More

Casey Anthony Trial: Guilty or Innocent? You Be The 13th Juror (POLL)

Casey Anthony Trial

First Posted: 07/03/11 02:29 PM ET Updated: 09/02/11 06:12 AM ET

ORLANDO, Fla. -- For 32 days, a jury has sat and listened to more than 200 hours of testimony in the case of the State of Florida vs. Casey Anthony.

It will be up to those 12 men and women to determine Anthony's level, if any, of guilt.

(What's Your Take? Vote In The Poll Below)

"Did the defense team save her from death? Probably. Did they save her from a murder one conviction? Maybe," famed Seattle attorney and legal analyst Anne Bremner said in an interview with The Huffington Post.

But in Bremner's opinion, it's far less clear whether Anthony might be found guilty of a lesser charge.

The question of who did a better job of proving their case -- the prosecution or the defense -- is far from cut and dry. Both sides raised compelling issues, which could take the jury several days to wade through.

From the start of the trial, the defense insisted Caylee's death was an accident. The 2-year-old "died on June 16, 2008, when she drowned in her family's swimming pool," Anthony's attorney, Jose Baez saidl.

Up until Baez's shocking opening statements, Casey Anthony had claimed her daughter was abducted by a babysitter. Multiple searches were conducted and, in December 2008, a former Orange County meter reader named Roy Kronk found Caylee's remains near her family home.

Prosecutors dismissed the defense's explanation and claimed Anthony killed her child by placing duct tape over her mouth. The remains were then kept in the trunk of Anthony's car for a period of time before being transported to the wooded area where they were recovered, the prosecution alleges.

Caylee's death allowed Casey Anthony to "live the good life," Assistant State Attorney Linda Drane Burdick said in court. 

To add credence to their claim, prosecutors called a slew of witnesses, including Casey Anthony's former friends and lovers.

One by one they told jurors how the then-22-year-old mother had entered a "Hot Body" contest, got a tattoo, went on a shopping spree and showed no signs of anxiety or depression just four days after the date her lawyer claimed her daughter had drowned.

While the prosecution appeared to do a good job assassinating Anthony's character, their witnesses did not describe her as a bad mother. Most, in fact, said she was a good mother and that her daughter never appeared to be abused or malnourished.

A Heartless, Cold-Blooded Killer?

Defense witness Dr. Sally Karioth, a Florida State University professor and grief expert, testified that everyone handles grief differently, and young adults are typically "reluctant grievers" who tend to drink or spend money they don't have, something she referred to as "retail therapy."

"Denial is a great tool for as long as you can make yourself believe it," Karioth said.

A key witness called by the prosecution was Simon Birch, the former manager of Johnson's Wrecker, the Orlando towing company that impounded Anthony's Pontiac Sunfire on June 30, 2008 -- roughly two weeks after her daughter died.

Birch delivered some explosive testimony when he described inspecting the vehicle four or five days after it was impounded.

"It was an odor consistent to what I have smelled in the past when it comes to decomposition," said Birch, who claimed to have been exposed to deceased bodies in the past. "The instant flash in my mind was, 'Whoa, I know what that smell is,'" Birch said.

Caylee was last seen alive on June 16, 2008. Her disappearance was reported on July 15, 2008, the same day Casey Anthony's parents, Cindy and George Anthony, retrieved their daughter's car from Johnson's Wrecker.

In infamous 911 calls, Cindy Anthony said it "smells like there's been a dead body in the damn car."

On the witness stand, George Anthony offered his own ornamental details about retrieving his daughter's vehicle. A former police detective, Anthony acknowledged he had smelled a "pretty strong odor" when he picked up the car. He testified that he was afraid of what he might find in the trunk of the vehicle and thought, "Please God, don't let this be my Casey or my Caylee [in the trunk]," he testified.

Day 11 brought Dr. Arpad Vass to the stand. A researcher at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Vass said he used a gas chromatograph mass spectrometer to analyze air samples taken from the trunk of Casey Anthony's Pontiac Sunfire. Vass said he found signs of human decomposition and a "shockingly high" level of chloroform.

Dr. Michael Rickenbach, a forensic chemist examiner for the FBI, later confirmed his analysis of the trunk liner from Casey Anthony's car and found residue of chloroform, but he also said traces of the chemical can be found in some household items.

It was also alleged by FBI forensic scientist Karen Lowe that a hair found in the trunk of Anthony's Pontiac Sunfire was consistent with hair from a dead body.

Trunk-related testimony continued on day 16, when Dr. Neal Haskell, an expert on insects, testified he found flies related to decomposition in the trunk of Anthony's car.

One Hair, One Bug, One Odor Equals Murder?

Defense witness Heather Seubert, an expert in blood serum and bodily fluids who worked for the FBI, said that she examined several key pieces of evidence, including swabs taken from items in the trunk of Anthony's car.

"All of those items were tested [for the presence of blood] and were negative," the expert testified.

In an effort to refute Haskell's insect testimony, Dr. Timothy Huntington, an assistant professor of biology from Concordia University and a forensic entomology consultant, was called to the stand by the defense.

Huntington said he inspected the same evidence that was reviewed by Haskell and only found one blow fly leg - suggesting a body did not decompose inside the trunk. The defense entomologist also pointed to research he conducted in September 2010, in which he put dead pigs into the trunks of cars to observe the decomposition process. He noted there was a large amount of fluid left inside the vehicles by the decomposing pigs, but no such stain was not found in Anthony's vehicle.

And what of the air tests? According to Dr. Barry Logan, a chemistry director at NMS Labs, in Pennsylvania, Vass' tests "lacked organization and planning." He said they were "poorly documented, and did not follow even minimal standards of quality control."

Logan also said chloroform is a byproduct of chlorinated swimming pool water.

Who Googled Chloroform?

There was a lot of time during the trial devoted to forensic searches of computers taken from the Anthony family home; specifically, there was digital information that allegedly shows someone conducted several suspicious searches on Wikipedia and other sites. Searched terms included the words "chloroform," "death" and "internal bleeding."

John Bradley, owner of SiQuest -- a Canadian software company that developed the program used by the Orange County Sheriff's Office -- testified he was asked to review evidence allegedly found in the Internet browsing history of the Anthony family's computer.

Bradley said he confirmed someone had used Google to conduct a search for the keyword "chloroform" on March 17, 2008. Bradley testified that other searches, conducted at Wikipedia, included "chloroform," "hand to hand combat," "inhalation," "chest trauma" and "ruptured spleen."

On March 21, 2008, someone used the computer to search for "how to make chloroform," according to Bradley.

Bradley said he also found searches on the computer for "making weapons of household products" and "neck breaking."

The computer searches were a key piece of evidence for prosecutors -- a virtual nail in Casey Anthony's coffin.

WATCH: (STORY CONTINUES BELOW VIDEO)


However, Anthony's mother made a shocking revelation in court on Day 25, when she testified that she, not Casey, had conducted Internet searches for "chloroform" in March 2008.

Cindy Anthony explained she conducted the computer searches in an attempt to figure out why her Yorkshire terrier was "extremely tired all the time." Anthony also told defense attorney Jose Baez that she conducted searches for "chest injuries" and "head injuries" around that same time because a friend of hers had been in a car accident.

But did she? No, according prosecutors, who during rebuttal, presented evidence that Anthony was at work the day the searches were conducted. The revelation could prove to be highly damaging to the defense and could be seen as a misguided attempt by Cindy Anthony to protect her daughter.

Finding Caylee

Roy Kronk, the Orange County meter reader who discovered Caylee's remains on December 11, 2008, described finding the child's remains.

Kronk said he first went into the woods off Suburban drive on Aug. 11, 2008, to use the bathroom. While in the woods, Kronk said he spotted something that looked like a skull. He said he contacted authorities on three separate occasions in August, but they did nothing to retrieve the item.

When he went back to the woods on December 11, Kronk testified he took his meter reader stick and used it to lift the skull up. It was then that he realized what it was and was horrified, he testified.

Kronk's estranged son, Brandon Sparks, was also called by the defense.

A member of the U.S. Coast Guard, Sparks said he was in contact with his father in November 2008 and that he told him he had found Caylee's skull and was going to be rich. This would have been roughly one month before Caylee's remains were announced to have been found.

The autopsy on Caylee's remains was conducted by Dr. Jan Garavaglia.

Garavaglia testified that she had ruled Caylee's death as a homicide because of the delay in reporting her missing, the fact that the body was hidden in a wooded area, and the discovery of duct tape near the skull.

The medical examiner did, however, admit that she could not determine a cause of death and was unable to find any sign of trauma on the remains.

FBI agent Elizabeth Fontaine testified that she was unable to find fingerprints on the duct tape that was found on the skull, but did say she found the outline of a heart. Fontaine's testimony was an introduction to that of Alina Burroughs, a crime scene investigator from the Orange County Sheriff's Office.

Burroughs testified that several books of heart-shaped stickers were found either in Casey Anthony's or Caylee's room.

Lorie Gottesman, a forensic document examiner for the FBI, testified for the defense that she did not find any evidence of a sticker or sticker residue on duct tape that was found near Caylee's remains.

In regard to the autopsy, the defense called Dr. Werner Spitz, a well-known forensic pathologist who had conducted autopsies on Nicole Brown-Simpson and JonBenet Ramsey.

Spitz said the initial autopsy on Caylee was "shoddy" because Caylee's skull was not opened up. "You need to examine the whole body in an autopsy," he said. Spitz testified that he was unable to determine a manner of death and said he believed the duct tape found on Caylee's skull was placed there after her body decomposed. If the tape had been on her skin, there would have been DNA on the tape, Spitz said.

Homicide or Accident?

Casey Anthony's mother made yet another startling revelation on the witness stand when she testified a ladder had been left leaning against the family swimming pool on the day defense attorneys say her granddaughter drowned.

"I thought it was strange ... I called [my husband], George, at work to see if he had left the pool ladder up because I also noticed that the side gate was open," Anthony testified.

According to Baez, Casey Anthony and her father, George Anthony, were home alone on the day the alleged accident occurred. The attorney said that in the early hours of June 16, George noticed Caylee was missing and that he and his daughter began a frantic search -- looking under beds and in the garage. Then George Anthony took the search outside, to the above-ground pool, Baez said.

"As Casey came around the corner [of the pool], she saw George Anthony holding Caylee in his arms," the defense attorney told the jury. "She immediately grabbed Caylee and began to cry. Shortly thereafter, George began to yell at her: 'Look what you've done. Your mother will never forgive you, and you will go to jail for child neglect for the rest of your frigging life.'"

George Anthony has denied knowledge of Caylee's death and testified that he did not dispose of his granddaughter's body. He has also denied molesting his daughter, something Baez accused him of during Day 1.

"It all began when Casey was 8 years old and her father came into her room and began to touch her inappropriately and it escalated ... She could be 14 years old, have [had] her father's penis in her mouth, and go to school and play with the other kids as if nothing [had] happened," Baez said.

During the trial Baez attacked George Anthony's character. The defense attorney questioned him about a suicide attempt and also called his alleged mistress to the stand. Anthony admitted attempting suicide but denied the affair.

But what about Caylee? Why the cover-up? According to Baez, the alleged sexual abuse, as well as Anthony's "incredibly dysfunctional" family life, was to blame.

But is it believable? Only one person knows, and she is not talking. When the defense rested their case Thursday, Casey Anthony told Judge Belvin Perry that she did not wish to testify.

"The prosecution is clearly ahead," Bremner said. "But ahead of what and to what end? Had the defense presented evidence of a drowning and of abuse, this could have been a horse race. Don't get me wrong, I would never say that the defense has any burden of proof. But once they make material evidentiary assertions, they better have the evidence. Had they, they could have been contenders."

Since there is not a defense per se, the defense will have to fall back on reasonable doubt, according to Bremner.

"They have raised a number of issues. Enough to keep the world on the edge of their seats. Was it to see if Casey would testify? Or was it a true query about whether she really did it? I think the true issue is whether this was an accident or intentional murder. And there is no evidence of a cause of death."

The veteran attorney added: "And will there ever be justice for Caylee or Casey, for that matter?"

Be The Thirteenth Juror

Quick Poll

Is Casey Anthony Guilty or Innocent?

She is guilty of murder

She is guilty of a lesser charge

She is not guilty

FOLLOW HUFFPOST CRIME

ORLANDO, Fla. -- For 32 days, a jury has sat and listened to more than 200 hours of testimony in the case of the State of Florida vs. Casey Anthony. It will be up to those 12 men and women to dete...
ORLANDO, Fla. -- For 32 days, a jury has sat and listened to more than 200 hours of testimony in the case of the State of Florida vs. Casey Anthony. It will be up to those 12 men and women to dete...
 
 
  • Comments
  • 2,514
  • Pending Comments
  • 0
  • View FAQ
Comments are closed for this entry
View All
Favorites
Bloggers
Recency  | 
Popularity
Page: 1 2 3 4 5  Next ›  Last »  (56 total)
09:41 AM on 07/14/2011
I saw the trial. I would have definitely convicted her on child neglect resulting in death. But that charge wasn't on the indictment. Which is why the jury acquitted her. All three top charges were based on Casey taking some kind of action resulting in Caylee's death. I believe Casey's lack of action led to Caylee's death, and she wasn't charged with that. I saw a lot of red flags and think there is much more to this story than anybody realizes, that started long before Caylee was even born.
06:38 PM on 07/14/2011
being the mother she had an obligation to act = at least felony homicide
11:46 PM on 07/12/2011
Casey will go back to jail when they find Caylee's body.
Jurors will like that prosecutors to bring photos of Caylee's body in court only.
They will make a decision - Casey is quilty of murder period.
02:55 AM on 07/13/2011
They found her remains! Apparently, you aren't keeping up!
12:36 PM on 07/13/2011
and its called double jeopardy she cant go to trial for the same case anymore....
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
000005
I am always right!
03:16 PM on 07/13/2011
Ha! I am not surprised. So many people here are posting defending Casey Anthony as if they watched the trial and saw what we saw.
10:16 PM on 07/12/2011
I've seen young irresponsible young single Moms living with their parents. What a pretty room Caylee had in her grandparents home. How long would it take those loving grandparents to report their granddaughter never came home? It doesn't make sense, does it? Somebody knew something other than Caylee. I think it was a manslaughter cover that led to many mistakes. I don't know that. That's the point. Why do we have a jury? So, mobs with emotional rage do not take the law in their own hands. The jury did their job. I think the court is smart enough to give the wrong date of when Casey gets released. That may be why no one can see her. She's not there. Mamasilverhair is right. When things are overwhelming, you can disassociate completely and keep it out of your mind. That's the way people cope when they can't cope. Then, people say, "You didn't give a damn"
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Barry Clarke
Retired Air Traffic Control Aviation Meteorologist
09:50 PM on 07/12/2011
I think that more likely than not she is a murdeerr. But, the states attorney could not say how this little girl died. Without this one piece of evidence, how can you convict someone of this crime? Just because the media said that she did it, does not mean that beyond a REASONABLE doubt, she is guilty of murder. I cannot see how you can hold the jurors responsible when there is evidence missing that would prove guilt.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
000005
I am always right!
03:18 PM on 07/13/2011
You didn't know that HOW she died is not needed in order to convict?????

Why not inform yourself before you post.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Barry Clarke
Retired Air Traffic Control Aviation Meteorologist
12:56 PM on 07/14/2011
I have been following this and comments from attorneys and forum stated that this is the reason why she was found not guilty. I am informed and if your reading level is beyond a 8th grade level, I asked how could you find a person guilty of murder beyond a reasonble doubt.....Another point to ponder, it cost nothing to be nice and a sarcastic fool will always be on the short end a conversation
03:35 PM on 07/14/2011
I understand what you are saying and I also followed this thoroughlly. Have you thought of this, she was the last one Caylee was seen with, she was her mother and her responsibility. The child is dead, no matter how or why! I do not see without definite evidence they should have given the death penalty, but she should have been held responsible in some lawful way. This sends a terribly bad example across the world. How many other Caylee's will we loose because she has not been held responsible at all. Also in some eyes she is and will be rewarded greatly at her daughters expense!
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Barry Clarke
Retired Air Traffic Control Aviation Meteorologist
10:43 AM on 07/15/2011
As I said, I think that more likely than not she is a murder. Sure, I have thought of all those things that you have mention and more. But, with our system of laws, beyond a REASONABLE doubt sometimes is not that hard to prove with a competent attorney. And that one piece of evidence that was missing was how did she die and her attorney went after this with a vengeance? Then your are looking to place that doubt in at least one jurors head for a hung jury and everyone’s head for an acquittal. Think back on OJ and the glove?
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mamasilverhair
,egalitarian, humanitarian,believer
09:00 PM on 07/12/2011
Those are close odds up there. I don't find evidence of murder. I find evidence of denial. I bet she might of spent time blissfully unaware of ever having a daughter. When bad things happen sometimes you just forget. Unless some one reminds you or a incident comes along that you can't "fake". It is a strange mental coping mechanism. But having experienced it a few times, to remember months...years later...I can see how this might of happened.
I know she could of murdered her daughter. But... there is no proof really.
08:43 PM on 07/12/2011
Guilty/Not Guilty!!!!!!!!

OK Casey was brought to trial and well the verdict wasn't what everyone wanted and well such is life. OK, there was not enough concrete evidence to charge her which means the Prosecution office DROPPED the ball. If the jurors couldn't come up with a guilty verdict because of lack of concrete proof/evidence then she can not be proven guilty. Yes it sucks that everyone is mad that she was proven innocent by a judicial system that is how this country works. OK, so maybe she is innocent so I guess people would rather have an innocent person in jail for closure. Look we might not ever know the truth but there are 3 sides to every story and the truth will come out one way and the answer might be very shocking. My feeling is that Casey's dad had something to do with it but that is my gut call. OK let the hate mail begin.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
mamasilverhair
,egalitarian, humanitarian,believer
09:03 PM on 07/12/2011
None from me. I don't agree, think it was a accident. Awful one, and I think she might of "snapped" don't know why they didn't just say so... But hey my theory is as good as yours... The world will never know. None of us, only that woman knows. and God.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
000005
I am always right!
03:23 PM on 07/13/2011
How can it be an accident when she was searching for how to kill someone; how to break a neck, how to make weapons with household items, etc. If this was an accident, she would have been scared and would've been in hiding. She had a huge fight with Cindy the night before and since Casey is a spiteful b****t (her words) she wanted to hurt Cindy by outing Caylee. You don't make an accident look like homicide. Also, what about the syringes that were found next to Caylee's remains?
Looks like you did NOT watch the trial either.
09:50 PM on 07/12/2011
Correction!!! She WAS NOT PROVEN INNOCENT< SHE WAS PROVEN NOT GUILTY FOR LACK OF EVIDENCE!!!! She WAS AND IS GUILTY OF THE DISAPPERANCE OF THAT CHILD!!!
09:23 AM on 07/13/2011
She was proven Not Guilty which means she is Innocent!!!!! The evidence they had was not good enough to prove if she was Guilty. The opposite of Guilty is Innocent. WOW because the verdict didn't come out how you wanted it to so that means you are right and everyone who doesn't agree with you is wrong. Again if the evidence doesnt show that she was guilty it means the prosecution dropped the ball or just maybe she didnt do it. I wasnt in Florida when the accident happened and unless you or anyone else can give me proof like DNA or a video or a picture of her doing the killing then again she was found NOT GUILTY!!!!!
08:21 PM on 07/12/2011
I certainly respect the decision of the jury, I do disagree with it though. I think it is a sad commentary that a juror felt the need to flee the state. I am one that did follow the case from the time an Amber Alert was issued. I do think there was enough circumstantial evidence for a conviction but I believe the jury used "beyond a shadow of doubt" rather than "reasonable doubt".
I am very curious about the video tape of when Casey was informed her daughters remains had been found. As I recall, the prosecution could not introduce it as evidence as it's viewing may have precluded Ms. Anthony from receiving a fair trial. It will be interesting to see if Ms Anthony obtains the cremains of that precious little girl.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
000005
I am always right!
03:41 PM on 07/13/2011
You are so wrong. There was plenty of evidence. Is 200 pieces of evidence enough for you??? The problem is that the jurors were lazy. They had no questions, they had to eat lunch and read the jury instructions which were around 300 pages. They did all that and deliberate in less than11 hours?? Experts have said that in a trial like this one they expected the jurors to return with a verdict in 4 days (more or less) - The other problem is that the jury wanted to hear how Caylee died and they do not need to know how she died in order to convict. This is why this is so disturbing -- why didn't they know this? Were they assuming that the jurors would know this??
05:34 PM on 07/14/2011
You read my post incorrectly. I most certainly believe she is guilty and should have been convicted! While it is not my place to be critical of the jury,one of the juries I served on was a simple assault case with seven hours of testimony and it took us five hours to deliberate!
photo
KC-CAJUN
Nobody goes there anymore--it's too crowded. -YB
07:33 PM on 07/12/2011
The evidence was too circumstantial. But they had no problem believing that George was behind it all, even though there wasn't even a shred of evidence that he was.

If the jury would have come out and said that they could not convict her because of the possibility that it may have been an accident, even a heinous one like too much chloroform, then I believe most people would have agreed. It's all the crazy reasons for the acquittal that are angering everyone.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
glss666
Proud Patriot
06:27 PM on 07/12/2011
"Miss Crazy" is a proven pathlogical liar? She lies every time she opens her big mouth. Yet, the dumb jury chose to believe the vicious stories she told about her Dad/Brother and Mom. Just because "Miss Crazy" is dysfunctional does not mean her whole family is. The jury refused to use their own intelligence (if, in fact, they had any). What else, short of watching the murder in real time, did this jury need? And, the pompous attorney, Baez, should be the one in hiding. He is a disgrace to his profession.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
000005
I am always right!
03:43 PM on 07/13/2011
Fanned.
05:43 PM on 07/12/2011
Too bad the jury didn't see fit to examine any of the 300 pieces of evidence or
deliberate more than 11 hours - oh yes - someone had a cruise. I almost forgot.
This case was lost in jury selection. How could twelve people have so little imagination?
Or determination to even think about the facts. They heard Baez's bombastic opening
comments (with zero supporting evidence) and it stuck in their wee tiny minds.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
Pamela Lakes Collins
12:53 AM on 07/14/2011
You hit the nail on the head. Fanned and faved.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
000005
I am always right!
01:53 PM on 07/14/2011
Fanned.
05:25 PM on 07/12/2011
Are the 12 jurors part of the16.9% that voted "Not Guilty" on this poll?? *sarcasm*
04:25 PM on 07/12/2011
Casey Anthony will never be a free woman. And when she eventually passes on, there is a much bigger and more final court waiting for her. "Justice is mine" said the Lord. And Mr.Baez will also face his maker. Lets see him lie and connive himself out of this one.

Parents be aware: Teach your children how important life is and raise them in a strict and spiritual life with truth, integrity, love and responsibility. Narcississum is one the the fastest growing problems in our society. Don't ever let your children be the elephant in the room that everyone tiptoes around.

Lee should write a book and tell the truth about what happened the night before little Caylee disappeared. We are only as sick as our secrets. God help Cindy, George and Lee. Get some help. And Casey, throw yourself at the feet of your maker, admit your lies, everyone of them (read the 8th and 9th step of any 12 step program,) and beg your God for forgiveness, then turn yourself into the closest police department and take responsibility for your actions, probably for the first time in your life, May God have mercy on your sorry, sick soul. You will never be a free woman again. Was it worth it for 30 days? Hmm. You have destroyed EVERYONE you came in contact with and will continue to. DO THE RIGHT THING!
05:13 PM on 07/12/2011
Since you are proclaiming her guilty of murder, I would like to know what your evidence is? First answer how she was killed? What proof do you have that Casey did it? Not reporting it for 31 days can be and has been explained away in other cases similar to this as the person being in denial. Her partying - Same thing. Wht you heard on TV, read in the newspapers do not count. Go back and read every news item in print you can find, I will bet you that if you will look toward bias, they all had her guilty and presented the stories that way.
This user has chosen to opt out of the Badges program
photo
glss666
Proud Patriot
06:35 PM on 07/12/2011
God gave us a brain and a conscience so we would be able to make the right decision. He didn't say we should have to WITNESS an act in order to figure out the truth. Of course, some people were a bit short-changed in the brain/reasoning department and are always wanting "more proof". So sad it was this group that the defense found and put on the jury.
photo
KC-CAJUN
Nobody goes there anymore--it's too crowded. -YB
07:39 PM on 07/12/2011
I never heard of a child dying by accident and then the parent covering up the accident by stuffing the child in plastic bags and dumping her in the woods. And then NEVER reporting it. Yes, it was reported 31 days later but not by the mother--the mom was spreading the story around about a rich boyfriend and moving to Europe.

And then while you're sitting in jail, you still don't fess up to the "accident" and let the whole world look for your child for another 5 months...while the poor soul withers away in a swamp in the woods.

Evidence.
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
neuticles
04:19 PM on 07/12/2011
well golly gee- i bet all of this is because the media hyped the
story and crammed it down our throats non stop for days on
end. its a shame the thoudands of other murders in this country
dont get the same non-stop brainwashing coverage.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
000005
I am always right!
03:49 PM on 07/13/2011
Dumb comment. The jury was inept and lazy that's why we have a Baby Killer being set free.
The media has nothing to do with the fact the the jurors had no interest in the case. If you had watched the trial you would be upset too.
11:05 AM on 07/14/2011
neuticles,they had no brains to wash.Their interviews so far confirm this.
photo
HUFFPOST SUPER USER
wtilton67
04:18 PM on 07/12/2011
There are so many people that will be negative without even reading everything that is written and trying to u/s why the jury had to find her not guilty. I am only saying Not Guilty because of the Law. I feel sorry for the jurors that had to make the decision that they made. It is really easy for everyone to sit back and say GUILTY, but when a person sits on a jury they have to actually do something that is difficult to do and especially in a case like this one. They have to do the right thing as it is spelled out by the proverbial "Letter of the Law" They have a sense of duty that makes them more aware of the evidence and a keen sense of what it means "Beyond a Reasonable Doubt". They are also aware that they are going to be responsible for sentencing someone to Death and not necessarily personally, but the verdict for a Capital Murder 1st Degree is the Death Penalty so technically that is also on their mind. People should not judge the jurors that did what they had to do. Just think it could have been anyone or even a family member of people that are now giving death threats to these jurors that did what they had to do.
05:31 PM on 07/11/2011
GUILTY!!!!!!!!!