be dealt with using existing laws. Subsidies to farmers are done by the government, it isn't the farmers or ranchers that decide they can't grow crops or raise cattle on their land. And I don't think you'd feel the same about farmers and ranchers if there was to be a food shortage would you?
photo
Barbara DeZan
Knowledge is Power
08:40 PM on 07/04/2011
Well. if those farmers chose those locations, knowing they would have an affect on the wild like...and did it anyway...too bad.

Sell your land and move. The Government would probably gladly buy it for you so it could become protected.

Farmers, ranchers, cattlemen and others have nearly destroyed the wildlife in places where it exists. They been given full license to pillage nature everywhere.

This upsets the balance of nature, for sure. Ever wonder why wolves attack your cattle or bears are invading the suburban developments....and cougars attack joggers?

When you kill off predators and their prey, some other predator will come along..and will eat what they can catch.

Get over it. It's not 1850 anymore.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kaj74
Just because you say it, doesn't make it true!
07:58 AM on 07/03/2011
So we need to ruin more land and kill off more wild life for oil and gas companies? Seems like these would be great areas to start exploring newer, greener energy, like wind turbines, or solar panels. I'm sure I'm not the smartest one in the room and am not the first to come up with such an idea, but money talks....
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:27 AM on 07/03/2011
I noticed you made no reference to the ranchers and farmers that would be affected by this decision.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kaj74
Just because you say it, doesn't make it true!
08:56 AM on 07/03/2011
First of all, if you have something constructive to add, please do so, don't take umbrage with me not being as descriptive in my itemization as you may like. But while we are on the topic, do farmers not use land? Do ranchers not raise wild life? Secondly, perhaps you are unaware that the Federal Government owns large swaths of land in the west (especially Montana) that are currently unpopulated by individuals, and these are the areas they will be looking to explore for resources and although the Government wouldn't be usurping individuals from their land to exploit said resources, any "accidents" would effect said individuals. Thus the reason why I suggested green and renewable energy. But hey, if you take exception to my suggestion, fine, drill baby drill, I'm on the East Coast, no oil in my yard.
D-Driller
my micro-bio is empty
08:44 AM on 07/03/2011
Two things to consider. 1. Grazing will be affected. If you make the argument that a lot of this land really shouldn't be grazed since it is basically a desert, I agree, but just making the point 2. Wind turbines take up as much or more pad space as drilling locations. Since there are multiple turbines p/square mile, they also need more roads to service. 3. Have you seen the amount of ground the solar panels take up out at DIA? They power 1/2 of the trains, let alone the other half, and don't even touch the power needs for lights, heat/AC, systems power, etc. These areas are not well suited for the green energy you mentioned, assuming you believe that the apparent need for grouse protection supercedes the need for energy here in the West.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kaj74
Just because you say it, doesn't make it true!
09:11 AM on 07/03/2011
The first thing I would like to say is thank you for forming a coherent, multi-sentenced response. As I replied to the one sentence genius who replied before you, there are large swaths of land owned by the Federal Government uninhabited in the Western States, these are the areas they will be exploring for resources.
It's not so much the protection of the grouse itself that is worrisome, but the interruption of the food chain that should be of concern. Also, although not the most beautiful of scenery, turbines and solar panels would do a lot less damage ecologically to the land and water surrounding it unlike fracking or oil production accidents.
I understand that the energy production of turbines and solar panels may not meet all the current power needs, but that doesn't mean we should to throw the idea out, but work on it to make it what we need.
niko73
Dem belly full but we hungry
07:03 PM on 07/02/2011
This thread tells the story of the Huffington Post clientele. Here we gave THE biggest "Green" issue in 11 western states and there are whole 7 comments. This website is filled with city slickers from the coasts. In the Green section, animal rights and climate change articles see thousands of comments, but the issues most pressing to MT, ID, CO, WY, NV, UT, NM get no attention. Good thing we have High Country News!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
kaj74
Just because you say it, doesn't make it true!
08:04 AM on 07/03/2011
I do have to agree with you, your dilemmas, unless grandeur in scale (yellow stone oil leak, NM wild fires close to breaching nuke plant,etc..) don't get the national attention they deserve, but please don't believe we don't care, we are, after all, one nation. And I'm a city slicker from the coast...lol..the East coast to be exact....gl to you!
niko73
Dem belly full but we hungry
06:24 PM on 07/03/2011
I'm no so bothered by it, mostly just making an observation of how detached most Americans are from western resource issues. But I hope more easterners like you get educated on western issues. Educated people tend to see the complexities of the issues, seeing things in shades of gray rather than black and white. IMO this keeps people out of the extremes and into reasonable moderation.
D-Driller
my micro-bio is empty
08:59 AM on 07/03/2011
I think it is an issue, not the "biggest" issue. Water distribution, flooding, drought, the wolf problem, city expansion, safe natural gas development - those are much more pressing than grouse habitat. The issue here is multiple-use, and will effect all of us in the West. To deny multiple-use of a large swath of land in 11 Western States due to the disruption of grouse habitat is lunacy. I agree with you, however, on the fact many of the respondents on here are from both coasts, and seem to have quite the opinion on how we should do things out here. Everyone should have an opinion, but I feel it should be an informed opinion, whether pro or con, and I don't think someone from out of area can have such an opinion.
niko73
Dem belly full but we hungry
06:10 PM on 07/03/2011
I'd agree that water--and related flooding and drought--is probably the biggest issue in the west. But wolves? The only "problem" regarding wolves is the extremists on both sides; one extreme which wants every wolf exterminated and the other which wants wolves everywhere. Neither one is a realistic and as long as they're drowned out by moderation and science, we'll be okay. I don't think it's a big deal if it's a bit harder for a hunter to bag an elk or a rancher has to do some wolf mitigation, and I don't think it's a big deal if a few hundred wolves are killed by hunters every year either.

Natural gas is an important part of our energy portfolio but we must insist companies spend the money to do it right. I'd put energy development right up there with water and sage-grouse as the three biggest issues in the west. City expansion is right up there as well. I agree about denying "multiple use" in all sage-grouse habitat, which is why it's such a big issue. If the bird is listed, that's exactly what could happen. All land owners, whether federal, private or state, need to do all they can to avoid a listing.

Anyway, cheers to the west, which I will never leave.
niko73
Dem belly full but we hungry
09:14 PM on 07/03/2011
My biggest western issues are very close to yours, Driller.

1. Water (droughts, floods, distribution)
2. Energy development
3. Sage-grouse/sagebrush habitat
4. Expanding/increasing recreation demands
5. Sprawl/urban expansion

I agree about putting huge swaths of sage-grouse habitat off limits to all uses. But that's exactly what could happen if the bird gets listed. That's why it's such a critical issue. All land owners--federal, private, state--are pouring a lot of resources into the problem to ensure this doesn't happen.

The only issue I disagree with is the wolf. First of all, it only affects a few states (ID, MT, WY, NM) and very few people. Secondly, I feel the only ones really yelling are the extremists. One side wants every wolf exterminated and the other wants to see wolves absolutely everywhere. Neither position is realistic. As long as policy makers stay away from the extremes and use reason and science, we should be okay. I really don't think it's a big deal if elk herds decline a bit or ranchers have to modify their operations for wolves. I also don't think it's a big deal for wolf populations to be controlled via hunting. I think when you drown out the two extremes screaming at each other, wolves really aren't a big issue.

Anyway, here's to the west. I will never leave. Let's keep it a secret, cause the fewer people the better. ;-)
photo
Deep Thinking Man
Always Remember, A Wet Bird Never Flies At Night !
06:01 PM on 07/02/2011
how bout we declare "open season" on idiot judges, politicians, coporations, and banks ???...i'm game
photo
Evil Twin Rove
No struggle, no progress
09:15 AM on 07/06/2011
as long as we can also declare open season on idiot people making comments
photo
Deep Thinking Man
Always Remember, A Wet Bird Never Flies At Night !
04:30 PM on 07/06/2011
ETR,
if you're not talking about my comment...yes we can !!!!
photo
Moose Luck 99
Rand Paul is a LIAR!
09:29 PM on 07/01/2011
What if sage grouse could eat hemp seeds?

Hemp BIO-ENERGY
Hemp 6X more BTUS than Corn
Hemp uses less water no herbicides and little pesticides and fertilizer.

Subbituminous coal is common in the US. It has an energy content of about 18 million Btu per ton, and is used mostly in coal-fired power plants

Coal generates about half of the electricity used in the United States. ... Each person in the United States uses 3.8 tons of coal each year.

Some 965 million tons of coal were consumed for the generation of electricity. This amounted to 86% of total U.S. coal production

U.S. soybeans 76.6 million acres

U.S. corn 90 million acres

Half of the acres 83.3 million acres

Hemp yields an average of nine dry tons per acre
(more in southern areas)

749 million tons hemp fiber

Bio-diesel Hempoline can be made from leaves and stalks.

You would also have the hemp seeds as a food source too.

U.S. annual anhydrous ammonia 22.90 million tons used.

U.S. ROUND-UP use100 million pounds
Contaminated with 1,4 dioxane

HERO-INSECTIDE SYNGENTA INSECTICIDE Soybeans and corn

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M-0XEQP3igk
D-Driller
my micro-bio is empty
09:02 AM on 07/03/2011
What is the btu content of hemp versus coal? You started to equate the two, it seemed, but never completed the thought?
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:40 PM on 07/01/2011
It's kinda hard to put a bird on the esl when they have a season allotted to it for bird hunters.

They are quite tasty too.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
olitenup
06:58 PM on 07/01/2011
"A federal judge has rejected the government's attempt to delay a lawsuit seeking protections for imperiled sage grouse across 11 Western states in a case with..

sweeping opportunities for more greed, greed, greed.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
08:29 AM on 07/03/2011
Sure because ranchers are so insidious.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
olitenup
09:47 AM on 07/03/2011
Yes, for quite some time.

Here is something from 1998. http://www.kbrhorse.net/news/hrskil01.html

And here is from this past week, http://www.8newsnow.com/category/28259/8-news-now-video?clipId=6009322&autostart=true
03:21 PM on 07/01/2011
The Obama Adminstration has been an utter disgrace with respect to animal rights, and this is yet more evidence of that. They want to do whatever is necessary to get their corporate masters what they want, which is more profits - at the cost of killing off yet more species. First, Obama sold out the grey wolf - an utter disgrace. Now, they want to do away with the Sage Grouse so their energy overlords can further rape the land and pollute the water in the name of more profits. Clean energy initiatives? Not if your'e Obama. With him, it's all talk as it is with everything else.
niko73
Dem belly full but we hungry
03:43 PM on 07/01/2011
No "clean energy initiatives?" You must not live anywhere near these states or you would see that wind turbines are going up faster than ever before. There are wind farm applications backlogged in WY, ID, CA, NV, UT and NV. They can't put them up fast enough, and this is partly because of Obama administration incentives.

Additionally, wind and solar farms impact sage-grouse habitat more than oil and gas wells. That kind of development renders the habitat completely unusable by the bird. You don't actually think clean energy doesn't have any environmental impacts, do you?

How does that fit into your black and white world?

I'm all for clean energy. But I'm also for educating yourself on energy development and wildlife biology.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
05:05 PM on 07/01/2011
all true. local solar and efficiency upgrades sited in the built environment don't slaughter wildlife or its habitat - perhaps we could start gushing taxpayer cash towards ourselves for these installations instead of Chevron (including Chevron Solar) and BP (including BP Wind)!
photo
Evil Twin Rove
No struggle, no progress
09:17 AM on 07/06/2011
it's true... the D's are just as corrupt and bought off as the R's... however the D's try to mask it a little more while the R's do it in the open and don't care what people think of it...

it is really a system problem, rather than either of the parties